Re: Debian accessibility settings
Mini iso don't, net install include accessibility but I try to build a distro slowly so I start with the bare minimum ... 2018-03-14 20:22 UTC−04:00, Samuel Thibault : > michael caron couturier, on mer. 14 mars 2018 20:00:07 -0400, wrote: >> I asked cause mini iso don't include accessibility > > It does include it. Or else it's a bug that shall be reported and > fixed. > > Note however that for speakup support you need to take the gtk mini.iso, > which doesn't have size constraints. > > Samuel > -- Michaël Caron Couturier
Re: Debian accessibility settings
michael caron couturier, on mer. 14 mars 2018 20:00:07 -0400, wrote: > I asked cause mini iso don't include accessibility It does include it. Or else it's a bug that shall be reported and fixed. Note however that for speakup support you need to take the gtk mini.iso, which doesn't have size constraints. Samuel
Re: Debian accessibility settings
I asked cause mini iso don't include accessibility so I need to replicate the usual settings ... 2018-03-14 17:09 UTC−04:00, Samuel Thibault : > Hello, > > michael caron couturier, on lun. 12 mars 2018 12:42:04 -0400, wrote: >> I just build up from the minimal iso into a Mate desktop, what are the >> packages and settings done for accessibility on Debian, do you mod >> some to improve accessibility and how ? > > There aren't realy tweaks, only making sure that accessibility is > enabled, as documented on https://wiki.debian.org/accessibility > > Samuel > -- Michaël Caron Couturier
Re: Debian accessibility settings
Hello, michael caron couturier, on lun. 12 mars 2018 12:42:04 -0400, wrote: > I just build up from the minimal iso into a Mate desktop, what are the > packages and settings done for accessibility on Debian, do you mod > some to improve accessibility and how ? There aren't realy tweaks, only making sure that accessibility is enabled, as documented on https://wiki.debian.org/accessibility Samuel
Re: Potentially broken repositories on Salsa
Hi Samuel Thibault schrieb am 14.03.2018, 21:51 +0100: >Andreas Tille, on mar. 13 mars 2018 13:59:30 +0100, wrote: >> > > a11y-team/dotify-api does not seem to have dir debian >> > > a11y-team/odt2braille does not seem to have dir debian >> > > >> > > I just wanted to make you aware that something might be wrong. I'd I simply haven't pushed anything. Sebastian -- Web: https://www.crustulus.de (English|Deutsch) | Blog: https://www.crustulus.de/blog FreeDict: Free multilingual dictionaries - http://www.freedict.org Freies Latein-Deutsch-Wörterbuch: https://www.crustulus.de/freedict.de.html signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Potentially broken repositories on Salsa
Hello, Andreas Tille, on mar. 13 mars 2018 13:59:30 +0100, wrote: > > > a11y-team/dotify-api does not seem to have dir debian > > > a11y-team/odt2braille does not seem to have dir debian > > > > > > I just wanted to make you aware that something might be wrong. I'd > > > recommend to remove the repositories if they are unused otherwise they > > > should be fixed. > > > > Why do you recommend to remove the (empty) repositories? I guess they > > serve as some form of a reminder. > > Feel free to do with these whatever you consider sensible. I have seen > other cases in other teams where it was total cruft in the better case > and in two worse cases failed migrations. The corresponding git repositories are also empty on moszumanska. Sebastian, do you have something which would make sense to push? IIRC there were plans to use odt2braille and dotify-api for braille translation, and perhaps just nothing has been pushed yet? Samuel