Re: What current NAS platform is recommended for installing Debian?
Excellent news. Need to consider a replacement for my current box when armel reaches end of life. (Skickat från min telefon == Sent from my phone) On Dec 3, 2016 20:51, "Romain Francoise" <rfranco...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 07:49:40PM +0100, Björn Wetterbom wrote: > > Does the Debian installer work on the Intel Qnaps? > > Yes, there's a standard AMI BIOS which lets you select the boot device, > and you can install Debian on the main drives (the built-in 512MB USB > DOM is a bit small). You just need to pick a model w/ HDMI out. > > -- > Romain Francoise <rfranco...@debian.org> > https://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/ > >
Re: What current NAS platform is recommended for installing Debian?
Does the Debian installer work on the Intel Qnaps? (Skickat från min telefon == Sent from my phone) On Dec 3, 2016 6:33 PM, "Romain Francoise"wrote: > On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 04:53:23PM +0100, Victor Hooi wrote: > > However, I'm curious - what platforms or units do people recommend > > these days? > > The QNAP TS-251C can be found for around 180€ in Europe right now and it > has a dual-core CPU, 1GB of RAM, an HDMI port, and everything works > right out of the box: fan control, temperature sensors, etc. But of > course it's an Intel Atom so it runs amd64, which may not be what you're > looking for. Still, a great little box to run Debian on. > > -- > Romain Francoise > https://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/ > >
Re: How to instaal empty hdd debian for seagate personal cloud
See http://lmgtfy.com/?q=seagate+personal+cloud+debian On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Mikronet Bilgi İşlem < mikronetbilgiis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > My seagate personal cloud hdd was died. > I want to install debian but i don't now how to install emty hdd > please help me, thanks. >
Re: Summary of the ARM ports BoF at DC15
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Steve McIntyrewrote: > Summary: if people care about armel for Stretch, they should make > noise NOW and convince people it's needed and can/should be supported > in future. > I'd hate to see my two QNAP NAS:es unsupported. Setting them up again with new hardware would really be a pain. I'm ever so grateful for the hard work done by all of the Debian team. /Björn
Re: Latest Debian for Sheevaplug?
You should start at http://cyrius.com/debian/kirkwood/sheevaplug/ I think you'll find everything you need there. (Skickat från min telefon == Sent from my phone) On Mar 25, 2015 5:50 PM, Gilles codecompl...@free.fr wrote: Hello I'm no expert and would like to upgrade a Sheevaplug to the latest stable release of Debian. Sheevaplug manufacturer GlobalScale provides two files: Sheeva-Debian7-SW.rar sheevaplug_env.tar.rar http://globalscaletechnologies.com/download/ Should I go ahead with those files or are there better alternatives? Also, to minimize use of the NAND flash memory and the SD card, I'd like to keep /tmp and other temporary files in RAM. Is this OK? Thank you. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/bgp5ha1mq2tsrub363ee03bvh92s09u...@4ax.com
Re: QNAP 219 P II, Luks, Debian
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:09 AM, peng li...@f2f10.com wrote: So, here's my test. 1. Sole relying U-boot/kernel/initramd, with /root on hard disk, I can enter passphrase for luks (for /root), but will land in shell and complain lacking of /dev/ram. 2. Creating a seperate /boot either on harddisk or separate usb disk, with /boot on luks on harddisk, I can enter passphrase for luks , but will land in shell and it complains lacking of /dev/ram. 3. without luks, it works. So, What seems to have caused this problem of not making luks work? Put /boot on a separate, unencrypted, partition formatted with ext2 and it should work. I have had that running myself on Qnap TS-419. AFAICT you haven't tried that. Why you are able to enter a passphrase, I don't know. The other question is, whether the following are correct boot sequence? U-boot Kernel on flash--initramd on flash-- /boot/kernel on hard disk and /boot/initramd on harddisk --- /root. or U-boot Kernel on flash--initramd on flash-- --- /root. This is the correct sequence. /boot is only used when flash-kernel writes the kernel and ramdisk to flash. On a typical linux system, it would be , Grub---/boot/kernel+initramd on hardisk/root. Please help to clarrify. thakns peng -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/0ed514927fab186ca35c1e80eb3eb7 3...@f2f10.com
Re: QNAP 219 P II, Luks, Debian
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 8:17 PM, peng li...@f2f10.com wrote: Hi All, I followed http://www.cyrius.com/debian/kirkwood/qnap/ts-219/ and converted my NAS to Debian. I tried the following, 1. raid0 (1G) as swap(encrypted as well with random key) and raid1 (rest of 2x1T); luks on raid1; lvm on luks; /root and /home on lvm 2. raid0 (1G) and raid1 (rest of 2x1T); lvm on luks; /root and /home on lvm. Seceraio 2 works. sceraio 1 doesn't. Even I was able to put in passphrase during initial boot via console, it's landing in initram sys mode. I don't understand the difference between the two scenarios, your description is not very clear. My intention is to have a fully encrypted NAS. I thought that kernel/initramdisk on the internal Flash of NAS (which was instralled by installer script) would good enough to serve as function of a seperate /boot (which would host kernel/initramdisk image). It seems not so. My question is , do we still have to rely on /boot on disk (be it on Harddisk or a seperate usb), even we have kernel/initramd on the flash, to make this full encryption working? I would assume yes. If you encrypt /boot, flash-kernel will write an encrypted kernel to flash, and it will not be able to decrypt itself. many thanks Peng -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/75a5756e1ecab2e6bffce1d2c8f959 1...@f2f10.com
Re: Encrytion on a QNAP
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote: On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 17:18 +0200, Lee Williams wrote: Lee, are you on the list or should we continue to cc? Hello, since I have to reinstall my NAS on a new HDD, I thought it would be a good idea to set up encryption this time. But I'm not sure how exactly I should start on this. I think the standard way to do this is using the dm-crypt facilities built into the Debian installer. Now, will this work with a headless machine where I can't enter anything on boot time? That was my thought too. Out of the box? Probably not. If you have serial console, it will work OOTB. I've done it on the SheevaPlug and it worked just fine entering the passphrase on the console. If it's possible to disable SWAP and encrypt /home, The installer will allow this I think (you'll need to ignore the warning about no swap) You can encrypt swap too, but you use the option to generate a random key at every boot (the option is available in the installer). There are plenty of guides around, just Google it. could it be mounted remotely after boot? You'd likely have to arrange for all that yourself and you'd be going pretty far of the beaten track I think, which probably means hacking something up yourself (even after googling for prior art would be my guess) but if you are willing to spend the time making it work it ought to be possible in theory. I've done this too, and it's not even hard. What you do is put dropbear in the initrd so you can ssh to the box pre-boot-time and enter the passphrase. Look e.g. at https://www.google.com/search?q=dropbear%20in%20initrd And what about services that run on those volumes, they should surely start after the mount, shouldn't they? They would certainly normally start after the mount, but if you were deferring the mount somehow then you might need to arrange to defer those services too. Or otherwise to stall the boot process until things were remotely enabled somehow. Finally, is this even a good idea? Will it cost too much performance? I'm using a TS-119 and am not sure if any crypto would be accelerated. TS-119 is kirkwood based I think, so there is some hardware acceleration (md5, sha-1, aes) and an associated kernel driver (mv_cesa). I don't know to what extent that is useful for dm-crypt etc though (md5 obviously not so much ;-)). If you use the installer, as I have, your performance will suffer severely. I used it for a torrent box, which was fine, but if you e.g. plan to stream HD content it's another story completely. I never tried custom kernels or the like. Good luck Björn Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1403632594.1829.25.ca...@dagon.hellion.org.uk
Re: Information needed from owners/users of Debian on ARM/kirkwood base QNAP devices (should take 1min to gather)
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote: Hello, TL;DR: Please run the attached kirkwood-qnap script on your ARM based QNAP systems as ./kirkwood-qnap --info and report the results in this thread along with the model/kind of your QNAP device (as precisely as you can). Device # 1: Qnap TS-419P II $ ./kirkwood-qnap --info Kernel: Linux rockan 3.2.0-4-kirkwood #1 Debian 3.2.57-3+deb7u2 armv5tel GNU/Linux cpuinfo:Hardware: QNAP TS-41x dt model: n/a PCI devices: 00:00.0 0600: 11ab:6282 (rev 01) 00:01.0 0100: 11ab:7042 (rev 02) 01:00.0 0600: 11ab:6282 (rev 01) 01:01.0 0c03: 1b6f:7023 (rev 01) PHY devices (/sys/bus/mdio_bus/devices/): 0:00 0:01 Soc Bus:n/a QNAP TS-41x kirkwood-qnap: machine: QNAP TS-41x kirkwood-qnap: success: PCI = kirkwood-ts419-6282.dtb kirkwood-qnap: success: PHY = kirkwood-ts419-6282.dtb Device # 2: Qnap TS-119 $ ./kirkwood-qnap --info Kernel: Linux geten 3.2.0-4-kirkwood #1 Debian 3.2.57-3+deb7u2 armv5tel GNU/Linux cpuinfo:Hardware: QNAP TS-119/TS-219 dt model: n/a PCI devices: PHY devices (/sys/bus/mdio_bus/devices/): 0:08 Soc Bus:n/a QNAP TS-119/TS-219 kirkwood-qnap: machine: QNAP TS-119/TS-219 kirkwood-qnap: success: PHY = kirkwood-ts219-6281.dtb
Re: Dropping armel/ixp4xx
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: The ixp4xx kernel is now too big to fit in the flash partitions: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=linuxarch=armelver=3.14-1~exp1stamp=1397151242 I intend to disable this flavour for the next upload of 3.14 and remove it for 3.15 if no-one provides a configuration fix. Does this mean that ixp4xx won't be supported in jessie? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings I say we take off; nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
Re: U-Boot on QNAP TS-421
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote: TS-421 doesn't save it's u-boot variables on NAND. As far as I can tell, they are always saved on a virtual MTD partition (mtdblock4) in RAM, and overwritten on every boot with the presets hard-coded in the u-boot binary (mtdblock0). Can't you just do 'saveenv' in u-boot after setting your variables? I haven't tried it on the TS-421, but on several other u-boots.
Re: Unable to boot QNAP TS-119 since update on 12 Nov
I can make my ts 119 kernel image available for download. Would that help? It's wheezy. (Skickat från min telefon == Sent from my phone) On Nov 15, 2013 6:25 PM, Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com wrote: * Felix Andreas Braun felix.br...@mail.mcgill.ca [2013-11-15 16:39]: I was following debian testing on a QNAP TS 119. Since the update late on 12 Nov 2013, I am unable to boot the device. While I haven't been able to root cause my problems, I suspect it might have to do with the kernel update included in that version. I take it you have no serial console? Is there any well known way to re-flash a current debian kernel without wiping the contents of the HD? You can generate a recovery image with the old kernel from disk. I thought there were intructions for this on my web site but I just checked and there aren't. :( -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131115172439.ge3...@jirafa.cyrius.com
Re: Removing lvm and crypto from rootfs
Are you sure flash-kernel got called by update-initramfs (it should on wheezy). How did you configure u-boot? Maybe you're passing a root parameter via u-boot. Yeah, I checked all that. After trying *really* hard to figure out how the initramfs hooks for lvm2 and cryptsetup work I ended up chrooting into the rootfs and doing apt-get purge cryptsetup lvm2 dropbear. That removed all the hooks in /usr/share/initramfs-tools. After that I did update-initramfs -u again and all was ok.
Removing lvm and crypto from rootfs
Hello list! I'm having an issue with my sheevaplug. Previously it booted off an encrypted lvm. I have now rsynced the entire rootfs to a standard partition on a usb stick and I am trying to get it to boot. My strategy is to update the initramfs from a chroot, inspired by this: http://www.cyrius.com/journal/debian/orion/d-link/dns-323/fix-initramfs-tools I have updated /etc/fstab and replaced all occurrences of /dev/mapper/vg-lv with the UUIDs of the partitions. However, after running update-initramfs -u, it still tries to boot from my old lvm, which obviously fails. There is something more than /etc/fstab that needs to be changed. I'm guessing I need to fiddle with the hooks for initramfs-tools, but I am completely unfamiliar with that. Any hints? TIA B
Re: Debian on QNAP 419P II
Just wanted to report a successful install. Compared to my old TS209 the throughput increased vastly. I have a gigabit network and with the TS209 I got about 140 Mbit/s (RAID1 with two disks). Now I get about 700 Mbit/s (RAID6 with four disks). Tests were performed with iperf against a very capable Dell laptop with SSD, Win 7 and Cygwin. Just for kicks I'm going to try a RAID0 with four disks to see if I can push that number even higher. BTW Martin, on http://cyrius.com/debian/kirkwood/qnap/ts-41x/uboot/ it's not enough to set 'ipaddr'. You also have to set 'eth1addr'. They have to be both set, I don't know why. I ended up using 'fatload' instead (inspired by http://cyrius.com/debian/kirkwood/sheevaplug/install/), which is easier and faster IMO. /Björn On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com wrote: * Björn Wetterbom bj...@wetterbom.se [2013-10-17 15:16]: How right you are. Well, Martin is a thorough guy, so I'm sure it's not there by accident, i.e. it's supported. Obviously not thorough enough. ;) I'll add it to the index and install pages. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/
Debian on QNAP 419P II
Would I have any problems installing Debian on said device? It's not specifically mentioned on cyrius.com as far as I can tell. I've done several installs before and know how to use serial. /B
Re: Debian on QNAP 419P II
How right you are. Well, Martin is a thorough guy, so I'm sure it's not there by accident, i.e. it's supported. Just found one at a good price and offered the seller SEK 4500 (roughly € 490, £ 410) for it, including 4*2TB disk. Let's see how it goes. It's about time to replace my good old TS-209. /B On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote: On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 14:40 +0200, Björn Wetterbom wrote: Would I have any problems installing Debian on said device? It's not specifically mentioned on cyrius.com as far as I can tell. The information at http://www.cyrius.com/debian/kirkwood/qnap/ts-41x/ applies to this one I'm reasonable sure. It's listed in the link to that page at http://www.cyrius.com/debian/kirkwood/qnap/ but not on the page itself AFAICT. Ian.
Re: Sheevaplug hangs after u-boot upgrade
The same happened to me. See my pasted mail to Martin below. B --- Hi Martin! I recently upgraded u-boot according to http://cyrius.com/debian/kirkwood/sheevaplug/uboot-upgrade/, which went smoothly. But after the install the plug would not boot beyond uncompressing the kernel. Eventually I realised that it used the kernel in nand since I hadn't updated the bootargs. So, it would be helpful to add to the upgrade instructions that the bootargs are reset on upgrade and that they have to be set again according to http://www.cyrius.com/debian/kirkwood/sheevaplug/install/. (Skickat från min telefon == Sent from my phone) On Sep 20, 2013 6:18 PM, willem de jong willemdej...@gmx.net wrote: Hi All, After upgrading u-boot from original u-boot 1.1.x to lastest following Martin's guide exactly: http://cyrius.com/debian/kirkwood/sheevaplug/uboot-upgrade/ The sheevaplug hangs at 'done, now booting the kernel'. Output is below. It seems the IDE disc is not being recognized. The setup was working fine before, 2 years without a reboot. Can anyone point me in the right direction please? Thanks Willem U-Boot 2011.12 (Mar 11 2012 - 18:59:46) Marvell-Sheevaplug - eSATA - SD/MMC SoC: Kirkwood 88F6281_A0 DRAM: 512 MiB WARNING: Caches not enabled NAND: 512 MiB In:serial Out: serial Err: serial Net: egiga0 88E1116 Initialized on egiga0 Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0 NAND read: device 0 offset 0x10, size 0x40 4194304 bytes read: OK (Re)start USB... USB: Register 10011 NbrPorts 1 USB EHCI 1.00 scanning bus for devices... 2 USB Device(s) found scanning bus for storage devices... EHCI timed out on TD - token=0x2008d80 1 Storage Device(s) found Reset IDE: ide_preinit failed ## Booting kernel from Legacy Image at 0640 ... Image Name: Linux-2.6.22.18 Image Type: ARM Linux Kernel Image (uncompressed) Data Size:2106696 Bytes = 2 MiB Load Address: 8000 Entry Point: 8000 Verifying Checksum ... OK Loading Kernel Image ... OK OK Starting kernel ... Uncompressing Linux done, booting the kernel.
Re: Will it work for QNAP 420?
I can't imagine that would be a problem. I'm running samba + raid1 on a 5-year-old (ish) ts-209 without any problems. It's got a 500 MHz CPU iirc. My only issue is that I only get about 1 MB/s throughput on a Gbit LAN. But I haven't yet had the time to isolate the issue, so I'm not sure the problem is with the ts-209. Even my Asus rt-n66u router can do samba+transmission+openvpn (not tried it though), so you should be fine. /B On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 1:04 PM, George Sedov radist.mo...@gmail.comwrote: Hi guys, Thanks for your replies. I have another question: everybody tells me that ARM processors are a way too slow for raid5+samba+transmission+openvpn, but the only information I got on ARM's performance is that Marvell's 1.6 GHz kirkwood chips are close to atom N270. I guess you have some practical experience with ARMs, can you tell me if Marvell's chips will be able to run all these tasks? Cheers, George В Сб, 24/08/2013 в 08:39 +0200, Martin Michlmayr пишет: * George Sedov radist.mo...@gmail.com [2013-08-23 19:27]: 1) First of all, will it work? Yes, see http://www.cyrius.com/debian/kirkwood/qnap/ts-41x/ 3) Can I install rootfs not on the SATA drives, but rather on the usb flash-stick, thus leaving all of the drives completely system-free? Yes, that's supported. 4) Will I manage all this without any experience with debian? :) I used gentoo for several years though. As long as you have experience with Linux, you should be fine. I wouldn't recommend it to people new to Linux, though. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1377601499.2244.9.ca...@atlassedov2.desy.de
Re: Will it work for QNAP 420?
Having the root file system on a usb flash drive will work fine. I would advice you to get two identical sticks and dd the data from your installed stick to a backup stick once installation is finished. Usb sticks tend to wear over time. They last 2-3 years for me. /B On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Hoshpak mailingl...@pozimski.eu wrote: Am 23.08.2013 20:23, schrieb Shawn Landden: On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:27 AM, George Sedov radist.mo...@gmail.com wrote: 3) Can I install rootfs not on the SATA drives, but rather on the usb flash-stick, thus leaving all of the drives completely system-free? Maybe there are some other ways to keep the system off the disks? i'm wondering how they do it with only 16MB of flash anyways, you could always netboot it via tftp from u-boot Only kernel, initrd and uboot are installed into the internal flash memory. If you use the original Qnap firmware, they only have a pretty minimal system installed by default and install the bigger part of the firmware onto the harddrives once you plug them in and run the initialization wizard. If you use the Debian installer, you have the option to use the harddrives for the root file system or some other attached storage like an usb drive. I use the later option with my Qnap TS219 P II and it works fine. Since the 420 doesn't seem to be that different (probably the same chipset with minor modifications), I don't see a reason why it wouldn't work with this device also. Kind Regards Helmut -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5217b773.1090...@pozimski.eu
Re: Dropping support for the smallest armel machines
Dropping support for nslu2 is fine with me. As noted above, I can continue running it with an older kernel and be equally happy. Or I could retire it and get (another) rpi. What would be (a little) worse for me though is dropping orion5 support. I rely on security updates for my ts-209. OTOH, by 2016 it may well be ready to be replaced by something faster. /B On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Martin Guy martinw...@gmail.com wrote: On 26 June 2013 11:06, Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.debian-...@telemetry.co.uk wrote: Another issue for tiny devices is the amount of RAM the Debian installer assumes is available, which now appears to be 256Mb. I just debootstrapped wheezy onto an armel board with 64MB RAM and no swap. Everything worked fine with the single exception of packages that contain files compressed with .xz, which died for lack of RAM - there were were one or two. Enabling a few MB of swap made the second stage run smoothly to completion. M Ignore my -Os stupidity. Of course it is already enabled in linux through CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cal4-wqpbepv4cke+ceg11rccu2qgcctox0p+5ytpcwdsqso...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Installing ftp Server on debian slug
Silly question perhaps, but are you root? (Skickat från min telefon == Sent from my phone) On Mar 25, 2013 6:27 PM, Tobias Wagner broadwa...@live.de wrote: Hi all, for access to log files and creating backups I`d like to install ftp server on my nslu2. It is set up as advised on cyrius.com and running well. I tried: apt-get install proftpd and got: E: Could not open lock file /var/lib/dpkg/lock - open (2: No such file or directory) Indeed, the directory doesn't exist, so I created it and upon reentering the install command I got: E: Unable to write to /var/cache/apt/ How can I make this work? Thanks, Tobias.
Re: Plug computer with two eth
http://www.newit.co.uk/ doesn't seem to have it right now, but since they carry other Globalscape products (and have done for years), the Mirabox will likely turn up there. /B On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Mike Howard m...@dewberryfields.co.ukwrote: On 03/03/2013 16:43, DrEagle wrote: Le 03/03/2013 16:12, Przemysław Kwiatkowski a écrit : Hello, Could anyone suggest any small Linux-based device with two ethernet ports? I would like it to be as small as possible, something like scheevaplug. P. Kwiatkowski The new and very promising generation of Plug devices like the Mirabox[1] Development Kit. I have received one for my own testing and future review. The device is like a small modem. Fast and powerfull. 1.2 Ghz Marvell Armada with 1GB DDR3 (technical specifications and comparison on my wiki [2]) Come with uboot and debian. Can boot from NAND (1GB), microSD, USB or Network. Short describe from the User Guide[3] [1] https://www.**globalscaletechnologies.com/p-** 58-mirabox-development-kit.**aspxhttps://www.globalscaletechnologies.com/p-58-mirabox-development-kit.aspx [2] https://doukki.net/doku.php?**id=wiki:notes:arm-features-**charthttps://doukki.net/doku.php?id=wiki:notes:arm-features-chart [3] https://www.**globalscaletechnologies.com/** download/MiraboxUserGuide_US_**V1-Sep-20-2012.pdfhttps://www.globalscaletechnologies.com/download/MiraboxUserGuide_US_V1-Sep-20-2012.pdf drEagle Are there any UK suppliers of this that you know of? Mike. -- Any question is easy if you know the answer! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-REQUEST@lists.**debian.orgdebian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/**5135A9D3.1000608@**dewberryfields.co.ukhttp://lists.debian.org/5135a9d3.1000...@dewberryfields.co.uk
Re: Flash-Kernel, IPv6 and Kirkwood CPU
Have you tried running flash-kernel as root and then rebooting, as suggested by http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel/82575? (Found by googling the error message) /B (Skickat från min platta == Sent from my tablet) On Dec 2, 2012 2:36 PM, Rash r.kra...@tu-bs.de wrote: Hi, I have a kirkwood based plug computer running debian 6.06 and updated the kernel via aptitude. So far, so good, but the performance maybe decreased a bit and I got IPv6 error messages. I don't know why. ipv6: Unknown symbol sock_queue_err_skb I used: aptitude install linux-image-2.6.32-5-kirkwood which worked fine. It worked a long time with the old kernel there were no problems. apt-get install flash-kernel Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done flash-kernel is already the newest version. Any idea how to fix it? This looks promising but not sure what it means. http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2012/05/msg00029.html Kind regards -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121202132017.30f0726d7877f368e90f2...@tu-bs.de
Re: arm, both disk able to boot (raid1)
I have a raid1 setup on my ts-209 (from the original install). See my fstab below. If your raid1 setup is done, just update your fstab and run update-initramfs -u flash-kernel to update the initramfs with the new fstab and install the initramfs to flash. I'd advice you to have a serial console in case something goes wrong. /B --- 8 $ cat /etc/fstab # /etc/fstab: static file system information. # # file system mount point type options dump pass proc/proc procdefaults0 0 /dev/md0/ ext3noatime,errors=remount-ro 0 1 /dev/md2/home ext3noatime 0 2 /dev/md1noneswapsw 0 0 none/proc/bus/usb usbfs defaults0 0 --- 8 --- On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:53 AM, rosea.grammostola rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/10/2012 06:53 AM, Johnson Chetty wrote: you need u-boot to set up the environment for the device and u-boot will then load the kernel.. Thanks. Do you've pointers for how to do this? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-REQUEST@lists.**debian.orgdebian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/**50753797.7010...@gmail.comhttp://lists.debian.org/50753797.7010...@gmail.com
Re: arm, both disk able to boot (raid1)
http://www.cyrius.com/debian/orion/qnap/ts-209/ On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:46 AM, rosea.grammostola rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/10/2012 11:07 AM, Björn Wetterbom wrote: I have a raid1 setup on my ts-209 (from the original install). See my fstab below. If your raid1 setup is done, just update your fstab and run update-initramfs -u flash-kernel to update the initramfs with the new fstab and install the initramfs to flash. I'd advice you to have a serial console in case something goes wrong. Thanks. I've no experience with a serial console. Tutorials on the web seems to edit also the grub files, which aren't on this ARM install. What should be done different on a ARM in comparison with this method for instance? http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/**howto-setup-serial-console-on-** debian-linux/http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/howto-setup-serial-console-on-debian-linux/ /B --- 8 $ cat /etc/fstab # /etc/fstab: static file system information. # # file system mount point type options dump pass proc/proc procdefaults 0 0 /dev/md0/ ext3noatime,errors=remount-ro 0 1 /dev/md2/home ext3noatime 0 2 /dev/md1noneswapsw 0 0 none/proc/bus/usb usbfs defaults 0 0 --- 8 --- On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:53 AM, rosea.grammostola rosea.grammost...@gmail.com mailto:rosea.grammostola@**gmail.comrosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/10/2012 06:53 AM, Johnson Chetty wrote: you need u-boot to set up the environment for the device and u-boot will then load the kernel.. Thanks. Do you've pointers for how to do this? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-REQUEST@lists.__deb**ian.orghttp://debian.org mailto:debian-arm-REQUEST@**lists.debian.orgdebian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org mailto:listmaster@lists.**debian.orglistmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/__**50753797.7010...@gmail.comhttp://lists.debian.org/__50753797.7010...@gmail.com http://lists.debian.org/**50753797.7010...@gmail.comhttp://lists.debian.org/50753797.7010...@gmail.com
Re: arm, both disk able to boot (raid1)
That's the one. /B On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:59 PM, rosea.grammostola rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/10/2012 12:26 PM, Björn Wetterbom wrote: http://www.cyrius.com/debian/**orion/qnap/ts-209/http://www.cyrius.com/debian/orion/qnap/ts-209/ Thx. Hmm ok so I need this hardware to connect the qnap to my laptop? http://apple.clickandbuild.**com/cnb/shop/ftdichip?** productID=53op=catalogue-**product_info-null**prodCategoryID=47http://apple.clickandbuild.com/cnb/shop/ftdichip?productID=53op=catalogue-product_info-nullprodCategoryID=47 On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:46 AM, rosea.grammostola rosea.grammost...@gmail.com mailto:rosea.grammostola@**gmail.comrosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/10/2012 11:07 AM, Björn Wetterbom wrote: I have a raid1 setup on my ts-209 (from the original install). See my fstab below. If your raid1 setup is done, just update your fstab and run update-initramfs -u flash-kernel to update the initramfs with the new fstab and install the initramfs to flash. I'd advice you to have a serial console in case something goes wrong. Thanks. I've no experience with a serial console. Tutorials on the web seems to edit also the grub files, which aren't on this ARM install. What should be done different on a ARM in comparison with this method for instance? http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/_**_howto-setup-serial-console-** on-__debian-linux/http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/__howto-setup-serial-console-on-__debian-linux/ http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/**howto-setup-serial-console-on-** debian-linux/http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/howto-setup-serial-console-on-debian-linux/ /B --- 8 $ cat /etc/fstab # /etc/fstab: static file system information. # # file system mount point type options dump pass proc/proc procdefaults 0 0 /dev/md0/ ext3noatime,errors=remount-ro 0 1 /dev/md2/home ext3noatime 0 2 /dev/md1noneswapsw 0 0 none/proc/bus/usb usbfs defaults 0 0 --- 8 --- On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:53 AM, rosea.grammostola rosea.grammost...@gmail.com mailto:rosea.grammostola@**gmail.comrosea.grammost...@gmail.com mailto:rosea.grammostola@__gm**ail.com http://gmail.com mailto:rosea.grammostola@**gmail.comrosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/10/2012 06:53 AM, Johnson Chetty wrote: you need u-boot to set up the environment for the device and u-boot will then load the kernel.. Thanks. Do you've pointers for how to do this? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-REQUEST@lists.__deb**__ian.org http://deb__ian.org http://debian.org mailto:debian-arm-REQUEST@__l**ists.debian.orghttp://lists.debian.org mailto:debian-arm-REQUEST@**lists.debian.orgdebian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org mailto:listmaster@lists.**debian.orglistmas...@lists.debian.org mailto:listmaster@lists.__deb**ian.org http://debian.org mailto:listmaster@lists.**debian.orglistmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/**50753797.7010...@gmail.comhttp://lists.debian.org/50753797.7010...@gmail.com http://lists.debian.org/__**50753797.7010...@gmail.comhttp://lists.debian.org/__50753797.7010...@gmail.com http://lists.debian.org/__**50753797.7010...@gmail.comhttp://lists.debian.org/__50753797.7010...@gmail.com http://lists.debian.org/**50753797.7010...@gmail.comhttp://lists.debian.org/50753797.7010...@gmail.com
Re: Debian qnap 109 - qnap 209
Well, you could try to install the ramdisk to flash using the Debian installer. See http://www.cyrius.com/journal/debian/installer-flash-kernel. Since the 109 and the 209 are very similar, it might work (they have the same machine architecture). I'm not sure if update-initramfs -u will flash, so to be extra sure issue flash-kernel as well. If you use the same medium as in your 109 it should be pretty straightforward. If you change medium you must update your UUIDs in /etc/fstab. Since I'm no expert, something probably will go wrong if you try this. But it won't break anything. /B On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:44 AM, rosea.grammostola rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've a working Debian installation on a qnap 109. Is it possible to make that boot in a qnap 209 in some way? How can I move the working 109 to my 209? Best regards, \r -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-REQUEST@lists.**debian.orgdebian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/**506eac0f.10...@gmail.comhttp://lists.debian.org/506eac0f.10...@gmail.com
Re: Debian qnap 109 - qnap 209
Thx for your reply. First I'm wondering how I start the debian-installer having the unbootable 109 disk in the 209. Unfortunately I installed debian already on the qnap 209. I can boot that install with also the 109 drive in it, but how do I launch the d-i then? And how do I make sure the commands you suggested are executed for the right drive? If you have Debian on the 209 you already have the correct ramdisk on the 209 flash (both installs must be the same Debian version). Try changing the UUIDs on the 109 disk to match those of the 209 disk and see if it boots. If it does not boot it should drop to a shell where you can try to find the error. This is a rather complicated procedure, and unfortunately I can't help you further. I have only fiddled with the ramdisk on one or two occasions and my knowledge is really very shallow in that area. /B Regards /B On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:44 AM, rosea.grammostola rosea.grammost...@gmail.com mailto:rosea.grammostola@**gmail.comrosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've a working Debian installation on a qnap 109. Is it possible to make that boot in a qnap 209 in some way? How can I move the working 109 to my 209? Best regards, \r -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-REQUEST@lists.__deb**ian.orghttp://debian.org mailto:debian-arm-REQUEST@**lists.debian.orgdebian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org mailto:listmaster@lists.**debian.orglistmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/__**506eac0f.10...@gmail.comhttp://lists.debian.org/__506eac0f.10...@gmail.com http://lists.debian.org/**506eac0f.10...@gmail.comhttp://lists.debian.org/506eac0f.10...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-REQUEST@lists.**debian.orgdebian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/**506ec1e3.6080...@gmail.comhttp://lists.debian.org/506ec1e3.6080...@gmail.com
Re: Help needed after updating Debian on QNAP TS-109 Pro II
I'd reboot if I were you. On the other hand, I have a serial console, which has helped me through the rough on at least one occasion. Worst case, you have to order a ttl converter to get serial access. But I _think_ your reboot will go well. B On Sep 22, 2012 10:37 PM, Juha Larjomaa juha.larjo...@iki.fi wrote: Thanks! I ran both of those now but I still have not dared to reboot because starting cupsd seems to hang forever. I am concerned that my boot could get stuck. This is what it is running: 13874 pts/9S+ 0:00 \_ /bin/sh /usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d cups start 13890 pts/9S+ 0:00 \_ /bin/sh /etc/init.d/cups start 13897 pts/9S+ 0:05 \_ modprobe -q -b parport_pc Any ideas? I suspect this might also be related to why smbd crashes. Or should I just take the leap and reboot? Juha On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Björn Wetterbom bjohv...@gmail.comwrote: Wait! You must also run flash-kernel as root to move the initramfs to flash. Sorry I missed that. B (Sent from my phone.) On Sep 22, 2012 9:57 PM, Björn Wetterbom bjohv...@gmail.com wrote: You should have no problems. The part about boot loader is because grub or lilo can't be found. That's normal since you boot from flash. Run update-initramfs -u as root before reboot and you will be fine. I'm not sure it's needed nowadays, but it certainly won't cause any harm. Björn (Sent from my phone.) On Sep 22, 2012 9:48 PM, Juha Larjomaa juha.larjo...@iki.fi wrote: Hi, I have been happily running Squeeze from a USB stick on my QNAP TS-109 Pro II for a long time. Today, I decided to update my system with 'apt-get upgrade'. Some packages were updated but I saw that some files were kept back by apt-get - so I decided to run 'apt-get dist-upgrade' without knowing any better. This is when problems started. Would anyone be able to help? Apparently the update changed the mgmt of hard disks to some UUID-based plot that I am not familiar with. For example, my /etc/fstab was changed as follows: kaappikone# less /etc/fstab # /etc/fstab: static file system information. # # file system mount point type options dump pass proc/proc procdefaults0 0 # /dev/sda2 / ext3errors=remount-ro,noatime 0 1 UUID=59c82707-e5bd-4538-a2ad-b697635e9313 / ext3 errors=remount-ro,noatime 0 1 # /dev/sda1 /boot ext2defaults0 2 UUID=42cacc9b-4dfd-4cd9-85dc-8810a82af109 /boot ext2 defaults0 2 # /dev/sda5 noneswapsw 0 0 UUID=0f4c0b92-afd9-45de-b9b1-40b93d458ffa noneswap sw 0 0 # /dev/sdb2 /bigdisk ext3noatime 0 1 UUID=af48689a-1f86-4a8b-ab86-be90915b37d9 /bigdiskext3 noatime 0 1 The bit that worries me is that the upgrade program gave me the following warning: │ Boot loader configuration check needed│ │ │ │ The boot loader configuration for this system was not recognized. These │ │ settings in the configuration may need to be updated: │ │ │ │ * The root device ID passed as a kernel parameter; │ │ * The boot device ID used to install and update the boot loader. │ │ │ │ │ │ You should generally identify these devices by UUID or label. However,│ │ on MIPS systems the root device must be identified by name. Would anyone be able to help me how to do that? Or, more generally, how to ensure that my QNAP box will be able to boot again? I have not yet rebooted since the update. I am able to login with SSH but for some reason smb crashes as soon as I try to connect to it. This did not happen before the update. Thanks! Juha
Re: Help needed after updating Debian on QNAP TS-109 Pro II
You should have no problems. The part about boot loader is because grub or lilo can't be found. That's normal since you boot from flash. Run update-initramfs -u as root before reboot and you will be fine. I'm not sure it's needed nowadays, but it certainly won't cause any harm. Björn (Sent from my phone.) On Sep 22, 2012 9:48 PM, Juha Larjomaa juha.larjo...@iki.fi wrote: Hi, I have been happily running Squeeze from a USB stick on my QNAP TS-109 Pro II for a long time. Today, I decided to update my system with 'apt-get upgrade'. Some packages were updated but I saw that some files were kept back by apt-get - so I decided to run 'apt-get dist-upgrade' without knowing any better. This is when problems started. Would anyone be able to help? Apparently the update changed the mgmt of hard disks to some UUID-based plot that I am not familiar with. For example, my /etc/fstab was changed as follows: kaappikone# less /etc/fstab # /etc/fstab: static file system information. # # file system mount point type options dump pass proc/proc procdefaults0 0 # /dev/sda2 / ext3errors=remount-ro,noatime 0 1 UUID=59c82707-e5bd-4538-a2ad-b697635e9313 / ext3 errors=remount-ro,noatime 0 1 # /dev/sda1 /boot ext2defaults0 2 UUID=42cacc9b-4dfd-4cd9-85dc-8810a82af109 /boot ext2 defaults0 2 # /dev/sda5 noneswapsw 0 0 UUID=0f4c0b92-afd9-45de-b9b1-40b93d458ffa noneswap sw 0 0 # /dev/sdb2 /bigdisk ext3noatime 0 1 UUID=af48689a-1f86-4a8b-ab86-be90915b37d9 /bigdiskext3 noatime 0 1 The bit that worries me is that the upgrade program gave me the following warning: │ Boot loader configuration check needed│ │ │ │ The boot loader configuration for this system was not recognized. These │ │ settings in the configuration may need to be updated: │ │ │ │ * The root device ID passed as a kernel parameter; │ │ * The boot device ID used to install and update the boot loader. │ │ │ │ │ │ You should generally identify these devices by UUID or label. However,│ │ on MIPS systems the root device must be identified by name. Would anyone be able to help me how to do that? Or, more generally, how to ensure that my QNAP box will be able to boot again? I have not yet rebooted since the update. I am able to login with SSH but for some reason smb crashes as soon as I try to connect to it. This did not happen before the update. Thanks! Juha
Re: Help needed after updating Debian on QNAP TS-109 Pro II
Wait! You must also run flash-kernel as root to move the initramfs to flash. Sorry I missed that. B (Sent from my phone.) On Sep 22, 2012 9:57 PM, Björn Wetterbom bjohv...@gmail.com wrote: You should have no problems. The part about boot loader is because grub or lilo can't be found. That's normal since you boot from flash. Run update-initramfs -u as root before reboot and you will be fine. I'm not sure it's needed nowadays, but it certainly won't cause any harm. Björn (Sent from my phone.) On Sep 22, 2012 9:48 PM, Juha Larjomaa juha.larjo...@iki.fi wrote: Hi, I have been happily running Squeeze from a USB stick on my QNAP TS-109 Pro II for a long time. Today, I decided to update my system with 'apt-get upgrade'. Some packages were updated but I saw that some files were kept back by apt-get - so I decided to run 'apt-get dist-upgrade' without knowing any better. This is when problems started. Would anyone be able to help? Apparently the update changed the mgmt of hard disks to some UUID-based plot that I am not familiar with. For example, my /etc/fstab was changed as follows: kaappikone# less /etc/fstab # /etc/fstab: static file system information. # # file system mount point type options dump pass proc/proc procdefaults0 0 # /dev/sda2 / ext3errors=remount-ro,noatime 0 1 UUID=59c82707-e5bd-4538-a2ad-b697635e9313 / ext3 errors=remount-ro,noatime 0 1 # /dev/sda1 /boot ext2defaults0 2 UUID=42cacc9b-4dfd-4cd9-85dc-8810a82af109 /boot ext2 defaults0 2 # /dev/sda5 noneswapsw 0 0 UUID=0f4c0b92-afd9-45de-b9b1-40b93d458ffa noneswap sw 0 0 # /dev/sdb2 /bigdisk ext3noatime 0 1 UUID=af48689a-1f86-4a8b-ab86-be90915b37d9 /bigdiskext3 noatime 0 1 The bit that worries me is that the upgrade program gave me the following warning: │ Boot loader configuration check needed│ │ │ │ The boot loader configuration for this system was not recognized. These │ │ settings in the configuration may need to be updated: │ │ │ │ * The root device ID passed as a kernel parameter; │ │ * The boot device ID used to install and update the boot loader. │ │ │ │ │ │ You should generally identify these devices by UUID or label. However,│ │ on MIPS systems the root device must be identified by name. Would anyone be able to help me how to do that? Or, more generally, how to ensure that my QNAP box will be able to boot again? I have not yet rebooted since the update. I am able to login with SSH but for some reason smb crashes as soon as I try to connect to it. This did not happen before the update. Thanks! Juha
RE: Running on usb flash
Could be a file system check. Leave it alone over night and see what happens. I can't see anything wrong with your fstab. If it's not fsck, you may need a serial console. B Sent from my nexus 7 On Sep 2, 2012 4:57 PM, Brian Platt brianpl...@hotmail.com wrote: Did I make a mistake on the below fstab as slug no longer boots -- From: brianpl...@hotmail.com To: debian-arm@lists.debian.org Subject: RE: Running on usb flash Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 21:56:39 +0100 Thanks I've added # /etc/fstab: static file system information. # # file system mount point type options dump pass proc/proc procdefaults0 0 /dev/sda2 / ext3errors=remount-ro,noatime 0 1 /dev/sda1 /boot ext2defaults,noatime0 2 /dev/sda6 /home ext3defaults,noatime0 2 /dev/sda5 noneswapsw 0 0 to fstab, is it worth minimzing or disabling swap? I've just bought some decent fast kingston drives, like you say it's not worth the risk using cheap drives. -- Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 22:03:20 +0200 Subject: Re: Running on usb flash From: bjohv...@gmail.com To: brianpl...@hotmail.com CC: debian-arm@lists.debian.org I've run several devices from usb flash for years and have always followed the advice of Martin Michlmayr to use -noatime. Through the years I've had a few crashes, but they have consistently been on cheap usb devices. My advice is to use noatime and sandisk memory, other measures give little in return. /B (Skickat från min mobiltelefon, därför kanske något kortfattat.) On Sep 1, 2012 9:55 PM, Brian Platt brianpl...@hotmail.com wrote: I'm running lenny on my nslu2 on a usb flash stick and found a few guides on how to reduce wear and tear on it but not sure which ones are upto date/relevant. Could someone have a look at these and let me know what ones I should be doing is seems ott to do them all. http://www.cyrius.com/debian/nslu2/linux-on-flash.html http://wiki.pcprobleemloos.nl/my_debian_linux_on_the_nslu2_installation_and_configuration_guide/#preventing_flash_writes_reduce_wear_on_flash_memory http://www.rawsontetley.org/ref_slug.html
Re: Running on usb flash
I've run several devices from usb flash for years and have always followed the advice of Martin Michlmayr to use -noatime. Through the years I've had a few crashes, but they have consistently been on cheap usb devices. My advice is to use noatime and sandisk memory, other measures give little in return. /B (Skickat från min mobiltelefon, därför kanske något kortfattat.) On Sep 1, 2012 9:55 PM, Brian Platt brianpl...@hotmail.com wrote: I'm running lenny on my nslu2 on a usb flash stick and found a few guides on how to reduce wear and tear on it but not sure which ones are upto date/relevant. Could someone have a look at these and let me know what ones I should be doing is seems ott to do them all. http://www.cyrius.com/debian/nslu2/linux-on-flash.html http://wiki.pcprobleemloos.nl/my_debian_linux_on_the_nslu2_installation_and_configuration_guide/#preventing_flash_writes_reduce_wear_on_flash_memory http://www.rawsontetley.org/ref_slug.html
Re: QNap Hard drive upgrade (Boot Sequence)
1. Try changing the UUIDs on the new disk to match those of the old disk and leave fstab unchanged. 2. As you mentioned, try not changing to ext4. 3. Try to get help at http://forum.qnap.com/viewforum.php?f=147 4. Get a serial console and run 'update-initramfs -u flash-kernel' from within initramfs-tools accordning to http://www.cyrius.com/journal/debian/orion/d-link/dns-323/fix-initramfs-tools.tbm I'm not sure why it does not work for you. I have done this several time with HDDs and USB thumb drives, albeit not with SSDs. Good luck! /Björn If that does not work you could try a serial console and On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:31 PM, David Pottage da...@electric-spoon.comwrote: It is not working for me. To summarize what I have done, I setup my SSD with the same partition as the original hard drive, but with different sizes, to reflect usage. I kept the /boot partition as ext2, and the root partition as ext3, but changed the format of all other partitions to ext4 so as to have support for trim. When I put the SSD into my Qnap device, and turned it on. I got the status light slow flashing red and green, and LAN light flickering. The box did not respond to pings, or SSH access. I left it in that state for 5 minutes in case it was slow booting. Thing I have tried: I ran fsck on all partitions to check for errors. I changed the mount options in /etc/fstab to remove anything problematic (eg discard on an ext2 partition) I have double checked that the UUIDs are correct. I have connected the SSD to the Qnap device's eSATA port, and confirmed that the Qnap box can access the SSD and mount the partitions. Was it a mistake to change the partition format to ext4 and re-size them? Could there be an issue with the partition layout that is preventing uboot or the kernel from finding what it needs? I have enabled boot logging, but a boot log was not created. Presumably this means that the boot process failed before it could mount /var Can you suggest anything else I might try? Thanks. On 27/05/2012 20:58, Björn Wetterbom wrote: Don't worry, just run rsync -aHX (iirc) from the old disk to the new and update fstab with new UUIDs and it will work. I've done it on several occasions. The kernel is stored in flash memory (if you watch kernel updates, they are always finalized with flash-kernel), so the mbr of the disk is not used. A brief explanation, I know, but the keyboard of my phone isn't that comfy. Use Google for more info. Good luck. (Sent from my phone.) On May 27, 2012 5:06 PM, David Pottage da...@chrestomanci.org wrote: Hello I have a Qnap TS-110, which I am using as a home server for the past year. It runs Debian Squeeze. I have decided to replace the internal hard drive with a much smaller SSD, but I am concerned about how the Kirkwood boot sequence works, and how I make sure that u-boot can find the kernel image and other necessary files to boot on the new SSD drive. Many years ago, when I used desktop based linux distros that used lilo to boot, I recall that the boot block contained raw hard drive offsets to the kernel an intrid image files, and if you moved the files on disc without re-writing the lilo boot block then the boot sequence would fail as the kernel would not be found, despite the fact that the pathname remained the same. Is there a similar issue with u-boot on Kirkwood devices? Do I need to make an exact copy of the boot partition in order for it to work, or is u-boot able to mount and understand the ext2 filesystem and find the boot image by pathname? Are there any similar issues with the root or any other partition on the system? Thank you. -- David Pottage -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fc23e99.1040...@chrestomanci.org
Re: QNap Hard drive upgrade (Boot Sequence)
Update: point 1 below should be the correct answer. A background is at http://forum.qnap.com/viewtopic.php?f=147t=58300 . Please report back. /B On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Björn Wetterbom bjohv...@gmail.com wrote: 1. Try changing the UUIDs on the new disk to match those of the old disk and leave fstab unchanged. 2. As you mentioned, try not changing to ext4. 3. Try to get help at http://forum.qnap.com/viewforum.php?f=147 4. Get a serial console and run 'update-initramfs -u flash-kernel' from within initramfs-tools accordning to http://www.cyrius.com/journal/debian/orion/d-link/dns-323/fix-initramfs-tools.tbm I'm not sure why it does not work for you. I have done this several time with HDDs and USB thumb drives, albeit not with SSDs. Good luck! /Björn If that does not work you could try a serial console and On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:31 PM, David Pottage da...@electric-spoon.comwrote: It is not working for me. To summarize what I have done, I setup my SSD with the same partition as the original hard drive, but with different sizes, to reflect usage. I kept the /boot partition as ext2, and the root partition as ext3, but changed the format of all other partitions to ext4 so as to have support for trim. When I put the SSD into my Qnap device, and turned it on. I got the status light slow flashing red and green, and LAN light flickering. The box did not respond to pings, or SSH access. I left it in that state for 5 minutes in case it was slow booting. Thing I have tried: I ran fsck on all partitions to check for errors. I changed the mount options in /etc/fstab to remove anything problematic (eg discard on an ext2 partition) I have double checked that the UUIDs are correct. I have connected the SSD to the Qnap device's eSATA port, and confirmed that the Qnap box can access the SSD and mount the partitions. Was it a mistake to change the partition format to ext4 and re-size them? Could there be an issue with the partition layout that is preventing uboot or the kernel from finding what it needs? I have enabled boot logging, but a boot log was not created. Presumably this means that the boot process failed before it could mount /var Can you suggest anything else I might try? Thanks. On 27/05/2012 20:58, Björn Wetterbom wrote: Don't worry, just run rsync -aHX (iirc) from the old disk to the new and update fstab with new UUIDs and it will work. I've done it on several occasions. The kernel is stored in flash memory (if you watch kernel updates, they are always finalized with flash-kernel), so the mbr of the disk is not used. A brief explanation, I know, but the keyboard of my phone isn't that comfy. Use Google for more info. Good luck. (Sent from my phone.) On May 27, 2012 5:06 PM, David Pottage da...@chrestomanci.org wrote: Hello I have a Qnap TS-110, which I am using as a home server for the past year. It runs Debian Squeeze. I have decided to replace the internal hard drive with a much smaller SSD, but I am concerned about how the Kirkwood boot sequence works, and how I make sure that u-boot can find the kernel image and other necessary files to boot on the new SSD drive. Many years ago, when I used desktop based linux distros that used lilo to boot, I recall that the boot block contained raw hard drive offsets to the kernel an intrid image files, and if you moved the files on disc without re-writing the lilo boot block then the boot sequence would fail as the kernel would not be found, despite the fact that the pathname remained the same. Is there a similar issue with u-boot on Kirkwood devices? Do I need to make an exact copy of the boot partition in order for it to work, or is u-boot able to mount and understand the ext2 filesystem and find the boot image by pathname? Are there any similar issues with the root or any other partition on the system? Thank you. -- David Pottage -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fc23e99.1040...@chrestomanci.org
Re: QNap Hard drive upgrade (Boot Sequence)
Don't worry, just run rsync -aHX (iirc) from the old disk to the new and update fstab with new UUIDs and it will work. I've done it on several occasions. The kernel is stored in flash memory (if you watch kernel updates, they are always finalized with flash-kernel), so the mbr of the disk is not used. A brief explanation, I know, but the keyboard of my phone isn't that comfy. Use Google for more info. Good luck. (Sent from my phone.) On May 27, 2012 5:06 PM, David Pottage da...@chrestomanci.org wrote: Hello I have a Qnap TS-110, which I am using as a home server for the past year. It runs Debian Squeeze. I have decided to replace the internal hard drive with a much smaller SSD, but I am concerned about how the Kirkwood boot sequence works, and how I make sure that u-boot can find the kernel image and other necessary files to boot on the new SSD drive. Many years ago, when I used desktop based linux distros that used lilo to boot, I recall that the boot block contained raw hard drive offsets to the kernel an intrid image files, and if you moved the files on disc without re-writing the lilo boot block then the boot sequence would fail as the kernel would not be found, despite the fact that the pathname remained the same. Is there a similar issue with u-boot on Kirkwood devices? Do I need to make an exact copy of the boot partition in order for it to work, or is u-boot able to mount and understand the ext2 filesystem and find the boot image by pathname? Are there any similar issues with the root or any other partition on the system? Thank you. -- David Pottage -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-REQUEST@lists.**debian.orgdebian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/**4FC23E99.1040103@chrestomanci.**orghttp://lists.debian.org/4fc23e99.1040...@chrestomanci.org
Re: Support for the D-Link DNS-320?
I don't know about the DNS-320, but I would heartily recommend the QNAP products, preferrably the ones with official Debian support via www.cyrius.com. I'm running two older Qnaps as servers 24/7 with excellent track record. /Björn 2012/2/20 Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br Hi, people. I just saw a guy selling a D-Link DNS-320 and, according to D-Link themselves, these devices run Linux. Looking on the Linux kernel tree I see that there is a file called dns323-setup.c (for the 323), but there is no mention of the 320. Of course, if I happen to buy one of these, I would wipe everything and install a real debian system. So, my question is: are there successful reports of people using the DNS-320? Some googling seems to indicate so, but I don't know which kernel would be appropriate, if everything works correctly etc. Also, is this a good purchase? I would love to get a NAS device that can hold 2 HDs, but I have no brand loyalty and I mostly only care about installing Debian on it. If you happen to know other devices that would be a better choice, I would love to know. Thanks in advance for any recommendation, Rogério Brito. P.S.: As I am not currently subscribed to debian-arm, I would kindly ask if you could include me in CC. -- Rogério Brito : rbrito@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key 4096R/BCFC http://rb.doesntexist.org : Packages for LaTeX : algorithms.berlios.de DebianQA: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rbrito%40ime.usp.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caotrxkogy064pqqfauy+cmvfz0+dbdhacg_q8qucu7eufdu...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Choose kernel in NSLU2
I want to know: a) how can I choose that other linux version boots my system: dpkg-reconfigure what? I believe you want to run flash-kernel to put your desired kernel in flash. Try 'man flash-kernel' as root. b) can I follow the general howto to build my own kernel and make dpkg -i my-kernel.deb ? I'm interested, overall, in (a). Thanks in advance, Xan. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-REQUEST@lists.**debian.orgdebian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/**4EFA1DAC.2040402@telefonica.**nethttp://lists.debian.org/4efa1dac.2040...@telefonica.net
nslu2 does not start - hw error
When pressing the power button on my nslu2 I can hear a click inside the device and the power button lights up briefly. Then it's dead again. After repeating this several times (up to, say, 20 times), the device starts. When it's running I can issue a reboot command without problems. I have tried with two different voltage adapters and the results are the same. I'm guessing something is about to give up on the inside of the nslu2. Is there something anyone knows that can be done about this? TIA Björn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTik0KsameD7Kyk=okfhcrbdl5i_...@mail.gmail.com
Re: QNAP TS-110: how to replace HDD?
What's the output on the serial console? I probably won't be any better than you interpreting it, but perhaps someone else will. On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 17:45, Hardy Griech nt...@mardys.de wrote: On 20.04.2011 10:27, Björn Wetterbom wrote: : You are correct, if you update UUIDs in /etc/fstab, a ' update-initramfs -u ' is required. What you can do is change the UUIDs on the new disk so that they are identical to those of the old disk. Use tune2fs for ext2/3/4 partitions and mkswap for swap partition. I did this on my TS-119 a while back. Forgot to mention in my procedure that I modified the UUIDs with tune2fs to reflect the old state. Nevertheless the system did not start. Perhaps an important 'detail': the new HDD had 2TB, while the old one had 1TB. What I meant with layout did not include the size, only that sda1 was boot for both, sda2 root and sda6 home. Hardy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4daeff8a.4080...@mardys.de
Re: QNAP TS-110: how to replace HDD?
-- Snip --- - how to actually replace the HDD? Since you have the same disk layouts, I would rsync the data from the old to the new disk. Then update /etc/fstab with the UUIDs of the new disk. After that you're good to go. - how to start the Debian installer? With a serial console, use tftp: http://www.cyrius.com/debian/kirkwood/qnap/ts-119/uboot.html - is recovery using DHCP or BOOTP? I don't know. Hardy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dadea44.50...@mardys.de
Re: Re: QNAP TS-110: how to replace HDD?
Yes, the installer can be flashed from the command line. See http://forum.qnap.com/viewtopic.php?f=147t=37149p=164507sid=dee8c64d1a8772fc2325acbebe529079 Disclamer: I don't know if the mentioned commands are valid for TS-110. You are correct, if you update UUIDs in /etc/fstab, a 'update-initramfs -u' is required. What you can do is change the UUIDs on the new disk so that they are identical to those of the old disk. Use tune2fs for ext2/3/4 partitions and mkswap for swap partition. I did this on my TS-119 a while back. /Björn On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 09:42, nt...@mardys.de wrote: Since you have the same disk layouts, I would rsync the data from the old to the new disk. Then update /etc/fstab with the UUIDs of the new disk. After that you're good to go. I tried it actually that way: - same HDD layout - copy data (cp -a) - insert new disk - try to start But that resulted in a non-starting system. It seems to me, that 'update-initramfs -u' is required. - how to start the Debian installer? With a serial console, use tftp: http://www.cyrius.com/debian/kirkwood/qnap/ts-119/uboot.html Any other way directly from the command line? Would be nice to 'activate' the installer running with the old HDD, replace the HDD (prepared as above) and then follow the procedure from http://www.cyrius.com/journal/debian/installer-flash-kernel. Hardy
Re: Suggestions for a SheevaPlug replacement
Or the TS-119, which is fanless. /B On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 15:44, KaruppuSwamy T karuppusw...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I suggest QNAP TS-110, which takes just 5W power. I am very much happy with this home server, powered by Debian Squeeze. It fits well with arm branch of Debian. http://karuppuswamy.com/wordpress/2010/08/04/diy-planning-to-build-home-nas-box-cum-digital-photo-frame/ Regards KaruppuSwamy.T On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 5:12 PM, David Given d...@cowlark.com wrote: Hello, I'm looking for some hardware to replace my elderly SheevaPlug house server --- it's working very well, but there are ongoing niggling problems with USB and storage, and I'd like something with more ports. I'm very intrigued by the new Dreamplug, which looks ideal. Unfortunately it's not cost effective. Here in the UK it would cost 160 pounds (including JTAG module so I get a console), and I can buy a Revo R3700 mini-PC for only 180, and that's got 2GB RAM, a dual-core D525 Atom processor, 160GB HDD, etc. I don't want to switch away from ARM but I've got to be realistic. So can anyone suggest any Debian-friendly hardware I should look at? Ideally I want something with two ethernet ports and eSATA; I've had enough of ethernet via slightly unreliable USB... -- ┌─── dg@cowlark.com ─ http://www.cowlark.com ─ │ │ I have a mind like a steel trap. It's rusty and full of dead mice. │ --- Anonymous, on rasfc
Re: Using nslu2 as remote console
Thank you for your input. Special thanks to Daniel who made me think a little about kernel and bootloader output to the console. I was planning on using the onboard serial, but my solution will now include one of these: http://www.ftdichip.com/Products/Cables/USBTTLSerial.htm I have used it before and it works out of the box on Debian. /Björn On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 16:50, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton l...@lkcl.netwrote: 2011/3/6 Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net: If you're using a separate USB serial adapter, i think you should have no problems, as long as (as you suggest) you don't have a getty or other process attached to the USB device. PL2303-based USB-to-serial converters: available from maplin's for about £15. absolutely great, i use one to connect my laptop - ok _used_ to (it's dead) - to an embedded serial box, ran console on that, worked perfectly. bizarre, going back to 30-year-old technology, but there you go. l. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinbkogp50ovaelxuq+2nedb3uxuw3pihooie...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Reports of successful Squeeze upgrades
Yup, that's it. On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:51, John Winters j...@sinodun.org.uk wrote: On 23/02/11 18:42, Martin Michlmayr wrote: [snip] I upgraded a NSLU2 to squeeze yesterday without any problems but the system was a base system of lenny without any additional software installed. It would be great if other users could comment. So far, I've seen one problem report about the RAID uuid changing. I have a turbo-slug which isn't doing much and is running pretty vanilla Lenny. I could upgrade that to Squeeze as a test case if it would help. Are there any particular parameters which you'd like set first in order to test them? Is it just the usual Edit /etc/apt/sources.list apt-get update apt-get install linux-image-mumble apt-get install udev reboot apt-get upgrade apt-get dist-upgrade ? Cheers, John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d661bf9.8080...@sinodun.org.uk
Reports of successful Squeeze upgrades
Following the recent conversations regarding upgrade problems I would appreciate some success stories before I attempt the upgrade on my (production) machines. Anyone willing to share? Please state your device type as well (I run an NSLU2 and a TS-209 with Lenny). Thanks Björn
Re: flashing fails due to size issue during upgrade
So what's the bottom line of this for the average user? Should I take any precautionary measures before upgrading my slug to Squeeze (I will of course follow the instructions in the release notes)? Is it clear why Jeffrey's ramdisk didn't fit in the flash? Regards Björn On Feb 21, 2011 8:39 PM, Jeffrey B. Green j...@kikisoso.org wrote: On 02/21/2011 11:18 AM, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Jeffrey B. Greenj...@kikisoso.org [2011-02-18 13:53]: # /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf # replace most with dep MODULES=dep Anyone out there know of any pitfalls in this approach?? I.e. are all the crucial modules included in the initrd? Yeah, it should work fine. Make sure to make a backup of your flash before you install the new ramdisk: cat /dev/mtdblock? backup It did indeed reboot okay. I waited about a day or so and then made the plunge. The only thing now that is not working quite right after the upgrade is IPv6 on the overclocked slug. It configures okay from boot on the stock slug. However, the overclocked one doesn't seem to configure the IPv6 interface on boot. Maybe a timing issue. If you have an idea as to why that may be so, then that would be great. Thanks for the feedback regarding the mods. -jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d62bb7f.8010...@kikisoso.org
Re: SD not detected when installing to sheevaplug
Try re-downloading the installer, that solved the modules problem for me. On Jul 17, 2010 4:55 PM, Carles Pagès bona...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to install debian lenny to a sheeva plug following the instructions on Martin's page. When the installer finishes the hardware detection, I get an error stating that no partitionable media was found. I have an SD card in the slot, which I previously had used with a debian tarball (so it should work). Has anyone experienced something similar? During the installation I received a warning that no modules were found for the current kernel? Is this normal or could it be the cause of the error I'm getting? Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktin87cfyyzocag_eeetssyrflmajqtk3rk9_6...@mail.gmail.com
Re: John Holland's eSATA support for the Sheevaplug
I just aked on IRC and was told that the latest blocker was #572618, which was fixed in the kernel upload done yesterday. So hopefully the kernel will move to squeeze soon and then we can update the installer. Can you please announce on the list when this happens. I'm considering an nslu2-to-esatasheeva upgrade. /Björn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktilzg1ruqgs9rqihde8kkxejp_yic81zzynpw...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Managed to brick my sheevaplug -- not getting any serial output
I threw my cable away months ago after big problems with it disconnecting serial access. Now I just use any mini-USB cable lying around. On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:18, Shiva Bhattacharjee shiva...@gmail.com wrote: Is it necessary for me to use the same mini-usb cable that came with the sheevaplug? It seems my host machines ( windows, linux, mac) all recognize the sheevaplug but when I try connecting to the serial port I get nothing... I think I am running into the same problem with the installer as well, . jtag_nsrst_delay: 200 jtag_ntrst_delay: 200 dcc downloads are enabled Error: unable to open ftdi device: device not found Runtime error, file command.c, line 469: openocd FAILED Is the mini USB cable connected? Try powering down, then replugging the Sheevaplug This particular snapshot is from my windows box, but I have installed the ftdi driver and the USB Serial Device shows up both under Device Manager and putty seems to connect on the correct COM4 port, but just doesn't show anything On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com wrote: * Lluís Batlle virik...@gmail.com [2010-03-10 22:41]: The plugcomputer.org wiki or places like that will give you information on how to do that. Exactly. Search for installer v1.0. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/3005d6291003110154s6b556cadx9873f55a11df1...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Managed to brick my sheevaplug -- not getting any serial output
Newer kernels don't use /dev/ttyUSB0 for JTAG. It is used for serial access and no /dev/ttyUSB1 will appear. Check out http://www.openplug.org/plugwiki/index.php/Setting_Up_OpenOCD_Under_Linux On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:29, Lluís Batlle virik...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/3/11 Shiva Bhattacharjee shiva...@gmail.com: Is it necessary for me to use the same mini-usb cable that came with the sheevaplug? It seems my host machines ( windows, linux, mac) all recognize the sheevaplug but when I try connecting to the serial port I get nothing... I think I am running into the same problem with the installer as well, . jtag_nsrst_delay: 200 jtag_ntrst_delay: 200 dcc downloads are enabled Error: unable to open ftdi device: device not found Device not found? Are you sure your system has /dev/ttyUSB0 in place, after connecting the cable? You should configure openocd to access that device. In a typical udev-enabled linux, you will see /dev/ttyUSB0 only with the cable connected. Regards, Lluís. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/45219fb01003110229n36771deemd43ddc401bd25...@mail.gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/3005d6291003111400r4fd454d0se09997fdc0017...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Very newbe help/pointers required about building a distribution from scratch
Could Linux from scratch provide you with at least some of the information you need? http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/ On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 19:10, Jonathan Wilson piercing_m...@hotmail.com wrote: Ok I'm quite a newbe to both Linux and PC development, however I know what I want to do but don't know where to start! What I'd like to know is how do I build a distribution entirely from scratch/source like the pro's do. ie. Get all the debian source for the latest arm port (just the source) and then compile/build it till I have a working system. Why would I want to do this? Well first of I want to optimize the final code to specific processors (OMAP3530 and ARM926EJ-S) and also customise the builds to use different application/graphic components such as gnome, E17, samba, etc. I also figure this is a great way to learn about Linux/debian and fixing any bugs will give me some insight into the various languages (C/C++ specifically) I'm sure there must be some product or methodoligy that the pro's use to build debian distributions with different tweaks where the code has to branch (eg, Ubuntu desktop V NBR) so that all the common code remains common and some kinds of config files then set the options (some kind of global system makefile? or .config file?) Surely its not a case of downloading each package source manually, checking that all the dependents are downloaded, then manually doing a make config / make / make install for each and every package and having one directory structure for each distribution? Any pointers would be welcome as google is not my friend as I can't find anything about taking a current distribution and compiling the whole. (it did find stuff about making packages, and rebuilding an already installed distribution, both of which are not what I want, lol) JonXx -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/blu0-smtp589ce1ec813b4cac037faa98...@phx.gbl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/3005d6291003101108g32166979vaf02b5de6dfba...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Very newbe help/pointers required about building a distribution from scratch
It was a while ago since I did any reading on LFS, but as far as I can remember it simply gives you instructions on how to build a custom Linux OS from scratch by downloading all the sources one by one yourself. I guess that means that the answer to all of your questions is no. 2010/3/10 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton l...@lkcl.net: 2010/3/10 Björn Wetterbom bjohv...@gmail.com: Could Linux from scratch provide you with at least some of the information you need? is that available for debian? does it rebuild _debian_ packages, entirely and recursively, recreating a debian mirror with a specific set of architecture-specific compiled packages? l. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/3005d6291003101131v192169fbrcab97928a8ac5...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Alternative to using USB-Stick as mass storage on NSLU2
I've used a Freecom 2.5 drive for a couple of years with good results. USB powered of course. I've also used an external WD 3.5 drive which I am very pleased with, and since WD offers a wide variety of 2.5 drives at good prices I would go for one of those. /Björn On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 18:02, u7l1...@mail.lrz-muenchen.de wrote: John Holland wrote You could use a 2.5 HDD. The Momentus has a typical usage specified @ 1.5W seek and .7W idle. Thanks for pointing out the low energy consumption of modern 2.5 HDs. Since others mentioned that SD is even less suitable for my purpose, I think I'll go that route. Can anybody recommend a specific model of an external 2.5 drive that works well with a slug under Debian (Lenny armel), preferably USB-powered so I don't need an extra power supply? I've read a lot on nslu2-linux.org about spindown issues with HDs connected to a slug. Since my slug is logging data continuously 24/7, I guess I shouldn't let the HD spin down at all. Is that assumption correct? Regards, Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/64062.84.150.195.114.1266512576.squir...@webmail.lrz-muenchen.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/3005d6291002180955g2be49839w3ea5270e09492...@mail.gmail.com
News from GlobalScale Technologies
Have you guys seen the coming products from GST? (Announced Jan 24 according to the web site.) http://www.globalscaletechnologies.com/c-4-guruplugs.aspx Incredible what they can pack into these things, the new plugs look sooo cool. The only thing I can't figure out is the configuration of the two version of the GuruPlug Display. One is said to have HDMI, and the other touch panel display. But neither can be seen in the pictures. Anyone got a clue? /Björn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Need help to boot debian on USB with more devices connected
Isn't this a well known issue with usb-booted devices? See e.g. http://www.nslu2-linux.org/wiki/Debian/TroubleShooting (section The slug fails to reboot with 2 drives connected). I guess you have already figured out that you can boot by detaching all devices except the boot disk. Will it perhaps be solved when (if?) Squeeze introduces UUIDs in /etc/fstab, or is it an unsolvable problem since the kernel doesn't pick up the boot device from /etc/fstab (according to the above link)? Hmm, seems I came up with more questions than answers. Help, anyone? /Björn On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 21:19, Douglas Lopes Pereira douglaslopespere...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, I'm trying to power up my Sheeva Plug (which is configured to boot Martin's debian from USB drive) with my USB drive connected over an USB hub with other devices on it (i.e Usb headset). Uboot identifies the devices connected but does not recognize my USB drive and get stuck. This is what I see from my terminal: === TERMINAL OUTPUT = U-Boot 1.1.4 (May 13 2009 - 13:10:52) Marvell version: 3.4.16 U-Boot code: 0060 - 0067FFF0 BSS: - 006CF100 Soc: 88F6281 A0 (DDR2) CPU running @ 1200Mhz L2 running @ 400Mhz SysClock = 400Mhz , TClock = 200Mhz DRAM CAS Latency = 5 tRP = 5 tRAS = 18 tRCD=6 DRAM CS[0] base 0x size 256MB DRAM CS[1] base 0x1000 size 256MB DRAM Total size 512MB 16bit width Flash: 0 kB Addresses 8M - 0M are saved for the U-Boot usage. Mem malloc Initialization (8M - 7M): Done NAND:512 MB CPU : Marvell Feroceon (Rev 1) Streaming disabled Write allocate disabled USB 0: host mode PEX 0: interface detected no Link. Net: egiga0 [PRIME], egiga1 Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0 (Re)start USB... USB: scanning bus for devices... USB device not responding, giving up (status=20) 4 USB Device(s) found scanning bus for storage devices... === TERMINAL OUTPUT = Does anyone know how to boot my system without removing other stuff from my usb hub? Thanks for your attention. Regards, Douglas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: QNAP TS 209 software RAID?
I have run hardware raid in the past, and have heard opinions from several others. To make a long story short, software raid is now the only way I go. I believe the TS-209 does not support hardware raid. I run software raid 1 on mine with an excellent track record. On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 16:56, Zarick Lauzar...@gmail.com wrote: Hi list, I've recently bought a QNAP TS 209 and I'm going to install debian on it. While I've started the debian installer, I just think I missed one thing. Does this box provide hardware RAID? As I never used hardware RAID before, and QNAP website haven't said anything about how the RAID functionality is implemented in the original firmware. I believe it should be software RAID only, but want to get some advice here! Best regards, Zarick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Sheevaplug late? - Call them!
Seems to me that several people have reported a speedy delivery of their sheevaplug after calling Globalscale. Yesterday the same thing happened to me. When calling (+1-714-632-9239), I was told that expected delivery was a week or more away, which would have meant a total delivery time of more than six weeks. Four hours later, a tracking number was issued by FedEx. Coincidence? I think not. Now I must quickly get my hands on a suitable usb stick, while waiting for Martins tar ball to work on my SD card. Huge amount of cred to Martin for his outstanding work. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [SheevaPlug] Order not received
Well, I ordered mine on the 30th of March and I'm still waiting for any word on when delivery will be. The only clue is given at http://www.globalscaletechnologies.com/c-2-globalscale-technologies-products.aspx It would be nice if any list member that receives a plug could announce this on the list. On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 17:39, Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Encouraged to help on the sheevaplug debian integration, I ordered a while ago (3/10/2009) from GlobalScale Technologies such device, but it never arrived to my place. I am not sure if you have had similar troubles. I have mailed them a couple or three times with no answer. Kind Regards, Hector Oron -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Regarding Kirkwood cpu support
I'd love to help out to the best of my abilities. Please tell me how. 2009/3/25 Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org: On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 04:56:37PM +0100, Björn Wetterbom wrote: What kind of time frames are we talking about when it comes to Debian support for Kirkwood for us ordinary users who don't compile our own kernels and want our machine to start every day, every time? Will initial support consist of install packages from Martin or others, and official Debian support be available only in Debian Squeeze? That's what it looks like for now. The reason I am asking is that I am thinking Should I buy a SheevaPlug now or wait a couple of months? I'd suggest the latter, unless you want to help out -- there are ways to do that, even if you don't know how to write code. -- Lo-lan-do Home is where you have to wash the dishes. -- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Regarding Kirkwood cpu support
What kind of time frames are we talking about when it comes to Debian support for Kirkwood for us ordinary users who don't compile our own kernels and want our machine to start every day, every time? Will initial support consist of install packages from Martin or others, and official Debian support be available only in Debian Squeeze? The reason I am asking is that I am thinking Should I buy a SheevaPlug now or wait a couple of months? On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:30, Lennert Buytenhek buyt...@wantstofly.org wrote: On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 09:34:18AM +0100, Thomas Boehne wrote: On the 6281 at 1.2 GHz, I get wire speed TCP transmit when GSO is enabled, and wire speed TCP receive when LRO is enabled (which mv643xx_eth supports since recently -- it's currently in net-next). Wirespeed sounds extremely interesting. I guess the CPU load is near 100% then, correct? Thanks for your input so far. CPU load on wire speed TCP receive is ~70% when copying everything to userspace (i.e. a userland recv() loop on the socket). When discarding all the data in kernelspace (e.g. splice() to /dev/null, with a hack to make sure that the linear part of skbuffs doesn't get copied into a separate area first or with a patch to make mv643xx_eth receive into pages), it's closer to ~30%. This are measured with cyclesoak with MTU=1500, and are pretty consistent. CPU load on wire speed TCP transmit is pretty variable, due to GSO behaving eratically when there isn't enough CPU to transmit wire speed without using GSO. (I.e. it seems that GSO will always converge into a stable state where it will saturate the wire at the same low CPU usage if the CPU is powerful enough to transmit wire speed without using GSO, but if you only get ~90MB/s-ish without using GSO, it seems that there are different stable states you can get into depending on burstiness of ACKs from the other side and some other factors. So sometimes it converges to 2 real segments per GSO skbuff and stays there, sometimes to 3 real segments per GSO skbuff, etc.) I sent some emails about this to netdev@ some time ago, but didn't find a good way of dealing with this yet. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Regarding Kirkwood cpu support
I just joined the list and sifted through a couple of months of the archive. With regards to Martin Michlmayr starting up work on Kirkwood support ( http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2009/02/msg00057.html) I wanted to share a link concerning a Kirkwood application: http://techreport.com/discussions.x/16466 Although 512 Mb worth of flash is a bit tiny (I mean, what would it cost to add another 4 Gb?) it's a neat application. I'm sure I could think of some cool use for it. While I'm at it, thank you Martin for all your work! I just upgraded my nslu2 to armel. That and my ts209 are so much fun.