Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] :BaseKB EA 2 and basekb-tools now available

2012-05-30 Thread Cristian Lai

Hi Paul and collegues,
good new. I'm happy to experience your system.
Keep in touch.

cristian

Il 5/29/12 8:53 PM, Paul A. Houle ha scritto:
 We're proud to announce the immediate availability of :BaseKB 
Early Access 2


http://basekb.com/dl/earlyaccess.php

The EA2 release fixes a number of problems in EA1,  most 
particularly,  problems that affected name resolution.  EA2 also comes 
with the initial release of basekb-tools:


http://code.google.com/p/basekb-tools/

an open-source package that implements the name resolution 
behavior of the proprietary MQL query engine for SPARQL.  Put simply,  
basekb-tools takes a readable query like


select ?date {
   graph public:baseKB {
  basekb:en.united_states 
basekb:location.dated_location.date_founded ?date .

}
}

and rewrites it it with identifiers that satisfy the unique name 
assumption


select ?date {
  graph public:baseKB {
basekb:m.09c7w0 basekb:m.035qyst ?date .
}
}

This grounding process is the key innovation that makes :BaseKB the 
first correct RDFization of Freebase.  :BaseKB covers the intersection 
of Freebase and Wikipedia and, like the Freebase quad dump,  is 
available freely under a CC-BY license.


By installing :BaseKB in a triple store and using basekb-tools,  you 
can write queries against Freebase using the industry-standard SPARQL 
1.1 language.  basekb-tools contains a test suite that confirms the 
correctness of of the knowledge base and compatibility with your 
triple store.  We believe that this kind of test suite is a practical 
answer to pressing problems of Proof and Trust in the semantic web.


:BaseKB is an important milestone for both Freebase and the Semantic 
Web, says Ontology2 founder Paul Houle, :BaseKB opens Freebase to 
users of SPARQL and other RDF standards.  The superior quality of 
Freebase data solves data quality problems that have,  so far,  
frustrated Linked Data applications.


Ontology2 founder Paul Houle will be speaking at the SemTechBiz 
converence in San Francisco on June 7.  His talk,  Linked Data, Free 
Pictures, and Markets for Semantic Data will cover Ookaboo,  :BaseKB 
and how they fit into the rapidly emerging semantic-social ecosystem.


http://semtechbizsf2012.semanticweb.com/sessionPop.cfm?confid=65proposalid=4594 




--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/


___
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion


--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion


[Dbpedia-discussion] Geographic Coordinates of Places

2012-05-30 Thread jordi castells
Hello Everybody

I have a couple of questions and probably you have the correct answer that
I can't find.

1)
I'm retrieving city points using the SPARQL endpoint and I find that there
are various predicates for the geographic coordinates: geo:lat , geo:long,
geo:POINT, grs:point and geo:geometry

For my convenience I used geo:geometry WKT format, but I realized that not
all the resources have this predicate (http://dbpedia.org/page/Oslo does
not have it while http://dbpedia.org/page/Barcelona) has it.

It poses me the question, Which of those predicates is present in all the
resources?

2)
This question comes from a problem that I have with some points in DBpedia.
For example Allueva (Spain).

Are the coordinates extracted from Wikipedia geodata or from another
service? Because I see that the properties are properly parsed
dbpedia:latd, dbpedia:latm, dbpedia:latns etc but the geo:geometry has a
different value.



Thanks for your time! and keep a good work :-)
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion


Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Geographic Coordinates of Places

2012-05-30 Thread Ghislain Atemezing
Hi Jordi,

 I have a couple of questions and probably you have the correct answer
 that I can't find.

 1)
 I'm retrieving city points using the SPARQL endpoint and I find that
 there are various predicates for the geographic coordinates: geo:lat ,
 geo:long, geo:POINT, grs:point and geo:geometry


 For my convenience I used geo:geometry WKT format, but I realized that
 not all the resources have this predicate (http://dbpedia.org/page/Oslo
 does not have it while http://dbpedia.org/page/Barcelona) has it.

 It poses me the question, Which of those predicates is present in all
 the resources?

I guess  the most uses are geo:lat, geo:long and geo:POINT. At least the 
first two predicates, because they come from the W3C Geo onto [1] and is 
one of the most used in GeoData [2]. WKT is a serialization as well as 
KML, GeoJSON , etc..
 2)
 This question comes from a problem that I have with some points in
 DBpedia. For example Allueva (Spain).

 Are the coordinates extracted from Wikipedia geodata or from another
 service? Because I see that the properties are properly parsed
 dbpedia:latd, dbpedia:latm, dbpedia:latns etc but the geo:geometry has a
 different value.
Here, I could only point you to other initiatives/ services dealing with 
GeoData: linkedGeoData [3], GADM [4] and NUTS [5] with mappings to DBpedia

I hope it helps..

Best,

Ghislain
[1] http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#
[2] http://stats.lod2.eu/vocabularies
[3] http://linkedgeodata.org/Datasets
[4] http://gadm.geovocab.org/
[5] http://nuts.geovocab.org/

-- 
Ghislain Atemezing
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
e-mail: auguste.atemez...@eurecom.fr  ghislain.atemez...@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8178
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~atemezin


--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion


[Dbpedia-discussion] Data returned on dbpedia.org/ontology/

2012-05-30 Thread Adrian Gschwend
Hi group,

We work on some software which heavily relies on the ontologies used by
the data. This means we dereference the ontologies used on data sets and
do some inference to figure out additional stuff about the data. For
most ontologies this works pretty well.

Last week we were test driving our software against some data at
DBPedia, namely the page of Tim Berners-Lee at
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Tim_Berners-Lee

So far so good, in there we have several rdf:type definitions, including
dbpedia-owl:Person, which points to http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Person

On that point we noticed that it took way too long to get the page,
cache it and do some stuff on it. So we started analyzing it and did it
by hand:

% curl -I -H Accept: application/rdf+xml
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Person

HTTP/1.1 303 See Other
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 19:00:08 GMT
Content-Type: application/rdf+xml
Connection: keep-alive
Server: Virtuoso/06.04.3132 (Linux) x86_64-generic-linux-glibc25-64  VDB
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Location: http://dbpedia.org/data3/Person.rdf
Content-Length: 0

Not a problem, the system can handle redirects. So we get the other file
instead. And boy were we confused: It returns an 8MB file for the
request (which took quite some time to get btw) After analyzing it in
rapper I figured out that we got about 50'000 triples, probably less
than 20 are really related to the ontology and the rest is stuff like:

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Zygmunt_Balicki
a http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Person .

While I do see that this reverse property or however it is called
might be interesting when I browse the data set in my web browser it is
in my opinion plain wrong to return it on the URI which dereferences the
ontology.

Our software is also targeted at smart phones, you can imagine that it
is not really fun to get 50'000 triples back on a crappy 3G link with
volume limits and then parse and cache them on a device which is running
on battery power. If I do that on several dbpedia data sets I'm probably
out of power very soon and didn't even get half of the ontologies used
in the data.

What is your opinion on that? Is there a good reason for this or did you
just think it might be useful? As you can see this pretty much kills the
way we use ontologies and I think the classical way to dereference
ontologies makes way more sense, so I would vote to change this behavior
on dbpedia and return uniquely the definition itself.


thanks

cu

Adrian

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion


Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] decimal and grouping separators doubt

2012-05-30 Thread María Poveda
Hello everybody,

  I was having a look at DBpedia data about cities as for example the area
total property. I would like to know how do you deal with different decimal
separators and grouping separators between countries. For example I found
that in  http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rio_Rufino the area total is 282,569
km² and I think the , is a decimal separator according to the Brazilian
convention [1] . However in the DBpedia dataset I found the following
value: 2.82569E11. My guess is that separator is being used as grouping
separator as it is the convention in United Kingdom [2] for example.

I would be very thankful if you can enlighten me.

Cheers,

María

[1]
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/forms/v3r0m0/topic/com.ibm.help.forms.doc/locale_spec/i_xfdl_r_formats_pt_BR.html
[2]
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/forms/v3r0m0/topic/com.ibm.help.forms.doc/locale_spec/i_xfdl_r_formats_en_GB.html
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion


Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Data returned on dbpedia.org/ontology/

2012-05-30 Thread Bernard Vatant
+100!

Separation of T-Box and A-Box descriptions seems quite a reasonable
requirement, in particular when there are so many instances!
Or does it mean that the only way to describe the class Person is in
extension : nobody can provide a definition of what a Person is, but
everybody knows when she meets one :)

Bernard

2012/5/30 Adrian Gschwend ml-...@netlabs.org

 Hi group,

 We work on some software which heavily relies on the ontologies used by
 the data. This means we dereference the ontologies used on data sets and
 do some inference to figure out additional stuff about the data. For
 most ontologies this works pretty well.

 Last week we were test driving our software against some data at
 DBPedia, namely the page of Tim Berners-Lee at
 http://dbpedia.org/resource/Tim_Berners-Lee

 So far so good, in there we have several rdf:type definitions, including
 dbpedia-owl:Person, which points to http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Person

 On that point we noticed that it took way too long to get the page,
 cache it and do some stuff on it. So we started analyzing it and did it
 by hand:

% curl -I -H Accept: application/rdf+xml
 http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Person

HTTP/1.1 303 See Other
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 19:00:08 GMT
Content-Type: application/rdf+xml
Connection: keep-alive
Server: Virtuoso/06.04.3132 (Linux) x86_64-generic-linux-glibc25-64  VDB
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Location: http://dbpedia.org/data3/Person.rdf
Content-Length: 0

 Not a problem, the system can handle redirects. So we get the other file
 instead. And boy were we confused: It returns an 8MB file for the
 request (which took quite some time to get btw) After analyzing it in
 rapper I figured out that we got about 50'000 triples, probably less
 than 20 are really related to the ontology and the rest is stuff like:

 http://dbpedia.org/resource/Zygmunt_Balicki
a http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Person .

 While I do see that this reverse property or however it is called
 might be interesting when I browse the data set in my web browser it is
 in my opinion plain wrong to return it on the URI which dereferences the
 ontology.

 Our software is also targeted at smart phones, you can imagine that it
 is not really fun to get 50'000 triples back on a crappy 3G link with
 volume limits and then parse and cache them on a device which is running
 on battery power. If I do that on several dbpedia data sets I'm probably
 out of power very soon and didn't even get half of the ontologies used
 in the data.

 What is your opinion on that? Is there a good reason for this or did you
 just think it might be useful? As you can see this pretty much kills the
 way we use ontologies and I think the classical way to dereference
 ontologies makes way more sense, so I would vote to change this behavior
 on dbpedia and return uniquely the definition itself.


 thanks

 cu

 Adrian


 --
 Live Security Virtual Conference
 Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
 threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
 will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
 threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
 ___
 Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
 Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion




-- 
*Bernard Vatant
*
Vocabularies  Data Engineering
Tel :  + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59
 Skype : bernard.vatant
Linked Open Vocabularies http://labs.mondeca.com/dataset/lov


*Mondeca**  **   *
3 cité Nollez 75018 Paris, France
www.mondeca.com
Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion


Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Geographic Coordinates of Places

2012-05-30 Thread jordi castells
Thanks.

Your answers and links helped a lot.

But, It would be nice to review how DBpedia obtains the geo:lat,geo:lon and
geo:geometry because there are resources
with incoherent data (geo:lat has an apparently incorrect value while the
dbpedia extractions from Wikipedia are correct).

If those values come from the Wikipedia dumps seems like the geo-extractor
is failing in some cases, obtaining
incorrect geo:lat geo:lon values.

Salut!

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:17 PM, 
dbpedia-discussion-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:

 Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 11:06:57 +0200
 From: Ghislain Atemezing auguste.atemez...@eurecom.fr
 Subject: Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Geographic Coordinates of Places
 To: dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
 Message-ID: 4fc5e331.1000...@eurecom.fr
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

 Hi Jordi,
 
  I have a couple of questions and probably you have the correct answer
  that I can't find.
 
  1)
  I'm retrieving city points using the SPARQL endpoint and I find that
  there are various predicates for the geographic coordinates: geo:lat ,
  geo:long, geo:POINT, grs:point and geo:geometry


  For my convenience I used geo:geometry WKT format, but I realized that
  not all the resources have this predicate (http://dbpedia.org/page/Oslo
  does not have it while http://dbpedia.org/page/Barcelona) has it.
 
  It poses me the question, Which of those predicates is present in all
  the resources?

 I guess  the most uses are geo:lat, geo:long and geo:POINT. At least the
 first two predicates, because they come from the W3C Geo onto [1] and is
 one of the most used in GeoData [2]. WKT is a serialization as well as
 KML, GeoJSON , etc..
  2)
  This question comes from a problem that I have with some points in
  DBpedia. For example Allueva (Spain).
 
  Are the coordinates extracted from Wikipedia geodata or from another
  service? Because I see that the properties are properly parsed
  dbpedia:latd, dbpedia:latm, dbpedia:latns etc but the geo:geometry has a
  different value.
 Here, I could only point you to other initiatives/ services dealing with
 GeoData: linkedGeoData [3], GADM [4] and NUTS [5] with mappings to DBpedia

 I hope it helps..

 Best,

 Ghislain
 [1] http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#
 [2] http://stats.lod2.eu/vocabularies
 [3] http://linkedgeodata.org/Datasets
 [4] http://gadm.geovocab.org/
 [5] http://nuts.geovocab.org/

 --
 Ghislain Atemezing
 EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
 2229, route des Cr?tes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
 e-mail: auguste.atemez...@eurecom.fr  ghislain.atemez...@gmail.com
 Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8178
 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~atemezin

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion


Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Data returned on dbpedia.org/ontology/

2012-05-30 Thread Pablo Mendes
Separation of schema and instances is a good solution for this symptom. The
root of the problem seems to be that when the amount of data grows, just
returning everything you know about something is not going to cut it. A
solution for that seems to be still missing.

Perhaps we need a mechanism of views for linked data -- building upon the
notion of named graphs already implemented by SPARQL endpoints?

So:
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Person?graph=schema

Would return only T-Box statements.

And:
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Person?graph=instances

Would return only A-Box statements.

Meanwhile:
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Person?graph=my-arbitrary-view

Would return only statements that Pablo thinks are important.

That being done, one could say that the default view would be
?graph=schema. This would perhaps address the issue more deeply?

Cheers,
Pablo

PS: Of course, feel free to read http://dbpedia.org/ontology where I said
schema; same goes for http://dbpedia/resource where I said instances.
It's just an identifier.


On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Bernard Vatant bernard.vat...@mondeca.com
 wrote:

 +100!

 Separation of T-Box and A-Box descriptions seems quite a reasonable
 requirement, in particular when there are so many instances!
 Or does it mean that the only way to describe the class Person is in
 extension : nobody can provide a definition of what a Person is, but
 everybody knows when she meets one :)

 Bernard


 2012/5/30 Adrian Gschwend ml-...@netlabs.org

 Hi group,

 We work on some software which heavily relies on the ontologies used by
 the data. This means we dereference the ontologies used on data sets and
 do some inference to figure out additional stuff about the data. For
 most ontologies this works pretty well.

 Last week we were test driving our software against some data at
 DBPedia, namely the page of Tim Berners-Lee at
 http://dbpedia.org/resource/Tim_Berners-Lee

 So far so good, in there we have several rdf:type definitions, including
 dbpedia-owl:Person, which points to http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Person

 On that point we noticed that it took way too long to get the page,
 cache it and do some stuff on it. So we started analyzing it and did it
 by hand:

% curl -I -H Accept: application/rdf+xml
 http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Person

HTTP/1.1 303 See Other
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 19:00:08 GMT
Content-Type: application/rdf+xml
Connection: keep-alive
Server: Virtuoso/06.04.3132 (Linux) x86_64-generic-linux-glibc25-64
  VDB
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Location: http://dbpedia.org/data3/Person.rdf
Content-Length: 0

 Not a problem, the system can handle redirects. So we get the other file
 instead. And boy were we confused: It returns an 8MB file for the
 request (which took quite some time to get btw) After analyzing it in
 rapper I figured out that we got about 50'000 triples, probably less
 than 20 are really related to the ontology and the rest is stuff like:

 http://dbpedia.org/resource/Zygmunt_Balicki
a http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Person .

 While I do see that this reverse property or however it is called
 might be interesting when I browse the data set in my web browser it is
 in my opinion plain wrong to return it on the URI which dereferences the
 ontology.

 Our software is also targeted at smart phones, you can imagine that it
 is not really fun to get 50'000 triples back on a crappy 3G link with
 volume limits and then parse and cache them on a device which is running
 on battery power. If I do that on several dbpedia data sets I'm probably
 out of power very soon and didn't even get half of the ontologies used
 in the data.

 What is your opinion on that? Is there a good reason for this or did you
 just think it might be useful? As you can see this pretty much kills the
 way we use ontologies and I think the classical way to dereference
 ontologies makes way more sense, so I would vote to change this behavior
 on dbpedia and return uniquely the definition itself.


 thanks

 cu

 Adrian


 --
 Live Security Virtual Conference
 Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
 threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
 will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
 threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
 ___
 Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
 Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion




 --
 *Bernard Vatant
 *
 Vocabularies  Data Engineering
 Tel :  + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59
  Skype : bernard.vatant
 Linked Open Vocabularies http://labs.mondeca.com/dataset/lov

 
 *Mondeca**  **   *
 3 cité Nollez 75018 Paris, France
 www.mondeca.com
 Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews 

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Data returned on dbpedia.org/ontology/

2012-05-30 Thread Adrian Gschwend
On 30.05.12 16:24, Kingsley Idehen wrote:

Hey Kingsley,

  See:
 curl -iL -H Accept: application/rdf+xml
 http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Person

wow definitely didn't expect that anytime soon :-D Thanks a lot!

Will test-drive it tonight.

 The 304 issue will also be addressed later.

great tnx! I hope this will make the services a bit more responsive.

cu

Adrian

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion


Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Data returned on dbpedia.org/ontology/

2012-05-30 Thread Kingsley Idehen

On 5/30/12 10:32 AM, Adrian Gschwend wrote:

On 30.05.12 16:24, Kingsley Idehen wrote:

Hey Kingsley,


  See:
curl -iL -H Accept: application/rdf+xml
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Person

wow definitely didn't expect that anytime soon :-D Thanks a lot!


When we get feedback we can act quickly. We have a powerful and highly 
configurable Linked Data platform at our disposal :-)


Will test-drive it tonight.


The 304 issue will also be addressed later.

great tnx! I hope this will make the services a bit more responsive.


Yes, for clients that understand how to exploit HTTP .

Kingsley


cu

Adrian

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion





--

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen 
Founder  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen








smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion


Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] [Dbpedia-developers] decimal and grouping separators doubt

2012-05-30 Thread Mariano Rico


 Any other ideas?


What about an 'statistical' approach? Most people will type number in their
locale format, and the common pitfall is to use the English format.
If the number format is correct English, and the statics say that most
numbers are xx format, the number could be converted to the local format by
using a conversion function. Every language has a number extractor to parse
numbers in their locale, we could add this conversion function.

-Mariano
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion


Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Data returned on dbpedia.org/ontology/

2012-05-30 Thread Adrian Gschwend
On 30.05.12 16:37, Kingsley Idehen wrote:

 When we get feedback we can act quickly. We have a powerful and highly
 configurable Linked Data platform at our disposal

great will definitely report more when we run into issues :-)

cu

Adrian

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion


Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] [Dbpedia-developers] decimal and grouping separators doubt

2012-05-30 Thread Pablo Mendes

 Add a configuration value decimalSeparator whose value may be dot or
 comma: , or .. Bit hard to read... We would also need a
 configuration value groupSeparator.


+1 to this. Accepted values:
- dot or .
- comma or ,
- space or  
(it is the case that groupSeparators are spaces sometimes)

Cheers,
Pablo

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt j...@sahnwaldt.de
 wrote:

 Hi Maria,

 thanks for the report!

 The problem is that the number is displayed with a comma as the
 decimal separator, but in the source text of the page [1], the decimal
 separator is a dot:

 | área = 282.569

 The template [2] that generates the HTML from the source expects the
 number to use a dot and formats it appropriately for
 Brazilian/Portuguese:

 {{formatnum:{{{área}

 To fix this problem, we will have to extend our extraction framework,
 so that users can specify which decimal separator is used in the
 values of a certain template property.

 @developers: We will have to discuss what's the best way to do this...

 - Add a configuration value decimalSeparator whose value may be dot or
 comma: , or .. Bit hard to read... We would also need a
 configuration value groupSeparator.

 - Add a configuration value numberFormat that takes a language code,
 in this case en.

 - Add a configuration value numberFormat that takes a decimal
 separator and a group separator: .,. Bit hard to read...

 Any other ideas?

 JC

 [1] http://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rio_Rufinoaction=edit
 [2]
 http://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Predefinição:Info/Município_do_Brasilaction=edit
 [3]
 http://mappings.dbpedia.org/index.php/Mapping_pt:Info/Município_do_Brasil#.C3.A1rea

 On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:06 PM, María Poveda mpov...@fi.upm.es wrote:
  Hello everybody,
 
I was having a look at DBpedia data about cities as for example the
 area
  total property. I would like to know how do you deal with different
 decimal
  separators and grouping separators between countries. For example I found
  that in  http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rio_Rufino the area total is
 282,569
  km² and I think the , is a decimal separator according to the Brazilian
  convention [1] . However in the DBpedia dataset I found the following
 value:
  2.82569E11. My guess is that separator is being used as grouping
 separator
  as it is the convention in United Kingdom [2] for example.
 
  I would be very thankful if you can enlighten me.
 
  Cheers,
 
  María
 
  [1]
 
 http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/forms/v3r0m0/topic/com.ibm.help.forms.doc/locale_spec/i_xfdl_r_formats_pt_BR.html
  [2]
 
 http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/forms/v3r0m0/topic/com.ibm.help.forms.doc/locale_spec/i_xfdl_r_formats_en_GB.html
 
 --
  Live Security Virtual Conference
  Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
  threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
  will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
  threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
  ___
  Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
  Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
 


 --
 Live Security Virtual Conference
 Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
 threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
 will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
 threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
 ___
 Dbpedia-developers mailing list
 dbpedia-develop...@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-developers



--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion


Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Data returned on dbpedia.org/ontology/

2012-05-30 Thread Dimitris Kontokostas
Hi Kingsley,

some more feedback...

The following data redirections doesn't work on ontology resources
http://dbpedia.org/data3/Person.json
http://dbpedia.org/data3/Person.jsod
http://dbpedia.org/sparql?default-graph-uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.orgquery=DESCRIBE+%3Chttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/Person%3Eoutput=application%2Fmicrodata%2Bjson

and microdata/json doesn't work on normal resources either
http://dbpedia.org/sparql?default-graph-uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.orgquery=DESCRIBE+%3Chttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Linux%3Eoutput=application%2Fmicrodata%2Bjson

Cheers,
Dimitris

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.comwrote:

 On 5/30/12 10:32 AM, Adrian Gschwend wrote:

 On 30.05.12 16:24, Kingsley Idehen wrote:

 Hey Kingsley,

   See:
 curl -iL -H Accept: application/rdf+xml
 http://dbpedia.org/ontology/**Personhttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/Person

 wow definitely didn't expect that anytime soon :-D Thanks a lot!


 When we get feedback we can act quickly. We have a powerful and highly
 configurable Linked Data platform at our disposal :-)


 Will test-drive it tonight.

  The 304 issue will also be addressed later.

 great tnx! I hope this will make the services a bit more responsive.


 Yes, for clients that understand how to exploit HTTP .

 Kingsley


 cu

 Adrian

 --**--**
 --
 Live Security Virtual Conference
 Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
 threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
 will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
 threats. 
 http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/**sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
 __**_
 Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
 Dbpedia-discussion@lists.**sourceforge.netDbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/**lists/listinfo/dbpedia-**discussionhttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion




 --

 Regards,

 Kingsley Idehen
 Founder  CEO

 OpenLink Software
 Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
 Personal Weblog: 
 http://www.openlinksw.com/**blog/~kidehenhttp://www.openlinksw.com/blog/%7Ekidehen
 Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
 Google+ Profile: 
 https://plus.google.com/**112399767740508618350/abouthttps://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
 LinkedIn Profile: 
 http://www.linkedin.com/in/**kidehenhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen








 --
 Live Security Virtual Conference
 Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
 threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
 will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
 threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
 ___
 Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
 Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion




-- 
Kontokostas Dimitris
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion


Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] decimal and grouping separators doubt

2012-05-30 Thread Tom Morris
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt
j...@sahnwaldt.de wrote:

 @developers: We will have to discuss what's the best way to do this...

 - Add a configuration value decimalSeparator whose value may be dot or
 comma: , or .. Bit hard to read... We would also need a
 configuration value groupSeparator.

 - Add a configuration value numberFormat that takes a language code,
 in this case en.

 - Add a configuration value numberFormat that takes a decimal
 separator and a group separator: .,. Bit hard to read...

 Any other ideas?

POSIX sorted this all out a couple of decades ago (and standardized
it).  Why not just use the infrastructure that they've made available
(and reference that standard)?
http://www.chemie.fu-berlin.de/chemnet/use/info/libc/libc_19.html

Note that they specify monetary and non-monetary number formatting
separately.  It may seem like overkill, but there's almost certainly a
good reason for it (although I don't know what it is).

Tom

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion


Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia content negotiation

2012-05-30 Thread Kingsley Idehen

On 5/30/12 4:28 PM, Adrian Gschwend wrote:

BTW I found it correctly described on a Virtuoso page;)

http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/whitepapers/VirtDeployingLinkedDataGuide_Introduction.html

BTW2 any reasons that turtle is not supported? IMHO rdf+xml has to
become extinct and replaced by turtle. Today someone asked me if they
have to learn XML first to understand RDF because many samples in RDF
books are in RDF/XML. That does not help adoption of RDF in the real
world;)

cu

Adrian


See:
http://linkeddata.informatik.hu-berlin.de/uridbg/index.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FTim_Berners-Leeuseragentheader=acceptheader=text%2Fturtle%3Bq%3D1%2Capplication%2Fx-turtle%3Bq%3D0.5 
.


We need fix the re-write rule bug shown here:
http://linkeddata.informatik.hu-berlin.de/uridbg/index.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FTim_Berners-Leeuseragentheader=acceptheader=text%2Fturtle 
.


--

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen 
Founder  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen








smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion