Re: [Dbix-class] unable to install via cpan
On 01/04/2017 06:41 AM, Luca Ferrari wrote: Hi all, maybe this is really trivial, however I cannot get DBIx::Class installed via cpan: % perl --version ~ This is perl 5, version 25, subversion 8 (v5.25.8) built for x86_64-linux (with 1 registered patch, see perl -V for more detail) % sudo cpan DBIx::Class ... t/zzz_authors.t . ok t/zzz_perl_perf_bug.t ... ok t/zzz_sqlite_deadlock.t . skipped: Skipping test on plain module install Test Summary Report --- t/prefetch/grouped.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 31 Failed: 1) Failed test: 28 Non-zero exit status: 255 Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output Files=308, Tests=12208, 79 wallclock secs ( 1.62 usr 0.23 sys + 73.60 cusr 3.96 csys = 79.41 CPU) Result: FAIL Failed 1/308 test programs. 1/12208 subtests failed. Makefile:1694: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 RIBASUSHI/DBIx-Class-0.082840.tar.gz /usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK //hint// to see the cpan-testers results for installing this module, try: reports RIBASUSHI/DBIx-Class-0.082840.tar.gz Any idea? Thanks, Luca I am not able to reproduce that failure. Just now I used 'cpanm' to install DBIx-Class-0.082840 against a more recent Perl 5 blead. All tests passed and the module installed. Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 25 subversion 9) configuration: Commit id: 2108cbcf2fd75bfcc7b9c01563db7063a67549cf ___ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk ___ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk
Re: [Dbix-class] Governance: Proposal A is adopted
On 12/08/2016 07:10 AM, David Golden wrote: Given the pattern of votes, I see no need to tally the exact numbers. The vast majority of voters clearly want the community to manage of the DBIx::Class namespace. I want to thank everyone for their participation and patience. As I've just woken up, I'm going to put off the permissions changes until later today when I have time to do it carefully. I'll post again to the list when that is complete. Thank you, David (and other PAUSE maintainers lurking silently in the background) for the time, effort and patience you put into this. Jim Keenan ___ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk
Re: [Dbix-class] ★ VOTE NOW: DBIC Governance and Namespace Control ★
On 12/05/2016 01:15 AM, David Golden wrote: Thank you to everyone who has been participating in or just reading the various governance discussions since my initial email to the DBIC list of Oct 3. [1] Proposal A ___ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk
Re: [Dbix-class] Decision time: which fork inherits the existing DBIx::Class namespace
On 12/03/2016 04:48 AM, Darren Duncan wrote: I agree now that MST's proposal should govern the DBIx::Class namespace as what "cpan DBIx::Class" resolves to, and users wanting Peter's fork can update their dependency lists per his proposal. That's my position, too. Let's move forward. Jim Keenan ___ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk
Re: [Dbix-class] GOVERNANCE: Aggregation and conclusion
On 10/31/2016 07:22 AM, Andrew Beverley wrote: On Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:43:31 Matt S Troutwrote: Otherwise, I would suggest that you turn your plan into a full proposal, TBH, I didn't even realise I was making a proposal until I saw the results[1]. I was merely bringing up one of Dave's earlier suggestions[2], which several others also seemed to like. But, in that case, I propose: - RIBASUSHI retains the current namespace, continuing to maintain and tighten that code base. The aim would be a rock-solid module with a very conservative rate of change and new features. - A new namespace DBIx::Class2 is created, owned and operated by MST's governance+core team proposal. Developers that want to create new features do so in this namespace. I do not understand the technicalities, but from what I have seen discussed, people would still be able to use DBIx::Class::* modules in both namespaces. -1 on this proposal from me. I favor getting on with the existing proposal. Thank you very much. Jim Keenan ___ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk
Re: [Dbix-class] IMPORTANT: A discussion of DBIC governance and future development
On 10/24/2016 07:11 AM, Leo Lapworth wrote: Can we agree on the new governance... first? Then IF (and so far no one seems to have suggested plans for this) there is ever a change that could cause instability or break backwards compat or has any major risk, the voting policy can be enacted to work out what the community wants, new name space for testing with a policy of 6 month release before merging back into main or what ever it maybe, but that is SEPARATE to the governance issue. To me these are two separate issues and it would be good to close off the governance issue before moving onto detail of how to run the project. Thanks Leo +1 to closing off the governance discussion and moving forward with our lives :-) jimk ___ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk
Re: [Dbix-class] GOVERNANCE: An actually concrete proposal w/bootstrap governance system
On 10/18/2016 12:51 PM, Matt S Trout wrote: =end GOVERNANCE What say ye? This sounds like a reasonable starting point for me. +1 ___ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk
Re: [Dbix-class] A slightly more concrete proposal
On 10/04/2016 04:17 PM, Matt S Trout wrote: Since people seem to be unsure as to what the alternative to riba's project freeze would actually be, let me provide something a little more concrete. This is intended as a basis for discussion rather than a complete plan, but I thought it was worth at least sketching a shape for things to come. 1) I think at this point we should formalise a core team. The BDFL model was nice while it lasted, but I don't think it's tenable going forwards. My first thought for composition would be a five-person team, and assuming everybody agrees to it,that being Ilmari, Castaway (Jess Robinson), Frew, myself, and whoever riba was planning to pass the first-come bits to. That seems like it should be a nice combination of continuity and ensuring that riba's fears we'll be insufficiently conservative being given a voice. +1 to this in particular, and to the thrust of mst's proposal more generally. From: A frustrated user of *other* ORMs ___ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk