Re: Speed of aptitude on NSLU2

2008-04-21 Thread Jon Dowland
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 08:57:59AM +0100, Barry Tennison wrote:
 That's interesting.  aptitude on my slug is annoyingly rather slow, but
 the slow parts for me are:
 * building the dependency tree
 * reading  writing extended state info
 * building tag database (wish I could get rid of that - an option?)

Me too.

 * building view

If you do a non-ncurses activity (aptitude update, aptitude install foo)
you have to pay that price _after_ the operation completes, but before
the program exits. This makes sense if you were returning to the UI
afterwards but with these use-cases youdon't. I expect this would be an
easy win for anyone who wanted to poke at the aptitude source :)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: running linux 2.6.24-5 on etch/NSLU2

2008-04-21 Thread Jason Lunz
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:11:36PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Yes. These are the instructions sent to me by Martin Michlmayer in response
 to a bug I had reported against the etch kernel:
 
wget
 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.24-1-ixp4xx_2.6.24-4_arm.deb
sudo dpkg -i linux-image-2.6.24-1-ixp4xx_2.6.24-4_arm.deb
sudo reboot

thanks for the data point. That's exactly what I did, but mine never
makes it past initramfs.

I grabbed the latest d-i daily build from
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/ixp4xx/netboot/
and used it to install unstable on a spare drive. So 2.6.24 definitely
works, and the installer worked normally. But on reboot into the new
system, I get the same result - the status LED stays orange forever.

Jason


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Big trouble

2008-04-21 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Mikael Rudberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-21 20:51]:
 Using mkinitramfs-kpkg to build the ramdisk.
 Running postinst hook script flash-kernel.
 *Flashing kernel: devio: stdout: write error: No space left on device
 done.  - This dosn't look good at all

I'm not quite sure how this can happen.  I looked at the 2.6.24-6
kernel image and it's 1338520 bytes whereas we hae 1441792 available
for the kernel.

Can you show the content of /proc/mtd ?
Is this a regular Debian installation (using debian-installer)?

 I haven't dared to reboot yet as I'm very unsure what is going to happened.

Try flashing an older kernel with flash-kernel 2.6.xxx-xx-ixp4xx;
look at /boot to see which older versions you have installed.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Big trouble

2008-04-21 Thread Mikael Rudberg

Thanks for you quick response Martin :)

nd it's 1338520 bytes whereas we hae 1441792 available
for the kernel.

Can you show the content of /proc/mtd ?
Is this a regular Debian installation (using debian-installer)?
  

Yes it's installed using the installer

Here is the mtd

nas:~# cat /proc/mtd
dev:size   erasesize  name
mtd0: 0004 0002 RedBoot
mtd1: 0002 0002 SysConf
mtd2: 0002 0002 Loader
mtd3: 0014 0002 Kernel
mtd4: 0062 0002 Ramdisk
mtd5: 0002 0002 FIS directory


Try flashing an older kernel with flash-kernel 2.6.xxx-xx-ixp4xx;
look at /boot to see which older versions you have installed.
  

flash-kernel 2.6.18-6-ixp4xx seem to have worked fine


Thanks

Mikael


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: 2 Disks (by label/UUID)

2008-04-21 Thread DE POOTER Bart
I know I had problems too with the UUID method at First ... The thing was,
everyone mentioned to use UUID=x syntax, but mine only worked when using
the full syntax like /dev/disk/by-uuid/

Don't know about others !

Bart


-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Stuart
Read
Verzonden: maandag 21 april 2008 4:41
Aan: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
Onderwerp: 2 Disks (by label/UUID)

Hello,

I was preparing to add a second harddisk to my NSLU2, and since
previous messages on this list referenced a boot order problem with
this, I followed the directions on the wiki (and some previous
messages on this list).

I have two questions:

1) Why does the troubleshooting page on the wiki say that the UUID
method there is no good when that's the method suggested on this list
by Martin M. et al?

2) After updating the flash, the NSLU2 failed to boot (orange LED) so
I had to restore my old fstab and flash to get it booting again. Is
there a step besides updating fstab, creating a new initramfs, and
flashing it?
 I noticed that in /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d there is a file named
resume which references /dev/sda5 (which is the swap). Could this be
the problem?

Let me know if there's more info required. I'm running a (mostly
up-to-date) lenny system.
-Stuart


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: 2 Disks (by label/UUID)

2008-04-21 Thread Tobias Frost
my thecus n2100 also stopped  booting when trying to mont a memory stick
to /media/sth via fstab and UUID. 
Someone should file a bug against .. Well, that was actually the
problem: I do not know excatly what causedit (=whom to blame), but I
did not find time.
Maybe you could investigate?

On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 21:39 +0200, DE POOTER Bart wrote:
 I know I had problems too with the UUID method at First ... The thing was,
 everyone mentioned to use UUID=x syntax, but mine only worked when using
 the full syntax like /dev/disk/by-uuid/
 
 Don't know about others !
 
 Bart
 
 
 -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
 Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Stuart
 Read
 Verzonden: maandag 21 april 2008 4:41
 Aan: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
 Onderwerp: 2 Disks (by label/UUID)
 
 Hello,
 
 I was preparing to add a second harddisk to my NSLU2, and since
 previous messages on this list referenced a boot order problem with
 this, I followed the directions on the wiki (and some previous
 messages on this list).
 
 I have two questions:
 
 1) Why does the troubleshooting page on the wiki say that the UUID
 method there is no good when that's the method suggested on this list
 by Martin M. et al?
 
 2) After updating the flash, the NSLU2 failed to boot (orange LED) so
 I had to restore my old fstab and flash to get it booting again. Is
 there a step besides updating fstab, creating a new initramfs, and
 flashing it?
  I noticed that in /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d there is a file named
 resume which references /dev/sda5 (which is the swap). Could this be
 the problem?
 
 Let me know if there's more info required. I'm running a (mostly
 up-to-date) lenny system.
 -Stuart
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]