Re: Bug#272069: apache: fix for #269009 raised a new problem

2009-08-26 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Hi!

 Ancient bug dig up, I know. ;)

* Fabio Massimo Di Nitto  [2004-09-17 11:23:15 CEST]:
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > Package: apache
> > Version: 1.3.31-6
> > Severity: important
> >
> > #269009's usage of www-browser instead of lynx raised a new problem: Not
> > all www-browser alternatives do support -dump.
> 
> This is a browser problem. Almost all the www-browsers support -dump. I
> fail to see why it is an apache problem to work around it. A package that
> offers an alternative should be capable to provide all the basic options
> as the others.

 I agree - and I see one way people can make use of it: defining LYNX in
/etc/apache2/envvars like e.g.:

#v+
export LYNX="netrik --dump"
#v-

 That should work from reading the source and fix the issue for
everyone.

 Do you think you could add that either as a comment into the envvars
file that this is possible, or put it into some other docs? That could
then be assumed as a fix for this bug. :)

 Thanks in advance!
Rhonda


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#272069: apache: fix for #269009 raised a new problem

2004-09-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 272069 wontfix
Bug#272069: apache: fix for #269009 raised a new problem
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix

> severity 272069 wishlist
Bug#272069: apache: fix for #269009 raised a new problem
Severity set to `wishlist'.

> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)




Re: Bug#272069: apache: fix for #269009 raised a new problem

2004-09-17 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
tag 272069 wontfix
severity 272069 wishlist
stop

On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:

> Package: apache
> Version: 1.3.31-6
> Severity: important
>
> #269009's usage of www-browser instead of lynx raised a new problem: Not
> all www-browser alternatives do support -dump.

This is a browser problem. Almost all the www-browsers support -dump. I
fail to see why it is an apache problem to work around it. A package that
offers an alternative should be capable to provide all the basic options
as the others.

> netrik e.g. does need
> --dump. Switching to --dump on the other hand would make w3m getting
> problems. I don't know for other browsers that do the www-browser
> alternative like (e)links, lynx supports both.

Well one of the 2 will have to switch. I am not dealing to implements 20
different exceptions because of this.

>  This needs to be addressed soon and should IMHO definitely go into
> sarge. What a clean solution is I don't really now. It would be great if
> w3m supports GNU-style options, but I don't think that that is going to
> happen soon.

I am leaving this bug open, but i don't believe it is our job to fix it so
for me it's a wishlist that i wontfix.

If you have valid arguments, I am wide open for discussion (that's why i
am not closing it), but to me looks like an inconsistency between
www-browsers that needs to be solved there.

Fabio

-- 
 fajita: step one
 Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log.
 fajita: step two
 When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout.