Re: Exim4 in Debian?

2024-04-28 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, 2024-04-28 at 16:58 -0400, Cindy Sue Causey wrote:

> DISCLAIMER: This is my first listserv reply using Evolution after Gmail dumped
> their old, simple web based format. My apologies in advance if there are any
> major formatting glitches in this response. This little side adventure sure 
> has
> had its own learning curve. :)

Evolution sometimes misformats replies. You can prevent this by
enabling the Outbox option in the Mail Preferences, previewing each
mail before you send it, double-click the message to edit it if needed,
previewing again and then sending the mail once it looks correct.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Exim4 in Debian?

2024-04-28 Thread Cindy Sue Causey
-Original Message-
From: Samuel Thibault 
To: debian-accessibility@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Exim4 in Debian?
Date: 04/26/24 13:51:02

Chime Hart, le ven. 26 avril 2024 10:23:33 -0700, a ecrit:
> I am noticing here in Debian SID that packages I use
> regularly are mysteriously vanishing.

SID is what it is: unstable. At the moment there is a huge upgrade to
64bit time_t which makes various packages non-installable, and thus apt
has a hard time finding another solution than just removing packages.

If you don't want instability, please use the testing distribution.


Thank you, Samuel! I didn't pursue the "why", but I knew I'd seen chatter about
that "t64" that many package upgrades are referencing. Now I understand.

For what it's worth, I'm on Trixie which had a couple hundred packages caught up
in that over the last few days. I was bored this morning so I messed with ihe
upgrade a couple packages at a time.

Most packages finally upgraded, but there are still a few holdouts that refuse
to install without purging my LXQt desktop environment first. Nope, don't want
that to happen, grin.

At one point, apt-get wanted to remove gdb (debugging) by itself. I knew I had
manually installed that package so I let it be removed. I reinstalled gdb as the
very next step, and a bunch of packages on developer hold suddenly also wanted
upgraded without any further problems. That was a nice bonus that I've seen
happen in the past.

For what it's worth, I haven't rebooted yet. Not ashamed to say I'm a little
afraid to just this second while things are still working well.

Cindy :)

DISCLAIMER: This is my first listserv reply using Evolution after Gmail dumped
their old, simple web based format. My apologies in advance if there are any
major formatting glitches in this response. This little side adventure sure has
had its own learning curve. :)

-- 
Talking Rock, Pickens County, Georgia, USA
* runs with birdseed *



Re: Exim4 in Debian?

2024-04-27 Thread James Addison
Hi Chime,

In response to the first part of your message, quoted in part below
for context: the default UI output format of apt has indeed changed,
however if you use the apt-get command (note the dash get suffix,
without a space) then it should continue to emit the previous format
that you are familiar with.  Neither of the two formats are guaranteed
to remain static, but at the moment both are available.

Please include me on any replies if required because I am not
subscribed to this mailing list.  Questions related to usage of Debian
utilities may in some cases be better resolved by using the
debian-user mailing list, however I do think there is an accessibility
aspect to this thread.

On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 10:23:33 -0700, Chime wrote (line-trimmed):
> Hi All: First of all, maybe 2weeks ago Debian altered an upgrade dialogue. 
> While I preferred the previous one, this one mentions available space which 
> may be a factor.

Thanks,
James



Re: Exim4 in Debian?

2024-04-26 Thread Samuel Thibault
Chime Hart, le ven. 26 avril 2024 11:31:35 -0700, a ecrit:
> And just curious, are their any Debian distros which have later
> kernels like Arch?

You cannot have the latest bleeding edge without bleeding.

Really, leave a bit of time to software, and you'll suffer less.

Samuel



Re: Exim4 in Debian?

2024-04-26 Thread Chime Hart
Well, thank you Samuel, I guess my `obsession in wanting the latest packages 
gets the best of me. Now, in the past I had found an alternative package 
manager which was supposedly better at dealing with dipendancies? And just 
curious, are their any Debian distros which have later kernels like Arch? On a 
laptop in Arch I have 6.8.7. Thanks in advance

Chime



Re: Exim4 in Debian?

2024-04-26 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello,

Chime Hart, le ven. 26 avril 2024 10:23:33 -0700, a ecrit:
> I am noticing here in Debian SID that packages I use
> regularly are mysteriously vanishing.

SID is what it is: unstable. At the moment there is a huge upgrade to
64bit time_t which makes various packages non-installable, and thus apt
has a hard time finding another solution than just removing packages.

If you don't want instability, please use the testing distribution.

Samuel



Exim4 in Debian?

2024-04-26 Thread Chime Hart
Hi All: First of all, maybe 2weeks ago Debian altered an upgrade dialogue. 
While I preferred the previous one, this one mentions available space which may 
be a factor. Next, I am noticing here in Debian SID that packages I use 
regularly are mysteriously vanishing. Maybe sometimes in a long list of an 
autoremove or even a just plain remove among my daily updates. For many weeks I 
was having issues with Alpine-and-mail folders. Well, among 
removing-and-re-installing trn4 I had been missing exim4. Once that was 
installed again, now my mail works well. Just today while trying to 
trouble-shoot issues with youtube-viewer, to my surprise git was gone, so I 
manually installed. I would like to offer a suggestion. Why not have an 
interacative flag such as an -i in apt which would offer a numbered menu of 
packages to be upgraded or removed? We could either select numbers from that 
menu either to exclude or accept. Lets say there are 28 packages to remove, 
menu number 29 could be for all, while typing combinations of those first 28 
would better protect against packages going in a Bermuda Triangle. I surely 
don't mind an upgrade or replacement, but nuking a package which is still 
available, well, that may not be helpful. Thanks so much for listening.

Chime