On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 02:59:44AM +, peter green wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 09:06:44AM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
That sounds like if the mpg123 package should use:
on armel: --with-cpu=arm_nofpu
on armhf: --with-cpu=arm_fpu
Does this make sense to everybody?
Seems sane to me. armv7 devices without neon are relatively uncommon
so while it's important that they are supported it's IMO not vitally
important to squeeze out every last drop of performance from them.
I wonder what we should use on raspbian? I haven't tested on a Pi
yet but it seems that on all tests i've seen so-far the generic fpu
code is quite a bit slower than the arm nofpu code. Is there any
quality difference from using a fpu vs nonfpu decoder? If so how
much performance degredation do you beleive should be accepted in
exchange for that quality improvement.
I think nofpu would good for raspian. Any lost audio quality would
unnoticable on the Rasberry's analog audio output ;)
Peter, what's the recommended way to recognize raspbian in debian/rules
?
Riku
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140305093430.gb16...@afflict.kos.to
