Bug#415775: remove AddDefaultCharset in lenny?

2007-06-26 Thread Stefan Fritsch
I believe adding AddDefaultCharset was a bad idea. It is only to be 
used if one _knows_ that the files have that charset, which we 
definitely don't.

It also overrides two out of three valid ways to specify the charset 
of a page: the meta tag and type maps (see #414429). Only the way 
via AddCharset remains functional.

Now the question is: Should we reverse that for lenny and comment 
AddDefaultCharset out?


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: r392 - in /trunk/apache2: apache2-doc.conf changelog

2007-06-26 Thread Peter Samuelson

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Log:
 Don't use AddDefaultCharset for our docs

You know, I think I agree with those (including you, I notice, reading
#415775 again) who say we shouldn't be using AddDefaultCharset _at
all_.  The issue came up a bit too late for etch, but I think for lenny
it is reasonable to remove /etc/apache2/conf.d/charset and leave only
the commented line in /etc/apache2/apache2.conf.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: r392 - in /trunk/apache2: apache2-doc.conf changelog

2007-06-26 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Dienstag, 26. Juni 2007, Peter Samuelson wrote:
 but I think for lenny
 it is reasonable to remove /etc/apache2/conf.d/charset and leave
 only the commented line in /etc/apache2/apache2.conf.

ok. Maybe we can change that together with the change 
of /etc/default/apache2 to a conffile and the removal of NO_START. I 
have already started to work on that and was planning to include it 
in 2.2.4-2.

I want to upload 2.2.4-1 as soon as 2.2.3-5 is in testing, which is 
still waiting for mpm-itk on sparc.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[bts-link] source package apache2

2007-06-26 Thread bts-link-upstream
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package apache2
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#

user [EMAIL PROTECTED]

# remote status report for #294648
#  * http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14090
#  * remote status changed: (?) - NEW
usertags 294648 + status-NEW

thanks



[bts-link] source package apache2

2007-06-26 Thread bts-link-upstream
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package apache2
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#

user [EMAIL PROTECTED]

# remote status report for #353443
#  * http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12355
#  * remote status changed: REOPENED - RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) - FIXED
#  * closed upstream
tags 353443 + fixed-upstream
usertags 353443 - status-REOPENED
usertags 353443 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

thanks