RE: [PATCH 3/5] ASoC: Davinci: pcm: Add device tree bindings
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 04:01:24, Mark Brown wrote: On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 06:12:03PM +0530, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: Device tree support for Davinci/OMAP2+ pcm driver. This looks like it's a device which maps a shared DMA controller in the SoC core into ASoC rather than actual hardware. Such devices are usually instantiated automatically from the DAI rather than being represented in the device tree since they are a Linux internal thing really - the Tegra and Freescale drivers provide examples of how this sort of thing can be done. From your for-3.7 branch, I could only find such implementation in Tegra Platform. Most Freescale platforms implements this through a device/driver method. Exception being sound/soc/mxs/mxs-pcm.c So should I follow tegra implementation? Regards, Gururaja ___ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
Re: [PATCH 3/5] ASoC: Davinci: pcm: Add device tree bindings
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 01:50:09PM +, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: From your for-3.7 branch, I could only find such implementation in Tegra Platform. Most Freescale platforms implements this through a device/driver method. Exception being sound/soc/mxs/mxs-pcm.c So should I follow tegra implementation? Tegra and mxs should be good examples, yes. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
RE: [PATCH 3/5] ASoC: Davinci: pcm: Add device tree bindings
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 21:28:08, Mark Brown wrote: On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 01:50:09PM +, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: From your for-3.7 branch, I could only find such implementation in Tegra Platform. Most Freescale platforms implements this through a device/driver method. Exception being sound/soc/mxs/mxs-pcm.c So should I follow tegra implementation? Tegra and mxs should be good examples, yes. Ok. Will update in V2 Regards, Gururaja ___ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
Re: [PATCH 3/5] ASoC: Davinci: pcm: Add device tree bindings
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 06:12:03PM +0530, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: Device tree support for Davinci/OMAP2+ pcm driver. This looks like it's a device which maps a shared DMA controller in the SoC core into ASoC rather than actual hardware. Such devices are usually instantiated automatically from the DAI rather than being represented in the device tree since they are a Linux internal thing really - the Tegra and Freescale drivers provide examples of how this sort of thing can be done. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
