Bug#611243: marked as done (installation-reports: Successful install of 'squeeze')

2011-01-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:25:34 +
with message-id 201101301125.34897.el...@debianpt.org
and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #611243,
regarding installation-reports: Successful install of 'squeeze'
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
611243: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611243
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i



-- Package-specific info:

Boot method: hard disk
Image version: debian-squeeze-di-rc2-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 2011-01-26 21:00:00 PST

Machine: Shuttle SS40G athlon
Partitions:
   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   *   2 610 4891792+  83  Linux
/dev/sda2 6111583 7815622+  82  Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/sda31584   38056   292969372+  83  Linux
/dev/sda4   38057   38913 6883852+  83  Linux


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [ ]
Detect network card:[O]
Configure network:  [O]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Install base system:[O]
Clock/timezone setup:   [O]
User/password setup:[O]
Install tasks:  [O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Overall install:[O]

Comments/Problems:

Trying to install directly to pristine hard disk; documentation on this
process is a little scattered. (Cannot boot this machine from PXE
or USB, didn't want to burn a CDR.) Ended up booting old version
of Linux, installing grub on new disk, copying netinst.iso
and kernel+initrd to spare partition, booting into that via grub,
continuing from there. Worked flawlessly once I got it to boot
into the installer.

-- 

Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other
installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this
report. Please compress large files using gzip.

Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org.

==
Installer lsb-release:
==
DISTRIB_ID=Debian
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer
DISTRIB_RELEASE=6.0 (squeeze) - installer build 20110106
X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=hd-media

==
Installer hardware-summary:
==
uname -a: Linux dunderbeck 2.6.32-5-486 #1 Fri Dec 10 15:32:53 UTC 2010 i686 
GNU/Linux
lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 740 
Host [1039:0740] (rev 01)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 740 Host [1039:0740]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: agpgart-sis
lspci -knn: 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] Virtual 
PCI-to-PCI bridge (AGP) [1039:0001]
lspci -knn: 00:02.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS961 
[MuTIOL Media IO] [1039:0961]
lspci -knn: 00:02.1 SMBus [0c05]: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS961/2 
SMBus Controller [1039:0016]
lspci -knn: 00:02.2 USB Controller [0c03]: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 
1.1 Controller [1039:7001] (rev 07)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.1 Controller 
[1039:7001]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:02.3 USB Controller [0c03]: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 
1.1 Controller [1039:7001] (rev 07)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.1 Controller 
[1039:7001]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:02.5 IDE interface [0101]: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5513 
[IDE] [1039:5513] (rev d0)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5513 [IDE] 
[1039:5513]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pata_sis
lspci -knn: 00:0a.0 Multimedia audio controller [0401]: C-Media Electronics Inc 
CM8738 [13f6:0111] (rev 10)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Holco Enterprise Co, Ltd/Shuttle Computer Device 
[1297:f440]
lspci -knn: 00:0b.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: VIA Technologies, Inc. 
VT86C100A [Rhine] [1106:3043] (rev 06)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: D-Link System Inc Device [1186:1400]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: via-rhine
lspci -knn: 00:0f.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. 
RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ [10ec:8139] (rev 10)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. 
RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ [10ec:8139]
lspci 

Bug#497979: marked as done (partman-lvm: fails to delete logical LVM volume)

2011-01-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:32:16 +
with message-id 201101301132.17328.el...@debianpt.org
and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #497979,
regarding partman-lvm: fails to delete logical LVM volume
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
497979: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=497979
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: partman-lvm
Severity: normal

Deleting logical volume fails because partman-lvm seems to be
incorrectly formatting the name of volume group. The error message is:

  partman-lvm:   Volume group VG volgroupname01 not found

This is because the volume group is named volgroupname01, not VG
volgroupname01. Seems like a simple string extraction mistake.

I am testing daily built image 20080905-09:33 (d-i 20080904-19:07), but
it is present in previous versions too.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Closing the report as it was fixed on partman version 65.


-- 
Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,

Miguel Figueiredo
http://www.DebianPT.org

---End Message---


Bug#259592: marked as done (Resizing should ask whether the existing data should be preserved)

2011-01-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 30 Jan 2011 12:19:39 +
with message-id 201101301219.39822.el...@debianpt.org
and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #259592,
regarding Resizing should ask whether the existing data should be preserved
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
259592: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=259592
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 2004-06-16 from Test Candidate 1 links on
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
uname -a: unknown
Date: 2004-06-16 22:00
Method: Boot off ATAPI CD with NetInst cD

Machine: Gateway Desktop PC
Processor: Athlon K7 1200
Memory: 256MB PC133
Root Device: IDE
Root Size/partition table: 
1: 50MB ext2 /boot
2: 1GB swap none
3: 10GB reiserfs /

Output of lspci:
:00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8363/8365
[KT133/KM133] (rev 81)
:00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8363/8365 [KT133/KM133
AGP]
:00:07.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super
South] (rev 40)
:00:07.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc.
VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 06)
:00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB
1.1 Controller (rev 16)
:00:07.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB
1.1 Controller (rev 16)
:00:07.4 SMBus: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super ACPI]
(rev 40)
:00:07.5 Multimedia audio controller: VIA Technologies, Inc.
VT82C686 AC97 Audio Controller (rev 50)
:00:08.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage 128
PD/PRO TMDS
:00:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: S3 Inc. ProSavage KM133 (rev 03)

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [E]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:
The only error I encoutered was in _changing_ an existing partition
table.

My table was: 
1: 50MB ext2 /boot
2: 1GB swap none
3: 18.9GB ext3 /

From a previous installation of Linux, and I wanted to change it to the
above:

1: 50MB ext2 /boot
2: 1GB swap none
3: 10GB reiserfs /

So, i went into the 3rd partition and tried repeatedly to change the
size from 18.9 GB to 10 GB unsucessfully.  It would ask me to confirm,
and I would confirm and it would return and show the size as 18.9 GB
again.  I had to escape out of the parition definitions, run fdisk on
tty2 to delete partition 3, and renter again on tty1 where it then
worked flawlessly.  

Keep up the great work all!

Thanks,
David Rasch


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
This behaviour is fixed in current installer release.

-- 
Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,

Miguel Figueiredo
http://www.DebianPT.org

---End Message---


Processed (with 1 errors): your mail

2011-01-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 retitle 529307 configuration of wireless network failed
Bug #529307 [installation-reports] installation report
Changed Bug title to 'configuration of wireless network failed' from 
'installation report'
 tags + moreinfo
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
529307: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=529307
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129639050832503.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#538231: marked as done (Package: installation-reports)

2011-01-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 30 Jan 2011 12:23:37 +
with message-id 201101301223.37889.el...@debianpt.org
and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #538231,
regarding Package: installation-reports
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
538231: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=538231
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports

Boot method: netboot-install
Image 
version:http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/lenny/main/installer-hppa/current/images/netboot/2.6/boot.img
Date: 23-July-2009

Machine: HP9000 C3600
Processor: PA-8600
Memory: 512MB
Partitions: 
FilesystemType   1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sdb5 ext3  482214 66522390793  15% /
tmpfstmpfs  257764 0257764   0% /lib/init/rw
udev tmpfs   10240   100 10140   1% /dev
tmpfstmpfs  257764 0257764   0% /dev/shm
/dev/sdb2 ext2  233366 11900209016   6% /boot
/dev/sdb10ext3 4806904140780   4421940   4% /home
/dev/sdb9 ext3  964500 17616897888   2% /tmp
/dev/sdb6 ext3 9614116385488   8740256   5% /usr
/dev/sdb7 ext3 4806904325928   4236792   8% /var

Output of lspci -nn and lspci -vnn:
# lspci -nn
00:0c.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 
21142/43 [1011:0019] (rev 41)
00:0d.0 Multimedia audio controller [0401]: Analog Devices AD1889 sound chip 
[11d4:1889]
00:0e.0 IDE interface [0101]: National Semiconductor Corporation 87415/87560 
IDE [100b:0002] (rev 03)
00:0e.1 Bridge [0680]: National Semiconductor Corporation 87560 Legacy I/O 
[100b:000e] (rev 01)
00:0e.2 USB Controller [0c03]: National Semiconductor Corporation USB 
Controller [100b:0012] (rev 02)
00:0f.0 SCSI storage controller [0100]: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53C896/897 
[1000:000b] (rev 07)
00:0f.1 SCSI storage controller [0100]: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53C896/897 
[1000:000b] (rev 07)
01:06.0 SCSI storage controller [0100]: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c895 
[1000:000c] (rev 02)
03:02.0 3D controller [0302]: Hewlett-Packard Company Visualize FXe [103c:108b] 
(rev 05)
# lspci -vnn
00:0c.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 
21142/43 [1011:0019] (rev 41)
Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:104f]
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 255, IRQ 65
I/O ports at 1000 [size=128]
Memory at f4008000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1K]
Expansion ROM at f404 [disabled] [size=256K]
Kernel driver in use: tulip
Kernel modules: tulip

00:0d.0 Multimedia audio controller [0401]: Analog Devices AD1889 sound chip 
[11d4:1889]
Subsystem: Analog Devices AD1889 sound chip [11d4:1889]
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 255, IRQ 66
Memory at f400c000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=512]
Memory at f400b000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=16]
Memory at f400a000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=16]
Memory at f4009000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=16]
Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 1
Kernel driver in use: AD1889 Audio
Kernel modules: snd-ad1889

00:0e.0 IDE interface [0101]: National Semiconductor Corporation 87415/87560 
IDE [100b:0002] (rev 03) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO PriP PriO])
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 255, IRQ 7
I/O ports at 0f00 [size=8]
I/O ports at 0e00 [size=4]
I/O ports at 0d00 [size=8]
I/O ports at 0b00 [size=4]
I/O ports at 0a00 [size=16]
Kernel driver in use: NS87415_IDE
Kernel modules: ns87415

00:0e.1 Bridge [0680]: National Semiconductor Corporation 87560 Legacy I/O 
[100b:000e] (rev 01)
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 255, IRQ 67
Kernel driver in use: SuperIO

00:0e.2 USB Controller [0c03]: National Semiconductor Corporation USB 
Controller [100b:0012] (rev 02) (prog-if 10 [OHCI])
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 240, IRQ 1
Memory at f4007000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
Memory at f4006000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd
Kernel modules: ohci-hcd

00:0f.0 SCSI storage controller [0100]: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53C896/897 
[1000:000b] (rev 07)
Subsystem: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic LSI53C896/7 PCI to Dual Channel 
Ultra2 SCSI Multifunction Controller [1000:1000]
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 255, IRQ 68
  

Bug#608965: Attaching logs

2011-01-30 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
Hi,

A Quarta 05 Janeiro 2011 17:18:20 Brian C você escreveu:
 Perhaps someone can sort out the issue from the attached logs. In syslog I
 find the below regarding mdadm. Also, tasksel is still failing after the
 array is rebuilt, so I'm going to reboot and see what happens. If the
 system isn't working I'll just go ahead and add the fifth drive and try
 the installation again. If the install seems salvageable, perhaps I'll
 just add the drive and add it to the RAID6.

[...]

From the logs you attached:

Jan  4 23:08:06 partman-md: Selected spare count: 1
Jan  4 23:08:06 partman-md: RAID devices count: 4
Jan  4 23:08:06 partman-md: Spare devices count: 1
Jan  4 23:08:06 partman-md: mdadm: You haven't given enough devices (real or 
missing) to create this array

It seems it was selected one spare device and weren't available the minimum of 
4 devices - maybe from a previous installation?

I have made several installation with latest installer release (Debian Squeeze 
RC2) [1] and RAID6 creation has been sucessful without any hassles.

I recommend to try use the current installer release, Debian Squeeze RC2, and 
when you reach partitioning delete any previous raid setup, before setup the 
wanted raid setup.

I am closing the installation report as there weren't enough devices for a 
raid6 installation. 
If you try with the RC2 release please give us feedback with a installation 
report.


1 - http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/

-- 
Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,

Miguel Figueiredo
http://www.DebianPT.org



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201101301318.05965.el...@debianpt.org



Bug#608965: marked as done (installation-reports: Squeeze Beta2 Net Install RAID6 not created but no error displayed)

2011-01-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 30 Jan 2011 13:23:38 +
with message-id 201101301323.39033.el...@debianpt.org
and subject line Re: Bug#608965: Attaching logs
has caused the Debian Bug report #608965,
regarding installation-reports: Squeeze Beta2 Net Install RAID6 not created but 
no error displayed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
608965: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608965
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal



-- Package-specific info:

Boot method: CD
Image version: 
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_beta2/i386/iso-cd/debian-squeeze-di-beta2-i386-netinst.iso
Date: January 4, 2011

Machine: Asus P4C800-E Deluxe motherboard
Partitions: df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred
/dev/sda1 RAID 250GB
/dev/sdb1 RAID 250GB
/dev/sdc1 RAID 250GB
/dev/sdd1 RAID 250GB

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [O]
Detect network card:[O]
Configure network:  [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [E]
Install base system:[O]
Clock/timezone setup:   [O]
User/password setup:[O]
Install tasks:  [E]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Overall install:[E]

Comments/Problems:

From the manual partition screen I created four partitions across four 
drives all 250GB and all use as physical volume for RAID with bootable 
flag on.

I chose Configure software RAID and then selected RAID6.

I selected /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 (the four 250GB RAID
partitions) as the active devices and selected nothing for the 
single spare device (which I intend to add later.)

Result: While it appears to create a RAID device and takes you back to
the software RAID configuration menu. When you say finish and go back to 
the main manual partitioning screen, there is no /dev/md0 device listed 
(or any RAID device at all). It just fails to create it, but does so 
silently without giving any error.

Expected Result: There should have been a /dev/md0 device created or an
error should have been reported.

Note: I was able to go to the shell and manually create a RAID6 from
there and then return to the manual partition screen and it finally 
showed up. The command I used was, iirc:
mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md0 --level=6 --raid-devices=4 /dev/sda1
/dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 --spare-devices=1 missing

Then I was able to create LVM on top of the RAID and proceed, although 
it did ultimately fail at software install. I'm wondering if this might 
be because the RAID array is not done building yet (as reported by cat 
/proc/mdstat from a shell, so I'm going to let it finish and try the 
software install again. 

-- 

Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other
installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this
report. Please compress large files using gzip.

Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org.


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---


---End Message---


Bug#511592: #511592 S390 Install Unable to find Disks

2011-01-30 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
Hi,

care to try and report the status of this BR against current debian installer 
release (Debian Squeeze RC2) [1] ?

1 - http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/

-- 
Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,

Miguel Figueiredo
http://www.DebianPT.org



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201101301507.10601.el...@debianpt.org



Bug#562122: Improve preseeding of network device to use

2011-01-30 Thread Floris Bos
Bumping an old bug.

 I've preseeded netcfg/choose_interface to auto, to try and avoid the
 netcfg/choose_interface question being asked. What I suspect is the
 problem, is the wireless interface is showing link so the question still
 gets asked.
 
 My thoughts on how to extend this functionality was:
 
 allow preseeding the interface to use based on:
 
 1) vendor component of the MAC
 2) PCI ID
 3) some substring of the interface description
 
 because preseeding the specific interface by name is a non-starter, due to
 the way Linux can't consistently enumerate the interfaces.

I think that at least selection of the network interface by MAC-address 
instead of interface name should be possible.

There is currently a patch pending for Ubuntu:
 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/60443113/S31pxedust
(belonging to bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netcfg/+bug/56679 
)

Any chance of getting this into Debian as well?


-- 
Yours sincerely,

Floris Bos



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201101301624.13189@je-eigen-domein.nl



[D-I] Localization system now working nominally

2011-01-30 Thread Christian PERRIER
Since D-I switched to git for most of its components, I have been
working to convert the l10n-sync script that synchronizes
translations from packages/po/sublevel{1-5}/ directories to individual
components of Debian Installer.

This script is now working as expected and I reinstated regular runs
on Tuesdays and Fridays at 22:47 UTC (the script is run under the
d-i role account on people.debian.org).

As a consequence, translators can now update their translations for
D-I level 1 (7 languages are already re-completed). Please notice
that these directories are still maintained in SVN and there are
currently no plans to switch to git.

These translation updates will NOT be used in squeeze. The
localization of D-I for squeeze stopped with the release of D-I RC1
and, later on, RC2.

Any update in D-I level 1 is now targeted for next versions of D-I and
Debian, namely wheezy.

Happy translation work...

(and don't forget to celebrate the release of Debian squeeze,
hopefully next week-end)



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#611548: Installation Report

2011-01-30 Thread Sirkay Aldaran
Package: installation-reports


Boot method: netinst (generally 135-175 MB) CD images

Image version: 
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_rc2/amd64/iso-cd/debian-squeeze-di-rc2-amd64-netinst.iso

Date: 30/01/2011 10h00GMT


Machine: Fujitsu Siemens Esprimo P2520
http://www.google.fr/url?sa=tsource=webcd=1ved=0CCAQFjAAurl=http%3A%2F%2Fuk.ts.fujitsu.com%2Frl%2Fservicesupport%2Ftechsupport%2Fprofessionalpc%2FESPRIMO%2FDatasheets%2Fds_esprimo_p2x2x.pdfei=c49FTYS5E8et8gPJn_yuCQusg=AFQjCNFzKfQ4gdr7VMoLTONEQ1dyWJE2uAsig2=mJaD8K6A_hfJOH8t2LDCzA

Processor: Intel® CoreTM2 Duo E4500 (2.2GHz)

Memory: 2GB

Partitions: df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred
FilesystemType   1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 ext438445384   3526124  32966188  10% /
tmpfstmpfs  900052 0900052   0% /lib/init/rw
udev tmpfs  895304   204895100   1% /dev
tmpfstmpfs  900052 0900052   0% /dev/shm
/dev/sda6 ext4   440349040207508 417773020   1% /home


Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn):
00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: nVidia Corporation MCP73 Host Bridge
[10de:07c1] (rev a2)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
00:00.1 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation nForce 630i memory
controller [10de:07cb] (rev a2)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
00:01.0 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation nForce 630i memory
controller [10de:07cd] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
00:01.1 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation nForce 630i memory
controller [10de:07ce] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
00:01.2 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation nForce 630i memory
controller [10de:07cf] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
00:01.3 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation nForce 630i memory
controller [10de:07d0] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
00:01.4 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation nForce 630i memory
controller [10de:07d1] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
00:01.5 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation nForce 630i memory
controller [10de:07d2] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
00:01.6 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation nForce 630i memory
controller [10de:07d3] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
00:02.0 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation nForce 630i memory
controller [10de:07d6] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
00:03.0 ISA bridge [0601]: nVidia Corporation MCP73 LPC Bridge
[10de:07d7] (rev a2)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
00:03.1 SMBus [0c05]: nVidia Corporation MCP73 SMBus [10de:07d8] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
Kernel driver in use: nForce2_smbus
00:03.4 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation MCP73 Memory Controller
[10de:07c8] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
00:04.0 USB Controller [0c03]: nVidia Corporation GeForce 7100/nForce
630i USB [10de:07fe] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd
00:04.1 USB Controller [0c03]: nVidia Corporation MCP73 [nForce 630i]
USB 2.0 Controller (EHCI) [10de:056a] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd
00:09.0 Audio device [0403]: nVidia Corporation MCP73 High Definition
Audio [10de:07fc] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:112c]
Kernel driver in use: HDA Intel
00:0a.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP73 PCI Express bridge
[10de:056d] (rev a1)
00:0b.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP73 PCI Express bridge
[10de:056e] (rev a1)
Kernel driver in use: pcieport
00:0c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP73 PCI Express bridge
[10de:056f] (rev a1)
Kernel driver in use: pcieport
00:0d.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP73 PCI Express bridge
[10de:056f] (rev a1)
Kernel driver in use: pcieport
00:0e.0 IDE interface [0101]: nVidia Corporation MCP73 IDE [10de:07f0] (rev a2)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
Kernel driver in use: ahci
00:0f.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: nVidia Corporation MCP73 Ethernet
[10de:07dc] (rev a2)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
Kernel driver in use: forcedeth
00:10.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: nVidia Corporation C73
[GeForce 7100 / nForce 630i] [10de:07e1] (rev a2)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
Kernel driver in use: nouveau


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = 

Processed: your mail

2011-01-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 merge 608025 587397
Bug#587397: windows detected by installer, but not listed by grub after reboot
Bug#608025: [debian-installer] Windows 7 entry is not written to GRUB list
Bug#603107: cdrom: grub does not add other OS to list
Bug#608219: Windows XP detected in installation but not end in grub
Bug#609251: installation-reports: successful installation with minor issues in 
lenovo ideapad s12
Merged 587397 603107 608025 608219 609251.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
603107: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603107
587397: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587397
609251: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609251
608025: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608025
608219: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608219
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12964074985557.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#611548: marked as done (Installation Report)

2011-01-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:27:17 +
with message-id 201101301727.17542.el...@debianpt.org
and subject line Re: Bug#611548: Installation Report
has caused the Debian Bug report #611548,
regarding Installation Report
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
611548: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611548
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports


Boot method: netinst (generally 135-175 MB) CD images

Image version: 
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_rc2/amd64/iso-cd/debian-squeeze-di-rc2-amd64-netinst.iso

Date: 30/01/2011 10h00GMT


Machine: Fujitsu Siemens Esprimo P2520
http://www.google.fr/url?sa=tsource=webcd=1ved=0CCAQFjAAurl=http%3A%2F%2Fuk.ts.fujitsu.com%2Frl%2Fservicesupport%2Ftechsupport%2Fprofessionalpc%2FESPRIMO%2FDatasheets%2Fds_esprimo_p2x2x.pdfei=c49FTYS5E8et8gPJn_yuCQusg=AFQjCNFzKfQ4gdr7VMoLTONEQ1dyWJE2uAsig2=mJaD8K6A_hfJOH8t2LDCzA

Processor: Intel® CoreTM2 Duo E4500 (2.2GHz)

Memory: 2GB

Partitions: df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred
FilesystemType   1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 ext438445384   3526124  32966188  10% /
tmpfstmpfs  900052 0900052   0% /lib/init/rw
udev tmpfs  895304   204895100   1% /dev
tmpfstmpfs  900052 0900052   0% /dev/shm
/dev/sda6 ext4   440349040207508 417773020   1% /home


Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn):
00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: nVidia Corporation MCP73 Host Bridge
[10de:07c1] (rev a2)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
00:00.1 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation nForce 630i memory
controller [10de:07cb] (rev a2)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
00:01.0 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation nForce 630i memory
controller [10de:07cd] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
00:01.1 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation nForce 630i memory
controller [10de:07ce] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
00:01.2 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation nForce 630i memory
controller [10de:07cf] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
00:01.3 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation nForce 630i memory
controller [10de:07d0] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
00:01.4 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation nForce 630i memory
controller [10de:07d1] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
00:01.5 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation nForce 630i memory
controller [10de:07d2] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
00:01.6 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation nForce 630i memory
controller [10de:07d3] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
00:02.0 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation nForce 630i memory
controller [10de:07d6] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
00:03.0 ISA bridge [0601]: nVidia Corporation MCP73 LPC Bridge
[10de:07d7] (rev a2)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
00:03.1 SMBus [0c05]: nVidia Corporation MCP73 SMBus [10de:07d8] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
Kernel driver in use: nForce2_smbus
00:03.4 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation MCP73 Memory Controller
[10de:07c8] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
00:04.0 USB Controller [0c03]: nVidia Corporation GeForce 7100/nForce
630i USB [10de:07fe] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd
00:04.1 USB Controller [0c03]: nVidia Corporation MCP73 [nForce 630i]
USB 2.0 Controller (EHCI) [10de:056a] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:115b]
Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd
00:09.0 Audio device [0403]: nVidia Corporation MCP73 High Definition
Audio [10de:07fc] (rev a1)
Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Device [1734:112c]
Kernel driver in use: HDA Intel
00:0a.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP73 PCI Express bridge
[10de:056d] (rev a1)
00:0b.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP73 PCI Express bridge
[10de:056e] (rev a1)
Kernel driver in use: pcieport
00:0c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP73 PCI Express bridge
[10de:056f] (rev a1)

Bug#562122: Improve preseeding of network device to use

2011-01-30 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 04:24:13PM +0100, Floris Bos wrote:
 I think that at least selection of the network interface by MAC-address 
 instead of interface name should be possible.
 
 There is currently a patch pending for Ubuntu:
  http://launchpadlibrarian.net/60443113/S31pxedust
 (belonging to bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netcfg/+bug/56679 
 )
 
 Any chance of getting this into Debian as well?

The feature, yes.  That patch... not so much.

- Matt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110130184849.go3...@hezmatt.org



Bug#611570: fails on kfreebsd-amd64 CD1

2011-01-30 Thread Robert Millan
Package: apt-setup
Version: 1:0.53
Severity: normal
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd

With debian-squeeze-di-rc2-kfreebsd-amd64-CD-1.iso:

Jan 30 18:59:51 main-menu[106]: INFO: Menu item 'apt-setup-udeb' selected
Jan 30 18:59:51 /usr/lib/apt-setup/generators/40cdrom: warning: 
/target/etc/mtab won't be updated since it is a symlink.
Jan 30 18:59:51 apt-setup: Using CD-ROM mount point /media/cdrom/
Jan 30 18:59:51 apt-setup: Unmounting CD-ROM
Jan 30 18:59:51 apt-setup: Waiting for disc...
Jan 30 18:59:51 apt-setup: Please insert a Disc in the drive and press enter
Jan 30 18:59:51 apt-setup: Mounting CD-ROM...
Jan 30 18:59:51 apt-setup: E
Jan 30 18:59:51 apt-setup: : Failed to mount the cdrom.
Jan 30 18:59:51 apt-setup: mount: mounting /dev/cd0 on /cdrom failed: Device or 
resource busy

After this error, /cdrom *is* mounted. Installation proceeds without CD
support.

Note: this seems related to #611569, however I'm reporting it as an
apt-setup bug because apt-setup seems to be taking care of the mount/umount
part already, in which case #611569 isn't supposed to have any effect.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ca_AD.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_AD.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110130192121.1483.92554.reportbug@thorin



Processed: your mail

2011-01-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 merge 611146 611570
Bug#611146: mount /dev/cd0 fails on kFreeBSD
Bug#611570: fails on kfreebsd-amd64 CD1
Merged 611146 611570.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
611570: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611570
611146: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611146
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129641599611103.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#611570: fails on kfreebsd-amd64 CD1

2011-01-30 Thread Joey Hess
Robert Millan wrote:
 Note: this seems related to #611569, however I'm reporting it as an
 apt-setup bug because apt-setup seems to be taking care of the mount/umount
 part already, in which case #611569 isn't supposed to have any effect.

No, apt-setup still relies on apt-cdrom mounting the CD.

The CD will already be mounted, as it is manually mounted for
debootstrap. apt-setup unmounts it, runs apt-cdrom, and re-mounts it.
And there are code paths where apt-cdrom cannot mount the CD (for example,
hd-media installs), and there apt-setup prevents it doing any mounting and
leaves the CD pre-mounted. But none of these should have any bearing on
your case, #611569 seems at fault.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: reassign 590568 to iso-scan

2011-01-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 590568 iso-scan
Bug #590568 [debian-installer] debian-installer: hd-media boot.img.gz's 
installer cannot find mini.iso
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'iso-scan'.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
590568: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590568
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129641779020748.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#590568: marked as done (debian-installer: hd-media boot.img.gz's installer cannot find mini.iso)

2011-01-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:10:40 -0400
with message-id 20110130201040.gc20...@gnu.kitenet.net
and subject line Re: Bug#590568: hd-media boot.img.gz's installer cannot find 
squeeze RC2 iso file
has caused the Debian Bug report #590568,
regarding debian-installer: hd-media boot.img.gz's installer cannot find 
mini.iso
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
590568: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590568
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal

Hi.

I've tried to follow instructions in 
http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/i386/ch04s03.html.en to create a 
bootable USB disk.

What I've done is reuse the files from : 
http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/current/images/hd-media/boot.img.gz
 and just use a basic syslinux config :
  default linux
  append initrd=initrd.gz
to get a bootable USB disk of maximum size that indeed will boot an installer.

However, whenever inside the installer, the netinst .iso file cannot be found 
when it searches the disks to find an installable iso image.

The iso is named mini.iso (just as downloaded from 
http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/current/images/netboot/)
 and sits inside the USB key's first (and only) VFAT partition (which mounts 
fine from /dev/sdb1 to /hd-media from a shell started inside the installer).

Is there a requirement on a special name for iso image files ?

Thanks in advance


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
anataka wrote:
 Then upon further inspection, I found out I've been using the wrong 
 boot.img.gz
 all along, I only thought I had the one linked above but in fact I was using
 the i386 one. I had several web pages open and click one thinking i was in
 another.
 
 I started over and it worked.
 
 I fixed my own stupidity but still automated scan is nice but imho it could be
 useful to offer an option to manually enter the path to the iso.

I don't think that further complicating the installer with prompts for
paths that most users will not find it easy to manually figure out is
the right approach.

iso-scan already does a 2-pass scan, so unless the user has hidden away the
iso very deep on the disk, they can avoid having it recursively scan
deeply through all their drives.

Anyway, all this is deprecated by hybrid isos that can be written
directly to USB disks to make a bootable image, avoiding every single
pain point that users have encountered with the piggyback iso and
iso-scan. So I expect that iso-scan will soon only be used by users in
highly unusual situations (either users who need to boot the installer
from an existing partition with no removable media at all, or users who
cannot afford a dedicated cheap USB stick).

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---


Bug#610906: Fix committed, tagging pending

2011-01-30 Thread Jurij Smakov
tag 610906 pending
thanks

Fix committed to git repo:

http://git.debian.org/?p=d-i/debian-installer.git;a=commit;h=be086ccd9915f029a5de5b7fc1829fdab80f0a67

Best regards,
-- 
Jurij Smakov   ju...@wooyd.org
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/  KeyID: C99E03CC



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110130214206.ga5...@droopy.oc.cox.net



Processed: Fix committed, tagging pending

2011-01-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tag 610906 pending
Bug #610906 [debian-installer] kernel-wedge: cmd64x driver missing from Squeeze 
installer
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
610906: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610906
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129642373115789.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#610524: Preseed: Debian Installer asks for keyboard-configuration/variant

2011-01-30 Thread Samuel Thibault
reassign 610524 keyboard-configuration
thanks

Dennis Hoppe, le Thu 27 Jan 2011 12:05:40 +0100, a écrit :
 i am using the following two images:
 
 http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/multi-arch/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-i386-netinst.iso
 
 http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_rc2/i386/iso-cd/debian-squeeze-di-rc2-i386-netinst.iso
 
 I also added the following line to isolinux/txt.cfg and remastered the
 image to save some typing.
 
 label basic
   menu label ^Install (basic)
   kernel /install.386/vmlinuz
   append auto=true priority=critical vga=791
 file=/cdrom/preseed/basic.cfg initrd=/install.386/initrd.gz
 DEBCONF_DEBUG=5 -- quiet

Ok, it helps a lot to have an idea what it might be happening when
you give more details. Since you were talking about console-setup
configuration I thought you were using the gtk image (which uses
console-setup for keyboard configuration instead of kbdchooser), and was
thus testing that, which would actually prevent the bug from happening.
According to your screenshot, the question is actually asked by the
_installed_ keyboard-configuration, which doesn't get enough information
from d-i to know which variant to choose.

That being said, I'm still unable to reproduce the issue.

I have
- taken 
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_rc2/i386/iso-cd/debian-squeeze-di-rc2-i386-netinst.iso
 ,
- put your basic.cfg into preseed/ ,
- appended file=/cdrom/preseed/basic.cfg to the kernel command line in txt.cfg ,
- rebuilt the image using genisoimage,
- booted it,
- chosen the text installer,
- chosen German
- chosen Deutschland
- chosen Deutsch keyboard

From then on everything happens up to rebooting into a freshly installed
system.  I have also tried with english/US/german, and english/US/USA,
still the same.  Where is the difference?  (Maybe you could upload the
image you have produced, to make sure we have at least the same image).

Samuel



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110130214952.gg7...@const.famille.thibault.fr



Bug#558036: (no subject)

2011-01-30 Thread Miguel Figueiredo

-- 
Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,

Miguel Figueiredo
http://www.DebianPT.org
diff --git a/modules/mmc-modules b/modules/mmc-modules
index 7d98f69..8820dd7 100644
--- a/modules/mmc-modules
+++ b/modules/mmc-modules
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 mmc_block
 sdhci
+sdhci-pci ?
 ricoh_mmc ?
 tifm_sd


Processed: your mail

2011-01-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 558036 + patch
Bug #558036 [kernel-wedge] mmc-modules-2.6.30-2-486-di doesn't include 
sdhci-pci.ko
Added tag(s) patch.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
558036: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=558036
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129642535422578.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: blocking bug

2011-01-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 block 231003 by 611330
Bug #231003 [netcfg] Should include IPv6 support from the beginning
Bug #509201 [netcfg] Debian Installer does not work with IPv6
Bug #596572 [netcfg] Please allow IPv6 addresses in manual configuration.
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 231003: 611330
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 509201: 611330
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 596572: 611330
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
231003: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=231003
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12964288643077.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



IPv6 in d-i stage 2: autoconfiguration

2011-01-30 Thread Matthew Palmer
I've put pre-built images for amd64 and i386 at
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/ipv6/ that handle most forms of IPv6
autoconfiguration:

* address/gateway via router solicitation/advertisement;
* Recursive DNS resolvers via router solicitation/advertisement;
* hostname/domain via reverse DNS

This gets us most of the way to full IPv6 support.  All that's left now is
stateless and stateful DHCPv6, which (given that all of the necessary
configuration can be provided by other means) is a lower priority for me
(though it will still definitely get done).

I've also put up a wiki page, http://wiki.debian.org/MattPalmer/IPv6, which
contains up-to-date info on everything, and will be kept up to date as
progress continues.

Heavy testing and comments appreciated.

- Matt


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110130235403.gu3...@hezmatt.org



Bug#381975: marked as done (graphical-installer: cannot undo ssid entry)

2011-01-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:47:16 +1100
with message-id 20110131004716.gw3...@hezmatt.org
and subject line Bug#381975: cannot undo ssid entry
has caused the Debian Bug report #381975,
regarding graphical-installer: cannot undo ssid entry
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
381975: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=381975
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal

if one should mistakenly enter an incorrect ssid value in the
graphical-installer wireless config, and press enter, one will not be
able to undo the mistake.  using the go back will not go to the
ssid, but it will eventually go to the main d-i menu.  however, even
from there, it is not possible to get to the ssid config dialog.

mike

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
I'm closing this bug, as I cannot reproduce it in a current installer
release and requests for further information have gone unanswered.

If you can still reproduce the problem in a current installer release,
please reopen this bug with the necessary details to reproduce the problem.

- Matt

---End Message---


Bug#416378: marked as done (etch-installer suggests wrong gateway address (outside the net) if netmask is different from /24)

2011-01-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:46:04 +1100
with message-id 20110131004604.gv3...@hezmatt.org
and subject line Bug#416378: installer suggests invalid gateway
has caused the Debian Bug report #416378,
regarding etch-installer suggests wrong gateway address (outside the net) if 
netmask is different from /24
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
416378: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=416378
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports
Version: etch-install CD from 22.03.2007

If you install etch and your computer is for example in a 10.0.0.64/26 network 
you enter the following:
IP: 10.0.0.66
Netmask: 255.255.255.192
Then the debian installer suggests the following gateway address:
Gateway 10.0.0.1
which is outside the network.
The installer should check for the first address in the network and use this as 
recommendation.

This error occurs with the debian-etch install CD1 from 22 March 2007

-- 
Sven Kloe
net-lab GmbH  |  Frankfurter Str. 99  |  63067 Offenbach
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Andreas John | AG Offenbach, HRB40832
Tel: +49 69 8570033-1 | Fax: -2 | http://www.net-lab.net

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
I'm closing this bug, since I cannot reproduce it, I feel that the problem
doesn't exist in the current installer, and requests for further information
have gone unanswered.

If you can reproduce this problem with a current installer release, please
reopen this bug with the relevant information.

- Matt

---End Message---


Debian installer build: failed or old builds

2011-01-30 Thread Daily build aggregator
Debian installer build overview
---

Failed or old builds:

* OLD BUILD:hppa Jan 17 07:06 didaily@c3700 build_cdrom 
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_cdrom.log

* OLD BUILD:hppa Jan 17 07:10 didaily@c3700 build_netboot 
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_netboot.log

* OLD BUILD:hppa Jan 17 07:14 didaily@c3700 build_miniiso 
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_miniiso.log

* daily mipsel images build:
The build daemon responsible for these builds is currently moving to a
new hosting location. Daily builds should be available again within the
first two weeks of 2011.

* daily sparc images build:
Due to the lack of buildd suitable buildd machine there are currently no daily
builds for the SPARC architecture. These builds will be reenabled as soon as
as a suitable machine is available.


Totals: 113 builds (0 failed, 11 old)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pji7f-0002x3...@ravel.debian.org



Bug#611599: Maybe a ADSL option in installer(squeeze) is better to me

2011-01-30 Thread topzdx
Package: installation-reports

Boot method: CD-RW
Image version: /i386/iso-cd/debian-squeeze-di-rc1-i386-netinst.iso from 
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
Date: 2011.l.28--1.30

Machine: DIY, Intel mainboard ,NVIDIA MX440 
Processor:
Memory:
Partitions: partitions by myself , 9.7G ext4 

Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn):

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [Note]
Detect network card:[O]
Configure network:  [NO DHCP,I have ADSL ]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Install base system:[O]
Clock/timezone setup:   [O]
User/password setup:[O]
Install tasks:  [O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Overall install:[?]  What is it mean? erase old data in partation? I 
format it.

Comments/Problems:
1.  I use boot from CDROM (squeeze_netinst_RC1), IT dead in mainboard 
LOGO(Intel MB)
,and I find the CD is OK(bootable in other PC).
My win XP driver and PPPOE fauit(It be OK for a long time),HW is a old 3COM 
netcard.
After change a realtek 8139D netcard, the boot is OK.

I don't know if install_rc1 cause 3COM netcard bad ?It's not important, 
it's too old and only one, I have some RL8139D netcard .

(If in this netcard bad situation, can installer jump it and pop a message say:
Not find netcard (NIC) in your system .  ?

-
2. I'm in china , many people use ADSL in home. And I use graph install (shell 
Install 
I think no problem) 
Install try to find DHCP , and after fault, I input 192.168.x.x something.
Maybe a ADSL option in installer(squeeze) is better to me?

like:
1. Local network with DHCP (Had a gateway to internet)
2. ADSL use pppoe (You know your username and password)

This may faster to beginer.


3. After I use expert mode to install pppoe, I find pppoeconf is in NETINST 
cdrom.
But if I choise a sources mirror in GRAPHINSTALL mode, I lost deb cdrom in 
sources.list.
Can you add this for me?

NETINST is default in sources.list (deb cdrom xx)
After user choise sources mirror, display a message :

nbsp;You must use apt-get update before apt-get install anything


When the squeeze is ok, if user (beginer) use :
apt-get install xx and get nothing , give this message:

Is the software in the list? Maybe use apt-get update first.


4. In console, the text is too small, oh my eyes
In etch  lenny  It's OK (Other PCs), maybe add a item in grub2 (big text)?

I should add vga=7xx something? I'll test afterwork...



THANK all of you . 



Description of the install, in prose, and any thoughts, comments
  and ideas you had during the initial install.