Moving the spellchecker to d-i.d.o

2009-05-21 Thread Davide Viti
Hi,
I was reading the IRC conversation backlog, in particular:


19:53  bubulle luk_: moving l10n-sync requires some coordination with david-e 
 as he's using an all-po.tar.gz file that's produced by the script (for the 
spellchecker)
19:54  bubulle and moving the spellchecker to d-i.d.o might be tricky as 
david-e is not DD
19:56  luk_ is the spellchecker in a VCS?
19:57  luk_ if so, then it should be rather easy to get updates deployed
20:01  bubulle luk_: yes, the spellchecker is in scripts/l10n/spellcheck
20:02  bubulle I don't exactly know how david-e is running itwhich is 
actually a good argument to ask him about this
20:02  luk_ sure, coordinating with him before doing anything is the best 
course of action


we have a couple of options here: 
1.
the easiest would be to leave the spellchecker scripts on Alioth and just
wget all-po.tar.gz from d-i.d.o rather than copying it from a local
directory. really trivial to fix as it would mean changing only cfg/update_po.sh

2.
everything can otherwise be moved to another server: this would mean
setting up a daily cronjob and fix a few paths in config files.
Havne't touched the spellchecker since a few years now and I can't remember
how to do it by heart. Of course I'd have no problems to help with this
though.

just let me know what you think it would be best

regards,
Davide


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Customize Debian Installer GUI and Debian Installer Text mode

2009-05-21 Thread Joaquin Manuel
Hi, on first place I'm sorry for my bad English.

I'm building a Debian based distro for internal use on my work.

I have to change Debian Installer Graphical Interface for adding the
bussiness logo and change some colours, but I can't find the logo and
colours. Also I can't find where to change the Text Interface colours. At
the moment I have changed the splash image and boot menu colours.

I had used SimpleCDD for building the distro, I've extracted the ISO on a
Directory and searched for the logo and searched along various files to
change the menu colours but I can't find it.

¿Can anybody tell me where are the files to change or the way to do that?

I've searched on Google, Debian Wiki, forums, etc. but i can't find
anything.

I know that it's possible because some Debian Based Distros had done, for
example Linex and Guadalinex.

Thank you for your help.

-- 
Joaquín Manuel Llano Montero

Linux Registered User #481540


Re: Customize Debian Installer GUI and Debian Installer Text mode

2009-05-21 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 21 May 2009, Joaquin Manuel wrote:
 ¿Can anybody tell me where are the files to change or the way to do
 that?

In the initrd for the graphical installer:
- logo and icons: /usr/share/graphics/
- theme definition (colors): /usr/share/themes/Clearlooks/gtk-2.0/gtkrc

Both are included in the rootskel-gtk source package. The best way to 
customize your version of the installer is to modify that and build a 
custom version of the installer using it.

For more information, see http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/doc/internals/.

Cheers,
FJP


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: user-setup (1.24)

2009-05-21 Thread Adeodato Simó
+ Frans Pop (Thu, 21 May 2009 00:12:59 +0200):

 + ... dpkg -s passwd | sed -n '/^Version:/s,^Version: ,,p')

FWIW that can be written just as `sed -n 's/^Version: //p'`, since p
will only print if a substitution was made, but what you probably want
is `dpkg-query -W -f '${Version}\n' passwd`, which TTBOMK is the
preferred interface for such queries.

HTH,

-- 
- Are you sure we're good?
- Always.
-- Rory and Lorelai


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Unneeded packages being installed

2009-05-21 Thread Adeodato Simó
+ Frans Pop (Wed, 20 May 2009 20:00:39 +0200):

 On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
  Still using the minimal install example (without selection standard
  system nor other task), shouldn't them have their priority lowered
  then?

 Possibly. But that is something that probably should have been done 
 *before* lenny was released. I doubt the FTP masters would be willing to 
 correct it now.

 But that is where this issue should be reported: against the
 ftp.debian.org pseudo package; it is not a Debian Installer issue.

No. The priority of the libraries is correct, at least correct according
to the ongoing policy no package should depend on a package of lower
priority. That's why those libraries are in important/standard, because
some package there depends on them.

I realize that with that, the correct solution is tricky, since it'd
involve debootstrap doing smart things with library packages, and
treating them specially.

-- 
- Are you sure we're good?
- Always.
-- Rory and Lorelai


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Unneeded packages being installed

2009-05-21 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi!

On Thu, 21 May 2009 16:46:07 +0200
Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es wrote:

 + Frans Pop (Wed, 20 May 2009 20:00:39 +0200):
 
  On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
   Still using the minimal install example (without selection
   standard system nor other task), shouldn't them have their
   priority lowered then?
 
  Possibly. But that is something that probably should have been done 
  *before* lenny was released. I doubt the FTP masters would be
  willing to correct it now.
 
  But that is where this issue should be reported: against the
  ftp.debian.org pseudo package; it is not a Debian Installer issue.
 
 No. The priority of the libraries is correct, at least correct
 according to the ongoing policy no package should depend on a
 package of lower priority. That's why those libraries are in
 important/standard, because some package there depends on them.

So it seems that I will receive a No, you are wrong from #529657 :-(

And just in case, with a daily-built Debian image, the list of libs
without any packages depending on them (packages from a minimal Debian
install) is:

libconsole
libgnutls26
libsasl2-2
libusb-1.0-0

And after their removal it's also possible to remove:

libdb4.6
libgcrypt11
libasn1-3
libgpg-error0

Best regards,
Nelson


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Unneeded packages being installed

2009-05-21 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 21 May 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:
 + Frans Pop (Wed, 20 May 2009 20:00:39 +0200):
  On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
   Still using the minimal install example (without selection
   standard system nor other task), shouldn't them have their
   priority lowered then?
 
  Possibly. But that is something that probably should have been done
  *before* lenny was released. I doubt the FTP masters would be willing
  to correct it now.
 
  But that is where this issue should be reported: against the
  ftp.debian.org pseudo package; it is not a Debian Installer issue.

 No. The priority of the libraries is correct, at least correct
 according to the ongoing policy no package should depend on a package
 of lower priority. That's why those libraries are in
 important/standard, because some package there depends on them.

If there _is_ a package with prio Important that depends on them, then why 
isn't that package getting installed?
I did not check really carefully, but for libsasl2-2 and libgnutls26 I did 
not see any such packages in the list of reverse deps, only ones of prio 
Standard. Which would mean that those libs should also be prio Standard, 
not Important.

I reported a number of priority inconsistencies myself before the release 
and those were fixed. But it seems as if the FTP masters have not done an 
extensive check for Lenny to update all such inconsistencies. IIRC such 
checks were done for past releases.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Unneeded packages being installed

2009-05-21 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 16:46:07 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:

 No. The priority of the libraries is correct, at least correct according
 to the ongoing policy no package should depend on a package of lower
 priority. That's why those libraries are in important/standard, because
 some package there depends on them.
 
Last I checked nothing = important depended on libgnutls26...  Also,
since debootstrap installs everything with that priority, if something
depended on those libs they wouldn't be flagged by deborphan.

Cheers,
Julien


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Unneeded packages being installed

2009-05-21 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 21 May 2009, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
 And just in case, with a daily-built Debian image, the list of libs
 without any packages depending on them (packages from a minimal Debian
 install) is:

For daily built images at the current stage of the release cycle this 
really isn't very interesting. It's much more important that such things 
get cleaned up in the last few months before a new stable release, when 
libraries are frozen (at least for ABI changes).

Example:
 libdb4.6

This one had to be prio Important up to the time iproute was updated to 
libdb4.7. This older version of the lib will disappear automatically when 
all remaining packages that depend on it have also been updated to 4.7.

The same is probably true for some of the others.
Which is exactly why this is not interesting for daily builds: there is 
simply too much flux with ABI changes in libs. It would be way too much 
work for essentially no gain to try to keep up with that at this point.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#529860: [INTL:sv] Swedish strings for console-setup debconf

2009-05-21 Thread Martin Bagge

package: console-setup
severity: wishlist
tags: patch l10n

Please consider to add this file to translation of debconf.

-- 
brother
http://frakalendern.se



sv.po
Description: Binary data


Bug#529862: switching from xorg to console and you have to rexec dpkg-reconfigure console-setup

2009-05-21 Thread Javier Barroso
Package: console-setup
Version: 1.36
Severity: normal

*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi,

Every time I go from X to vt a I have to exec dpkg-reconfigure
console-setup and select the same options.

Seems like dpkg-reconfigure console-setup is not saving persistently my config.

When I change to vt and I want to write 'á' it draws a '╗', then I
exec dpkg-reconfigure console-setup, and works again

Thank you very much

Regards,

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages console-setup depends on:
ii  console-terminus  4.28-1 Fixed-width fonts for fast reading
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.26 Debian configuration management sy
ii  xkb-data  1.5-2  X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu

Versions of packages console-setup recommends:
ii  console-tools1:0.2.3dbs-65.1 Linux console and font utilities

Versions of packages console-setup suggests:
ii  locales   2.9-12 GNU C Library: National Language (
ii  lsb-base  3.2-22 Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip

-- debconf information:
* console-setup/variant: España
  console-setup/unsupported_options: true
* console-setup/fontsize-text: 16
* console-setup/compose: No compose key
  debian-installer/console-setup-udeb/title:
  console-setup/modelcode: pc105
  console-setup/switch: No temporary switch
  console-setup/unsupported_config_layout: true
  console-setup/use_system_font:
  console-setup/fontsize: 16
  console-setup/unsupported_layout: true
* console-setup/charmap: UTF-8
  console-setup/layoutcode: es
  console-setup/optionscode: lv3:ralt_switch
  console-setup/unsupported_config_options: true
* console-setup/layout: España
  console-setup/variantcode:
  console-setup/codesetcode: Lat15
* console-setup/altgr: Right Alt
* console-setup/ttys: /dev/tty[1-6]
* console-setup/model: PC genérico 105 teclas (intl)
  console-setup/fontsize-fb: 16
* console-setup/codeset: # Latin1 and Latin5 - western Europe and
Turkic languages
  console-setup/toggle: No toggling
* console-setup/fontface: Fixed



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Instant Arousal - How Do I Spot My A-eSpot?

2009-05-21 Thread Armato Tronzo
sexualize.png

Bug#529868: Template d-i/console-setup-udeb/title should not be on installed system

2009-05-21 Thread Frans Pop
Package: console-setup
Version: 1.36
Severity: minor

In BR #529862 I noticed that the template
   debian-installer/console-setup-udeb/title
for some reason gets included in the debconf database for installed 
systems. This is a bug as that template is udeb-specific.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#529879: Hang in vbetool vbesave

2009-05-21 Thread Leon van Dommelen
Package: installation-reports

Boot method: DVD
Image version: 2.6.26-2-686
Date: 05/21/2009

Machine: FUJITSU Lifebook S6520
Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo Processor P8600 (2.4 GHz, 3 MB L2 cache, 1066 MHz)
Memory: 4GB
Partitions: 

FilesystemType   1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda3 ext3   120849748   2447320 112263592   3% /
tmpfstmpfs 1519616 0   1519616   0% /lib/init/rw
udev tmpfs   10240   112 10128   2% /dev
tmpfstmpfs 1519616 0   1519616   0% /dev/shm
/dev/sdb1 vfat  495168  6192488976   2% /a

Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn):

00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Memory 
Controller Hub [8086:2a40] (rev 07)
Kernel driver in use: agpgart-intel
Kernel modules: intel-agp
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series 
Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2a42] (rev 07)
00:02.1 Display controller [0380]: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset 
Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2a43] (rev 07)
00:1a.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI 
Controller #4 [8086:2937] (rev 03)
Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
Kernel modules: uhci-hcd
00:1a.1 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI 
Controller #5 [8086:2938] (rev 03)
Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
Kernel modules: uhci-hcd
00:1a.2 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI 
Controller #6 [8086:2939] (rev 03)
Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
Kernel modules: uhci-hcd
00:1a.7 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB2 EHCI 
Controller #2 [8086:293c] (rev 03)
Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd
Kernel modules: ehci-hcd
00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) HD Audio 
Controller [8086:293e] (rev 03)
Kernel driver in use: HDA Intel
Kernel modules: snd-hda-intel
00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express 
Port 1 [8086:2940] (rev 03)
Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver
Kernel modules: shpchp
00:1c.2 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express 
Port 3 [8086:2944] (rev 03)
Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver
Kernel modules: shpchp
00:1d.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI 
Controller #1 [8086:2934] (rev 03)
Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
Kernel modules: uhci-hcd
00:1d.1 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI 
Controller #2 [8086:2935] (rev 03)
Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
Kernel modules: uhci-hcd
00:1d.2 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI 
Controller #3 [8086:2936] (rev 03)
Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
Kernel modules: uhci-hcd
00:1d.7 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB2 EHCI 
Controller #1 [8086:293a] (rev 03)
Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd
Kernel modules: ehci-hcd
00:1e.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801 Mobile PCI Bridge 
[8086:2448] (rev 93)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation ICH9M LPC Interface Controller 
[8086:2919] (rev 03)
00:1f.2 SATA controller [0106]: Intel Corporation ICH9M/M-E SATA AHCI 
Controller [8086:2929] (rev 03)
Kernel driver in use: ahci
Kernel modules: ahci
00:1f.3 SMBus [0c05]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) SMBus Controller 
[8086:2930] (rev 03)
Kernel driver in use: i801_smbus
Kernel modules: i2c-i801
08:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8055 PCI-E 
Gigabit Ethernet Controller [11ab:4363] (rev 14)
Kernel driver in use: sky2
Kernel modules: sky2
18:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 5300 AGN 
[Shiloh] Network Connection [8086:4235]
38:03.0 CardBus bridge [0607]: O2 Micro, Inc. OZ711SP1 Memory CardBus 
Controller [1217:7136] (rev 01)
Kernel driver in use: yenta_cardbus
Kernel modules: yenta_socket
38:03.2 SD Host controller [0805]: O2 Micro, Inc. Integrated MMC/SD Controller 
[1217:7120] (rev 02)
Kernel driver in use: sdhci
Kernel modules: sdhci
38:03.3 Mass storage controller [0180]: O2 Micro, Inc. Integrated MS/xD 
Controller [1217:7130] (rev 01)
38:03.4 FireWire (IEEE 1394) [0c00]: O2 Micro, Inc. Firewire (IEEE 1394) 
[1217:00f7] (rev 02)
Kernel driver in use: ohci1394
Kernel modules: ohci1394



Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [O]
Detect network card:[O]
Configure network:  [ ]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Install base system:[O]
Clock/timezone setup:   [O]
User/password 

[D-I Manual] Build log for en (21 May 2009)

2009-05-21 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.

There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.

A log of the build is available at:
- http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/logs/en.log

===
It is possible to use RSS to track changes to the manual.
For more information, see:
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/translators.html
===
Note: PDF output is not yet supported for some languages; help
with this would be appreciated.
===
If you have any questions about the build or this message, feel
free to contact me at faw AT funlabs DOT org.
===

Updated files ('svn up')

Uen/using-d-i/modules/pkgsel.xml
Updated to revision 58650.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#516280: This bug needs to stay open until it is resolved

2009-05-21 Thread Dominique Brazziel
Quoting Rob Fulton (r...@cow-frenzy.co.uk):
 Package: debian-installer
 Version: 20090123

 When installing Lenny on a HP DL360 / DL380 server Grub is installed on  
 the wrong device.

 The server is booted from CD, during network detection, the bnx2 firmware 
 is required. A USB key is inserted to provide the firmware. The disks are 
 then partitioned and the install proceeds, grub is installed on the 
 master boot record. On reboot with the USB stick still connected, GRUB 
 loads and the os is booted from the internal disks. Without the USB 
 drive, the OS refuses to boot.

 The internal disks are presented as /dev/cciss/c0d0 devices, the USB 
 drive is presented as /dev/sda.

 Running grub-install to the /dev/cciss/c0d0 device after install resolves 
 the problem but the installer appears to be picking the wrong device when 
 grub is installed

Such issues are documented in the errata file.

Where?  Which errata file?  Please be more specific, the software
in question (debian-installer, GRUB) certainly demands specificity.

This issue indeed pertains to the general goal of having fixed mount
names instead of relying on the devices names

Whose goal?  The Debian Installation manual makes no such mission 
statement.

As this issue is documented and well known, I propose closing it.

Again, the issue is _not_ well documented.  After googling 'GRUB Error
2' and receiving hits for numerous distributions, hardware setups and
configurations, here I am at the Debian Bug database.

This bug needs to stay open until it is resolved either by inserting a
clear and concise warning or requirements sections in the relevant
Debian documentation or making more the installer and/or GRUB more
robust, and include step by step workarounds to get the newly installed
system to boot.  The old system is gone, need to get the new one up
ASAP.  This is a definite showstopper for installation of a 'stable'
release from USB key/memory stick, et.al.





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org