Processed: Re: Bug#537407: installer: Manual Disc Partitioning
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 537407 installation-reports Bug#537407: installer: Manual Disc Partitioning Warning: Unknown package '0' Bug reassigned from package `0' to `installation-reports'. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
please let dhcp3 into testing
Andrew Pollock apoll...@debian.org (18/07/2009): I didn't realise that udeb-generating packages were still frozen. Is that necessary? Could you please let 3.1.2p1-1 into testing. It has a security fix for CVE-2009-0692 You're supposed to mail -boot as well… (Doing so, adjusting subject.) And yes, udeb-generating are always frozen. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: please let dhcp3 into testing
Cyril Brulebois wrote: Andrew Pollock apoll...@debian.org (18/07/2009): I didn't realise that udeb-generating packages were still frozen. Is that necessary? Could you please let 3.1.2p1-1 into testing. It has a security fix for CVE-2009-0692 You're supposed to mail -boot as well… (Doing so, adjusting subject.) And yes, udeb-generating are always frozen. For the moment, it's supposed to change in the future though. Anyway, unblocked after ack from Otavio. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing of libdebian-installer_0.64_amd64.changes
libdebian-installer_0.64_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp.upload.debian.org along with the files: libdebian-installer_0.64.dsc libdebian-installer_0.64.tar.gz libdebian-installer4_0.64_amd64.deb libdebian-installer4-dev_0.64_amd64.deb libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.64_amd64.udeb libdebian-installer-extra4_0.64_amd64.deb libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.64_amd64.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing of libdebian-installer_0.64_amd64.changes
libdebian-installer_0.64_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libdebian-installer_0.64.dsc libdebian-installer_0.64.tar.gz libdebian-installer4_0.64_amd64.deb libdebian-installer4-dev_0.64_amd64.deb libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.64_amd64.udeb libdebian-installer-extra4_0.64_amd64.deb libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.64_amd64.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing of flash-kernel_2.20_armel.changes
flash-kernel_2.20_armel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: flash-kernel_2.20.dsc flash-kernel_2.20.tar.gz flash-kernel_2.20_armel.deb flash-kernel-installer_2.20_armel.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#308236: marked as done (Debian Installer: After successful install system doesnt recognise /dev/ida devices)
Your message dated Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:54:19 +0200 with message-id 20090718145419.ga11...@dp.lan and subject line Re: Bug#308236: Debian Installer: After successful install system doesnt recognise /dev/ida devices has caused the Debian Bug report #308236, regarding Debian Installer: After successful install system doesnt recognise /dev/ida devices to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 308236: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=308236 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: Debian Installer Severity: important Tags: patch I have installed from the 10 may 2005 daily build on a generic P3-866 system with a Compaq 3200 Disk Array controller. Everything went well, until the system booted into the newly installed Deb. While starting rcS.d it got to S30checkfs.sh. The check returned /dev/ida/c0d0p1 is not a valid block device. After getting into the shell I noticed that if I ran /etc/rcS.d/S40hotplug, followed by mount -a, the devices mounted without problems. If I tried mount -a without first loading hotplug, the invalid block device error came up. I have renamed S40hotplug to S29hotplug and rebooted, to find that everything ran smoothly; the error as above didnt occur any longer. Maybe it is a good idea to place hotplug *before* checkfs, as it appears that some devices, such as the Compaq 3200 Disk Array, need to be detected before a fsck can be succesfully started. If there are any serious reasons of why hotplug is placed after checkfs, please let me know because I have planned to leave the rcS.d as it is right now. Thanks -Patrick -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:45:15AM +0200, Patrick Donker wrote: I have installed from the 10 may 2005 daily build on a generic P3-866 system with a Compaq 3200 Disk Array controller. Everything went well, until the system booted into the newly installed Deb. While starting rcS.d it got to S30checkfs.sh. The check returned /dev/ida/c0d0p1 is not a valid block device. Someone recently sent a report of successfull install of Lenny using the same Compaq controller (#528914). Given that, I'm closing this bug report on the assumption that it is fixed. Please let me know (or reopen the bug) in case you can still reproduce the problem. Thanks for your bug report, Max ---End Message---
flash-kernel_2.20_armel.changes REJECTED
Rejected: flash-kernel_2.20_armel.deb: has 39 file(s) with a time stamp too ancient (e.g. control [Mon Jun 11 08:35:54 1973]). Rejected: flash-kernel-installer_2.20_armel.udeb: has 5 file(s) with a time stamp too ancient (e.g. templates [Mon Jun 11 08:34:57 1973]). === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
libdebian-installer_0.64_amd64.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.64_amd64.udeb to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.64_amd64.udeb libdebian-installer-extra4_0.64_amd64.deb to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4_0.64_amd64.deb libdebian-installer4-dev_0.64_amd64.deb to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4-dev_0.64_amd64.deb libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.64_amd64.udeb to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.64_amd64.udeb libdebian-installer4_0.64_amd64.deb to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4_0.64_amd64.deb libdebian-installer_0.64.dsc to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer_0.64.dsc libdebian-installer_0.64.tar.gz to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer_0.64.tar.gz Override entries for your package: libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.64_amd64.udeb - optional debian-installer libdebian-installer-extra4_0.64_amd64.deb - optional libs libdebian-installer4-dev_0.64_amd64.deb - optional libdevel libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.64_amd64.udeb - optional debian-installer libdebian-installer4_0.64_amd64.deb - optional libs libdebian-installer_0.64.dsc - source libs Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: netcfg fails to configure dhcp, segfault in libresolv
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: unarchive 517231 Bug 517231 [debian-installer] debian-installer should unpack all glibc udebs at once Bug 520442 [debian-installer] amd64 netinst netcfg segfault daily build 03/19/2009 Bug 520711 [debian-installer] installation-reports: The squeeze netinst doesn't find archive Bug 528929 [debian-installer] debian-installer fails to install testing squeeze because libresolv-2.9.so segfaults Unarchived Bug 517231 Unarchived Bug 520442 Unarchived Bug 520711 Unarchived Bug 528929 reassign 520285 debian-installer Bug#520285: installation-reports: The squeeze netinst dosn't configure DHCP Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `debian-installer'. forcemerge 517231 520285 Bug#517231: debian-installer should unpack all glibc udebs at once Bug#520285: installation-reports: The squeeze netinst dosn't configure DHCP Bug#520442: amd64 netinst netcfg segfault daily build 03/19/2009 Bug#520711: installation-reports: The squeeze netinst doesn't find archive Bug#528929: debian-installer fails to install testing squeeze because libresolv-2.9.so segfaults Forcibly Merged 517231 520285 520442 520711 528929. archive 517231 Bug 517231 [debian-installer] debian-installer should unpack all glibc udebs at once Bug 520285 [debian-installer] installation-reports: The squeeze netinst dosn't configure DHCP Bug 520442 [debian-installer] amd64 netinst netcfg segfault daily build 03/19/2009 Bug 520711 [debian-installer] installation-reports: The squeeze netinst doesn't find archive Bug 528929 [debian-installer] debian-installer fails to install testing squeeze because libresolv-2.9.so segfaults archived 517231 to archive/31 (from 517231) deleted 517231 (from 517231) archived 520285 to archive/85 (from 517231) deleted 520285 (from 517231) archived 520442 to archive/42 (from 517231) deleted 520442 (from 517231) archived 520711 to archive/11 (from 517231) deleted 520711 (from 517231) archived 528929 to archive/29 (from 517231) deleted 528929 (from 517231) thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing of flash-kernel_2.20_armel.changes
flash-kernel_2.20_armel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: flash-kernel_2.20.dsc flash-kernel_2.20.tar.gz flash-kernel_2.20_armel.deb flash-kernel-installer_2.20_armel.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
flash-kernel_2.20_armel.changes REJECTED
Rejected: flash-kernel_2.20_armel.deb: has 21 file(s) with a time stamp too ancient (e.g. usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/flash_kernel_set_root [Mon Jun 11 10:38:42 1973]). === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Switch to udhcpc in netcfg
Hello all, On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Christian Perrierbubu...@debian.org wrote: I just tested it with a locally built netboot image in Virtualbox. I applied the patch, compiled netcfg and built with that udeb in build/localudebs It unfortunately doesn't work. netcfg times out. I've redone the Luk's patch to allow us to keep dhclient, dhclient3 and pump support. It is quite important, specially now, due the lack of properly support of busybox to kfreebsd and possible other OSs. To get it working I've to change netcfg and also to produce a busybox udhcpc script. I've made the patches available for review and testing. Please take a look at http://people.debian.org/~otavio/netcfg-udhcpc/ To test the udhcpc usage you can build an installer image with the modified udebs and do, at console: #: rm -rf /var/lib/dhcp3 /sbin/dhclient* That way udhcpc is going to be used. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#536820: please add scratchbox2 variant
Hello Riku, On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Riku Voipioriku.voi...@iki.fi wrote: Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.13 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Two changes needed for supporting scratchbox2: The patch looks OK but: - it has coding style issues (mixed tabs and spaces) - it lacks manpage updates Please take a look on those things and post it again for new review. Cheers, -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#536820: please add scratchbox2 variant
Hello, On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Riku Voipioriku.voi...@iki.fi wrote: Argh, please forget the previous patch. That one was certainly not the one I wanted to send. The patch attached to this mail has the advantage of actually working. Previous comments still fits. It has coding style issues and miss the manpage updating. Take also a look at || since you have one missing spaces before and after it. Cheers, -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#537502: netboot for Squeeze: everything failed... +no error checking
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20090718-19:05
$ cat version.info
Debian version: 6.0 (squeeze)
Installer build: 20090718-19:05
I tried netboot installer from
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/netboot/netboot.tar.gz
on old PC with PXE loader on NIC.
Automatic network configuration had failed. Thanks to log console, I
explore that it seems it was some global failure with system - just no
normal error detection and handling was made where they should be
done.
Here piece of text I written down from log console (it goes after
'menu: Entering NIC detecting'):
...
hw-detect: Loading PCMCIA bridge driver module: i82365
kernel: Intel ISA PCIC probe: not found.
hw-detect: FATAL: Error inserting i82365
(/lib/modules/2.6.29-2-486/kernel/drivers/pcmcia/i82365.ko): No such
device
check-missing-firmware: no missi...
kernel: e100 :00:0a.0: firmware: requesting e100/d101m_ucode.bin
kernel: e100: eth0: e100_request_firmware: Failed to load firmware
e100/d101m_ucode.bin: -2
check-missing-firmware: no m...
...
Then installer tries to continue (probes DHCP etc) and a number of
warnings Link is down is written to log while installer tries to use
that link and reports to user that possibly user's network or DHCP
is misconfigured...
Well, I would be glad to save log for you (instead of writting it down
from screen and typing it back here to email), but I couldn't: I can't
use web (as network is broken), can't mount disk (I see no /dev/hd* at
all, though /dev/fd{,0} there exist), and may be tomorrow if I found a
floppy I try to use it to save log...
Hardware:
iPentium MMX 233MHz on i430TX-based mainboard, 64M DIMM, IDE HDD,
Intel PRO/100+ ethernet PCI. MS Windows98SE works OK.
