Re: Announcing d-i betas / rcs properly
Hi! Am 13.01.2011 03:33, schrieb Paul Wise: In the meantime RC1 was announced on d-d-a. I've taken the liberty of condensing it and rewriting it for a wider audience, any thoughts? Partly my fault; right when otavio found the time to contact me, I kind of fell of the net (and then fell into sleep). But as the press doesn't seem to have it picked up, yet, we can still send out announcements, if we hurry :) Some major improvements of the Squeeze installer over the Debian 5.0 (Lenny) installer include ...FIXME... Maybe we can extract that from the first alpha1 announcement? I'll check that. More changes are available in the Debian Installer team's announcement to the Debian community[3]. 3. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/01/msg2.html It's also available on the web, I think we should use http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/News/2011/20110112. Best regards, Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d2ec066.2060...@debian.org
Re: Announcing d-i betas / rcs properly
Hi again! Am 13.01.2011 10:05, schrieb Alexander Reichle-Schmehl: Some major improvements of the Squeeze installer over the Debian 5.0 (Lenny) installer include ...FIXME... Maybe we can extract that from the first alpha1 announcement? I'll check that. That was easy: Found http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2010/01/msg2.html (linked from http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/News/2010/). So I propose the following: Some major improvements of the Squeeze installer over the Debian 5.0 Lenny installer include the automatic installation of recommended packages, a rewrite of the localechooser component, on which language, timezone and mirror settings are based upon, ext4 file system support (while ext3 remains the default file system), and easier usage of partitions for software RAID, LVM and crypto setups. If no one says otherwise, I'll prepare it that way, and will send it out in about two hours. Best regards, Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d2ec240.4060...@debian.org
Re: Announcing d-i betas / rcs properly
[ adding -l10n-english to the CCs ] Hi! Am 13.01.2011 10:13, schrieb Alexander Reichle-Schmehl: If no one says otherwise, I'll prepare it that way, and will send it out in about two hours. The complete announcement is now available at svn+ssh://svn.alioth.debian.org/svn/publicity/announcements/en/2011/2011-01-13-debian-installer-rc1.wml. Most of the announcement was written by a native speaker, but if someone finds the time to review the improvements over the lenny installer paragraph, that would be great! Best regards, Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d2ec79f.5020...@debian.org
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On 2011-01-13, Daily build aggregator debian-boot@lists.debian.org wrote: * daily sparc images build: Due to the lack of porter and buildd admin interest there are currently no daily builds for the SPARC architecture. These builds will be reenable as soon as someone finds the time to do the necessary buildd setup. Please remove the buildd FUD. kthx Philipp Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrniitjg0.ka2.tr...@kelgar.0x539.de
Bug#608201: Patch
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 03:11, Jose Luis Zabalza jlz.3...@gmail.com wrote: Yes. I guest it work but, when you build a live with lb config -a i386 -b usb-hdd -d squeeze preseed say cdrom-detect/hybrid=false because it is not a hybrid image, but I don't know what is the way to detect that we are installig a usb-hdd image or a hybrid image and modify the 40cdrom script. The difference is the filesystem, but I don't sure of this either. If this is the case, the right place to fix it is on live-build. Not d-i. Daniel, could you give it a shot and tell us? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=9qrx356h6101_y3f992bhwyczsl5ijexgk...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#519196: (no subject)
Still an issue in Squeeze. :( Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d2ef641.5040...@xwis.net
Bug#609880: partman-partitioning: Add acl mount option
Package: partman-partitioning Version: 79 Severity: wishlist Hi, The mount options list doesn't include an option to enable ACLs (on ext). Could you add it? Greetings, Olaf -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110113125826.4588.73291.reportbug@router
Booting installer using hd-media
Hi all, I've created a version of debian installer (custom kernel). I've created a hd-media and cdrom-isolinux images. Then I've created iso image (using simple-cdd and its custom_installer conf variable - http://wiki.debian.org/Simple-CDD/Howto). During installation, when I try to load the installer I get No kernel modules were found I've checked the kernel in the hd-media image and in the iso image and both are the same. When I burn the iso onto a CD and boot it I get same error (and uname shows correct kernel version). So where can be a problem? How can I debug it? Where should be the modules located? Thank you for an advice. Michal Filka -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinngwy0kzveznvtcfybykzo8bbwyyi2ts71l...@mail.gmail.com
Upcoming Lenny point release
Hi, The next Lenny point release (5.0.8) is scheduled for Saturday, January 22nd. Stable NEW will be frozen during Monday 17th. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/6ba4cd83372f56a95d2e9019930044d8.squir...@adsl.funky-badger.org
Bug#608201: Patch
2011/1/13 Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br: On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 03:11, Jose Luis Zabalza jlz.3...@gmail.com wrote: Yes. I guest it work but, when you build a live with lb config -a i386 -b usb-hdd -d squeeze preseed say cdrom-detect/hybrid=false because it is not a hybrid image, but I don't know what is the way to detect that we are installig a usb-hdd image or a hybrid image and modify the 40cdrom script. The difference is the filesystem, but I don't sure of this either. If this is the case, the right place to fix it is on live-build. Not d-i. Daniel, could you give it a shot and tell us? Please, don't begin again. The problem is not in live-build. The problem is in apt-setup package that not taking into account the usb-hdd media to install. The patch is running. What more do you want? Bye -- José Luis Zabalza jlz.3008 a t gmail.com Linux Counter 172551 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktim2ogjf3ixrx85vyuhf+q+xc8jo9qjwzfkmg...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#608201: Patch
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 16:03:37 +0100, Jose Luis Zabalza wrote: 2011/1/13 Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br: On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 03:11, Jose Luis Zabalza jlz.3...@gmail.com wrote: Yes. I guest it work but, when you build a live with lb config -a i386 -b usb-hdd -d squeeze preseed say cdrom-detect/hybrid=false because it is not a hybrid image, but I don't know what is the way to detect that we are installig a usb-hdd image or a hybrid image and modify the 40cdrom script. The difference is the filesystem, but I don't sure of this either. If this is the case, the right place to fix it is on live-build. Not d-i. Daniel, could you give it a shot and tell us? Please, don't begin again. The problem is not in live-build. The problem is in apt-setup package that not taking into account the usb-hdd media to install. The patch is running. What more do you want? An explanation of what the patch does, why it's the right thing to do, and why it's not going to break some other use case, would be nice. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#609887: installation-reports: squeeze preseed recipe (partitioning) does not provide the same layout as lenny
Package: installation-reports Severity: normal I issued the following bug against the debian-installer; but I now noticed that bugs were requested against installation-reports for squeeze. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608906 -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.6 APT prefers stable APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable') Architecture: armel (armv5tel) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26 (PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_IE, LC_CTYPE=en_IE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110113151712.1627.28427.report...@crichton.homelinux.org
Mirroring win32-loader.exe in debian/tools/
Hi dear FTP-masters, after a short IRC talk with Alexander, let's resend this email to FTP-masters, with a proper subject. So please take a look below for the background, but in short form this would be: what about mirroring the win32-loader.exe Windows™ executable (from the win32- loader package) in our mirrors pool for the all the poor remaining Windows users out there to have a clearly defined place to download win32-loader.exe? Le Wednesday 20 October 2010 19:48:42 Otavio Salvador, vous avez écrit : On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote: Otavio Salvador, le Wed 20 Oct 2010 14:42:16 -0200, a écrit : * New goodbye-microsoft.com ? That website once installed Debian; now it's gNewSense that gets proposed. There is also get.debian.net, which had not the win32-loader.exe until recently. It gained a debian.exe which is apparently the goodbye-microsoft.com gnewsense installer (customized win32- loader 0.6.13). So I think a canonical place for win32-loader-standalone.exe would be nice. get.d.n ? under d-i.d.o ? Opinions ? Personally I think that it ought to be in the mirrors. Maybe it could use same way we do for loadlin and other stuff. Indeed, that'd be in http://ftp.debian.org/debian/tools/ then. The way loadlin does it is running dpkg-distaddfile loadlin.exe byhand - from debian/rules. Note however that byhand indeed means that you need to give cookies to Ganeff to get him install the file by hand, so avoid doing it too often. As you can read above we're discussing how to deal with win32-loader. I think it should be on the mirrors but maybe we're missing something here that might cause problems. Please comment on that. Cheers, OdyX -- Didier Raboud, proud Debian Developer. CH-1020 Renens o...@debian.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#608201: Patch
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 13:03, Jose Luis Zabalza jlz.3...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/1/13 Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br: Daniel, could you give it a shot and tell us? Please, don't begin again. The problem is not in live-build. The problem is in apt-setup package that not taking into account the usb-hdd media to install. I have not began. Sometimes the easiest fix is not the right fix but a workaround and that's why I asked for Daniel's input on that. I don't know if you know it but I am an old contributor of Debian Live and I always try to fix and help the handling of Debian Live related stuff so before complaning please stop and think twice. This avoid losing your and other's time with useless email. The patch is running. What more do you want? Personally I am not confident if the patch can or not have bad effects in other use cases and then I asked Daniel (on this mail), Joey and Colin's (on #debian-boot) input about that.. We won't risk installer stability if a risky patch. We're too close of release. We are not denying the fix for the release but we need to be sure about the fix. Cheers, -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimiyhb1sk4+ss7f+yw-rlvlhknk1mfk-aydx...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Mirroring win32-loader.exe in debian/tools/
Le Thursday 13 January 2011 16:29:48 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud, vous avez écrit : Hi dear FTP-masters, after a short IRC talk with Alexander, let's resend this email to FTP-masters, with a proper subject. So please take a look below for the background, but in short form this would be: what about mirroring the win32-loader.exe Windows™ executable (from the win32- loader package) in our mirrors pool for the all the poor remaining Windows users out there to have a clearly defined place to download win32-loader.exe? Ah… I also noticed some minutes after (within the same IRC chat, doh) that we should actually talk about the win32-loader-standalone.exe executable; as it's the one that is network-enabled and which is of interest for random users out there: win32-loader.exe is the one installed on d-i CDs. -- Didier Raboud, proud Debian Developer. CH-1020 Renens o...@debian.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: SPARC daily d-i builds
Excerpts from Philipp Kern's message of Mit Jan 12 02:46:24 +0100 2011: Hi, am Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 01:53:59AM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben: Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org (11/01/2011): As all my attempts to find someone willing to setup d-i daily builds on a sparc buildd [1] failed. I'm going to give up now and will not bother you again until some steps up to do the necessary work or provide me with buildd access. I added the following note to the d-i daily builds overview page: Due to the lack of porter and buildd admin interest there are currently no daily builds for the SPARC architecture. These builds will be reenable as soon as someone finds the time to do the necessary buildd setup. I would also be willing to do the neccessary setup myself if someone provides me with the necessary access to a sparc buildd. So, again, it's not about lack of interest, it's about lack of time. As Cyril Brulebois was the only one to even answer, I inferred that the other persons behind sparc@b.d.o and all the subscribers on debian-sparc don't seem to be interested. My bad. After having more information I have now reworded the text to: Due to the lack of buildd suitable buildd machine there are currently no daily builds for the SPARC architecture. These builds will be reenabled as soon as as a suitable machine is available. It was never my intention to offend anyone or to spread FUD. Sorry if you got this impression. Also, you could have pinged debian-wb-team@. I believe aba did most of the d-i autobuilding stuff, so he might have some clue to share. I've added this list to the loop. I was not aware that the right contact point for this kind of question would be debian-wb-team@l.d.o. I thought that the correct contact point would be the sparc buildd admins because the setup needs access to the buildd and I expected that the persons having this kind of access to be the buildd admins. I thought that the wb-team is involved with managing the wb database which is not used for the d-i daily builds. and I did tell on #d-boot the following on Nov 13 2010: [...] 15:27 trave11er ok, we didn't get any reply from stappers, so sparc dailies still have the old kernels, afaict [...] 15:31 otavio trave11er: buildd people were going to put sparc into it 15:31 otavio trave11er: dunno if it has been done 15:31 otavio adsb: ^? [...] 15:33 phil otavio: were going to is quite untrue. There still isn't a bug report, and I did report the result of my investigation, i.e. there's no space on the only LVMed sparc buildd we have. 15:37 otavio phil: I didn't recall about the space issue 15:37 otavio phil: indeed So meh, whatever. To my knowledge that's still true. We currently don't have the capacities and we admitted that. Furthermore not asking -wb-team might not give you answers, indeed. Sorry if I missed something along the way. Sorry that I missed this along the way. This is the first time I hear of the space issue. IMHO IRC is not a good medium to communicate important information to a team. It's to easy to forget something and the information never reaches all the involved persons. As I'm very rarely on IRC I missed this communication. Gaudenz -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Kads sekss tev patik?
Esmu visseksigaka latviete uz shis planetas. Esmu iista pornozvaigzne. Tagad stradaa pirma man veltita majas lapa latviesu valoda. Nac un noskaties 3 seksigakas filmas no manas kolekcijas. Profesionalju darbs - seksigi, atklati, erotiski. Cilick on link: HTTP://WWW.latvianpornstar.lv -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/auto-10612...@tsrs.ru
Re: SPARC daily d-i builds
Hi Excerpts from Axel Beckert's message of Mit Jan 12 10:47:19 +0100 2011: So how much disk space is needed for building the daily images, why does it have to be on a buildd (i.e. does it suffice to throw hardware at it) and how new/fast does the sparc to be? The d-i team would like to have all these builds on buildds. This is to avoid problems due to builds stopping because the person doing the builds loosing interest. So I would prefer the buildd solution to yet another single DD run solution. The builds themselves don't need a lot of disk space and cpu power. The main part is downloading udebs and building images out of them. There is no compilation involved. Gaudenz -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#609887: installation-reports: squeeze preseed recipe (partitioning) does not provide the same layout as lenny
reassign 609887 partman-base reassign 608906 partman-base forcemerge 597005 608906 609887 thanks On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:17:12 +0100, Marc Leeman wrote: I issued the following bug against the debian-installer; but I now noticed that bugs were requested against installation-reports for squeeze. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608906 Your previous report was sufficient. Actually, this was already reported, see #597005. This issue may be due to some change in the alignment settings in the installer. Does it help if you try to preseed partman/alignment to something else than optimal (e.g. cylinder or minimal)? -- Denis Laxalde -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110113125308.2efff...@mail.gmail.com
Processed: Re: Bug#609887: installation-reports: squeeze preseed recipe (partitioning) does not provide the same layout as lenny
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 609887 partman-base Bug #609887 [installation-reports] installation-reports: squeeze preseed recipe (partitioning) does not provide the same layout as lenny Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'partman-base'. reassign 608906 partman-base Bug #608906 [debian-installer] debian-installer: preseed recipe (partitioning) does not provide the same layout as lenny Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'partman-base'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions debian-squeeze-di-beta2-amd64-netinst.iso. forcemerge 597005 608906 609887 Bug#597005: partman-base: Preserving partitions on install exposes alignment problem Bug#608906: debian-installer: preseed recipe (partitioning) does not provide the same layout as lenny Bug#609887: installation-reports: squeeze preseed recipe (partitioning) does not provide the same layout as lenny Forcibly Merged 597005 608906 609887. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 608906: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608906 609887: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609887 597005: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597005 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129494120030427.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#609887: installation-reports: squeeze preseed recipe (partitioning) does not provide the same layout as lenny
reassign 608906 installation-reports forcemerge 608906 609887 thanks Quoting Marc Leeman (marc.lee...@gmail.com): Package: installation-reports Severity: normal I issued the following bug against the debian-installer; but I now noticed that bugs were requested against installation-reports for squeeze. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608906 So reassigning and merging both bug reports. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#609887: installation-reports: squeeze preseed recipe (partitioning) does not provide the same layout as lenny
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 608906 installation-reports Bug #608906 [partman-base] debian-installer: preseed recipe (partitioning) does not provide the same layout as lenny Bug #597005 [partman-base] partman-base: Preserving partitions on install exposes alignment problem Bug #609887 [partman-base] installation-reports: squeeze preseed recipe (partitioning) does not provide the same layout as lenny Bug reassigned from package 'partman-base' to 'installation-reports'. Bug reassigned from package 'partman-base' to 'installation-reports'. Bug reassigned from package 'partman-base' to 'installation-reports'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions partman-base/144. Bug No longer marked as found in versions partman-base/144. Bug No longer marked as found in versions partman-base/144. forcemerge 608906 609887 Bug#608906: debian-installer: preseed recipe (partitioning) does not provide the same layout as lenny Bug#609887: installation-reports: squeeze preseed recipe (partitioning) does not provide the same layout as lenny Bug#597005: partman-base: Preserving partitions on install exposes alignment problem Forcibly Merged 597005 608906 609887. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 608906: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608906 609887: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609887 597005: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597005 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129494466415769.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#609910: installation-reports: squeeze rc1 successful with encrypted root
Subject: installation-reports: squeeze rc1 successful with encrypted root Package: installation-reports Severity: minor *** Please type your report below this line *** -- Package-specific info: Boot method: CD Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_rc1/i386/iso-cd/debian-sq-di-rc1-i386-CD-1.iso Date: 2011-01-12 Machine: Dell Latitude E6400 Partitions: Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdb1 * 1 32 248832 83 Linux Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary. /dev/sdb2 329730778997775 Extended /dev/sdb5 32973077899776 83 Linux sdb5 is an encrypted partition using LVM. Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[O] Overall install:[O] Comments/Problems: There are some spurious errors in the boot process (after grub) but before I get asked for a password. These don't seem to cause any problems, after I enter the password it boots fine: Volume group squeeze not found Skipping volume group squeeze Unable to find LVM volume squeeze/root Volume group squeeze not found Skipping volume group squeeze Unable to find LVM volume squeeze/swap_1 Reading all physical volumes. This may take a while... No volume groups found No volume groups found cryptsetup: evms_activate is not available Thanks for your hard work, Squeeze looks great! -- Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this report. Please compress large files using gzip. Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org. == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer DISTRIB_RELEASE=6.0 (squeeze) - installer build 20110106 X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom == Installer hardware-summary: == uname -a: Linux squeeze 2.6.32-5-486 #1 Fri Dec 10 15:32:53 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Memory Controller Hub [8086:2a40] (rev 07) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0233] lspci -knn: 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset PCI Express Graphics Port [8086:2a41] (rev 07) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport lspci -knn: 00:19.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 82567LM Gigabit Network Connection [8086:10f5] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0233] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: e1000e lspci -knn: 00:1a.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #4 [8086:2937] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0233] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1a.1 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #5 [8086:2938] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0233] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1a.2 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #6 [8086:2939] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0233] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1a.7 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller #2 [8086:293c] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0233] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) HD Audio Controller [8086:293e] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0233] lspci -knn: 00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 1 [8086:2940] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport lspci -knn: 00:1c.1 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 2 [8086:2942] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport lspci -knn: 00:1c.2 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 3 [8086:2944] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport lspci -knn: 00:1c.3 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 4 [8086:2946] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport lspci -knn: 00:1d.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #1 [8086:2934]
Re: Announcing d-i betas / rcs properly
Hello, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org wrote: The complete announcement is now available at svn+ssh://svn.alioth.debian.org/svn/publicity/announcements/en/2011/2011-01-13-debian-installer-rc1.wml. pThere are some a href=http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/errata;known issues/a with the installer that do not need to be reported, but the Debian installer team do need your help to find more bugs and further improve the installer, so please try it. Installer CDs, - other media and everything you else you will need are available at the + other media and everything else you will need are available at the a href=http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer;web site/a./p Holger -- = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Created with Sylpheed 2.5.0 under DEBIAN GNU/LINUX 5.0.0 - L e n n y Registered LinuxUser #311290 - http://counter.li.org/ = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110113205205.fc7988e2.li...@wansing-online.de
Re: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#606268: Bug#606268: Bug#606268: now ignores interfaces configured by d-i
Sorry for the short and probably unsatisfying answer. I'll try to provide more detail. On 09.01.2011 02:52, Michael Biebl wrote: On 08.01.2011 23:24, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:15:02 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Michael Biebl wrote: Please also note that e.g. if you setup your (ethernet) connection using a static IP configuration, we do not comment such interface configurations either. So the issue about NM not managing certain devices extends to ethernet interfaces as well and this behaviour has been so ever since lenny, so I'll mark this bug accordingly. There is a world of difference between statically configuring a ethernet interface and having that interface never be managed by network-manager, and having a wireless interface that was working fine with network-manager suddenly start only connecting to a single wireless network (if any) and not appearing in network-manager anymore. This bug is about the latter problem; the former is not a problem. This is a new bug, and I tire of your attempts to deny it. Is there any progress towards fixing this for squeeze? No This is still true. The simple reason is, that I'm not sure how to fix this properly for squeeze and currently I don't have a lot of time to look into this. I'm already not very fond of the /etc/network/interfaces mangling as of now (i.e. commenting out dhcp entries). I don't really want to go further down that road. That said, this behaviour of ignoring interfaces from /etc/network/interfaces has been so since at least lenny. So the bug title is not quite correct in that regard. It is true, that releases that followed the Lenny version contained a bug in the interface parser, which did not correctly mark wireless interfaces as unmanaged when configured in /etc/network/interfaces. People upgrading directly from Lenny won't see a change in behaviour, people who constantly upgraded did. This leaves the new-install case. Imho, the cleanest solution here would be, if d-i simply wouldn't write out any configuration (dhcp/wireless) if network-manager is installed (through the desktop task). CCing the d-i team, to know if that would be feasible. Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#609466: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_rc1/sparc/iso-cd/debian-sq-di-rc1-sparc-netinst.iso
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_rc1/sparc/iso-cd/debian-sq-di-rc1-sparc-netinst.iso It has the same problem Last line is console [tty0] enabled, bootconsole disabled after that nothing more happens
Re: Bug#606268: Bug#606268: Bug#606268: now ignores interfaces configured by d-i
[Summary: NetworkManager doesn't properly transition away from /etc/network/interfaces-configured wireless interfaces to using it's own internal configuration database, causing them to not come up at all] On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 08:30:40PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: Imho, the cleanest solution here would be, if d-i simply wouldn't write out any configuration (dhcp/wireless) if network-manager is installed (through the desktop task). CCing the d-i team, to know if that would be feasible. No, this is not feasible at this stage of the release. The package that detects and configures the network (netcfg) runs long, *LONG* before any packages or tasks are chosen. Now, in theory, we could defer writing out /e/n/interfaces until the end of the install (probably by extending finish-install), but that would be complicated and prone to bugs, which means isn't going to happen for squeeze anyway (d-i rc1 was just released; nothing but showstopper bugs *in* *d-i* are going to get fixed now). At any rate, I don't think that not writing out network config is going to solve your problem. What about when a user of a newly-installed system (ie post d-i) decides they want the desktop task installed? Or decides to install NM individually? In both of those cases, interfaces is going to be populated, and you (presumably) need to deal with that correctly, and it's no different to the install-time case anyway. Even if we ignored those people, by not writing out a network config you're giving all desktop users a system with no network at all at first boot, which is pretty much guaranteed to result in a large pile of failing d-i installation reports that we can do nothing about. - Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110113212202.gb2...@hezmatt.org
Re: Mirroring win32-loader.exe in debian/tools/
So please take a look below for the background, but in short form this would be: what about mirroring the win32-loader.exe Windows™ executable (from the win32- loader package) in our mirrors pool for the all the poor remaining Windows users out there to have a clearly defined place to download win32-loader.exe? Personally I think that it ought to be in the mirrors. Maybe it could use same way we do for loadlin and other stuff. Well, we do want to get less, not more of those. :) from debian/rules. Note however that byhand indeed means that you need to give cookies to Ganeff to get him install the file by hand, so avoid doing it too often. I like cookies. Now, how often ARE you going to update this? Does this need a new version with every d-i release? That would be bad. Or just every other century? If its more than *few* times a year we can think of an autobyhand way for it, but if its seldomly... Keep in mind, it will be attached to the win32-loader package, so with each upload the byhand will be there. Also, please not only provide a .exe, but also a .txt with the same basename, explaining what it is. -- bye, Joerg My first contact with Linux was with SuSE 6.3. A friend of mine installed it on my pc, and just take me a couple of hours to reinstall Windows on it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87pqs0o5vq@gkar.ganneff.de
Re: Mirroring win32-loader.exe in debian/tools/
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 19:23, Joerg Jaspert jo...@debian.org wrote: So please take a look below for the background, but in short form this would be: what about mirroring the win32-loader.exe Windows™ executable (from the win32- loader package) in our mirrors pool for the all the poor remaining Windows users out there to have a clearly defined place to download win32-loader.exe? Personally I think that it ought to be in the mirrors. Maybe it could use same way we do for loadlin and other stuff. Well, we do want to get less, not more of those. :) hehe :-) from debian/rules. Note however that byhand indeed means that you need to give cookies to Ganeff to get him install the file by hand, so avoid doing it too often. I like cookies. Now, how often ARE you going to update this? Does this need a new version with every d-i release? That would be bad. Or just every other century? It will be updated ofthen specially because people adds translation updates to it. If its more than *few* times a year we can think of an autobyhand way for it, but if its seldomly... Keep in mind, it will be attached to the win32-loader package, so with each upload the byhand will be there. I think that autobyhand is the way to go. However I think it shouldn't be put as stable with the autobyhand. This should be coordinated with you (ftpmasters) as we do for d-i. Also, please not only provide a .exe, but also a .txt with the same basename, explaining what it is. Right. Odyx, can you take care of it? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=SRJwkje10KkxTPEASvWrF2RXXYEkXDq4xfZ=y...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bug#606268: Bug#606268: Bug#606268: now ignores interfaces configured by d-i
On 13.01.2011 22:22, Matthew Palmer wrote: [Summary: NetworkManager doesn't properly transition away from /etc/network/interfaces-configured wireless interfaces to using it's own internal configuration database, causing them to not come up at all] On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 08:30:40PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: Imho, the cleanest solution here would be, if d-i simply wouldn't write out any configuration (dhcp/wireless) if network-manager is installed (through the desktop task). CCing the d-i team, to know if that would be feasible. No, this is not feasible at this stage of the release. The package that detects and configures the network (netcfg) runs long, *LONG* before any packages or tasks are chosen. Now, in theory, we could defer writing out /e/n/interfaces until the end of the install (probably by extending finish-install), but that would be complicated and prone to bugs, which means isn't going to happen for squeeze anyway (d-i rc1 was just released; nothing but showstopper bugs *in* *d-i* are going to get fixed now). Ok, then I guess we need to tag this bug as squeeze-ignore, unless someone comes up with a better idea. At any rate, I don't think that not writing out network config is going to solve your problem. What about when a user of a newly-installed system (ie post d-i) decides they want the desktop task installed? Or decides to install NM individually? In both of those cases, interfaces is going to be populated, and you (presumably) need to deal with that correctly, and it's no different to the install-time case anyway. Even if we ignored those people, by not writing out a network config you're giving all desktop users a system with no network at all at first boot, which is pretty much To be precise, this would only affect desktop installs using wireless/WEP during installation, so not *all*. guaranteed to result in a large pile of failing d-i installation reports that we can do nothing about. Afaics the proposed solution to simply comment out the wep configuration from /e/n/i will basically have the same effect. I mean, I could ride the easy path, as wicd does, and simply ignore what's configured in /e/n/i and if people want to have devices not be managed by NM, they have to configure that explicitly in /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf. Setting managed=true needs more work and integration, especially from ifupdown, i.e. if NM is in charge of the device, you don't want ifupdown to bring it up too, and e.g. spawn a second wpa_supplicant instance which then fight against each other. Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#603554: Bug#603552: Update theme SpaceFun and wiki page
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 18:10 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: reopen 603554 reassign 603554 debian-installer thanks On jeu., 2010-12-09 at 16:36 +, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 07:29:40PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On mer., 2010-12-08 at 19:12 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: regarding squeeze, i'll only sync those from debian-cd, so if debian-cd uses the correct things, so will syslinux-themes-debian. Nice to know that. Adding the debian-cd bug to the list then. For debian-cd people, the SpaceFun isolinux artwork is at http://svn.debianart.org/themes/spacefun/isolinux/ Do you plan to include it? There's nothing needed in debian-cd at all; we just include whatever graphics are provided by the d-i folks. Ok, so maybe in the end we'll manage to do it, one step at a time. I'm not sure if Otavio reply applies to d-i or not, though. So, the d-i side of this appears to be done with RC1, afaict. Is there anything that still needs to happen on the syslinux side and, if so, could it either happen soon or for 6.0.1, please? :) Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1294955561.1480.247.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Mirroring win32-loader.exe in debian/tools/
Le Thursday 13 January 2011 22:23:05 Joerg Jaspert, vous avez écrit : from debian/rules. Note however that byhand indeed means that you need to give cookies to Ganeff to get him install the file by hand, so avoid doing it too often. I like cookies. Now, how often ARE you going to update this? Does this need a new version with every d-i release? That would be bad. Or just every other century? The win32-loader package has a track record of being updated on a ~ monthly basis in unstable: translations, new features, etc. It has spent a long time in unstable as it was blocked as the rest of d-i, but has then 4 times during the Squeeze release cycle (so a ~ monthly basis too, depending on the unblocking policy in effect). And of course it should not get any update in stable (but s**t happens). If its more than *few* times a year we can think of an autobyhand way for it, but if its seldomly... Keep in mind, it will be attached to the win32-loader package, so with each upload the byhand will be there. Now I'm not certain we want the debian/tools/win32-loader.exe be synced with the unstable version. Is there a way to sync it to the testing version (beside setting and unsetting $BYHAND [as is done in loadlin] depending on the importance of the changes)? Also, please not only provide a .exe, but also a .txt with the same basename, explaining what it is. I will try to come up with something; it'll be there on the win32-loader upload that enables the dpkg-distaddfile call (after proofread on -boot). -- Didier Raboud, proud Debian Developer. CH-1020 Renens o...@debian.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Debian Installer 6.0 Release Candidate 1 release
Christian PERRIER a écrit: There's one: the LANGUAGE variable. ... Northern Sami fallsback successively to: - Norwegian Bokmal - Norwegian Nynorsk - Danish - Swedish Ah, that sounds like a good mechanism. I am satisfied :) turned out to be sensitive: Ukrainian was falling back to Russian, for instanceand we've been told that Ukrainian people aren't enthusiast about that..:-) Yes, it would make sense for it to be the responsibility of the language translation teams to select their chosen LANGUAGE variable with their preferred fallbacks. Drew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1294962375.4363.13.camel@pug
Bug#512794: marked as done (installation-reports)
Your message dated Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:04:55 + with message-id 1294963495.2565.6.camel@eeepc.Belkin and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #512794, regarding installation-reports to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 512794: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=512794 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: installation-reports Boot method: CD, expert mode no gui. Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-kde-CD-1.iso (weekly-build image = first week of January, 2009) Date: January, 5th 2009 Machine: HP Compaq dx2450 Microtower PC Processor: AMD Athlon 1640B Memory: 2GB Partitions: df -Tl: S.ficherosTipo Bloques de 1K UsadoDispon Uso% Montado en /dev/sda1 ext396124904445672 90796280 1% / tmpfstmpfs 972592 0972592 0% /lib/init/rw udev tmpfs 1024096 10144 1% /dev tmpfstmpfs 972592 0972592 0% /dev/shm /dev/sda7 ext3 180811976 27987228 143639988 17% /home /dev/sda8 ext3 9606084152712 8965400 2% /tmp /dev/sda6 ext396124904 2954204 88287748 4% /usr /dev/sda5 ext396124904 1427328 89814624 2% /var Output of lspci -knn: 00:00.0 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 Memory Controller [10de:03ea] (rev a1) 00:01.0 ISA bridge [0601]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 LPC Bridge [10de:03e0] (rev a2) 00:01.1 SMBus [0c05]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 SMBus [10de:03eb] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: nForce2_smbus Kernel modules: i2c-nforce2 00:01.2 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 Memory Controller [10de:03f5] (rev a2) 00:02.0 USB Controller [0c03]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 USB Controller [10de:03f1] (rev a3) Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd Kernel modules: ohci-hcd 00:02.1 USB Controller [0c03]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 USB Controller [10de:03f2] (rev a3) Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd Kernel modules: ehci-hcd 00:04.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 PCI bridge [10de:03f3] (rev a1) 00:05.0 Audio device [0403]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 High Definition Audio [10de:03f0] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: HDA Intel Kernel modules: snd-hda-intel 00:07.0 Bridge [0680]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 Ethernet [10de:03ef] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: forcedeth Kernel modules: forcedeth 00:08.0 IDE interface [0101]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 SATA Controller [10de:03f6] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: sata_nv Kernel modules: sata_nv 00:08.1 IDE interface [0101]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 SATA Controller [10de:03f6] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: sata_nv Kernel modules: sata_nv 00:09.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 PCI Express bridge [10de:03e8] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver Kernel modules: shpchp 00:0b.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 PCI Express bridge [10de:03e9] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver Kernel modules: shpchp 00:0c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 PCI Express bridge [10de:03e9] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver Kernel modules: shpchp 00:0d.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: nVidia Corporation GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 [10de:03d0] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: nvidia Kernel modules: nvidiafb, nvidia 00:18.0 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] HyperTransport Technology Configuration [1022:1100] 00:18.1 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Address Map [1022:1101] 00:18.2 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] DRAM Controller [1022:1102] 00:18.3 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Miscellaneous Control [1022:1103] Kernel driver in use: k8temp Kernel modules: k8temp Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[O] Overall install:[O] Comments/Problems: I've had to install nVidia binary kernel module (173.14.09+3) after installation and
Bug#512791: marked as done (reboot with amd64 on a Core 2 Duo SU93000)
Your message dated Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:04:31 + with message-id 1294963471.2565.5.camel@eeepc.Belkin and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #512791, regarding reboot with amd64 on a Core 2 Duo SU93000 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 512791: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=512791 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: installation-reports Boot method: USB stick (zcat boot.img.gz /dev/sda1; mount ...; cp ...iso /mnt) Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/lenny_di_rc1/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-businesscard.iso http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-amd64/current/images/hd-media/boot.img.gz Date: 23. Jan 2009 Machine: Samsung x360 premium (Core 2 Duo SU9300) Memory: 4GB Partitions: - Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn): - Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [ E ] Detect network card:[ ] Configure network: [ ] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [ ] Detect hard drives: [ ] Partition hard drives: [ ] Install base system:[ ] Clock/timezone setup: [ ] User/password setup:[ ] Install tasks: [ ] Install boot loader:[ ] Overall install:[ ] Comments/Problems: When using the amd64 version of the installer, the computer reboots early in the linux start up process. Any help would be acknowledged. Best wishes, Helmut Rathgen ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi, Thanks for your report. Closing as it's an installation report from debian installer version which isn't supported anymore. Feel free to test and report any issues against the current debian installer release (Squeeze RC1) which supports more hardware and also it's improved. Thanks! http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_rc1/ -- Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, Miguel Figueiredo http://www.DebianPT.org ---End Message---
Bug#513750: marked as done (installation-report)
Your message dated Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:05:34 + with message-id 1294963534.2565.7.camel@eeepc.Belkin and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #513750, regarding installation-report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 513750: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513750 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: installation-reports Version: 2.38 Severity: normal -- Package-specific info: Boot method: CD Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/.lenny_bibble Date: Sa 31. Jan 22:06:44 CET 2009 Machine: FSC Lifebook E Series E8110 Partitios: df -Tl: Dateisystem Typ1K#8208;Blöcke Benutzt Verfügbar Ben% Eingehängt auf /dev/mapper/debian-root ext3 6724784 2062588 4320592 33% / tmpfstmpfs 513152 0513152 0% /lib/init/rw udev tmpfs 10240 100 10140 1% /dev tmpfstmpfs 513152 0513152 0% /dev/shm /dev/sda1 ext2 25 17099203788 8% /boot /dev/mapper/debian-home ext367337848192120 63725160 1% /home /dev/hda iso9660 659508659508 0 100% /media/cdrom0 fdisk -l Disk /dev/sda: 80.0 GB, 80026361856 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 9729 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disk identifier: 0x477719f1 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1 31 248976 83 Linux /dev/sda2 32972977899185 83 Linux Disk /dev/dm-0: 79.7 GB, 79767712768 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 9697 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disk identifier: 0x Disk /dev/dm-0 doesn't contain a valid partition table Disk /dev/dm-1: 6996 MB, 6996099072 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 850 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disk identifier: 0x Disk /dev/dm-1 doesn't contain a valid partition table Disk /dev/dm-2: 2717 MB, 2717908992 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 330 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disk identifier: 0x Disk /dev/dm-2 doesn't contain a valid partition table Disk /dev/dm-3: 70.0 GB, 70053265408 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 8516 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disk identifier: 0x Disk /dev/dm-3 doesn't contain a valid partition table Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [0] Detect network card:[0] Configure network: [0] Detect CD: [0] Load installer modules: [0] Detect hard drives: [0] Partition hard drives: [0] Install base system:[0] Clock/timezone setup: [0] User/password setup:[0] Install tasks: [0] Install boot loader:[0] Overall install:[0] Comments/Problems: I installed a full encrypted harddrive with LVM on a laptop. After the installation process I had to install gnome, openoffice.org, icedove, brasero, rhythmbox, audacity, gimp and mc, but I had no problems doing this. -- Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this report. Please compress large files using gzip. Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org. == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer DISTRIB_RELEASE=5.0 (lenny) - installer build 20090123 X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom == Installer hardware-summary: == umame -a: Linux debian 2.6.26-1-486 #1 Sat Jan 10 17:46:23 UTC 2009 i686 unknown lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/PM/GMS, 943/940GML and 945GT Express Memory Controller Hub [8086:27a0] (rev 03) lspci -knn: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:27a2] (rev 03) lspci -knn: 00:02.1 Display controller [0380]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:27a6] (rev 03) lspci -knn: 00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio Controller [8086:27d8] (rev 02) lspci -knn: 00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) PCI Express
Bug#513841: marked as done (installation-report)
Your message dated Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:06:50 + with message-id 1294963610.2565.9.camel@eeepc.Belkin and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #513841, regarding installation-report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 513841: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513841 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: installation-reports Version: 2.38 Severity: normal -- Package-specific info: Boot method: CD Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/lenny_di_rc2/i386/iso-cd/debian-Lenny-DI-rc2-i386-CD-1.iso Date: So 1. Feb 17:54:50 CET 2009 Machine: FSC Lifebook E 8110 Partitions: df -Tl Dateisystem Typ1K#8208;Blöcke Benutzt Verfügbar Ben% Eingehängt auf /dev/mapper/web.de-root ext3 6724784 2477460 3905720 39% / tmpfstmpfs 513152 0513152 0% /lib/init/rw udev tmpfs 10240 100 10140 1% /dev tmpfstmpfs 513152 0513152 0% /dev/shm /dev/sda1 ext2 25 9143211744 5% /boot /dev/mapper/web.de-home ext367337848188820 63728460 1% /home Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [0] Detect network card:[0] Configure network: [0] Detect CD: [0] Load installer modules: [0] Detect hard drives: [0] Partition hard drives: [0] Install base system:[0] Clock/timezone setup: [0] User/password setup:[0] Install tasks: [0] Install boot loader:[0] Overall install:[0] Comments/Problems: I installed the DI RC2 for lenny from the first CD-iso from 31.01.09 on an FSC-Laptop without any problems. I installed lenny in the expert mode (gnome, disk-enencryption with lvm, etc.). During the installation process one task was not transleted: when you have to install the boot-loader, the first question is in english, the secound one is in german. doesn't matter. ;-) thanx for the good work again. ;-) m.w. -- Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this report. Please compress large files using gzip. Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org. == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer DISTRIB_RELEASE=5.0 (lenny) - installer build 20090123 X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom == Installer hardware-summary: == umame -a: Linux web.de 2.6.26-1-486 #1 Sat Jan 10 17:46:23 UTC 2009 i686 unknown lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/PM/GMS, 943/940GML and 945GT Express Memory Controller Hub [8086:27a0] (rev 03) lspci -knn: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:27a2] (rev 03) lspci -knn: 00:02.1 Display controller [0380]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:27a6] (rev 03) lspci -knn: 00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio Controller [8086:27d8] (rev 02) lspci -knn: 00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Port 1 [8086:27d0] (rev 02) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver lspci -knn: 00:1c.1 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Port 2 [8086:27d2] (rev 02) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver lspci -knn: 00:1c.2 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Port 3 [8086:27d4] (rev 02) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver lspci -knn: 00:1d.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI Controller #1 [8086:27c8] (rev 02) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: Kernel modules: uhci-hcd lspci -knn: 00:1d.1 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI Controller #2 [8086:27c9] (rev 02) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: Kernel modules: uhci-hcd lspci -knn: 00:1d.2 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI Controller #3 [8086:27ca] (rev 02) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: Kernel modules:
Bug#513762: marked as done (PowerMac G5 installation report)
Your message dated Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:06:10 + with message-id 1294963570.2565.8.camel@eeepc.Belkin and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #513762, regarding PowerMac G5 installation report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 513762: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513762 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Subject: installation-report: PowerMac G5 installation report Package: installation-reports Version: 2.38 Severity: normal *** Please type your report below this line *** -- Package-specific info: Boot method: DVD Image version: Debian GNU/Linux testing Lenny - Official Snapshot powerpc DVD Binary-1 20090119-08:17 Date: 2009-01-31 Machine: PowerMac G5 Partitions: FilesystemType 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sda6 xfs 466738068 2472624 464265444 1% / tmpfstmpfs 1002516 0 1002516 0% /lib/init/rw udev tmpfs 1024096 10144 1% /dev tmpfstmpfs 1002516 0 1002516 0% /dev/shm /dev/hda iso9660 4540990 4540990 0 100% /media/cdrom0 Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[O] Overall install:[O] Comments/Problems: The only problem was with xorg not working properly with the default resolution. More specifically, in 1920x1440, 1600x1200, 1280x1024, 1024x768 and 800x600 only part of the desktop is displayed, meaning that some random part of the desktop is displayed at some random place on the screen (although which part and where is the same for each resolution). The only resolution that seems to work is this: Section Screen Identifier Default Screen Monitor Configured Monitor SubSection Display Modes 1152x864 EndSubSection EndSection The video card is Nvidia GeForce 6600. There seems to be a similar bug in BTS aready: #493327, so I guess it is best to post specifics there. -- Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this report. Please compress large files using gzip. Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org. == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer DISTRIB_RELEASE=5.0 (lenny) - installer build 20081029 X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom == Installer hardware-summary: == umame -a: Linux milner 2.6.26-1-powerpc64 #1 SMP Thu Oct 9 12:57:44 CEST 2008 ppc64 unknown lspci -knn: :00:0b.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Apple Computer Inc. Device [106b:005b] lspci -knn: :0a:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: nVidia Corporation NV43 [GeForce 6600] [10de:0141] (rev a2) lspci -knn: 0001:00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Apple Computer Inc. U4 HT Bridge [106b:0074] lspci -knn: 0001:00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Broadcom BCM5780 [HT2000] PCI-X bridge [1166:0130] (rev a3) lspci -knn: 0001:00:02.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Broadcom BCM5780 [HT2000] PCI-X bridge [1166:0130] (rev a3) lspci -knn: 0001:00:03.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Broadcom BCM5780 [HT2000] PCI-Express Bridge [1166:0132] (rev a3) lspci -knn: 0001:00:04.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Broadcom BCM5780 [HT2000] PCI-Express Bridge [1166:0132] (rev a3) lspci -knn: 0001:00:05.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Broadcom BCM5780 [HT2000] PCI-Express Bridge [1166:0132] (rev a3) lspci -knn: 0001:00:06.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Broadcom BCM5780 [HT2000] PCI-Express Bridge [1166:0132] (rev a3) lspci -knn: 0001:00:07.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Apple Computer Inc. Shasta PCI Bridge [106b:0053] lspci -knn: 0001:00:08.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Apple Computer Inc. Shasta PCI Bridge [106b:0054] lspci -knn: 0001:00:09.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Apple Computer Inc. Shasta PCI Bridge [106b:0055] lspci -knn: 0001:01:07.0 Class [ff00]: Apple Computer Inc. Shasta Mac I/O [106b:004f] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: macio lspci -knn: 0001:01:0b.0 USB Controller [0c03]: NEC Corporation USB [1033:0035] (rev 43) lspci -knn:
Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * daily mipsel images build: The build daemon responsible for these builds is currently moving to a new hosting location. Daily builds should be available again within the first two weeks of 2011. * daily sparc images build: Due to the lack of buildd suitable buildd machine there are currently no daily builds for the SPARC architecture. These builds will be reenabled as soon as as a suitable machine is available. Totals: 167 builds (0 failed, 8 old) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pdy1m-0003la...@ravel.debian.org
Squeeze installer
Is the new installer for squeeze able to deal with 4KiB sector hard drives? This requires the partitioner to detect the drive and place partition boundaries on mod 8 boundaries. Supposedly the new kernel has the facility to deal with such drives. Thanks, Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d2fa1ed.1010...@sbcglobal.net
Re: Squeeze installer
Andrew Suchy, le Thu 13 Jan 2011 17:07:57 -0800, a écrit : Is the new installer for squeeze able to deal with 4KiB sector hard drives? This requires the partitioner to detect the drive and place partition boundaries on mod 8 boundaries. It simply now always align on 1MiB. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110114013343.gu5...@const.famille.thibault.fr
Processed: reassign 597005 to partman-base
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 597005 partman-base Bug #597005 [installation-reports] partman-base: Preserving partitions on install exposes alignment problem Bug #608906 [installation-reports] debian-installer: preseed recipe (partitioning) does not provide the same layout as lenny Bug #609887 [installation-reports] installation-reports: squeeze preseed recipe (partitioning) does not provide the same layout as lenny Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'partman-base'. Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'partman-base'. Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'partman-base'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 597005: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597005 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129497055128104.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Debian Installer 6.0 Release Candidate 1 release
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org (13/01/2011): There's one: the LANGUAGE variable. This is used in D-I for very few languages. The most noticeable case are Northern Sami, Norwegian Bokmal and Norwegian Nynorsk: […] Oh, great! Thanks for sharing. KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
