Re: Laptop advice

2008-05-13 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:48:35AM -0400, Brett Viren wrote:
 I've recently been shopping for a T61.  It is easy to stay below $1k
 and hard to go much above $1.5k.  Given their specs, I would call this
 cheap.  Also, the fact that it comes with SuSE pre-installed means
 little worry about putting Debian on it.

Not quite.  I have seen comapnies provide binary only drivers for redhat
and suse, which do nothing to help anyone else (and little to help the
redhat/suse users who want to change or upgrade anything).  I doubt that
is the case with the thinkpad though.  It's more of a Dell thing to do.

-- 
Len Soresen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Laptop advice

2008-05-13 Thread Brett Viren
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) writes:

 A thinkpad that's cheap?  I didn't think that was ever possible.  They
 are quite nice in general though.

I've recently been shopping for a T61.  It is easy to stay below $1k
and hard to go much above $1.5k.  Given their specs, I would call this
cheap.  Also, the fact that it comes with SuSE pre-installed means
little worry about putting Debian on it.

-Brett.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Laptop advice

2008-05-12 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello.

Thanks for all the advice.

 A thinkpad that's cheap?  I didn't think that was ever possible.  They
 are quite nice in general though.

How to assess cheapness?  I saw that prices span quite a large range...
Everyone here seems to agree that a ThinkPad is nice but expensive.  So what
does one get for the higher price (with respect to other laptops)?

This one (ThinkPad R61) is currently a special offer at my usual IT shop:
  
http://www5.pc.ibm.com/europe/products.nsf/$wwwPartNumLookup/_NF0FDxx?openOpenDocumentepi=web_express

It seems that it has all the recommended components. Any gotchas I should
be aware of?

Best,
Gilles


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Laptop advice

2008-05-12 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:30:06PM +0200, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
 How to assess cheapness?  I saw that prices span quite a large range...
 Everyone here seems to agree that a ThinkPad is nice but expensive.  So what
 does one get for the higher price (with respect to other laptops)?

They do tend to have rather solid cases on them, unlike the thin plastic
used by many other companies.  So far I am quite pleased with the build
quality of the Asus R1F which has a lot more stuff for a lot less than
IBM could provide a year ago when we got that one and it too runs linux
very well (same video, wireless, etc).

 This one (ThinkPad R61) is currently a special offer at my usual IT shop:
   
 http://www5.pc.ibm.com/europe/products.nsf/$wwwPartNumLookup/_NF0FDxx?openOpenDocumentepi=web_express
 
 It seems that it has all the recommended components. Any gotchas I should
 be aware of?

I have no idea if the modem works, but certainly video, audio, wireless,
screen, pointer, etc should all work fine with 2.6.22 or higher kernel.
Etch would not work so well.

-- 
Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Laptop advice

2008-05-12 Thread Karl Schmidt

How to assess cheapness?  I saw that prices span quite a large range...
Everyone here seems to agree that a ThinkPad is nice but expensive.  So what
does one get for the higher price (with respect to other laptops)?


Cheap computers are VERY expensive, if your time is worth anything.  Figure the time needed to debug 
'fleeting hardware failures' and find out there isn't support for buggy components that were 
discontinued. Poorly designed components that are bought by the integrators at firesafe prices are 
part of what make cheap computers cheap. Some of these components have such poorly written 
specifications that it is almost impossible to write good drivers for them - the provided drivers 
may have enough bugs in them that they never get widely adopted and the chipset or component gets 
'dumped' into 'discounted' computers.


If you have more-time-than-money, it might make sense to buy a cheap computer and spend your time 
debugging low level drivers - but if you can do that, you probably have more-money-than-time anyway.



Karl Schmidt EMail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Transtronics, Inc. WEB http://xtronics.com
3209 West 9th StreetPh (785) 841-3089
Lawrence, KS 66049 FAX (785) 841-0434

When everything is coming my way, I'm probably in the wrong lane.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Laptop advice

2008-05-12 Thread Jack Malmostoso
On Mon, 12 May 2008 23:40:19 +0200, Gilles Sadowski wrote:

 This one (ThinkPad R61) is currently a special offer at my usual IT
 shop:
   http://www5.pc.ibm.com/europe/products.nsf/$wwwPartNumLookup/_NF0FDxx?
openOpenDocumentepi=web_express
 
 It seems that it has all the recommended components. Any gotchas I
 should be aware of?

The R61 is an excellent choice. If it's in your price range, go for it.

As for how to assess cheapness, I think it's quite subjective: hardware 
components are pretty much the same for all manufacturers, what really 
changes are build quality and screens. That said, there are people for 
whom 1000EUR is a lot of money, and others for whom it's not much.

-- 
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on AMD64


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Laptop advice

2008-05-10 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello.

Sorry if this slightly off-topic.
But what laptops would you currently advise to buy?
Obviously, the purpose is that all the components be supported by Debian
GNU/Linux.

Specifications:
 - Lightweight but usable (i.e. screen should be 14 or 15).
 - Wired network adapter
 - Wireless network adapter
 - Firewire
 - Webcam

Many thanks,
Gilles


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Laptop advice

2008-05-10 Thread Jack Malmostoso
On Sat, 10 May 2008 15:30:10 +0200, Gilles Sadowski wrote:

  - Lightweight but usable (i.e. screen should be 14 or 15). 

I'd stick with 13.3, since nowadays you seem to only be getting 
widescreen laptops. And those are pretty big.

  - Wired network adapter

Can't think of a non supported one.

  - Wireless network adapter

Go with Intel, be it 4965 or 3945.

  - Firewire

Again, can't think of a non supported one.

  - Webcam

Good luck with that. You might find something compatible with linux-UVC, 
but it's really a lottery.

I bought an Asus Z37E barebone and customized it to my liking, and the 
only nonsupported thing is the webcam, as of now.
I'd have gone with a Thinkpad but it was not available when I needed a 
laptop, but if you have the cash for it, go with one and never look back.

Check out tuxmobil.org and linux-laptop.net for comprehensive information.

-- 
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on AMD64


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Laptop advice

2008-05-10 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 01:41:57PM +, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
 On Sat, 10 May 2008 15:30:10 +0200, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
 
   - Lightweight but usable (i.e. screen should be 14 or 15). 
 
 I'd stick with 13.3, since nowadays you seem to only be getting 
 widescreen laptops. And those are pretty big.

Certainly a 15.4 widescreen (as is quite common) makes for a very large
laptop, and the 13.3 widescreen are the same resolution (1280x800) so
no loss there.

   - Wired network adapter
 
 Can't think of a non supported one.

I am sure someone can find one, but it would be unusual.

   - Wireless network adapter
 
 Go with Intel, be it 4965 or 3945.

I will second that.  As long as you have a 2.6.22 or higher kernel they
simply work.

   - Firewire
 
 Again, can't think of a non supported one.

TI made some pretty crappy ones years ago but I doubt anyone uses them
anymore.  Most are UCHI1394 compliant.

   - Webcam
 
 Good luck with that. You might find something compatible with linux-UVC, 
 but it's really a lottery.

Yeah I can't think of any that would work for sure either, although I
have never wanted a webcam so I haven't looked much.

 I bought an Asus Z37E barebone and customized it to my liking, and the 
 only nonsupported thing is the webcam, as of now.
 I'd have gone with a Thinkpad but it was not available when I needed a 
 laptop, but if you have the cash for it, go with one and never look back.

My wife has an Asus R1F tablet, and so far everything (except perhaps
the modem, haven't checked) works with linux perfectly.  Haven't tried
the stylus interface under linux although it should work being a wacom
tablet design.

 Check out tuxmobil.org and linux-laptop.net for comprehensive information.

-- 
Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Laptop advice

2008-05-10 Thread Joerg Bashir



On May 10, 2008, at 7:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart  
Sorensen) wrote:



On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 01:41:57PM +, Jack Malmostoso wrote:

On Sat, 10 May 2008 15:30:10 +0200, Gilles Sadowski wrote:


- Lightweight but usable (i.e. screen should be 14 or 15).


I'd stick with 13.3, since nowadays you seem to only be getting
widescreen laptops. And those are pretty big.


Certainly a 15.4 widescreen (as is quite common) makes for a very  
large

laptop, and the 13.3 widescreen are the same resolution (1280x800) so
no loss there.


1440x1050 is a nice crisp resolution on a T61.





- Wired network adapter


Can't think of a non supported one.


I am sure someone can find one, but it would be unusual.


- Wireless network adapter


Go with Intel, be it 4965 or 3945.


I will second that.  As long as you have a 2.6.22 or higher kernel  
they

simply work.


Atheros is even better than intel imho.  It allows for more tricks  
with airsnort and friends.








I bought an Asus Z37E barebone and customized it to my liking, and  
the

only nonsupported thing is the webcam, as of now.
I'd have gone with a Thinkpad but it was not available when I  
needed a
laptop, but if you have the cash for it, go with one and never look  
back.




Agreed.



Check out tuxmobil.org and linux-laptop.net for comprehensive  
information.


And thinkwiki.org if you are considering thinkpads. The x61 is quite  
cheap and light. 



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Laptop advice

2008-05-10 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 09:58:18AM -0700, Joerg Bashir wrote:
 1440x1050 is a nice crisp resolution on a T61.

I saw a thinkpad with a 1600x1200 about 5 years ago.  Now that was a
screen.  IBM's sales people tried to talk them out of getting that one
because they had a lot of difficulties getting those screens at the
time and they would rather sell something they had in stock.

 Atheros is even better than intel imho.  It allows for more tricks  
 with airsnort and friends.

Many atheros chips also aren't supported, or at least weren't last time
I tried to get one of those working.

 And thinkwiki.org if you are considering thinkpads. The x61 is quite  
 cheap and light. 

A thinkpad that's cheap?  I didn't think that was ever possible.  They
are quite nice in general though.

-- 
Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]