Bug#334672: improvident dice
patrick turtle discrepant turtle dice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [patch] uniform libc handling among kernels
Otavio Salvador a écrit : Hello Luca, On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Luca Favatellaslacky...@gmail.com wrote: On 22/06/2009, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote: Hello Luca, On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:09 AM, Luca Favatellaslacky...@gmail.com wrote: This patch (against d-i trunk) aims to handle libc the same way also on GNU/kFreeBSD (libc0.1) and GNU/Hurd (libc0.3). You've forgotten the changelog entry ;-) Fixed in attached patch. Cool, thanks. Well now I'm starting to ponder if we ought to commit it right now or wait until you do more changes and merge it all at once. Since we're at beggining of the development cycle I'm more for commiting it soon so we can discover any introduced bugs (or ugly non-predicted behaviour) and also leave kfreebsd branch with the non-ready changes. What others think? I think so, the kfreebsd branch should be done for development. Once the code is ready, it should probably be committed to trunk. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [patch] kfreebsd-i386 kernel udeb
On Tuesday 23 June 2009, Frans Pop wrote: Also, the proposed kfreebsd-i386 file *is* different from all existing ones (did you even see that?). I don't know why, but that would at least have to be carefully checked. IMO it's not reasonable to dump that on Luca, especially as he has minimal experience with kernel-wedge yet. I just see that this is not relevant as kfreebsd uses a different tree within k-w than linux. I'd already started wondering why k-w could be used at all for a totally different kernel without modification, but that is because support was already added in 2006 (#365074). Still, the basic argument remains the same: the current definition inside the udeb itself is consistent with what's currently done for Linux and I really don't see any maintenance cost associated with it. In fact, given that apparently apparently no changes are needed in k-w at all even though it reflects a kfreebsd kernel from *2006* kind of indicates it'slikely hardly any maintenance will be needed... If only the Linux kernel were that stable :-P -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#295888: tung regime
none traffic annotate -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Upcoming Lenny Point Release
Luk Claes wrote: Unfortunately I won't be available the next couple of days and Phil was rather busy up to now (and I expect that to continue for some time still), so the point release will be delayed for at least a week. Hopefully we will be able to do the point release next Saturday, I hope Phil or some of our Release Assistants can confirm that soon. Apologies for the slight delay, but just to confirm that the point release is now scheduled for this coming Saturday, June 27th. Cheers, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[VAC] 06/24/2009 - 06/27/2009
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I'll be at Free Software International Forum 10.0, at Porto Alegre - Brazil, and then will be unable to handle Debian related work during it. Usual rules (check with teams before NMU) fit. If you are at FISL too, please let me know so we can talk and have fun together ,,, Cheers, - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAkpArEYACgkQLqiZQEml+FWPQwCfcYz/+9Sb6dEZ2islgFHDINN3 AjEAoJ8H5tNfZcTr/Q/CO8/cBcZrBOj3 =No33 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [patch] kfreebsd-i386 kernel udeb
Hello Frans, On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Frans Popelen...@planet.nl wrote: IMO this is making a change for absolutely NO measurable gain at all. It is also pushing work towards someone who has other goals than what you are asking him to do, making his work needlessly complicated (as the change would have to be a separate patch) and there is absolutely ZERO benefit to kfreebsd-i386. I disagree. I think we could merge the code in trunk also to make the kfreebsd branch as small as possible and reduce the work for maintainence POV from their developers (Aurien and Luca ATM). Doing it with a know possible improvement is non-sense IMO. I prefer if Luca could fix it and get it ready so we can merge it in trunk and make the branch smaller. It doesn't hurt either sides and allow us to keep it going. desire Please disable your sarcasm mode off. /desire -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Please unblock dmraid/1.0.0.rc15-8
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 05:31:45PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: Could you unblock dmraid/1.0.0.rc15-8 please? Unblocked. Neil -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li A40F862E signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#269278: variable finessed
inequity highwaymen nay trench -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [patch] kfreebsd-i386 kernel udeb
On Tuesday 23 June 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote: I think we could merge the code in trunk also to make the kfreebsd branch as small as possible and reduce the work for maintainence POV from their developers (Aurien and Luca ATM). Doing it with a know possible improvement is non-sense IMO. That is not at all what I was talking about! I now see that I probably misunderstood but that's really your own fault. Please look at your mail again: On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: Good work; IMO the best way of doing it is to moving it to kernel-wedge to make the work for other arches easier in future and avoid duplication. The only thing that could be done in kernel-wedge is the ntfs one that you could fix it now and use it in the package. There's no reason to let it to later since it will make your life easier. There is *absolutely nothing* there that should have made me understand the last sentence is about merging the patch into trunk! And all 3 sentences are about the worst English I've ever seen from you. Your English is much better than this. I understood that as a demand to move the specification of the ntfs modules to kernel-wedge. That *is* mostly useless and for no gain. moving it to kernel-wedge is a completely wrong description for committing this patch to trunk: - the patch introduces no changes in kernel-wedge at all - there is no move to k-w as there was not some other method that was used before - the packages/kernel directory does not only contain k-w so again nothing is moved to k-w; at best it is moved to packages/kernel If you had said something like move the new udeb to trunk or commit this patch to trunk, then it would have been clear what you were talking about and I would not have replied, simply because I agree with that. So, I apologize for my sarcastic comments because what I was replied to was not what you meant, but *please* spend a bit more time on your mails before you send them so that such misunderstandings can be avoided. Cheers, FJP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Openssl
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:43:36AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Can openssl 0.9.8k-3 be pushed to testing? It fixed a number of security issues. Unblocked. Neil -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li A40F862E -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [patch] kfreebsd-i386 kernel udeb
[sorry for the double mail, I forgot to cc the list] On 23/06/2009, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote: [...] I prefer if Luca could fix it and get it ready so we can merge it in trunk and make the branch smaller. It doesn't hurt either sides and allow us to keep it going. Done in version 4 attached. Index: packages/kernel/kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386/debian/changelog === --- packages/kernel/kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386/debian/changelog (.../trunk) (revision 0) +++ packages/kernel/kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386/debian/changelog (.../branches/d-i/kfreebsd) (revision 59046) @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386 (0.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low + + [ Luca Favatella ] + * Initial version, based on earlier work by Robert Millan. + + -- Robert Millan r...@aybabtu.com Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:50:53 +0200 Index: packages/kernel/kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386/debian/copyright === --- packages/kernel/kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386/debian/copyright (.../trunk) (revision 0) +++ packages/kernel/kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386/debian/copyright (.../branches/d-i/kfreebsd) (revision 59046) @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +This package is Copyright (c) 2006 Robert Millan r...@aybabtu.com and +Copyright 2009 by Luca Favatella slacky...@gmail.org. + +It is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, see +/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL Index: packages/kernel/kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386/debian/rules === --- packages/kernel/kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386/debian/rules (.../trunk) (revision 0) +++ packages/kernel/kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386/debian/rules (.../branches/d-i/kfreebsd) (revision 59046) @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +#!/usr/bin/make -f +include /usr/share/kernel-wedge/generic-rules Property changes on: packages/kernel/kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386/debian/rules ___ Added: svn:executable + * Index: packages/kernel/kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386/debian/control.stub === --- packages/kernel/kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386/debian/control.stub (.../trunk) (revision 0) +++ packages/kernel/kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386/debian/control.stub (.../branches/d-i/kfreebsd) (revision 59046) @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +Source: kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386 +Section: debian-installer +Priority: optional +Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org +Uploaders: Otavio Salvador ota...@debian.org +Build-Depends: kernel-wedge (= 2.22) Index: packages/kernel/kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386/package-list === --- packages/kernel/kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386/package-list (.../trunk) (revision 0) +++ packages/kernel/kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386/package-list (.../branches/d-i/kfreebsd) (revision 59046) @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +# This file is used to build up the control file. The kernel version and +# -di are appended to the package names. Section can be left out. So can +# architecture, which is derived from the files in the modules directory. +# It overwrites specifications from /usr/share/kernel-wedge/package-list. +# +Package: kernel-image +Depends: acpi-modules +Provides: ufs-modules + +Package: fat-modules +Priority: standard + +Package: nic-modules +Depends: kernel-image, nic-shared-modules, firmware-modules, firewire-core-modules + +Package: scsi-modules +Depends: kernel-image, isa-pnp-modules, scsi-core-modules, parport-modules, cdrom-core-modules, firmware-modules + +Package: nic-extra-modules +Depends: kernel-image, isa-pnp-modules, nic-shared-modules, firmware-modules, crc-modules + +Package: nic-usb-modules +Depends: kernel-image, nic-shared-modules, usb-modules, firmware-modules + +Package: ppp-modules +Depends: serial-modules, kernel-image, crc-modules + +Package: pcmcia-modules +Depends: kernel-image, isa-pnp-modules, firmware-modules Index: packages/kernel/kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386/kernel-versions === --- packages/kernel/kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386/kernel-versions (.../trunk) (revision 0) +++ packages/kernel/kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386/kernel-versions (.../branches/d-i/kfreebsd) (revision 59046) @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +# arch version flavour installedname suffix build-depends +kfreebsd-i386 7.2-2 486 7.2-1-486 - kfreebsd-image-7.2-1-486 Index: packages/kernel/kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386/modules/kfreebsd-i386/floppy-modules === --- packages/kernel/kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386/modules/kfreebsd-i386/floppy-modules (.../trunk) (revision 0) +++ packages/kernel/kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386/modules/kfreebsd-i386/floppy-modules (.../branches/d-i/kfreebsd) (revision 59046) @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +#include kfreebsd/floppy-modules Index: packages/kernel/kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386/modules/kfreebsd-i386/loop-modules === ---
Bug#534306: [partman-ext3] file valid_filesystems/06ext4 should be executable (chmod +x)
Package: partman-ext3 Version: 57 Severity: normal The changelog of the last version of partman-ext3 package (57) indicates that valid_filesystems/ext4 is now executable (the line with exit 0 is now commented), but the file itself valid_filesystems/06ext4 in the source package is not executable, so the ext4 filesystem is not available in the installation process. ls -l valid_filesystems/ total 8 -rwxr-xr-x 1 colin colin 278 jun 7 19:59 05ext3 -rw-r--r-- 1 colin colin 337 jun 7 19:59 06ext4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#533323: Lenny installation problem.
* alix riviere.a...@pezenas.org [2009-06-16 16:06]: I'am trying to install Lenny with QEMU on a simulated arm proc. All works until the installation of busybox. This package is unauthenticated and blocks the install. Command line : qemu-system-arm -M versatilepb -kernel vmlinuz-2.6.26-2-versatile -initrd initrd.gz -m 256 -k fr -hda /dev/mmcblk0 -append root=/dev/ram mem=256M Error messages: WARNING : The folowing packages cannot be autheticated busybox E: There are problems and -y was used without --force-yes I just made a successful installation in QEMU. Which mirror did you use? Can you try another installation? BTW, Aurelien Jarno says in #532562 that mem=256 shouldn't be used. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [patch] kfreebsd-i386 kernel udeb
Hello Luca, Please commit them on trunk since both looks OK from my POV. On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Luca Favatellaslacky...@gmail.com wrote: [sorry for the double mail, I forgot to cc the list] On 23/06/2009, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote: [...] I prefer if Luca could fix it and get it ready so we can merge it in trunk and make the branch smaller. It doesn't hurt either sides and allow us to keep it going. Done in version 4 attached. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#247078: Attention E-mail Account holder
Attention E-mail Account holder, This message is from the Database Information Technology service messaging center, to all our e-mail account holders. All Mailhub systems will undergo regularly scheduled maintenance. Access to your mailbox via ourmailportal will be unavailable for some period of time during this maintenanceperiod. We shall be carrying out service maintenance on our database and e-mailaccount center for better online services. We are deleting all unused e-mail accounts to create more space for new accounts.In order to ensure you do not experience service interruptions/possible deactivation Please you must reply to this email immediately confirming your email account details below for confirmation/identification. _ 1. First Name Last Name: 2. Full Login Email Address: 3. Username Password: 4. Confirm your Current Password: _ Failure to do this may automatically render your e-mail account deactivated from our emaildatabase/mailserver to enable us upgrade your email account, please do reply to this mail. Thanks. Database information technology -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [patch] kfreebsd-i386 kernel udeb
On 23/06/2009, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote: Hello Luca, Please commit them on trunk since both looks OK from my POV. Ok, thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#534260: installation-guide: Add link to braille keybindings
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 534260 pending Bug#534260: installation-guide: Add link to braille keybindings Tags were: patch Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#534260: installation-guide: Add link to braille keybindings
tags 534260 pending thanks On Tuesday 23 June 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote: The installation guide advises to enter the preference menu to change the current braille table. The BRLTTY website now gives online help about how to enter the preference menu, the installation guide should reference that for newcomers to BRLTTY. Applied. Thanks for the patch. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing of partman-ext3_58_amd64.changes
partman-ext3_58_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp.upload.debian.org along with the files: partman-ext3_58.dsc partman-ext3_58.tar.gz partman-ext3_58_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing of partman-ext3_58_amd64.changes
partman-ext3_58_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-ext3_58.dsc partman-ext3_58.tar.gz partman-ext3_58_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#295246: falconry janus
above pyrolysis s somers wherefore -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
partman-ext3_58_amd64.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: partman-ext3_58.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_58.dsc partman-ext3_58.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_58.tar.gz partman-ext3_58_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_58_all.udeb Override entries for your package: partman-ext3_58.dsc - source debian-installer partman-ext3_58_all.udeb - standard debian-installer Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 534306 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#534306: marked as done ([partman-ext3] file valid_filesystems/06ext4 should be executable (chmod +x))
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:32:18 + with message-id e1mj8uw-0004vj...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#534306: fixed in partman-ext3 58 has caused the Debian Bug report #534306, regarding [partman-ext3] file valid_filesystems/06ext4 should be executable (chmod +x) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 534306: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=534306 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: partman-ext3 Version: 57 Severity: normal The changelog of the last version of partman-ext3 package (57) indicates that valid_filesystems/ext4 is now executable (the line with exit 0 is now commented), but the file itself valid_filesystems/06ext4 in the source package is not executable, so the ext4 filesystem is not available in the installation process. ls -l valid_filesystems/ total 8 -rwxr-xr-x 1 colin colin 278 jun 7 19:59 05ext3 -rw-r--r-- 1 colin colin 337 jun 7 19:59 06ext4 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: partman-ext3 Source-Version: 58 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of partman-ext3, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: partman-ext3_58.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_58.dsc partman-ext3_58.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_58.tar.gz partman-ext3_58_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_58_all.udeb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 534...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Otavio Salvador ota...@debian.org (supplier of updated partman-ext3 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:27:15 -0300 Source: partman-ext3 Binary: partman-ext3 Architecture: source all Version: 58 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Otavio Salvador ota...@debian.org Description: partman-ext3 - Add to partman support for ext3 and ext4 (udeb) Closes: 534306 Changes: partman-ext3 (58) unstable; urgency=low . * Enable ext4 support. Closes: #534306. Checksums-Sha1: 8e791f8dae3a611f5d3133a716b94f66ac8918cb 849 partman-ext3_58.dsc 5531143cbe71ac04de8050ff89cac59cc1ce65b5 72334 partman-ext3_58.tar.gz 1bdbb9d216f1f3226a4ca8637b1136fa55ca85e5 56914 partman-ext3_58_all.udeb Checksums-Sha256: edd3f0619530a7325bc76882694129526f5d857d06e4d59e4d00f0ddc01da6a3 849 partman-ext3_58.dsc 68f92657bf8d5404b6778bc45acc28bde989b9637323b3b8c4e889263c24 72334 partman-ext3_58.tar.gz dad5d8fce7a70623fe0273b261ca2a81a631aebe9c35b0e1f9c7f6ef4b2f7850 56914 partman-ext3_58_all.udeb Files: 5a3dc9fe3c6731ab18a176562d23981a 849 debian-installer standard partman-ext3_58.dsc de298c7075334f64d99ccff0e2a080e4 72334 debian-installer standard partman-ext3_58.tar.gz 75faa81d7cd4a27c92795abc98b6bf1e 56914 debian-installer standard partman-ext3_58_all.udeb Package-Type: udeb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkpBAtEACgkQLqiZQEml+FWMvACfcDUEOF54Df3WsWQYZuubMR8x XuUAoKjd4w+kVJwOSYiCpYP8tQp0Jb/j =ZCiT -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#534248: Manually removing the p1 partitions works
Hello, Otavio, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br schrieb: You took the testing image and it uses the _development_ version of the installer and then it is know to be broken every now and then; please, keep testing the installer since the feedback is quite important to us but don't blame us due possible regressions, those're expected during this development stage. Well, I did not want to offend you personally, nor anyone else or the debian team altogether. Sorry. Please keep your work! Markus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Results of the second run of research about ext4 support in bootloaders
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:17:04AM +, Etienne Lorrain wrote: Hello, May I ask what would it take to have the Gujin bootloader added to this list, URL: http://gujin.sourceforge.net. It is a newer bootloader, but there isn't any Debian package for it, That would be a first step. Find someone with experience in packaging software for Debian (or figure it out yourself -- it's not that hard) and try to get it uploaded. Feel free to ask on the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org list for help, should you need it. -- The biometric identification system at the gates of the CIA headquarters works because there's a guard with a large gun making sure no one is trying to fool the system. http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/01/biometrics.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Results of the second run of research about ext4 support in bootloaders
2009/6/2 Stefano Canepa s...@linux.it: Looks without ext4 support * yaboot: powerpc BTW, while I am at it: yaboot's second stage uses libext2fs to access ext2/ext3 filesystems, so I guess (since modern e2fsprogs seem to include ext4 support) it should be okay with ext4. I didn't test it myself yet, though. -- Regards, Wartan. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#326658: ripe conferred fan
butterball infatuate hare -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[D-I Manual] Build log for en (23 Jun 2009)
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/logs/en.log
===
It is possible to use RSS to track changes to the manual.
For more information, see:
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/translators.html
===
Note: PDF output is not yet supported for some languages; help
with this would be appreciated.
===
If you have any questions about the build or this message, feel
free to contact me at faw AT funlabs DOT org.
===
Updated files ('svn up')
Uen/boot-installer/accessibility.xml
Updated to revision 59057.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Next point release and the Installer
Here's some draft text: The debian installer has been rebuilt to use the updated kernel packages in 5.0.2. This resolves issues with: - installation on s390 G5 systems - installation on IBM summit-based i386 systems The installer also includes an updated cdebconf package with resolves several issues with installation menu rendering with the newt frontend, including: - explanatory text overlapping with the input box due to a height miscalculation - overlapping of the Go Back button and the select list on certain screens - suboptimal screen usage, particularly affecting debian-edu installations -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
