Re: DSA concerns for jessie architectures

2013-06-22 Thread Dr. David Alan Gilbert
* Martin Zobel-Helas (zo...@debian.org) wrote:
 [please consider replacing debian-ports@ldo with the appropriate port
 specific list when replying.]

 
 * armel: no remote management (being worked on); no archive kernel for
   the machines we use.
 
 * armhf: no remote management (being worked on).

Generally I've seen most ARM boards managed via separate PDUs and
serial concentrators; there are ARM systems that as I understand
are built for remote management - but if you've got PDUs setup
then you can control nigh on anything; and given the current draw
on many of those machines it doesn't need to be expensive PDUs,
simple USB driven relay setups can be sufficient (although
it gets hairier if you want to control hard drive power etc).

Dave
-- 
 -Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ---   
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert|   Running GNU/Linux   | Happy  \ 
\ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org |   | In Hex /
 \ _|_ http://www.treblig.org   |___/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130622175739.GB25102@gallifrey



Re: [Arm-netbook] small exynos5 pc (ARM Cortex A15, 2gb RAM)

2012-11-03 Thread Dr. David Alan Gilbert
* luke.leighton (luke.leigh...@gmail.com) wrote:
 [cc to arm-netbook and debian-arm, please bear in mind arm-netbook is
 subscriber-only]
 
 this is just to let people know that i had a fascinating conversation
 with insignal's director, today.  insignal do the
 http:/arndaleboard.org/ which is the developer board containing the
 Exynos5 ARM Cortex A15 SoC.  he mentioned that they've been madly busy
 getting the arndaleboard ready, working very very hard, so are going a
 little easier on themselves before releasing the source code etc.
 which kinda makes sense and explains the dec2012 release of the linux
 kernel source etc.
 
 but, the very interesting thing he mentioned was their plans to do a
 $99 PC using the same CPU Board.  as it would have SATA and so on as
 well as 2gb of RAM i get the impression that they could well be
 overwhelmed with enquiries and orders, just from the free software
 community alone, so as a community can i please encourage people to
 take it easy on them and let them do the official announcements etc.
 so that, apart from anything, they can focus!
 
 the reason why i'm mentioning it on here, unofficially, is to gather
 some informal input as to whether people would be interested in such a
 device before contacting insignal again; what sort of features, uses
 etc. what would people be prepared to pay for an initial run of 100 to
 200 units as a test-run, and so on.

Either multiple ether or a PCI-e slot to add a multiport ether card.
Bonus for multiple PCI-e slots.

Dave
-- 
 -Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ---   
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert|   Running GNU/Linux   | Happy  \ 
\ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org |   | In Hex /
 \ _|_ http://www.treblig.org   |___/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121103175841.GA14592@gallifrey



Re: [Arm-netbook] ARM port(s) BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread Dr. David Alan Gilbert
* Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton (l...@lkcl.net) wrote:
 On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp wrote:
  Hi,
 
  On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:35:44 +0100
  Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
  buildds
  ===
 
  Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We
  don't have any ARM server hardware yet, so we're stuck using
  development boards as build machines. They work, but they're a PITA
  for hosting and they're not designed for 24x7 usage like we're doing
  so they're not that reliable.
 
   As I've posted during DebConf(*), Maybe OpenBlocks can solve this problem.
   It has 2GB RAM, reliable production use and we can buy it NOW.
 
   *) http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2012/07/msg7.html
 
  hideki, those look superb.  summarising (in case anyone's missed it):
 they're armv7 compatible because they're using a marvell xp processor;
 they're up to dual-core 1.4ghz and the company openblocks can do them
 with up to 3gb of RAM, and i gather the openblocks boxes have a mini
 pci-e port as well as gigabit ethernet.

ftp://ftp.plathome.co.jp/pub/OBSAX3/Documents/OBSA_UsersGuide_1.0.0.pdf

seems to be the (Japanese) user guide for it.  Now, erm I don't know
any Japanese at all, but there are lots of very pretty diagrams in there.
But the picture on 4/24, and table 1.4 on section 6/24
shows the OBSAX3/4/x with an Armada XP, 1.33GHz dual core,
1GB SDRAM, a SODIMM that takes 1 or 2GB (more??), SATA2, Mini PCIe,
4 () GigE, eSATA, 2xUSB2, and 2xRS-232C.

Very nice!  Pity it says available in japan only.

  i'm including arm-netbooks because there may almost certainly be
 people on that list who would be interested in a group buy.  there has
 been quite a bit of interest in getting hold of modular computing
 devices for rack-mounted server usage.

Dave
-- 
 -Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ---   
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert|   Running GNU/Linux   | Happy  \ 
\ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org |   | In Hex /
 \ _|_ http://www.treblig.org   |___/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120720222832.GA637@gallifrey