Processing of quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1_powerpc.changes
quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1.dsc quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1.tar.gz quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1_powerpc.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oa0sx-0002ee...@franck.debian.org
quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1.dsc to main/q/quik-installer/quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1.dsc quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1.tar.gz to main/q/quik-installer/quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1.tar.gz quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1_powerpc.udeb to main/q/quik-installer/quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1_powerpc.udeb Override entries for your package: quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1.dsc - source debian-installer quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1_powerpc.udeb - standard debian-installer Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 587928 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oa0to-0002gf...@franck.debian.org
Bug#589365: installation-reports: Debian Testing(Squeeze) a success.
Comments/Problems: My Intel Wireless 5100 AGN was detected, but needed a firmware driver(not a problem). My ethernet card was/is not detected. My hard drive driver was not detected during install, but was able to install anyway when I selected to continue without loading a driver. My hardrive info is now available in the Gnome Disk Utility(with the correct info same as Ubuntu). Given that your installation was a complete success, I do as usual with reports for successful installations: I close the bug..:-) This does not of course mean you weren't right to report. Knowing the installations are correct is important for the d-i team. Many thanks for your time testing the Debian Installer and reporting your results. Have fun with your new Debian system! signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#589365: marked as done (installation-reports: Debian Testing(Squeeze) a success.)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2010 07:58:54 +0200 with message-id 20100717055854.gm3...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org and subject line Re: Bug#589365: installation-reports: Debian Testing(Squeeze) a success. has caused the Debian Bug report #589365, regarding installation-reports: Debian Testing(Squeeze) a success. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 589365: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589365 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Please type your report here. The text will be wrapped to be max 79 chars long per line. -- Package-specific info: Boot method: cd Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd /debian-testing-amd64-DC-1.iso 7-Jul-2010 Date: 2010-07-12 16:20:10 Machine: Sager NP2096 Partitions: /dev/sda1 / ext44.7 GB /dev/sda9 /home ext4251.2 GB /dev/sda8 /tmpext49.4 GB /dev/sda5 /usrext49.4 GB /dev/sda6 /varext49.4 GB /dev/sda7 swap9.4 GB Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[E] Configure network: [E] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[O] Overall install:[O] Comments/Problems: My Intel Wireless 5100 AGN was detected, but needed a firmware driver(not a problem). My ethernet card was/is not detected. My hard drive driver was not detected during install, but was able to install anyway when I selected to continue without loading a driver. My hardrive info is now available in the Gnome Disk Utility(with the correct info same as Ubuntu). Description of the install, in prose, and any thoughts, comments and ideas you had during the initial install. How about a question during the installer asking the user if they would like to enable any repositories(e.g. non-free) needed to install the necessary drivers/firmware to get hardware working. Other than that, the process was painless and great. -- Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this report. Please compress large files using gzip. Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org. == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer DISTRIB_RELEASE=6.0 (squeeze) - installer build 20100211 X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom == Installer hardware-summary: == uname -a: Linux FitzLT 2.6.30-2-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Sep 25 22:16:56 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Memory Controller Hub [8086:2a40] (rev 07) lspci -knn: Subsystem: COMPAL Electronics Inc Device [14c0:0031] lspci -knn: 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset PCI Express Graphics Port [8086:2a41] (rev 07) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver lspci -knn: 00:1a.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #4 [8086:2937] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: COMPAL Electronics Inc Device [14c0:0031] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1a.1 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #5 [8086:2938] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: COMPAL Electronics Inc Device [14c0:0031] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1a.2 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #6 [8086:2939] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: COMPAL Electronics Inc Device [14c0:0031] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1a.7 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller #2 [8086:293c] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: COMPAL Electronics Inc Device [14c0:0031] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1b.0 Audio
Bug#587928: marked as done (quik-installer: fails to detect ext2 boot partition)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2010 06:02:06 + with message-id e1oa0to-0002gl...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#587928: fixed in quik-installer 0.0.24+nmu1 has caused the Debian Bug report #587928, regarding quik-installer: fails to detect ext2 boot partition to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 587928: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587928 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: quik-installer Version: 0.0.22 Severity: important Tags: patch quik-installer fails to detect that /boot is on an ext2 partition, as it is expecting the wrong sort of value from the $boot variable: --- debian/postinst.orig2009-05-14 05:07:12.0 -0700 +++ debian/postinst 2010-07-02 13:40:01.0 -0700 @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ # The partition where quik is installed must be ext2 and # quik must be installed on the first disk -if ! grep [[:space:]]/target$boot[[:space:]]ext2[[:space:]] /proc/mounts \ +if ! grep $boot[[:space:]]/target.*[[:space:]]ext2[[:space:]] /proc/mounts \ /dev/null; then die quik-installer/boot_not_ext2 '/boot not ext2' fi version 0.0.23 also includes this issue. live well, vagrant ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: quik-installer Source-Version: 0.0.24+nmu1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of quik-installer, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1.dsc to main/q/quik-installer/quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1.dsc quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1.tar.gz to main/q/quik-installer/quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1.tar.gz quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1_powerpc.udeb to main/q/quik-installer/quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1_powerpc.udeb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 587...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Vagrant Cascadian vagr...@debian.org (supplier of updated quik-installer package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 22:09:31 -0700 Source: quik-installer Binary: quik-installer Architecture: source powerpc Version: 0.0.24+nmu1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Vagrant Cascadian vagr...@debian.org Description: quik-installer - Install quik on a hard disk (udeb) Closes: 587928 Changes: quik-installer (0.0.24+nmu1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload. * Fix check for /boot on ext2. Closes: #587928 Checksums-Sha1: 539e947d2fc51bbefc9bba55f1dc03ee3213e363 1581 quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1.dsc a497edbe6b09e7cb7f0cf98faaa434264bae9305 97533 quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1.tar.gz b13da238aa688e7fcc092f1b7a4e88400934b726 94180 quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1_powerpc.udeb Checksums-Sha256: 4fc68caef992e664270a35a3d12796307ce3d4ee0b89ed3086a9d948c0c55d6b 1581 quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1.dsc a8254e129a743f8a30b448b71a0f64b9f8fd4b55d19867e0feef1dadad37d346 97533 quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1.tar.gz 80c07802fbeb9a835889e78d77d8780dcffc3ee88a1d8b553109456b442bc42c 94180 quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1_powerpc.udeb Files: f4c647aa2ec7a22cfaefcde494ac855a 1581 debian-installer standard quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1.dsc 440ad1908838b173924be884fa134555 97533 debian-installer standard quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1.tar.gz 265c595f5c0537111e3fe1da07de45c1 94180 debian-installer standard quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1_powerpc.udeb Package-Type: udeb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMQUWoAAoJEAMEK/Djv2x44wMP/0a36okVDrJtseUXar5gRnid VKB1jpzK9sYl5cqEwPZZWzvrN9wO6XxIJb+RMa44s7BUsbDxpUQRlKF6KdL2Cl7n NWK4c6AXfVGFfCPGKAn3dpScfQLBb6eizH61ssagXeDKjG18x7DRvKegzl6FJvGK vJafAQcUhjI9V0SK5xu3biEICsK2l2eeYff3w251jx7U+Sf12c2JRc2l3aOvUXvw f/LxYUVJAYNBNIzyDACCSPPPxzzJpoQYhQubyHgHxMPrQC6oMftOGB4T1NZI5aBE OhzJMPku3Td5nr/geoBM40w2NhtMVDWXYs2WSzPH96lrA1tllNvfp4R4GRjVxc9c Eqqgs+fHE3ARTdDvO52HxCOZvq8ilwhVdhFnN8GDqfM2dYmSugb3l5+Q71tlTRvX 8b4NcvgcuNo94p7KuhtNIpw12LaDZmqHVrz66K+QAZLtWTurK56otbBWcsMqFL28 D6jeQxCSLUCY6ihYyBYQuKBjpy6nk00aCp8omfHZt2IrQjo/n0k3ZDUdEP6pL08l H6M+iUOax9GT0fg9pASx+Sa9a1/nXkvfE0aUvIZD31do7CQJcqvglIjSrizN5ypb
Bug#587928: quik-installer: fails to detect ext2 boot partition
here's the diff for the uploaded NMU: diff -Nru quik-installer-0.0.24/debian/changelog quik-installer-0.0.24+nmu1/debian/changelog --- quik-installer-0.0.24/debian/changelog 2010-07-11 13:42:03.0 -0700 +++ quik-installer-0.0.24+nmu1/debian/changelog 2010-07-16 22:10:11.0 -0700 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +quik-installer (0.0.24+nmu1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix check for /boot on ext2. Closes: #587928 + + -- Vagrant Cascadian vagr...@debian.org Fri, 16 Jul 2010 22:09:31 -0700 + quik-installer (0.0.24) unstable; urgency=low [ Updated translations ] diff -Nru quik-installer-0.0.24/debian/postinst quik-installer-0.0.24+nmu1/debian/postinst --- quik-installer-0.0.24/debian/postinst 2009-07-23 10:00:00.0 -0700 +++ quik-installer-0.0.24+nmu1/debian/postinst 2010-07-16 22:02:47.0 -0700 @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ # The partition where quik is installed must be ext2 and # quik must be installed on the first disk -if ! grep [[:space:]]/target$boot[[:space:]]ext2[[:space:]] /proc/mounts \ +if ! grep $boot[[:space:]]/target.*[[:space:]]ext2[[:space:]] /proc/mounts \ /dev/null; then die quik-installer/boot_not_ext2 '/boot not ext2' fi live well, vagrant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100717064852.gt9...@claws.fglan
Bug#587928: quik-installer: fails to detect ext2 boot partition
Quoting Vagrant Cascadian (vagr...@freegeek.org): here's the diff for the uploaded NMU: Thanks. It's committed to SVN now. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
New strings in Debian Installer sublevels 1 to 3
Now that l10n updates and uploads happened in preparation of Debian Installer squeeze beta 1 release, I could add two new packages to the list of packages which templates are aggregated together in Debian Installer PO files: partmand-btrfs and partman-ufs These packages' strings are very similar to strings used in other partman-* packages, so most new strings are already pre-filled for many languages and just need minor updates to be complete again. There is no strict deadline to complete this, but I would urge D-I translators to do the update when possible. I really dream of D-I releases where I wouldn't have to prod late comers..:-) The statistics pages are currently being updated and you should soon get websec notices, for those of you who are subscribed to this service. -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#589213: Do not install Exim in minimal system
[Daniel Richard G.] Of course; it is attached. Looking at that, it doesn't appear that cron is responsible for pulling in exim4*; cron is installed much earlier in the process. heirloom-mailx is installed at the same time as exim4*, but that one only Suggests: exim4. It seems possible that d-i is installing exim4 explicitly. This is the point where exim is pulled in: Jul 15 18:27:55 in-target: The following NEW packages will be installed: Jul 15 18:27:55 in-target: exim4 exim4-base exim4-config exim4-daemon-light heirloom-mailx libgcrypt11 Jul 15 18:27:55 in-target: libgnutls26 libgpg-error0 libgssapi-krb5-2 libk5crypto3 libkeyutils1 Jul 15 18:27:55 in-target: libkrb5-3 libkrb5support0 libpcre3 popularity-contest psmisc The exim4 package is installed when popularity-contest is installed, while it is not removed when popularity-contest is purged. I suspect exim4 stay because it is the recommends of other packages (cron?). The popularity-contest recommend look ike this: Recommends: cron | fcron, exim4 | mail-transport-agent The obvious fix is to change popularity-contest to suggest instead of recommend, to avoid pulling in a MTA when popularity-contest is installed. Cc to the maintainer list to see if that is an interesting alternative. An alternative would be to change pkgsel/pre-pkgsel.d/90popcon to not install recommended packages. Looking at the svn source, this seem to have be the current setting in svn since 2009-12-24 (uploaded as version 0.27). Not convinced it is a good idea to not install recommended packages by default in d-i, thought, and suspect it is better to change the recommends for popularity-contest. Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100717075608.gb18...@login2.uio.no
Bug#589379: Unable to install Ubuntu because old LVM pvolume appear after automatic partitioning
Package: debian-installer? partman-* ? don't know Version: Ubuntu 10.04 installer. I send this bug-report to you, as the partman-auto package maintained by debian bug tracker (https://launchpad.net/partman-auto) I Unable to install Ubuntu 10.04 server because old LVM pvolume appear after automatic partitioning. How to reproduce: 1. Install Ubuntu to automatic LVM partitions 2. On other computer, just overwrite DOS partition table with another one, or just clear it. 3. Try to install Ubuntu again. After automatic partitioning it will see LVM partitions created on step 1! But it will try to issue pvcreate which fail due to existing logical volumes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimznhkeehgigfy94qrcsw7rahd5ikr_uk_t4...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#589213: Do not install Exim in minimal system
On Sat, 2010 Jul 17 09:56+0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: The obvious fix is to change popularity-contest to suggest instead of recommend, to avoid pulling in a MTA when popularity-contest is installed. Cc to the maintainer list to see if that is an interesting alternative. Hunh. I wasn't aware that popcon could submit reports via e-mail in addition to HTTP. Recommending an MTA in light of that doesn't seem unreasonable, in the abstract. But given that an MTA is useless for popcon's purposes if it is not configured, and that HTTP submission has a good chance of working out of the box, I'm inclined to think downgrading that to a suggestion would be sensible. An alternative would be to change pkgsel/pre-pkgsel.d/90popcon to not install recommended packages. Looking at the svn source, this seem to have be the current setting in svn since 2009-12-24 (uploaded as version 0.27). Not convinced it is a good idea to not install recommended packages by default in d-i, thought, and suspect it is better to change the recommends for popularity-contest. Yes, I see that... what is it now, the --no-recommends switch is broken? What source package do these files go into, anyway? Google pointed me to the d-i.alioth.debian.org site, but if I do apt-get source debian- installer, there's nothing like this in there. (I'd like to verify that the current installer is using the same revision of this script we're seeing in SVN.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1279355646.9862.1385319...@webmail.messagingengine.com
Bug#589213: marked as done (Do not install Exim in minimal system)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2010 10:46:15 +0200 with message-id 201007171046.16291.elen...@planet.nl and subject line Re: Bug#589213: Do not install Exim in minimal system has caused the Debian Bug report #589213, regarding Do not install Exim in minimal system to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 589213: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589213 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: debian-installer Version: 20100211+b1 (Note: I'm not sure that d-i is the correct package for this bug; please reassign if needed.) I want to install a minimal Debian/squeeze system. When the installer presents the tasksel screen, I unselect everything, even Standard system utilities. Yet when the install is finished, I see that a complete exim4 installation is present, and running. This is, to say the least, inappropriate for a minimal install. I found a couple of discussion threads referencing this issue: http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=17t=49816 http://www.pubbs.net/201003/debian/1016-fresh-debian-install-wo-exim.html From the looks of it, exim4 is installed because of a Recommends: by the cron package: Recommends: exim4 | postfix | mail-transport-agent, lockfile-progs I believe the right thing to do would be to include in the base install a minimal, non-daemon-ized, dumb MTA capable only of forwarding and local delivery, to satisfy the mail-transport-agent dependency. (Forwarding won't work out of the box, obviously, but for cron and other system facilities, local delivery is all that matters anyway.) It would make sense to install Exim if the user selects the Mail server task, or perhaps even Standard system utilities. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Saturday 17 July 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: The obvious fix is to change popularity-contest to suggest instead of recommend, to avoid pulling in a MTA when popularity-contest is installed. Cc to the maintainer list to see if that is an interesting alternative. It's only obvious if there is no good reason to have exim4 as a Recommends for popcon. IMO the Recommends fits the policy requirements in this case. An alternative would be to change pkgsel/pre-pkgsel.d/90popcon to not install recommended packages. Looking at the svn source, this seem to have be the current setting in svn since 2009-12-24 (uploaded as version 0.27). So the issue is already fixed in daily built images. Not convinced it is a good idea to not install recommended packages by default in d-i, thought, and suspect it is better to change the recommends for popularity-contest. Recommended packages *are* installed by default. We're just making an exception in this case as discussed in [1]. Given that the issue is already resolved, I'm closing this report. There is no need for any change in popcon. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2010/02/msg00033.html ---End Message---
Bug#589213: Do not install Exim in minimal system
[Daniel Richard G.] Yes, I see that... what is it now, the --no-recommends switch is broken? Nope. Your installation simply used version 0.26, which is one version before the change was introduced. I eagerly await Bills view on the proposed change for popularity-contest, which I believe i a better place to implement the change. What source package do these files go into, anyway? The pkgsel package got the 90popcon file. Google pointed me to the d-i.alioth.debian.org site, but if I do apt-get source debian-installer, there's nothing like this in there. The debian installer consist of a lot of smaller source packages working together, so the debian-installer source is only a small fragment of the entire installer. Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100717092955.gc18...@login2.uio.no
Processing of s390-dasd_0.0.26_s390.changes
s390-dasd_0.0.26_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: s390-dasd_0.0.26.dsc s390-dasd_0.0.26.tar.gz s390-dasd_0.0.26_s390.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oa5hb-0003l9...@franck.debian.org
Processing of s390-netdevice_0.0.23_s390.changes
s390-netdevice_0.0.23_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: s390-netdevice_0.0.23.dsc s390-netdevice_0.0.23.tar.gz s390-netdevice_0.0.23_s390.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oa5hc-0003m6...@franck.debian.org
Bug#589213: Do not install Exim in minimal system
On Saturday 17 July 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: I eagerly await Bills view on the proposed change for popularity-contest, which I believe i a better place to implement the change. No, it is not reasonable to ask packages to change functionally correct and policy-compliant dependencies only because of D-I [1]. popcon falls back to mail if the HTTP method fails, which does happen occasionally. Therefore a Recommends of an MTA is reasonable. Why do you feel the need to second-guess me on this? I spent several days analyzing the whole issue of Recommends and making various changes to deal with minor issues that arose from it. All changes where posted for review and discussed on the d-boot list. popcon is not the only package that needed an exception, so the --no-recommends option is needed anyway. Using it for popcon is a perfectly acceptable solution. So: as the reported issue is already fixed in current daily built D-I images and as the Recommends in popcon is functionally correct, there is absolutely zero need to make any changes in popcon. [1] The issue in D-I is mainly one of ordering: we install popcon before running tasksel and installing prio standard packages. The fact that we uninstall popcon if a user chooses not to participate is another weirdness in D-I which should not be reason to make any changes in the package. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201007171335.50088.elen...@planet.nl
s390-dasd_0.0.26_s390.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: s390-dasd_0.0.26.dsc to main/s/s390-dasd/s390-dasd_0.0.26.dsc s390-dasd_0.0.26.tar.gz to main/s/s390-dasd/s390-dasd_0.0.26.tar.gz s390-dasd_0.0.26_s390.udeb to main/s/s390-dasd/s390-dasd_0.0.26_s390.udeb Override entries for your package: s390-dasd_0.0.26.dsc - source debian-installer s390-dasd_0.0.26_s390.udeb - standard debian-installer Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oa5si-0004z8...@franck.debian.org
s390-netdevice_0.0.23_s390.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: s390-netdevice_0.0.23.dsc to main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.23.dsc s390-netdevice_0.0.23.tar.gz to main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.23.tar.gz s390-netdevice_0.0.23_s390.udeb to main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.23_s390.udeb Override entries for your package: s390-netdevice_0.0.23.dsc - source debian-installer s390-netdevice_0.0.23_s390.udeb - standard debian-installer Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oa5so-0004au...@franck.debian.org
Re: floppy install - unable to find root filesystem, ide_generic not loaded
Hi, Philip Hands p...@hands.com wrote:. BTW, is there any reason why not install Etch from floppy instead of Sarge? No, none -- I thought I'd checked that. Actually, I think what actually happened is that I found the sarge link first, checked for etch, found it and then must have pasted the wrong one into the email -- Doh! Sorry for any wasted time. Installing from Etch floppies would be much more sensible. So, I made a new try with installing Etch and then upgrading to Lenny. The first step, installing Etch worked fine, booting from Etch floppies and the installing from a Etch netinst cd. Then I upgraded to Lenny, according to the Lenny release notes in three steps: apt-get install apt aptitude aptitude safe-upgrade aptitude dist-upgrade No problems so far, upgrade completed without errrors or any glitches, but the new kernel was unable to boot (more exactly spoken: cannot find the root filesystem). It's an 2.6.26 kernel from debian linux image package (linux-image-2.6.26-486). System boot hangs at Waiting for root filesystem ... and then the debug shell comes up. The problem is: there are no ide related modules loaded, only some ACPI modules are loaded. Doing modprobe ide_generic makes the harddisk available, and closing the shell with exit let's the system boot continue fine. Can anyone tell me, why this happens? Should I file a bugreport? Against which package? Holger -- = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Created with Sylpheed 2.5.0 under DEBIAN GNU/LINUX 5.0.0 - L e n n y Registered LinuxUser #311290 - http://counter.li.org/ = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100717142850.5b6ed249.li...@wansing-online.de
Bug#589404: installation-reports: Squeeze fails to configure monitor
Package: installation-reports Severity: important -- Package-specific info: Boot method: netinst Image version: netinst iso from 14 jul 10 to within a day or 2 Date: Date and time of the install Machine: White box; VIA KT266/A mobo:Athlon 2000 :Nvidia MX4000: LG Flatron W1942T monitor Partitions: df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [0] Detect network card:[0] Configure network: [0] Detect CD: [0] Load installer modules: [0] Detect hard drives: [0] Partition hard drives: [0] Install base system:[0] Clock/timezone setup: [0] User/password setup:[0] Install tasks: [0] Install boot loader:[0] Overall install:[0] Comments/Problems: Failed to configure display to 1440 x 900. Config was 4 x 3 aspect ratio; sorry I don't remember exactly which numbers. I was surprised because Lenny gets it right with no problems and a HP laptop with the same 1440 x 900 is working with Squeeze. Text based install went flawlessly except for display config which I don't know enough to work around. Description of the install, in prose, and any thoughts, comments and ideas you had during the initial install. -- Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this report. Please compress large files using gzip. Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org. == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer DISTRIB_RELEASE=5.0 (lenny) - installer build 20090123lenny7 X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom == Installer hardware-summary: == umame -a: Linux Newbox 2.6.26-2-486 #1 Sat Jun 12 02:15:32 UTC 2010 i686 unknown lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8366/A/7 [Apollo KT266/A/333] [1106:3099] lspci -knn: 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8366/A/7 [Apollo KT266/A/333 AGP] [1106:b099] lspci -knn: 00:0a.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ [10ec:8139] (rev 10) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: 8139too lspci -knn: Kernel modules: 8139too, 8139cp lspci -knn: 00:0b.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ [10ec:8139] (rev 10) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: 8139too lspci -knn: Kernel modules: 8139too, 8139cp lspci -knn: 00:0c.0 USB Controller [0c03]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller [1106:3038] (rev 62) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: Kernel modules: uhci-hcd lspci -knn: 00:0c.1 USB Controller [0c03]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller [1106:3038] (rev 62) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: Kernel modules: uhci-hcd lspci -knn: 00:0c.2 USB Controller [0c03]: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 [1106:3104] (rev 65) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd lspci -knn: Kernel modules: ehci-hcd lspci -knn: 00:11.0 ISA bridge [0601]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8233A ISA Bridge [1106:3147] lspci -knn: 00:11.1 IDE interface [0101]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C PIPC Bus Master IDE [1106:0571] (rev 06) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: VIA_IDE lspci -knn: Kernel modules: via82cxxx lspci -knn: 00:11.2 USB Controller [0c03]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller [1106:3038] (rev 23) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: Kernel modules: uhci-hcd lspci -knn: 00:11.3 USB Controller [0c03]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller [1106:3038] (rev 23) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: Kernel modules: uhci-hcd lspci -knn: 00:11.5 Multimedia audio controller [0401]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8233/A/8235/8237 AC97 Audio Controller [1106:3059] (rev 40) lspci -knn: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: nVidia Corporation NV18 [GeForce4 MX 4000] [10de:0185] (rev c1) lsmod: Module Size Used by lsmod: nls_cp437 5504 0 lsmod: ufs63620 0 lsmod: qnx47684 0 lsmod: ntfs 180544 0 lsmod: dm_mod 45384 0 lsmod: md_mod 65940 0 lsmod: xfs 446836 0 lsmod: reiserfs 187264 0 lsmod: jfs 148188 0 lsmod: ext3 103688 4 lsmod: jbd35092 1 ext3 lsmod: vfat8832 0 lsmod: fat39964 1 vfat lsmod: ext2 52744 0 lsmod: mbcache 6656 2 ext3,ext2 lsmod:
partman-auto 92 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the partman-auto source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 89 Current version: 92 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oaaq1-0001qg...@franck.debian.org
partman-auto-crypto 14 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the partman-auto-crypto source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 12 Current version: 14 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oaaq1-0001qk...@franck.debian.org
partman-auto-lvm 35 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the partman-auto-lvm source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 33 Current version: 35 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oaaq1-0001qo...@franck.debian.org
partman-base 142 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the partman-base source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 140 Current version: 142 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oaaq1-0001qw...@franck.debian.org
partman-auto-raid 16 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the partman-auto-raid source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 15 Current version: 16 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oaaq1-0001qs...@franck.debian.org
partman-basicfilesystems 64 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the partman-basicfilesystems source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 63 Current version: 64 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oaaq1-0001qy...@franck.debian.org
partman-crypto 44 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the partman-crypto source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 40 Current version: 44 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oaaq1-0001r6...@franck.debian.org
partman-efi 21 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the partman-efi source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 20 Current version: 21 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oaaq1-0001ra...@franck.debian.org
partman-basicmethods 45 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the partman-basicmethods source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 43 Current version: 45 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oaaq1-0001r4...@franck.debian.org
partman-jfs 31 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the partman-jfs source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 30 Current version: 31 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oaaq2-0001ro...@franck.debian.org
partman-lvm 71 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the partman-lvm source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 68 Current version: 71 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oaaq2-0001rq...@franck.debian.org
partman-ext3 60 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the partman-ext3 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 58 Current version: 60 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oaaq2-0001rk...@franck.debian.org
partman-md 52 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the partman-md source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 49 Current version: 52 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oaaq2-0001rw...@franck.debian.org
Bug#589404: installation-reports: Squeeze fails to configure monitor
reassign 589404 xserver-xorg thanks Quoting Chris Barnard (cb...@westnet.com.au): Comments/Problems: Failed to configure display to 1440 x 900. Config was 4 x 3 aspect ratio; sorry I don't remember exactly which numbers. I was surprised because Lenny gets it right with no problems and a HP laptop with the same 1440 x 900 is working with Squeeze. Text based install went flawlessly except for display config which I don't know enough to work around. Thanks for your report. This issue is more related to the X.org server than the installer itself. Hence reassigning this bug report. You may need to add information about your system. Probably sending /var/log/Xorg.0.log would be good already. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#589404: installation-reports: Squeeze fails to configure monitor
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 589404 xserver-xorg Bug #589404 [installation-reports] installation-reports: Squeeze fails to configure monitor Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'xserver-xorg'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 589404: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589404 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127938631130475.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
SVN problem: committing a file named s...@latin
I need to add such a file, but svn add apparently chokes on it: bubu...@mykerinos:~/src/debian/debian-installer/installer/build/needed-characters LC_ALL=C svn add s...@latin svn: warning: 'sr' not found bubu...@mykerinos:~/src/debian/debian-installer/installer/build/needed-characters LC_ALL=C svn add s...@latin svn: warning: 'sr' not found Any suggestion? -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#589379: marked as done (Unable to install Ubuntu because old LVM pvolume appear after automatic partitioning)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:58:21 +0100 with message-id 20100717175821.gf12...@riva.ucam.org and subject line Re: Bug#589379: Unable to install Ubuntu because old LVM pvolume appear after automatic partitioning has caused the Debian Bug report #589379, regarding Unable to install Ubuntu because old LVM pvolume appear after automatic partitioning to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 589379: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589379 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: debian-installer? partman-* ? don't know Version: Ubuntu 10.04 installer. I send this bug-report to you, as the partman-auto package maintained by debian bug tracker (https://launchpad.net/partman-auto) I Unable to install Ubuntu 10.04 server because old LVM pvolume appear after automatic partitioning. How to reproduce: 1. Install Ubuntu to automatic LVM partitions 2. On other computer, just overwrite DOS partition table with another one, or just clear it. 3. Try to install Ubuntu again. After automatic partitioning it will see LVM partitions created on step 1! But it will try to issue pvcreate which fail due to existing logical volumes. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 02:07:05PM +0600, Марк Коренберг wrote: Package: debian-installer? partman-* ? don't know Version: Ubuntu 10.04 installer. I send this bug-report to you, as the partman-auto package maintained by debian bug tracker (https://launchpad.net/partman-auto) Please report Ubuntu bugs to Launchpad, regardless of what that page says for the upstream bug tracker location (most people won't be able to accurately determine whether an installer bug is upstream or not). https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs#Filing%20bugs%20at%20Launchpad.net -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] ---End Message---
Re: SVN problem: committing a file named s...@latin
On Saturday 17 July 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote: I need to add such a file, but svn add apparently chokes on it: bubu...@mykerinos:~/src/debian/debian-installer/installer/build/needed-c haracters LC_ALL=C svn add s...@latin svn: warning: 'sr' not found bubu...@mykerinos:~/src/debian/debian-installer/installer/build/needed-c haracters LC_ALL=C svn add s...@latin svn: warning: 'sr' not found Any suggestion? Works here (system running Lenny): $ touch s...@latin $ svn add s...@latin A s...@latin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201007172037.41596.elen...@planet.nl
Bug#589213: Do not install Exim in minimal system
On Sat, 2010 Jul 17 13:35+0200, Frans Pop wrote: So: as the reported issue is already fixed in current daily built D-I images and as the Recommends in popcon is functionally correct, there is absolutely zero need to make any changes in popcon. Okay, now I'm a little confused. So I see in the pkgsel ChangeLog that you addressed this back in late February. And I see that the current d-i downloads (netboot in particular) are dated early July, the same for both sid and squeeze. So why did this problem come up at all? Petter mentioned that version 0.26 of pkgsel was being used, but why would an early-July build of d-i use a version of pkgsel from last December? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1279393222.26560.1385369...@webmail.messagingengine.com
Bug#589213: Do not install Exim in minimal system
(Daniel: sorry for the private duplicate of this mail; no need to CC me.) On Saturday 17 July 2010, Daniel Richard G. wrote: On Sat, 2010 Jul 17 13:35+0200, Frans Pop wrote: So: as the reported issue is already fixed in current daily built D-I images and as the Recommends in popcon is functionally correct, there is absolutely zero need to make any changes in popcon. Okay, now I'm a little confused. So I see in the pkgsel ChangeLog that you addressed this back in late February. And I see that the current d-i downloads (netboot in particular) are dated early July, the same for both sid and squeeze. So why did this problem come up at all? Petter mentioned that version 0.26 of pkgsel was being used, but why would an early-July build of d-i use a version of pkgsel from last December? I'm not sure what image was used by the bug reporter, but I assume a current D-I alpha 1 image. The alpha1 images date from mid February. Until today, the version of pkgsel in testing was 0.26, which does not have my latest changes. This also means that current squeeze_d-i images still have the old version. As you can see from [1] my final work on Recommends handling in D-I was done _after_ the alpha1 release. I verified earlier today that with a daily built D-I image exim4 does not get pulled in when popcon is installed during pkgsel. Cheers, FJP [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2010/02/msg00148.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201007172143.49508.elen...@planet.nl
Bug#293967: jnzh 6n
03w -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c422f8a.f7f2f...@diamondv.com
Bug#304565: yukp tqj
w -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c422f20.458bf...@unisys.com
Bug#589453: 'Abort the installation' in main menu not working
Package: live-installer-launcher When using live-installer-launcher and d-i can't find a installer medium and you go back to the main menu, the 'Abort the installation' item doesn't work. I guess this is something similar as with the 'Exit' item we had and which was fixed in main-menu 1.30 and rootskel 1.79. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c421e73.7030...@debian.org
Bug#589213: Do not install Exim in minimal system
On Sat, 2010 Jul 17 21:40+0200, Frans Pop wrote: I'm not sure what image was used by the bug reporter, but I assume a current D-I alpha 1 image. The alpha1 images date from mid Februari. These received a refresh a few days ago: http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/squeeze/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/ I used the netboot tarball, from July 10. It's identical to the one for sid, so I had thought there were no pending updates to d-i or its dependencies. Until today, the version of pkgsel in testing was 0.26, which does not have my latest changes. As you can see from [1] my final work on Recommends handling in D-I was done after the alpha1 release. But this same error would have occurred if I had used d-i from sid. When you say release, do you mean, from daily builds to unstable, rather than unstable to testing? I verified earlier today that with a daily built D-I image exim4 does not get pulled in when popcon is installed during pkgsel. This is good to hear (as well as the fact that everyone wants to keep an MTA out of a minimal install). But how soon should a sid or squeeze d-i image with the correct behavior become available? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1279418959.13574.1385396...@webmail.messagingengine.com
Bug#589213: Do not install Exim in minimal system
On Sunday 18 July 2010, Daniel Richard G. wrote: On Sat, 2010 Jul 17 21:40+0200, Frans Pop wrote: I'm not sure what image was used by the bug reporter, but I assume a current D-I alpha 1 image. The alpha1 images date from mid Februari. These received a refresh a few days ago: http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/squeeze/main/installer-amd64/curr ent/images/netboot/ No, that's no update. Only a date change for some reason. The images are still identical to the alpha1 release from February. One way to see that is to check the kernel version: it uses 2.6.30 instead of 2.6.32. Another is to check the /etc/lsb-release file or the versions of udebs listed in /var/lib/dpkg/status. But this same error would have occurred if I had used d-i from sid. When you say release, do you mean, from daily builds to unstable, rather than unstable to testing? The error would *not* have occurred if you had used images based on D-I from sid. If you look at http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/, you will see three sets of links: - squeeze Alpha1 release (these are the ones you used) - current weekly snapshot - daily built images The first is the old release I was talking about and will soon be replaced with the new release. The second currently also still has the old version of pkgsel as weekly CD snapshots take udebs from testing and the current build is from last Monday (before the migrations of new versions done earlier today). The next build will use the new version (but is likely to be unusable because of the preparation for the new release which means that temporarily things from the old and new release will be mixed up and that is almost certain to cause breakage). The third set are the images that have the lastest version of all installer components from unstable. The page linked above is the only authoritative source for the various images available to install testing. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201007180446.34329.elen...@planet.nl
Bug#589213: Do not install Exim in minimal system
On Sun, 2010 Jul 18 04:46+0200, Frans Pop wrote: No, that's no update. Only a date change for some reason. The images are still identical to the alpha1 release from February. One way to see that is to check the kernel version: it uses 2.6.30 instead of 2.6.32. Another is to check the /etc/lsb-release file or the versions of udebs listed in /var/lib/dpkg/status. My understanding is that these were recently updated to fix the libblkid issue (see bug #587570), which had previously made the installer unusable. I guess they just re-built it from the same source as alpha1, modulo that one bit. The error would *not* have occurred if you had used images based on D-I from sid. So if I had used the one from http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/ it would have worked? But it's identical to the one for squeeze... If you look at http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/, you will see three sets of links: - squeeze Alpha1 release (these are the ones you used) - current weekly snapshot - daily built images Okay, so the weeklies come from testing, and the dailies from unstable. But the d-i images that are themselves in unstable and testing, those are formal, infrequently-updated releases? The page linked above is the only authoritative source for the various images available to install testing. Okay, though the netboot/USB/etc. downloads just go to the same place in the repositories where I was looking. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1279422828.20867.1385402...@webmail.messagingengine.com
Bug#589213: Do not install Exim in minimal system
On Sunday 18 July 2010, Daniel Richard G. wrote: So if I had used the one from http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/installer-amd64/current/ images/netboot/ it would have worked? No. Those are *not* daily built images. Follow the relevant links from the page I referred to! For netboot you need other images. But it's identical to the one for squeeze... Correct. Both are the last D-I release, not daily builds. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201007180609.52040.elen...@planet.nl
Bug#589213: Do not install Exim in minimal system
On Sun, 2010 Jul 18 06:09+0200, Frans Pop wrote: No. Those are *not* daily built images. Follow the relevant links from the page I referred to! For netboot you need other images. Oh, right---I see the different set of links, that go to various places (e.g. people.debian.org) not in the repositories. Missed those, sorry! But it's identical to the one for squeeze... Correct. Both are the last D-I release, not daily builds. Ah, so when you say images based on D-I from sid, you mean a daily build of the installer image (which uses d-i and other components from sid), not the image that is itself in sid/squeeze (which would be the last release). I think I have it straight now :) So I need to wait for the next release of d-i images, and then for those to make their way into testing. Thanks for your patience, and all the work you've done. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1279427557.29612.1385407...@webmail.messagingengine.com
Re: SVN problem: committing a file named s...@latin
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl): bubu...@mykerinos:~/src/debian/debian-installer/installer/build/needed-c haracters LC_ALL=C svn add s...@latin svn: warning: 'sr' not found bubu...@mykerinos:~/src/debian/debian-installer/installer/build/needed-c haracters LC_ALL=C svn add s...@latin svn: warning: 'sr' not found Any suggestion? Works here (system running Lenny): $ touch s...@latin $ svn add s...@latin A s...@latin And it worked also on my lenny system. For the sake of it, I tried from my sid system and a bash shell (I'm using dash as shell on my unstable system) and the same problem happened. That thus seems to be an issue in Subversion 1.6 that doesn't occur in 1.5. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Spam cleaning effort: June 2010
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org): We're now in July, so it's time for our team of magic reviewers to work on June 2010 archives. More details on http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SpamClean Please note that last month saw a discussion about whether it's good or not to mention the number of spam one finds, along with one's name. Some of us agreee with this, some don't. Please feel free to do whatever you think is appropriate. We still need at least one or, even better, two people to review June posts to -boot in order to be sure that spam is completely identified. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
