[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----TEXAS, PENN., OHIO, IND., USA

2012-05-24 Thread Rick Halperin






May 24



TEXAS:

Death sentence upheld for Blaine Milam, another East Texas killer


An appeals court upheld the death sentence for a Rusk County man convicted in 
the 2008 beating death of his girlfriend's 13-month-old daughter.


Texas Court of Criminal Appeals upheld the ruling.

Evidence showed the child was bitten some 30 times and beaten with a hammer at 
Milam's Rusk County trailer.


In a 2nd case, 25-year-old Demontrell Miller was sent to death row for the 2008 
beating death of his girlfriend's 2-year-old son while he was babysitting the 
boy and his own 5-month-old son at a Tyler apartment complex.


The court Wednesday rejected what attorneys for the convicts said were 20 
errors at Milam's trial and 28 at Miller's trial. Neither man has an execution 
date and both could pursue federal appeals.


(source: News-Journal)






PENNSYLVANIA:

Judge admonishes Hitcho during closings in cop murder sentencing


George Hitcho Jr. was the judge, jury and the executioner when he shot and 
killed a Freemansburg police officer last summer and his actions merit a death 
sentence, District Attorney John Morganelli argued in his closing statements 
Thursday.


A Northampton County jury must decide whether Hitcho should be sentenced to die 
by lethal injection or spend the rest of his life in prison without parole for 
killing Officer Robert A. Lasso. The same panel last week found Hitcho guilty 
of 1st-degree murder after deliberating just 35 minutes.


During Morganelli's closing arguments before the jury, Hitcho occasionally 
shook his head back and forth.


I'm tired, I'm tired of hearing his lies, Hitcho told one of his defense 
team, Michael Corcoran, in a voice that could be heard during Morganelli's 
argument.


Hitcho's muttering prompted Judge Anthony Beltrami to interrupt Morganelli and 
address the defense table.


You need to use a whisper when you talk with your counsel, Beltrami told 
Hitcho.


Morganelli argued the jury should sentence Hitcho to death because it's the 
verdict he deserves, not the verdict he desires. If Hitcho is sentenced to life 
in prison without parole, he'll still have the company of other inmates and 
will be visited by friends and family, Morganelli said.


Give him the same compassion he showed Officer Lasso when he shot him in the 
head, Morganelli said. Give him the same mercy.


After a short recess Thursday morning, Chief Public Defender Michael Corriere 
will argue to the jury why Hitcho's life should be spared. Beltrami said after 
he gives legal instruction, the jury will begin deliberation.


On Aug. 11, Lasso was at Hitcho's New Street home after being called for an 
argument between Hitcho and a neighbor. Police said Lasso was being attacked by 
Hitcho's dogs and was moving to use his stun gun against them when he was 
felled by a 12-gauge blast from behind.


Over three days in this week's sentencing hearing, Corriere sought to paint 
Hitcho in human terms by showcasing the good and bad throughout the 46 years of 
his life.


Corriere called Hitcho an otherwise nonviolent man who faced many challenges, 
including drug and alcohol dependency, and physical and possibly sexual abuse.


Defense witnesses claimed that Hitcho suffered from brain damage from 
motorcycle accidents that left him prone to anger, frustration and agitation. 
Chronic pain also set him on edge, and had gotten worse after a 2007 motorcycle 
crash that made it difficult for him to work, according to defense testimony.


In the months before the shooting, Hitcho had become increasingly paranoid, 
pushing away friends and leading an isolated existence, Corriere said.


Morganelli said nothing from Hitcho's life offsets the killing of Lasso. He 
dismissed claims of brain damage as manufactured. He also argued there was 
violence in Hitcho's past, highlighting a protection-from-abuse order his 
former wife got against him.


Morganelli said Hitcho deserves to be executed for a crime that targeted a 
protector of the community and left a family shattered. Jurors also heard this 
week from Lasso's loved ones, who described the heartbreak they have suffered 
since the 31-year-old married father of two was killed.


For a death sentence to be imposed, all 12 jurors must agree it is appropriate.

(source: The Morning Call)






OHIO:

Condemned Ohio inmates' injection claim denied


A federal judge has rejected claims by 2 condemned Ohio inmates challenging the 
constitutionality of the state's lethal injection process.


The 2 are the next inmates scheduled to die in the state, with Abdul Awkal set 
for execution June 6 and John Eley set to die July 26.


The 2 challenged Ohio's lethal injection process on the grounds it fails to 
guarantee the state won't execute someone who is insane, mentally disabled or 
was a juvenile when the crime was committed.


U.S. District Court Judge Gregory Frost on Wednesday said Awkal and Eley have 
misunderstood Ohio's long-running injection lawsuit, which 

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----MO., CALIF., ARIZ., LA.

2012-05-24 Thread Rick Halperin






May 24



MISSOURI:

Missouri opts for untested drug for executions


The same anesthetic that caused the overdose death of pop star Michael Jackson 
is now the drug of choice for executions in Missouri, causing a stir among 
critics who question how the state can guarantee a drug untested for lethal 
injection won.


Last week the Missouri Department of Corrections announced it was switching 
from its longstanding 3-drug method to use of a single drug, propofol. Missouri 
would be the 1st state ever to use propofol as an execution drug.


This is very, very concerning with a drug that we don't know, and seeing the 
problems of the 1-drug method, said Kathleen Holmes of Missourians for 
Alternatives to the Death Penalty.


Until recently, the 33 states with the death penalty used a virtually identical 
3-drug process: Sodium thiopental was administered to put the inmate to sleep, 
then two other drugs stopped the heart and lungs. But makers of sodium 
thiopental have stopped selling it for use in executions. Supplies mostly ran 
out or expired, forcing states to consider alternatives.


Most states have retained the 3-drug method but turned to pentobarbital as a 
replacement for sodium thiopental. Pentobarbital, a barbiturate used to treat 
anxiety and convulsive disorders such as epilepsy, has been used in roughly 50 
executions over the past 2 years, said Richard Dieter, executive director of 
the Washington-based Death Penalty Information Center.


But its use may be short-lived as its maker also opposes selling it for use in 
executions. The statement announcing the change in Missouri said the decision 
was due to the unavailability of sodium thiopental but did not elaborate on 
why propofol was chosen. The protocol change was administrative and did not 
require legislative approval. The Corrections Department declined interview 
requests, but spokesman Chris Cline said Wednesday in a 1-sentence statement, 
Working with expert guidance, we are confident that this new 1-drug protocol 
will be effective and appropriate.


It wasn't clear when propofol would get its first use in an execution. None are 
scheduled in Missouri despite Attorney General Chris Koster's request last week 
that the Missouri Supreme Court set execution dates for up to 19 condemned men 
whose appeals have run out.


Litigation over Missouri

Between 1989, when executions resumed in Missouri, and 2005, the state put to 
death 66 convicted killers. But in the 7 years since, only 2 men have been 
executed — Dennis Skillicorn in 2009 and Martin Link last year. Use of the 
death penalty has declined sharply in recent years nationwide. The U.S. had 98 
executions in 1999 but just 43 last year. Nearly 3,200 people remain on death 
row.


Propofol, made by AstraZeneca and marketed as Diprivan, gained notoriety 
following Jackson


Any drug used for a new purpose on human subjects should certainly be tested 
very, very carefully, Dieter said. I can only imagine the things that might 
go wrong.


Adding to the concern, some say, is Missouri's written protocol which, like the 
one it replaced, does not require a physician to be part of the execution team. 
It states that a physician, nurse, or pharmacist prepares the chemicals, and 
a physician, nurse or emergency medical technician ... inserts intravenous 
lines, monitors the prisoner, and supervises the injection of lethal chemicals 
by nonmedical members of the execution team.


Jonathan Groner, an Ohio State University surgeon who has studied lethal 
injection extensively, said propofol is typically administered by either an 
anesthesiologist, who is a physician, or a nurse anesthetist under the 
physician's direct supervision. Improper administration could cause a burning 
sensation or pain at the injection site, he said.


Groner said high doses of propofol will kill by causing respiratory arrest. But 
the dosage must be accurate and the process must move swiftly because propofol 
typically wears off in just a few minutes.


If they start breathing before the heart stops, they might not die, Groner 
said. That would force the process to be restarted.


Critics also question the safety of the single-drug method. Missouri becomes 
the 3rd state with a single-drug protocol, along with Arizona and Ohio. 3 
others — South Dakota, Idaho and Washington — have options for single- or 
multiple-drug executions, according to the Death Penalty Information Center. 
California and Kentucky are exploring a switch to the 1-drug method.


Concerns were raised after a 1-drug execution last month in Arizona. Thomas 
Arnold Kemp, a 63-year-old convicted killer, shook for several seconds upon 
receiving a lethal dose of pentobarbital.


The debate over the administration of lethal drugs has angered some capital 
punishment advocates who suggest that death row inmates — largely convicted 
killers — seem to get more compassion than their victims.


Carol Angelbeck has spent years urging Missouri 

[Deathpenalty] [SPAM] death penalty news----TEXAS, USA, KY., MISS., MONT.

2012-05-24 Thread Rick Halperin










May 24



TEXASfemale could face death penalty

Death Penalty Decision Pending In Baby Kidnap Case


A judge has set a July 1 deadline for prosecutors to decide whether they will 
seek the death penalty in the case of a Texas woman accused of kidnapping a 
newborn after fatally shooting his mother.


Verna McClain is charged with capital murder in the April death of Kala 
Golden-Schuchardt in a clinic parking lot in the Houston suburb of Spring.


McClain appeared at the Thursday hearing in Conroe but her attorney, Stephen 
Jackson, tells The Associated Press no questions were posed to her.


The Montgomery County judge also approved a request by prosecutors to turn over 
grand jury transcripts to the defense. The prosecution isn't required to turn 
over grand jury transcripts, but the Houston Chronicle reports District 
Attorney Brett Ligon said he wanted fair play in the case.


(source: KERA News)






USA:

Obama, Bush testimony sought in 9/11 case at Gitmo


Defense lawyers in the Sept. 11 case at Guantanamo are seeking the testimony of 
former President George W. Bush and President Barack Obama in a motion to 
dismiss charges, according to a legal motion released Wednesday.


Lawyers for 3 of the 5 defendants charged with planning and helping carry out 
the attacks say the charges should be dismissed because Mr. Bush, Mr. Obama and 
other top officials have made many statements that could influence potential 
jurors in their eventual trial before a special tribunal known as a military 
commission, according to the motion.


They have exerted what is known as “unlawful influence,” over the case with 
prejudicial statements such as repeatedly referring to the defendants 
“terrorists,” and saying they must be brought to justice, the lawyers argue.


“Under these facts, it is impossible for any objective, disinterested observer, 
with knowledge of all the facts and circumstances, to believe these men can 
receive a fair trial by military commission,” they wrote.


Also among those called to testify are Vice President Joe Biden, Attorney 
General Eric Holder and Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican who 
has been active in detainee policy, as well as several Pentagon officials.


The motion was filed May 11 but was only just released on a Pentagon website 
following a security review. It will be up to the military judge to decide 
whether to call any of the witnesses to the stand at the U.S. base in Cuba and 
such an outcome would seem unlikely. The judge may just require written briefs 
in what is one of many pretrial motions pending in the case.


Prosecutors have not filed a response, though the motion notes that the 
government opposes the motion to dismiss.


The 5 defendants, including the self—proclaimed mastermind of the attacks, 
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, were arraigned at Guantanamo on May 5 on charges that 
include terrorism and murder. They could get the death penalty if convicted at 
a trial that is not expected to start for at least a year. The next pretrial is 
scheduled for June, though lawyers for several defendants have asked for a 
postponement.


The brief was submitted by the defense lawyers for 3 of the men- Ramzi 
Binalshibh of Yemen; Mustafa Ahmad al—Hawsawi of Saudi Arabia; and Pakistani 
national Ali Abd al—Aziz Ali.


A prohibition on improper influence is an important tenet of the military 
justice system, intended to prevent higher ranking officers from attempting to 
sway a case being tried by people over whom they have command.


The motion argues that allowing a death penalty case to go forward after high 
officials have commented on the case to this extent would place “an intolerable 
stain,” on the public’s perception of the military justice system.


“For the past 10 years, through the administrations of 2 presidents, these 
accused have consistently been described as ‘thugs,’ ‘murderers’ and 
‘terrorists’ who ‘planned the 9/11 attacks’ and must ‘face justice,’” the 
lawyers wrote. “It can easily be understood by members of the public that this 
system of military commissions exists solely for the purpose of imposing a 
death sentence upon these accused.”


(source: The Hindu)






KENTUCKY:

Condemned Ky. inmate loses appeal on mental state


A Kentucky inmate awaiting execution for the 1990 slayings of a Lexington 
husband and wife outside their business has lost a challenge to his death 
sentenced based on his mental state.


The Kentucky Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that 59-year-old Thomas Clyde 
Bowling is not entitled to have his sentence overturned based on a claim of 
mental disability. The court also ruled that, because Bowling has raised the 
issue before, he's now barred from bringing it up in the future.


A jury condemned Bowling for the shooting deaths of Eddie and Tina Early. The 
husband and wife were shot on the morning of April 9, 1990 while sitting in 
their car before opening their family-owned dry cleaning business; their