Re: Hints for packages that produces udeb
* Otavio Salvador [Sat, 18 Aug 2007 01:26:19 -0300]: unblock busybox/1:1.1.3-5 Please remove gnu-fdisk from block list since it doesn't build udebs anymore. Both done. Thanks, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Listening to: Bambino - Voy a perder -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
linux-latest-2.6 update in stable incomplete
Hi folks The linux-latest-2.6 update in 4.0r1 was incomplete. arm still have the version 6, anything else 6etch1. This is a serious problem as arm will be uninstallable now and no machine gets new security uploads. Bastian -- ... The prejudices people feel about each other disappear when they get to know each other. -- Kirk, Elaan of Troyius, stardate 4372.5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: binNMU of rootskel for stable
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 01:26:05AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please RM team, Could you please schedule binNMUs to stable for rootskel? Please make it easy for the one scheduling the binNMUs by being accurate: rootskel_1.50, 1, Rebuild against klibc_1.4.34-2, alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc Adding a dep-wait libklibc-dev (=1.4.34-2) Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-latest-2.6 update in stable incomplete
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 01:20:11PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: Hi folks The linux-latest-2.6 update in 4.0r1 was incomplete. arm still have the version 6, anything else 6etch1. This is a serious problem as arm will be uninstallable now and no machine gets new security uploads. I'm sure this is my fault, sorry about that. Is it possible to update this before r2? I can build/upload an arm pkg, but probably not before Monday (I'll need to go physically reset my netwinder). -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-latest-2.6 update in stable incomplete
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 02:10:16PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 01:20:11PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: Hi folks The linux-latest-2.6 update in 4.0r1 was incomplete. arm still have the version 6, anything else 6etch1. This is a serious problem as arm will be uninstallable now and no machine gets new security uploads. I'm sure this is my fault, sorry about that. Is it possible to update this before r2? By definition, no; pushing a new package into stable is pushing a point release. Unfortunately this isn't the only regression in r1, so there's some incentive to have r2 happen soon. I can build/upload an arm pkg, but probably not before Monday (I'll need to go physically reset my netwinder). I imagine that's soon enough, I don't think folks are going to be ready to do an r2 before then. :) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327712: marked as done (debootstrap: Fail bootstrapping a working sarge)
Your message dated Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:33:26 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327712: A bit more investigation on this issue has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: debootstrap Version: 0.3.1.5 Severity: important Hi, I tried bootstrapping sarge with the new debootstrap, and even if the bootstrapping itself is successful the resulting system fails to boot. (I tried to boot it under the xen vmm). In particular after starting cron the system hangs and starts complaining about id 1 respawning too fast. The procedure instead works for debootstrap 0.2.45-0.2. Thanks! :) Guido ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 05:31:44PM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote: I still haven't tried if installing udev before booting it solves the problem, but if that can helps I might try... No new informations for more than a year, I am thus closing this bug report. In the meantime, xen-tools has entered Debian and can be used to install Debian systems inside Xen virtual machines easily. It is a wrapper around debootstrap which should setup everything nicely. Cheers, -- Jérémy Bobbio.''`. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `- signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#296738: IBM NetVista fails to identify cdrom with module piix
tags 296738 + moreinfo thanks On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 02:10:05PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: Workaround: start the installation in expert mode. disable loading the module 'piix' when probing for modules to detect the CD. Strangely enough the module appeared on the list of modules for the network adapter. piix still got into the initrd and thus the CD was not accessible after the boot and thus the CD was not accessible in the installed system. Luckily for me I did not need the installer at the second boot stage. The problem seems to also exist in the daily build of 20050223. Both in kernel 2.4 and in kernel 2.6 of both builds. Can you still reproduce this bug with recent version of the debian-installer? Cheers, -- Jérémy Bobbio.''`. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#248163: marked as done (debian-installer bug)
Your message dated Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:47:42 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#248163: debian-installer bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: debian-installer During the module reading phase from a floppy disk, if the read fails (just pull the floppy out for example) then it fails to unmount the media so further attempts fail. Tested using boot floppies for beta 4 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 02:53:41PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: I tried to reproduce this in vmware and cannot, it unmounts the floppy after displaying the first error screen. This unproducible bug has been opened 3 years ago. I am closing it as I don't expect any progress on it. Cheers, -- Jérémy Bobbio.''`. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `- signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#301211: hw-detect: loading of ata_piix before ide-generic hides detection of ide cdrom for Dell PowerEdge 750
tags 301211 + moreinfo thanks On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 02:46:05PM +0100, Finn-Arne Johansen wrote: I set up the poweredge first with the 2.4 kernel, which work without problem, but left the sata disks in ata-33 modus. Then I tried to use the 2.6 kernel, but then the installer was unable to find the cdrom afterwards. I guess I could have finished of the installation if I had installed from pxe, but I didn't do that. Then I Tried to skip the loading of ata_piix when the installer searched for drivers for the CDrom. Everythig went well after that. Can you reproduce this bug on a recent version of the debian-installer? Cheers, -- Jérémy Bobbio.''`. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#405627: debootstrap: /etc/hosts is needed to run pbuilder
Hi Junichi, On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 12:19:51AM -0200, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote: Package: debootstrap The /etc/hosts file isn't copied to destination by debootstrap and the pbuilder command needs this file to work correctly. Without /etc/hosts the pbuilder create command shows: E: /etc/hosts does not exist, your setup is insane. fix it cp: cannot stat `/etc/hosts': No such file or directory - Aborting with an error Do you have any comments on the previous bug report? What should be the correct behaviour for debootstrap? Isn't the problem avoided when pbuilder create is used? Cheers, -- Jérémy Bobbio.''`. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#341905: /etc/debian_chroot
tags 341905 + moreinfo thanks On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 12:19:45AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: Package: debootstrap please write a /etc/debian_chroot file containing a string for identifying the chroot. This information can (and is currently) be used i.e. in shell prompts. I am not totally sure that I understand your wish: * Do you want debootstrap to create /etc/debian_chroot while it is actually running and delete it afterwards? * Do you want debootstrap to create /etc/debian_chroot in the process that would be left in the result? Cheers, -- Jérémy Bobbio.''`. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#296738: IBM NetVista fails to identify cdrom with module piix
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 296738 + moreinfo Bug#296738: IBM NetVista fails to identify cdrom with module piix There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#301211: hw-detect: loading of ata_piix before ide-generic hides detection of ide cdrom for Dell PowerEdge 750
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 301211 + moreinfo Bug#301211: hw-detect: loading of ata_piix before ide-generic hides detection of ide cdrom for Dell PowerEdge 750 There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#341905: /etc/debian_chroot
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 341905 + moreinfo Bug#341905: /etc/debian_chroot There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#220509: marked as done (prompts for unnecessary driver floppy)
Your message dated Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:50:37 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#220509: also in 'sarge-i386-businescard.iso' (11 Nov 2003) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: installation Version: 2003-11-12 Severity: minor debian-installer prompts for a driver floppy, even though the driver for my NIC is already installed and, once I decline, is autodetected. -- Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 05:43:42PM +1030, Paul Schulz wrote: When installing modules for networking (lot of modules are tried) the dialog pops for manual entry of module parameters, for almost every module. Newer versions of the debian-installer will not ask for modules to load (and their options) except in expert mode. I am thus closing this bug report. Cheers, -- Jérémy Bobbio.''`. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `- signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#299610: hw-detect select de4x5 instead of tulip
tags 299610 + moreinfo thanks On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 12:01:32PM +0100, sferriol wrote: Package: hw-detect i test d-i with a network card SMC dec 21140 chip. hw-detect loads de4x5 module, no error displayed by modprobe, but the card do not work after ifconfig. (earing a 'click' when trying to access network) i tried in console the tulip module, and it works ( earing a double 'click' when trying to access network). Can you still reproduce this bug on a recent version of the debian-installer? Cheers, -- Jérémy Bobbio.''`. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#299610: hw-detect select de4x5 instead of tulip
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 299610 + moreinfo Bug#299610: hw-detect select de4x5 instead of tulip There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#279195: marked as done (issues when booting 2.4 to install 2.6)
Your message dated Sat, 18 Aug 2007 13:36:19 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#279195: installation report (bug: CDROM not detected) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: 27/10/2004 http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/cd-images/debian-weekly/ pre-rc2? uname -a: Linux dione 2.6.8 #1 Sat Sep 4 18:05:26 CEST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 30/10/2004 Method: How did you install? From weekly CDROM images, What did you boot off? CD#1 Machine: Dell Dimension XPS T600 Processor: Pentium III Memory: 512Mb Root Device: /dev/sda1 Root Size/partition table: /dev/sda1 1 608 4883728+ 83 Linux / /dev/sda2 609 670 498015 82 Linux swap /dev/sda3 6711278 4883760 83 Linux empty /dev/sda412792213 7510387+ 83 Linux /pub Output of lspci and lspci -n: :00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX Host bridge (rev 03) :00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX AGP bridge (rev 03) :00:07.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 02) :00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01) :00:07.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 USB (rev 01) :00:07.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 02) :00:0d.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c900 10Mbps Combo [Boomerang] :00:0e.0 Multimedia audio controller: Ensoniq ES1371 [AudioPCI-97] (rev 06) :00:0f.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c900B-TPC Etherlink XL [Cyclone] (rev 04) :00:10.0 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec AHA-2940UW Pro / AIC-788x (rev 01) :00:11.0 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec AHA-2940U2/U2W :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA G400 AGP (rev 05) :00:00.0 0600: 8086:7190 (rev 03) :00:01.0 0604: 8086:7191 (rev 03) :00:07.0 0601: 8086:7110 (rev 02) :00:07.1 0101: 8086:7111 (rev 01) :00:07.2 0c03: 8086:7112 (rev 01) :00:07.3 0680: 8086:7113 (rev 02) :00:0d.0 0200: 10b7:9001 :00:0e.0 0401: 1274:1371 (rev 06) :00:0f.0 0200: 10b7:9006 (rev 04) :00:10.0 0100: 9004:8778 (rev 01) :00:11.0 0100: 9005:0010 :01:00.0 0300: 102b:0525 (rev 05) Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [ ] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [E] Comments/Problems: When I got the very end of the install and rebooted into the base system everything seemed fine. But already it wasn't. I continued and when I got to the apt-based installation then I kept receiving the CDROM wasn't detected (sorry, can't remember exact message) And indeed if I tried to manually mount it then it failed. It seemed that 'ide-generic' had not been loaded because it wasn't in /etc/modules. I modprobe'd it and added it and then reran the step and it was fine. Install logs and other status info is available in /var/log/debian-installer/. Okay, but I'm not attaching them - syslog is a bit big :-) I'll keep the files, so if you want them, or more info, then just ask. Alexis ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 12:56:46PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Alexis Huxley wrote: I started with the (current) weekly CDROM images via bittorrent, then when prompted for which kernel to install I selected the newest non-SMP, non-AMD 686, which was 2.6.8. Ok so you did the install using a 2.4 kernel and in expert mode, and manaully choose a 2.6 kernel. That could explain why it added the wrong module to /etc/modules, because it checks the running installer kernel. As recent version of the debian-installer does not support 2.4 kernels anymore, I am closing this (old) bug report. Cheers, -- Jérémy Bobbio.''`. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install
Bug#405627: debootstrap: /etc/hosts is needed to run pbuilder
Hi, On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 12:19:51AM -0200, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote: Package: debootstrap The /etc/hosts file isn't copied to destination by debootstrap and the pbuilder command needs this file to work correctly. Without /etc/hosts the pbuilder create command shows: E: /etc/hosts does not exist, your setup is insane. fix it cp: cannot stat `/etc/hosts': No such file or directory - Aborting with an error Do you have any comments on the previous bug report? What should be the correct behaviour for debootstrap? I don't think it has been clearly defined, however, in practical terms, /etc/hosts is a machine-dependent configuration. Copying /etc/hosts to be the same might not be a good idea, since debootstrap can create chroots for use on other machines. Isn't the problem avoided when pbuilder create is used? Yes. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
