Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2008-01-22 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 07:54:39PM -0600, Karl Schmidt wrote:
 I made the module with out any problem with m-a. I seem to have all the 
 same versions except for nvidia-glx
 
 wajig list nvidia
 ii  nvidia-glx1.0.8776-4  NVIDIA binary 
 XFree86 4.x driver
 ii  nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-3-amd64 1.0.8776-4+2.6.18-7 NVIDIA 
 binary kernel module for Linux 2.6.18
 ii  nvidia-kernel-2.6.22-3-amd64 169.07-2+2.6.22-6   NVIDIA 
 binary kernel module for Linux 2.6.22
 ii  nvidia-kernel-common  20051028+1-0.1  NVIDIA binary 
 kernel module common files
 ii  nvidia-kernel-source  169.07-2NVIDIA binary 
 kernel module source
 ii  nvidia-settings   1.0+20060516-3  Tool of 
 configuring the NVIDIA graphics driv
 ii  nvidia-xconfig1.0+20070502-1  The NVIDIA X 
 Configuration Tool
 
 
 
 I now think nvidia-glx is the problem:
 
 The following packages have unmet dependencies:
   nvidia-glx: Depends: nvidia-kernel-169.07 but it is not installable

nvidia-kernel-169.07 SHOULD be provided by your
nvidia-kernel-2.6.22-3-amd64 169.07-2+2.6.22-6 package above.

   Depends: xserver-xorg-core (= 2:1.4) but 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-12 
   is to be installed

This on the other hand needs updating.  You need version 1.4 not version
1.3 of the xserver-xorg-core to use the nvidia-glx driver from version
169.07

 How did you get nvidia-glx to install (or can I turn it off?)

nvidia-glx is the driver for X that talks to the kernel module.  The
kernel module is useless without the matching driver.

--
Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Gnome takeover

2008-01-22 Thread Nuno Magalhães
I got a rar file with a bunch of mpc files in it. When i tried to play
one it opened with gnome's movieplayer but had no codec. That's fine,
but why did the windowmanager change? As soon as the player opened all
the icons, titlebars etc turned to gnome's default. i'm using xfce and
i like it and there was no aparent reason for this to happen. Plus, it
crashed mozilla.

Guess i'll follow some threads and rm everything gnome. Or i'll just
reisntal the whole thing. y biggest partition is my XP's fat32 where
most of my files are but i have problems copying to/from it unicode
issues mostly, i suppose) and i almost never use XP anyway so i could
use some of that space. And just stick to etx3 everywhere, /home
included. If needed i have an external fat32  drive to talk to Bill.

While searching for the musepack codec i ran across xmms and xmms2...
er... what's the difference?

Is there any kind of wrapper or something where you can centralize all
your prefs? Meaning one application that stores and enforces your
default sxerver, display manager, window manager, file manager... With
all this experimenting i have a crowded drive with packages i most
certainly do not use and no apparent coherence.

-- 
Fica bem, porta-te mal.
Be well, misbehave.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2008-01-22 Thread Karl Schmidt

Stephen Cormier wrote:





It is definitely the problem you won't get it to install unless you rebuild 
the package source 


Which package source? please email me the corrected package - what ever it is (BTW there are 
ways to force installation - wouldn't that work?)


having modified it so that it will install with the X 
version being 2:1.3 

I have:

wajig list xorg
ii  xorg1:7.2-5 
X.Org X Window System
ii  xserver-xorg1:7.2-5 
the X.Org X server
ii  xserver-xorg-core   2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-12 
X.Org X server -- core server



I think you are referring to the version of  xserver-xorg-core ?


as I mentioned in my first mail and yes you need the -glx 
package installed as well. If you do not want to rebuild the packages as I 
mentioned in my previous mail I have them here and can send them to you so 
you can get it installed.


Please send me the packages you think I need. (Thanks in advance!)

 You would only need to remove the currently 
installed ones install the source .deb I send you build/install the binary 
module then install the -glx and you are good to go.


Stephen



Did you send the patch to the package maintainer?




Karl Schmidt EMail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Transtronics, Inc. WEB http://xtronics.com
3209 West 9th StreetPh (785) 841-3089
Lawrence, KS 66049 FAX (785) 841-0434

Misdirection is the key to being a good magician. Magicians tell
you they are doing something while they do something quite
different; much like politicians -- except we can afford magicians.
-KPS




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2008-01-22 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 12:56:46PM -0600, Karl Schmidt wrote:
 Which package source? please email me the corrected package - what ever it 
 is (BTW there are ways to force installation - wouldn't that work?)

Using force pretty much always leaves you with a broken dependancy set
which will have to be fixed before you can install or upgrade anything
else.

So yes it might make the package be installed, but it won't leave things
working properly.

--
Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2008-01-22 Thread Stephen Cormier
On January 22, 2008 04:07:58 pm Stephen Cormier wrote:
 On January 22, 2008 02:56:46 pm Karl Schmidt wrote:
  Stephen Cormier wrote:
   It is definitely the problem you won't get it to install unless you
   rebuild the package source
 
  Which package source? please email me the corrected package - what ever
  it is (BTW there are ways to force installation - wouldn't that work?)

 The package needing to be downloaded is nvidia-kernel-source with something
 like this apt-get source nvidia-kernel-source as normal user this after
 having made a new directory and changed into it as the source package is
 downloaded into the current directory where the command is run from. I
 would not force it installing it will probably just break your install
 until you upgraded to the newer X.

   having modified it so that it will install with the X
   version being 2:1.3
 
  I have:
 
  wajig list xorg
  ii  xorg1:7.2-5
  X.Org X Window System
  ii  xserver-xorg1:7.2-5
  the X.Org X server
  ii  xserver-xorg-core
  2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-12 X.Org X server -- core server
 
 
  I think you are referring to the version of  xserver-xorg-core ?

 Yes I am referring to that version we have identical packages installed for
 these.

 apt-cache policy xorg xserver-xorg xserver-xorg-core
 xorg:
   Installed: 1:7.2-5
   Candidate: 1:7.2-5
   Version table:
  1:7.3+10 0
 600 http://ftp.de.debian.org sid/main Packages
  *** 1:7.2-5 0
 990 http://ftp.de.debian.org testing/main Packages
 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 xserver-xorg:
   Installed: 1:7.2-5
   Candidate: 1:7.2-5
   Version table:
  1:7.3+10 0
 600 http://ftp.de.debian.org sid/main Packages
  *** 1:7.2-5 0
 990 http://ftp.de.debian.org testing/main Packages
 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 xserver-xorg-core:
   Installed: 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-12
   Candidate: 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-12
   Version table:
  2:1.4.1~git20080118-1 0
 600 http://ftp.de.debian.org sid/main Packages
  *** 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-12 0
 990 http://ftp.de.debian.org testing/main Packages
 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

   as I mentioned in my first mail and yes you need the -glx
   package installed as well. If you do not want to rebuild the packages
   as I mentioned in my previous mail I have them here and can send them
   to you so you can get it installed.
 
  Please send me the packages you think I need. (Thanks in advance!)

 Done you should be getting four emails with a package attached to each.

You would only need to remove the currently
   installed ones install the source .deb I send you build/install the
   binary module then install the -glx and you are good to go.
  
   Stephen
 
  Did you send the patch to the package maintainer?

 Wouldn't be much of a patch it is only changing a single digit in the
 nvidia-glx section of the control file, it would probably be just be
 classified as a wishlist bug and not fixed anyways.

 PS: No need to CC me I read the list, thanks.

 Stephen

Oh also if your board is like mine and you get the fan running at 100% with 
this driver installed then install the nvclock program and use nvclock -f -F 
50 as normal user to lower it to 50% or you can go lower with the number if 
you wish.

Stephen

-- 
GPG Public Key: http://users.eastlink.ca/~stephencormier/publickey.asc


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2008-01-22 Thread Damon L. Chesser

Karl Schmidt wrote:
I think I shouldn't have updated to lenny -- I can't get nvidia 
working and I need it for a dual head setup (I don't think the nv 
driver can do this).


Not sure which way to go from here:

* Use the nvidia supplied drivers? (I've never done this)

* Is there a way to use the etch drivers?

* Get Some other card that has an open driver that supports dual head 
display?






Karl Schmidt EMail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Transtronics, Inc. WEB http://xtronics.com
3209 West 9th StreetPh (785) 841-3089
Lawrence, KS 66049 FAX (785) 841-0434

If man's brain was simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple to understand it.




I have not been following this thread completely, but I am at a loss.  
Why not just follow these directions:


http://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers#head-ba6a83e61cea90c0e3e5e9d7b014618e35f65ec3

This has always just worked for me.  Most notable is the first method.  
With out fail, it just worked.  Of course, setting up dual head monitor 
takes some tweaking of your xorg. conf file but you can always try 
nvidia-settings or nvidia-xconfig and see if they can find the correct 
settings for you.


If this has been covered, please excuse the repost.

HTH

--
Damon L. Chesser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]