Re: install problem
i'm using amd64 iso image 2012/8/6 samuel arellano > hi, since about ten days ago I have a problem trying to install debian > testing, I boot from usb stick and in the step of "detecting network > hardware" the screen keeps blue, I've tried with many images downloaded in > differentes days and the problem remains. > > I hope you can answer me > > thanks >
Bug#684097: Guided partition setup want to use its owner media installation like destination disk
Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I choosed guided partitioned, first option (use largest partition available) and Debian wanted to create partitions (/ and swap) in my usb stick. There was another partition larger and unused (well, I'm not sure if gparted formated it, that could be the reason of this 'issue', now that I am thinking it is more than probable that the partition was used (but empty)) than the usb in the first disk available. Finally I changed partition schema manually, and it worked fine. Another issue is that if you does not choose swap partition, warning is ok, but a file should be created instead (or at least be asked if user want to create). Thank you for all your effort making Debian the best OS in the world. -- Package-specific info: Boot method: USB Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-testing-amd64-DVD-1.iso Date: Mon Aug 6 05:51:31 UTC 2012. Machine: HP 630 Notebook PC Partitions: Filesystem Type 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on rootfs rootfs 54567776 4702980 47130972 10% / udev devtmpfs 102400 10240 0% /dev tmpfs tmpfs 385636 688384948 1% /run /dev/disk/by-uuid/e49c5f1b-bffe-45dc-bbd1-72baab3774ee ext4 54567776 4702980 47130972 10% / tmpfs tmpfs 51200 5120 0% /run/lock tmpfs tmpfs 771272 360770912 1% /tmp tmpfs tmpfs 771272 296770976 1% /run/shm /dev/sda2 fuseblk 433505272 65320216 368185056 16% /media/24640CC6640C9D24 /dev/sda1 fuseblk 20377229140174632 15% /media/SYSTEM Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [ ] Clock/timezone setup: [E] User/password setup:[O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[O] Overall install:[O] Comments/Problems: It is 2 hour later in Debian clock, I will adjust :-) Maybe adding a comment in /etc/apt/sources.list about adding deb://... to have to update the distro help with people starting with Debian. Installing from USB and next line in that file are not compatible (or you need to mount Usb like it were a CD): deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Wheezy_ - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-1 20120806-05:09]/ wheezy contrib main Thank you ! -- Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this report. Please compress large files using gzip. Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org. == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Debian GNU/Linux installer" DISTRIB_RELEASE="7.0 (wheezy) - installer build 20120712" X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom == Installer hardware-summary: == uname -a: Linux beadebian 3.2.0-3-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Jun 28 09:07:26 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Core Processor DRAM Controller [8086:0044] (rev 02) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:3674] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: agpgart-intel lspci -knn: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0046] (rev 02) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:3674] lspci -knn: 00:16.0 Communication controller [0780]: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset HECI Controller [8086:3b64] (rev 06) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:3674] lspci -knn: 00:1a.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset USB2 Enhanced Host Controller [8086:3b3c] (rev 05) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:3674] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset High Definition Audio [8086:3b56] (rev 05) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:3674] lspci -knn: 00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset PCI Express Root Port 1 [8086:3b42] (rev 05) lspci
install problem
hi, since about ten days ago I have a problem trying to install debian testing, I boot from usb stick and in the step of "detecting network hardware" the screen keeps blue, I've tried with many images downloaded in differentes days and the problem remains. I hope you can answer me thanks
Re: I want x feature
alex, le Mon 06 Aug 2012 14:43:32 -0600, a écrit : > tanks, but its more easy to my friends to install DEBIAN with this > tool > http://sliceoflinux.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/instalar-ubuntu-9-10-06_animado.gif As always, help to integrate such thing is simply welcome. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120806204540.go4...@type.famille.thibault.fr
Re: I want x feature
On Sun, 2012-07-22 at 04:44 +0900, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Alejandro Alcántar, le Sat 21 Jul 2012 13:37:39 -0600, a écrit : > >>hi, i love debian , but went recommend to my friends , the have > >>problems to re-size a partition and install with windows together, then > >>thast why end to recomend ubuntu or 'linuxmint'. > > >>i wish add this option to debian installer > > >> http://sliceoflinux.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/instalar-ubuntu-9-10-06_animado.gif > > its a resizing hard drive. > i thing would be a big step, to make easy install debian for a novice. > > its a resizing hard drive. > > i thing would be a big step, to make easy install debian for a novice. > > See installation manual, e.g. > http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/install.txt.en > > and look for "resize" in the Manual Partitioning section. > > Samuel > tanks, but its more easy to my friends to install DEBIAN with this tool http://sliceoflinux.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/instalar-ubuntu-9-10-06_animado.gif this is a difference to install Ubuntu OR Debian for him. *more easy and *more faster to do -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1344285812.5175.208.camel@taller
Bug#684048: marked as done (installation-reports: Successful installation from CD netinst Beta1 on PC amd64)
Your message dated Mon, 6 Aug 2012 22:07:02 +0200 with message-id <20120806200702.gr9...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org> and subject line Re: Bug#684048: installation-reports: Successful installation from CD netinst Beta1 on PC amd64 has caused the Debian Bug report #684048, regarding installation-reports: Successful installation from CD netinst Beta1 on PC amd64 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 684048: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684048 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: installation-reports Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, This is a report of a successful installation. Congratulations for the work and thank you very much. -- Package-specific info: Boot method: CD Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch- latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso Date: Sun 5 Aug 2012 Machine: PC AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3500+ Partitions: S.ficheros Tipo 1K-bloques Usado Disponible Uso% Montado en rootfs rootfs 9949776 42517045198976 45% / udev devtmpfs 10240 0 10240 0% /dev tmpfs tmpfs309540 640 308900 1% /run /dev/disk/by-uuid/27dcf376-86bb-4fa4-8c11-f8c2b2c43e90 ext49949776 42517045198976 45% / tmpfs tmpfs 5120 0 5120 0% /run/lock tmpfs tmpfs619076 200 618876 1% /tmp tmpfs tmpfs619076 296 618780 1% /run/shm Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O ] Detect network card:[O ] Configure network: [ O] Detect CD: [ O] Load installer modules: [O ] Clock/timezone setup: [O ] User/password setup:[O ] Detect hard drives: [O ] Partition hard drives: [O ] Install base system:[O ] Install tasks: [O ] Install boot loader:[O ] Overall install:[O ] Comments/Problems: I used the text install, not the graphical install. I used manual partition, reusing my old /dev/sda6 which was used formerly for Debian Squeeze (reformatted it as ext4) and reused /dev/sda7 as swap I chose Spanish from Spain. Everything went ok, all the installer was in Spanish, except the tasksel options. I chose Debian Desktop environment, print server, ssh server, and "standard system utilities" (this last one option was in Spanish, the rest in English). Everything went ok. Thank you very much and congratulations for the work. -- Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this report. Please compress large files using gzip. Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org. == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Debian GNU/Linux installer" DISTRIB_RELEASE="7.0 (wheezy) - installer build 20120712" X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom == Installer hardware-summary: == uname -a: Linux debian7arjona 3.2.0-3-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Jun 28 09:07:26 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Memory controller [0580]: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 Memory Controller [10de:005e] (rev a3) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5000] lspci -knn: 00:01.0 ISA bridge [0601]: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 ISA Bridge [10de:0050] (rev a3) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:0c11] lspci -knn: 00:01.1 SMBus [0c05]: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 SMBus [10de:0052] (rev a2) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:0c11] lspci -knn: 00:02.0 USB controller [0c03]: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 USB Controller [10de:005a] (rev a2) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5004] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:02.1 USB controller [0c03]: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 USB Controller [10de:005b] (rev a3) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5004] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:06.0 IDE interface [0101]: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 IDE [10de:0
Setting up to do repetitive installs on ONE machine (cf BabelBox)
[Previously sent to debian-user list, was advised here was
more appropriate]
I have two objectives:
1. Define, by experimentation, optimal installation
parameters to meet my
idiosyncratic concept of a "minimal install".
2. Determine if there are bugs in Debian Installer, the
instructions for
the installer, or MY reading of those instructions.
I've bought the 8 DVD set of Debian 6.0.5 and have set aside
a laptop as a testbed. I would divvy up the 80GB drive with
8-10GB for a quasi-static Debian install [some other
experiments, possible supervisor for these tests] and ~40GB
for DVD content [possibly some additional packages]. The
rest would be for the resulting test install and possibly
preserving some log files.
"Debian GNU/Linux Installation Guide" (particularly sections
4 & 5 and appendix B) give some indication that what I want
to do is feasible. BabelBox
{http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/BabelBox} indicates
that something quite _similar_ has been done.
Open questions about BabelBox and its suitability for my goals:
BabelBox is apparently aimed at a fully scripted fully
automated repetitive install install dependent only on the
first DVD of a release [e.g. "When you get to partitioning,
create a Linux partition on /dev/sda1 ( *_about 1.5 to 4GB_*
depending on which media you want to use as installation
media)..." {EMPHASIS added}].
I will, initially, be doing only manual installs using
preseeding to avoid entering fixed data - keyboard, time
zone, user name/password, no networking etc.
Can I simply copy all 8 DVD's to the root of my supervising
Debian install?
After an install will I be able to do apt-get to access the
DVD content now residing on the hard drive?
Am I missing something?
Are there other routes to my goals I should investigate?
TIA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/502023bb.4060...@cloud85.net
Re: Processed: Reassign bug #681656 to hw-detect
Quoting Debian Bug Tracking System (ow...@bugs.debian.org): > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > > > reassign 681656 hw-detect > Bug #681656 [debian-installer] Detect Network Hardware stops Wheezy install > Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'hw-detect'. > No longer marked as found in versions debian-installer/20120508. > Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #681656 to the same values > previously set > > thanks > Stopping processing here. > > Please contact me if you need assistance. > -- > 681656: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681656 > Debian Bug Tracking System > Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems > These problems might indeed be bug #683849 in mountmedia. I suggest to people affected by this bug to try daily built images, *after Aug 7th*, from http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/ -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#683849: [d-i Wheezy Beta1] [amd64] Installer hangs while loading partitioner (mdadm/mount deadlock)
Quoting Brian Potkin (claremont...@gmail.com): > ethernet interfaces do not. At the 'Detect network hardware' stage the > process hung and the d-i screen remained blue. > > Another machine behaved in a similar fashion but on a third the expected > message about missing firware was displayed. This was puzzling until I > realised this one had only two primary partitions whereas the other two > had disks with primary and logical partitions. > > Taking a spare disk and creating four primary partitions on it lead to > network hardware being detected. With an extended partition d-i did not > return to the main menu. > > Sorry, I have no explantion for what is happening. It is perplexing > because the alpha images do not exhibit this behaviour and the > mountmedia and check-missing-firmware files do not appear to have > changed in the beta image. Well, it could very well be mountmedia bug #683849, which just got fixed (at least theoretically). It could be interesting to test the daily built *netboot* image from http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/ (but only tomorrow asmountmedia was fixed just today) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#683849: [d-i Wheezy Beta1] [amd64] Installer hangs while loading partitioner (mdadm/mount deadlock)
On Sun 05 Aug 2012 at 09:02:54 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > It look like the two "hangs" result from trying to find the firmware files > > iwlwifi-2030-6.ucode (for WiFi) and rtl_nic/rtl8168e-3.fw (for wired > > ethernet). This seems to be the same problem as in bugs #683690 and #683692. > > Do you have logs for this? The machine I used had no network cable attached. The intention was to test an installation over a wireless connection with WPA/PSK. I know that the USB wireless adapters I have require non-free firmware. The ethernet interfaces do not. At the 'Detect network hardware' stage the process hung and the d-i screen remained blue. Another machine behaved in a similar fashion but on a third the expected message about missing firware was displayed. This was puzzling until I realised this one had only two primary partitions whereas the other two had disks with primary and logical partitions. Taking a spare disk and creating four primary partitions on it lead to network hardware being detected. With an extended partition d-i did not return to the main menu. Sorry, I have no explantion for what is happening. It is perplexing because the alpha images do not exhibit this behaviour and the mountmedia and check-missing-firmware files do not appear to have changed in the beta image. I have attached one of the logs for an 'unsuccessful' install and the ps output when the failure takes place. syslog.gz Description: Binary data ps Description: PostScript document
mountmedia_0.21_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: mountmedia_0.21.dsc to main/m/mountmedia/mountmedia_0.21.dsc mountmedia_0.21.tar.gz to main/m/mountmedia/mountmedia_0.21.tar.gz mountmedia_0.21_all.udeb to main/m/mountmedia/mountmedia_0.21_all.udeb Changes: mountmedia (0.21) unstable; urgency=low . [ Karsten Merker ] * Do not try to mount extended partitions (type 0x5 or 0xf) Closes: #683849. . [ Christian Perrier ] * Add myself to Uploaders * Replace XC-Package-Type by Package-Type Override entries for your package: mountmedia_0.21.dsc - source debian-installer mountmedia_0.21_all.udeb - optional debian-installer Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 683849 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sys6n-0004wi...@franck.debian.org
Bug#679984: marked as done (installation-report: Wheezy installed successfully on Asus P5B with alpha1 installer from USB stick)
Your message dated Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:43:12 +0100 with message-id <20120806184312.gg24...@einval.com> and subject line Thanks for your installation report! has caused the Debian Bug report #679984, regarding installation-report: Wheezy installed successfully on Asus P5B with alpha1 installer from USB stick to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 679984: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679984 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, -- Package-specific info: Boot method: USB stick Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/wheezy_di_alpha1/amd64/iso-cd/debian-wheezy-DI-a1-amd64-netinst.iso Date: 2012/07/02 Machine: PC w. Asus P5B mb/8G ram/Core2 E4400/2 hds/1 GbE Partitions: $ df -Tl Filesystem Type 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on rootfs rootfs 9733152 2622600 6622312 29% / udev devtmpfs 102400 10240 0% /dev tmpfstmpfs 710016 384709632 1% /run /dev/mapper/solofly-root ext4 9733152 2622600 6622312 29% / tmpfstmpfs 51200 5120 0% /run/lock tmpfstmpfs 1420028 220 1419808 1% /tmp tmpfstmpfs 14200280 1420028 0% /run/shm /dev/sda1ext223319110427210323 5% /boot /dev/mapper/solofly-home ext4 951183740 14191248 889382636 2% /home Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[O] Overall install:[O] Comments/Problems: Nothing to do with Debian Installer per se, but experienced severe problems on getting the hardware to boot from USB stick in first place and wasted hours to get the thing (the hardware thing) working with continuous thought, should I abandon USB-boot. FWIW in startup of BIOS the list of boot devices (F8) always showed the tried and numereous USB sticks I had. Finally a web-search showed that other people too have had problems with USB booting on the mb. Tried couple of reported successes for BIOS settings. They did not work for me. Finally a hint lead to disable second hard disk, IDE, from BIOS startup order and that made the thing go. Just listing the above for others to find with a web-search engine, although the hardware begins to be such old that wonder if anyone else use it anymore. -- Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this report. Please compress large files using gzip. Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org. == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Debian GNU/Linux installer" DISTRIB_RELEASE="7.0 (wheezy) - installer build 20120508" X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom == Installer hardware-summary: == uname -a: Linux solofly 3.2.0-2-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Apr 15 16:47:38 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 82P965/G965 Memory Controller Hub [8086:29a0] (rev 02) lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:81ea] lspci -knn: 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82P965/G965 PCI Express Root Port [8086:29a1] (rev 02) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport lspci -knn: 00:1a.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI Controller #4 [8086:2834] (rev 02) lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:81ec] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1a.1 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI Controller #5 [8086:2835] (rev 02) lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:81ec] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1a.7 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller #2 [8086:283a] (rev 02) lspci -knn: Su
Processed: reassign
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 677519 installation-guide Bug #677519 [installation-reports] installation-reports: 32 or 64 bit? Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'installation-guide'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #677519 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #677519 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 677519: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677519 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134427852910364.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processing of mountmedia_0.21_i386.changes
mountmedia_0.21_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: mountmedia_0.21.dsc mountmedia_0.21.tar.gz mountmedia_0.21_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sys1b-0003yo...@franck.debian.org
Bug#662108: marked as done (Installation on Acer Aspire One 532h)
Your message dated Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:39:24 +0100 with message-id <20120806183924.ge24...@einval.com> and subject line Thanks for your installation report! has caused the Debian Bug report #662108, regarding Installation on Acer Aspire One 532h to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 662108: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662108 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: installation-reports Boot method: CD Image version: Self-made boot CD with actual Installer from sid Date: 2012-03-03 Machine: Acer Aspire One 532h Processor: Intel Atom 1,6GHz Memory: 1,0GB Partitions: > DateisystemTyp 1K-Blöcke > Benutzt Verfügbar Verw% Eingehängt auf > rootfs rootfs 9733688 > 5015692 4229756 55% / > udev devtmpfs501536 > 05015360% /dev > tmpfs tmpfs 101604 > 3401012641% /run > /dev/disk/by-uuid/1c8b52a6-8254-4640-82b9-07a00e8e6d4a ext4 9733688 > 5015692 4229756 55% / > tmpfs tmpfs 5120 > 0 51200% /run/lock > tmpfs tmpfs 203208 > 122031961% /tmp > tmpfs tmpfs 203208 > 02032080% /run/shm > /dev/sda6 ext4 233177480 > 3580480 2179242722% /home Output of lspci -knn: > 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation N10 Family DMI Bridge > [8086:a010] > Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:0349] > Kernel driver in use: agpgart-intel > 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation N10 Family > Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:a011] > Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:0349] > Kernel driver in use: i915 > 00:02.1 Display controller [0380]: Intel Corporation N10 Family Integrated > Graphics Controller [8086:a012] > Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:0349] > 00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family High > Definition Audio Controller [8086:27d8] (rev 02) > Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:0349] > Kernel driver in use: snd_hda_intel > 00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family PCI Express > Port 1 [8086:27d0] (rev 02) > Kernel driver in use: pcieport > 00:1c.1 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family PCI Express > Port 2 [8086:27d2] (rev 02) > Kernel driver in use: pcieport > 00:1d.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB UHCI > Controller #1 [8086:27c8] (rev 02) > Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:0349] > Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd > 00:1d.1 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB UHCI > Controller #2 [8086:27c9] (rev 02) > Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:0349] > Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd > 00:1d.2 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB UHCI > Controller #3 [8086:27ca] (rev 02) > Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:0349] > Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd > 00:1d.3 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB UHCI > Controller #4 [8086:27cb] (rev 02) > Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:0349] > Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd > 00:1d.7 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB2 EHCI > Controller [8086:27cc] (rev 02) > Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:0349] > Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd > 00:1e.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801 Mobile PCI Bridge > [8086:2448] (rev e2) > 00:1f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation NM10 Family LPC Controller > [8086:27bc] (rev 02) > Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:0349] > 00:1f.2 SATA controller [0106]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH7 Family SATA > Controller [AHCI mode] [8086:27c1] (rev 02) > Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:0349] > Kernel driver in use: ahci > 00:1f.3 SMBus [0c05]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family SMBus Controller > [8086:27da] (rev 02) > Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:0349] > Kernel driver in use: i801_smbus > 01:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Atheros Communications Inc. AR8132 Fast > Ethe
Bug#661834: marked as done (Installation report)
Your message dated Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:38:47 +0100 with message-id <20120806183847.gd24...@einval.com> and subject line Thanks for your installation report! has caused the Debian Bug report #661834, regarding Installation report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 661834: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661834 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: installation-reports Boot method: Booted from floppy, Plop Boot Manager V5.0.11-02 Image version: debian-6.0.3-i386-netinst.iso Date: 20120223 Fresh install; booted from floppy disk for usb flash disk install. Machine: Celeron tower PSU: Maxpower, 300 W Processor: Slot 1, Intel, Celeron 300A Memory: MS3856UPS, 1*256 MB, 256 MB SDRAM Memory total: 256 MB Mainboard: Tyan S1854 Trinity 400 AGP: Sparkle GeForce2 MX200 32 MB, DE-15F PCI slots 1. Empty: Left empty, very close to AGP card 2. Network: ethernet card, Micronet SP2500RW V6, (chip is Realtek RTL8139C), WOL. It has a socket for a ROM BIOS; no ROM BIOS is installed. 3. Empty 4. Empty 5. Empty 6. Empty Floppy Drive: Teac, FD-235HF Hard Disk: PATA, Quantum Fireball EL, EL51A013, 5.1 GB Keyboard: PS/2, Genius, KL-0210 (Comfy KB-21e Scroll), 129 keys Mouse: KONIG CMP-MOUSE14, 5 button, PS/2 Monitor: Ica, Ica-1402V, 14 inch, Actual size 13.3 inch, Maximum resolution 640X480 HDD 5.25 inch removable caddy with tray: ViPowER, Super RACK, DataBridge Mainboard internal speaker (buzzer) does not work. --- Aris Veresie m1arisvere...@gmail.com Installation logged 20120223 (ADSL line, 512Kb/s download, 256Kb/s upload) Comments/Problems: The installation process is listed below. --- Time 12:45 Installer boot menu, Advanced options, Expert install Choose language Language: English Country, territory or area: other Continent or region: Europe Country, territory or area: Cyprus Country to base default locale settings on: United States - en_US.UTF-8 Additional locales: none Select a keyboard layout Type of keyboard: PC-style (AT or PS-2 connector) keyboard Keymap to use: British English Detect and mount CD-ROM PCMCIA resource range options: none Load installer components from CD Installer components to load: parted-udeb Comment: I decided not to manually partition this disk, so I did not need any additional components. Detect network hardware Configure the network Auto-configure with DHCP? IP address: 192.168.10.60 Netmask: 255.255.255.0 Gateway: 192.168.10.254 Name server address: 192.168.10.254 Hostname: DebianCeleron Domain name: www.exhomdom.net Set up users and passwords Enable shadow passwords? Yes Allow login as root? Yes Comment. If answering no here then, ($ sudo passwd root), to setup root password. Root password: password Create a normal user account now? Configure the clock Set the clock using NTP? Yes NTP server to use: 0.debian.pool.ntp.org Select your time zone: Asia/Nicosia Detect disks Partition disks Guided partitioning Partitioning method: Guided - use entire disk and set up encrypted LVM Select disk to partition: SCSI1 (0,0,0) (sda) - 5.1 GB ATA QUANTUM FIREBALL Partitioning scheme: All files in one partition (recommended for new users) Write the changes to disks and configure LVM? Encryption passphrase: passphrase Name of the volume group for the new system: DebianCeleron LVM VG DebianCeleron, LV root - 4.6 GB Linux device-mapper (linear) #1 4.6 GB f ext3 / LVM VG DebianCeleron, LV swap_1 - 255.9 MB Linux device-mapper (linear) #1 255.9 MB f swap swap Encrypted volume (sda5_crypt) - 4.9 GB Linux device-mapper (crypt) #1 4.69GB K lvm SCSI1 (0,0,0) (sda) - 5.1 GB ATA QUANTUM FIREBALL #1 primary 255.0 MB B F ext2 /boot #5 logical4.9 GB K crypto(sda5_crypt) Install the base system Kernel to install: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 Drivers to include in the initrd: targeted Configure the package manager Use a network mirror? Services to use: security updates, volatile updates Select and install software Choose software to install: none Install the GRUB boot loader on a hard disk Install the GRUB boot loader to the master boot recor
Processed: Reassign bug #681656 to hw-detect
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 681656 hw-detect Bug #681656 [debian-installer] Detect Network Hardware stops Wheezy install Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'hw-detect'. No longer marked as found in versions debian-installer/20120508. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #681656 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 681656: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681656 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13442783939228.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processing of mountmedia_0.21_i386.changes
mountmedia_0.21_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: mountmedia_0.21.dsc mountmedia_0.21.tar.gz mountmedia_0.21_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1syrzk-0001d4...@ravel.debian.org
Bug#671682: marked as done (Successful Wheezy netinst report)
Your message dated Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:37:44 +0100 with message-id <20120806183744.gc24...@einval.com> and subject line Thanks for your installation report! has caused the Debian Bug report #671682, regarding Successful Wheezy netinst report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 671682: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=671682 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: installation-reports Boot method: netinst CD Image version: 05-May-2012 17:37 http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso Date: 05-May-2012 21:00 Machine: Custom Processor: Pentium 4 2.40GHz Memory: 256MiB DDR1/333MHz Partitions: Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 *204810741759 5369856 83 Linux (ext4) /dev/sda21074176012705791 982016 82 Linux swap / Solaris Output of lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 82865G/PE/P DRAM Controller/Host-Hub Interface [8086:2570] (rev 02) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:80a5] Kernel driver in use: agpgart-intel 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation 82865G Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2572] (rev 02) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. P5P800-MX Mainboard [1043:80a5] 00:06.0 System peripheral [0880]: Intel Corporation 82865G/PE/P Processor to I/O Memory Interface [8086:2576] (rev 02) 00:1e.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge [8086:244e] (rev c2) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) LPC Interface Bridge [8086:24d0] (rev 02) 00:1f.1 IDE interface [0101]: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) IDE Controller [8086:24db] (rev 02) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. P4P800/P5P800 series motherboard [1043:80a6] Kernel driver in use: ata_piix 00:1f.3 SMBus [0c05]: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) SMBus Controller [8086:24d3] (rev 02) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. P4P800/P5P800 series motherboard [1043:80a6] 01:08.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 82562EZ 10/100 Ethernet Controller [8086:1050] (rev 02) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:80f8] Kernel driver in use: e100 Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] (expert-install) Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] (manual, didn't use DHCP) Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] (manual) Install base system:[O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] (no root login) Install tasks: [O] (no desktop) Install boot loader:[O] Overall install:[O] Comments/Problems: Everything worked without a hitch. Thanks to all contributors. :) Minor cosmetic gripe: After selecting "Install GRUB boot loader" the screen stayed blue for quite a bit while the (slow) HDD was active. This could confuse some users. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Closing as successful, thanks for the information. :-) -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com Welcome my son, welcome to the machine.--- End Message ---
Bug#660667: marked as done (Package: installation-reports)
Your message dated Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:36:31 +0100 with message-id <20120806183631.gb24...@einval.com> and subject line Thanks for your installation report! has caused the Debian Bug report #660667, regarding Package: installation-reports to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 660667: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660667 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: installation-reports Boot method: CD Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso Date: 2012-feb-20 Machine: ASUS W7S 3P056E Processor: Intel Core2 Duo CPU T7500 @ 2.20GHz x 2 Memory: 1,5Go Partitions: [root:asd]# df -Tl Sys. fich. Type Taille Util. Dispo Uti% Monté sur rootfs rootfs 942M 262M 633M 30% / udev devtmpfs 754M 0 754M 0% /dev tmpfs tmpfs 152M 740K 152M 1% /run /dev/disk/by-uuid/03095423-adec-4058-9a2d-2b63b3a3be2c ext3 942M 262M 633M 30% / tmpfs tmpfs 5,0M 0 5,0M 0% /run/lock tmpfs tmpfs 942M 18M 877M 2% /tmp tmpfs tmpfs 304M 356K 304M 1% /run/shm /dev/sda11 ext319G 15G 3,2G 83% /backup /dev/sda10 ext319G 9,5G 8,0G 55% /data /dev/sda4 ext329G 6,8G 21G 25% /depot /dev/sda9 ext314G 12G 2,1G 85% /home /dev/sda8 ext3 942M 18M 877M 2% /tmp /dev/sda5 ext3 9,2G 3,7G 5,2G 42% /usr /dev/sda6 ext3 9,2G 4,2G 4,7G 48% /var Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn): [root:asd]# lspci -knn 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Mobile PM965/GM965/GL960 Memory Controller Hub [8086:2a00] (rev 03) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:1517] 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation Mobile PM965/GM965/GL960 PCI Express Root Port [8086:2a01] (rev 03) Kernel driver in use: pcieport 00:1a.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI Controller #4 [8086:2834] (rev 04) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:1517] Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd 00:1a.1 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI Controller #5 [8086:2835] (rev 04) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:1517] Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd 00:1a.7 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller #2 [8086:283a] (rev 04) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:1517] Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd 00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller [8086:284b] (rev 04) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:12e2] Kernel driver in use: snd_hda_intel 00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) PCI Express Port 1 [8086:283f] (rev 04) Kernel driver in use: pcieport 00:1c.1 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) PCI Express Port 2 [8086:2841] (rev 04) Kernel driver in use: pcieport 00:1c.2 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) PCI Express Port 3 [8086:2843] (rev 04) Kernel driver in use: pcieport 00:1c.3 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) PCI Express Port 4 [8086:2845] (rev 04) Kernel driver in use: pcieport 00:1c.4 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) PCI Express Port 5 [8086:2847] (rev 04) Kernel driver in use: pcieport 00:1c.5 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) PCI Express Port 6 [8086:2849] (rev 04) Kernel driver in use: pcieport 00:1d.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI Controller #1 [8086:2830] (rev 04) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:1517] Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd 00:1d.1 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI Controller #2 [8086:2831] (rev 04) Subsy
Processed: update title and severity
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 655005 wifi connection didn't work during installation Bug #655005 [installation-reports] installation-report Changed Bug title to 'wifi connection didn't work during installation' from 'installation-report' > severity 655005 minor Bug #655005 [installation-reports] wifi connection didn't work during installation Severity set to 'minor' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 655005: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=655005 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13442780497455.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#650195: marked as done (installation-reports: Wheezy 64-bit succesfully installed on a Intel Core i3 system)
Your message dated Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:30:21 +0100 with message-id <20120806183021.ga23...@einval.com> and subject line Thanks for your installation report! has caused the Debian Bug report #650195, regarding installation-reports: Wheezy 64-bit succesfully installed on a Intel Core i3 system to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 650195: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650195 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? * What was the outcome of this action? * What outcome did you expect instead? *** End of the template - remove these lines *** -- Package-specific info: Boot method: CD Image version: debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso 21-NOV-2011 Date: Machine: Home-buildt w/ Intel Core i3 Dual Core 2.93 Ghz, on a Gigabyte GA-H55-UD2h motherboard w/ 4 Mb DDR3-memory, Samsung SATA-hd and Samsung DVD-burner. Partitions: Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[O] Overall install:[O] Comments/Problems: I also have Windows XP and Ubuntu 10.11 installed. Both of them were detected by the GRUB intstall, but none of them were displayed after reboot. -- Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this report. Please compress large files using gzip. Easily fixed, thou, with 'updat-grub'. Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org. == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Debian GNU/Linux installer" DISTRIB_RELEASE="7.0 (wheezy) - installer build 2021-00:07" X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom == Installer hardware-summary: == uname -a: Linux lgli3 3.1.0-1-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Nov 14 08:02:25 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Core Processor DRAM Controller [8086:0040] (rev 12) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5000] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: agpgart-intel lspci -knn: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0042] (rev 12) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:d000] lspci -knn: 00:16.0 Communication controller [0780]: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset HECI Controller [8086:3b64] (rev 06) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:3b64] lspci -knn: 00:1a.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset USB Universal Host Controller [8086:3b3b] (rev 06) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5004] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1a.1 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset USB Universal Host Controller [8086:3b3e] (rev 06) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5004] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1a.2 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset USB Universal Host Controller [8086:3b3f] (rev 06) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5004] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1a.7 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset USB2 Enhanced Host Controller [8086:3b3c] (rev 06) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5006] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset High Definition Audio [8086:3b56] (rev 06) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:a002] lspci -knn: 00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset PCI Express Root Port 1 [8086:3b42] (rev 06) lspci -knn:
Processed: tagging 607698
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 607698 + moreinfo Bug #607698 [installation-reports] installation-report: squeeze d-i i386 hangs accessing the hdd (segfault) Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 607698: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607698 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13442773323505.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#513565: post install bugs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 513565 hw-detect Bug #513565 [installation-reports] post install bugs Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'hw-detect'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #513565 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #513565 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 513565: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513565 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134427642930501.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#681610: Installation fails during loading firmware
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 681610 hw-detect Bug #681610 [installation-reports] Installation fails during loading firmware Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'hw-detect'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #681610 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #681610 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 681610: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681610 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134427492822060.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#681610: Installation fails during loading firmware
reassign 681610 hw-detect thanks Reassigning firmware loading bugs to hw-detect. There's a number of bugs showing up here; time to look for patterns so we can fix the underlying cause(s). -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "C++ ate my sanity" -- Jon Rabone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120806174127.ga7...@einval.com
Processed: Re: Bug#613822: installation-reports: Squeeze (amd64 and i386) cannot load NIC firmware from USB during installation for Poweredge 2950
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 613822 hw-detect Bug #613822 [installation-reports] installation-reports: Squeeze (amd64 and i386) cannot load NIC firmware from USB during installation for Poweredge 2950 Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'hw-detect'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #613822 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #613822 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 613822: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613822 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134427474920339.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#547175: Reproduced on Sun Fire v490/Wheezy
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 547175 hw-detect Bug #547175 [installation-reports] installation-report: SunBlade 2000: fails to pick up ql2200_fw.bin from usb stick Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'hw-detect'. No longer marked as found in versions 2.38. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #547175 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 547175: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=547175 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134427457118988.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#547175: Reproduced on Sun Fire v490/Wheezy
reassign 547175 hw-detect thanks On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 06:13:21PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:48:38AM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote: >>Installed from the 30th of July 2012 DVD ISO. >> >>Same workaround was successful - drop to a shell, manually copy firmware >>across and reload modules. > >Just talking to Leif, he's sure he copied the raw firmware file onto >his USB stick rether than the packaged .deb/.udeb version. Looking at >check-missing-firmware.sh and mountmedia now to see if there are any >obvious bugs down that path. > >I've also had verbal reports from other folks about firmware loading >failing; this is a problem area at the moment. I'm looking at a few of these bug reports in installation-reports now. Reassigning over to hw-detect, the package responsible for this code. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com Getting a SCSI chain working is perfectly simple if you remember that there must be exactly three terminations: one on one end of the cable, one on the far end, and the goat, terminated over the SCSI chain with a silver-handled knife whilst burning *black* candles. --- Anthony DeBoer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120806173558.ga4...@einval.com
Bug#547175: Reproduced on Sun Fire v490/Wheezy
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:48:38AM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote: >Installed from the 30th of July 2012 DVD ISO. > >Same workaround was successful - drop to a shell, manually copy firmware >across and reload modules. Just talking to Leif, he's sure he copied the raw firmware file onto his USB stick rether than the packaged .deb/.udeb version. Looking at check-missing-firmware.sh and mountmedia now to see if there are any obvious bugs down that path. I've also had verbal reports from other folks about firmware loading failing; this is a problem area at the moment. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com < liw> everything I know about UK hotels I learned from "Fawlty Towers" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120806171321.ga29...@einval.com
Bug#678883: IA 64 (Itanium) Wheezy unbootable iso images, patch proposal
The mail client wrapped a line of the patch, please take the attached file: loadsize.patch Description: loadsize.patch
Bug#681656: Detect Network Hardware stops Wheezy install
I tried to install beta 1 now – this bug is still present: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/wheezy_di_beta1/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-wheezy-DI-b1-amd64-DVD-1.iso The workaround mentioned in Message #35 works for me. Cheers, Stefan. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/260d69957e76801b22b7f582b5fce...@stefan-nagy.at
Bug#678883: IA 64 (Itanium) Wheezy unbootable iso images, patch proposal
Source: debian-cd A patch proposal for the package debian-cd package of Wheezy. It turned out that the script 'tools/boot/wheezy/boot-ia64' in the debian-cd source package gives genisoimage the switches -no-emul-boot -b boot/boot.img -c boot/boot.catalog in similar way as I did it in my last message post. But the --boot-load-size is absend and genisoimage uses its default load size. The relevant script files in the debian-cd source package didn't change after Sept. 2008. Since any Lenny and Sequeeze iso image is able to boot, but not the Wheezy iso images, I assume that different versions of genisoimage have different default boot-load-sizes. You can read the following in the "EFI Specification version 1.10" of Intel (http://www.intel.com/technology/efi/efiagree.htm), in section "11.2.2.2 ISO-9660 and El Torito" at page 11-12: "EFI differs from 'El Torito' 'no emulation' mode in that it does not load the 'no emulation' image into memory and jump to it. EFI interprets the 'no emulation' image as an EFI system partition. EFI interprets the Sector Count in the Initial/Default Entry or the Section Header Entry to be the size of the EFI system partition. If the value of Sector Count is set to 0 or 1, EFI will assume the system partition consumes the space from the beginning of the 'no emulation' image to the end of the CD-ROM." The boot image is a FAT file system which contains the EFI boot loader. A sector has 2KB on a CD or DVD. So the boot-load-size must be the size of the boot image - the count of 2K blocks (the size is rounded up to full 2k blocks). I examined the Lenny DVD-1 iso image: the boot-load-size is 0 - what means that the boot image consumes the space to the end of the iso image. But the boot image is much smaller here. Obviously the EFI-BIOS implementations which are out there do not bother about that and boot anyway. The Wheezy Alpha-1 iso image has a boot-load-size of 4; this is wrong; at least the Intel EFI-BIOS of my Itanium box didn't want to boot that. The proposed solution is to add an explicit --boot-load-size switch for genisoimage on the IA64 architecture. The patch doesn't change anything on the other architectures. The actual value is evaluated from the size of the boot image. When the boot image size changes for some reason, the script still works correctly. I checked whether the patch works: - installed Debian Lenny (5.0.10) on my Itanium box; it is the most recent version that installs without any flaw, - a Wheezy dist-upgrade (went catastrophic, the upgraded gdm doesn't start anymore, remaining work at a console), - created a local debian mirror using the data from the first Wheezy alpha-1 DVD and some additional rsync'd wheezy installer-ia64 files of a debian mirror, - pulled the debian-cd source package of wheezy and build a set of wheezy netinst cd with it. The dumpet tool (Fedora 17 i386) outputs for the build netinst CD (/boot/boot.img has 33.554.432 Bytes): Validation Entry: Header Indicator: 0x01 (Validation Entry) PlatformId: 0x00 (80x86) ID: "" Checksum: 0x55aa Key bytes: 0x55aa Boot Catalog Default Entry: Entry is bootable Boot Media emulation type: no emulation Media load segment: 0x0 (:7c00) System type: 0 (0x00) Load Sectors: 16384 (0x4000) Load LBA: 1640 (0x0668) what is perfect in my opinion. My Itanium box is able to boot it. diff -r --context debian-cd-3.1.8/tools/boot/wheezy/boot-ia64 debian-cd-3.1.8-fix/tools/boot/wheezy/boot-ia64 *** debian-cd-3.1.8/tools/boot/wheezy/boot-ia64 2012-08-05 16:37:02.0 +0200 --- debian-cd-3.1.8-fix/tools/boot/wheezy/boot-ia64 2012-08-05 16:43:44.0 +0200 *** *** 56,61 --- 56,62 add_mkisofs_opt $CDDIR/../$N.mkisofs_opts "-no-emul-boot" add_mkisofs_opt $CDDIR/../$N.mkisofs_opts "-b boot/boot.img" add_mkisofs_opt $CDDIR/../$N.mkisofs_opts "-c boot/boot.catalog" + add_mkisofs_opt $CDDIR/../$N.mkisofs_opts "-boot-load-size $[($(stat -c%s "boot$N/boot/boot.img")+2047)/2048]" add_mkisofs_opt $CDDIR/../$N.mkisofs_dirs "boot$N" Kind regards Stephan Schreiber -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120806184433.horde.2w7aiqgzi1vqh-rxsuhc...@webmail.df.eu
Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy
Ritesh Raj Sarraf (06/08/2012): > Release Team, > > Now that Beta 1 is out, what is the status on this request? Will this > migrate to testing? As the maintainer, let me know if there is > anything I can do to speed up the process. > > PS: If the new udeb is too big a problem, let me know. I will revert > it. > > > I hope we can close this soon. The more it is delayed, the lesser > testing it gets, if any. ACK for d-i. Feel free to unblock it. I'd still be happy to hear back from Colin. ;) Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [SCM] d-i libdebian-installer repository branch, master, updated. 0.79-8-g4ac8107
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 15:25 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 02:04:08PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > Yes, I normally would, don't know how I missed it this time. I'll go fix > > it up now. > > dch should do this by itself in the meantime. Otherwise add > DEBCHANGE_RELEASE_HEURISTIC=changelog > to ~/.devscripts. Ah, that's it -- I wasn't doing this development on my regular system and so my .devscripts was missing. Thanks for the tip. > > Bastian > > -- > Each kiss is as the first. > -- Miramanee, Kirk's wife, "The Paradise Syndrome", > stardate 4842.6 > > -- Ian Campbell Current Noise: The Hidden Hand - The Hidden Hand (theme) Honi soit qui mal y pense. [Evil to him who evil thinks.] -- Motto of the Order of the Garter (est. Edward III) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1344267751.11339.51.ca...@zakaz.uk.xensource.com
Re: Debian Installer 7.0 Beta1 preseed , Keymap to use issue
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 19:10:31 +0400, Darren Baginski wrote: > Perhaps I mistakenly though that there is/was two keyboard configuration: > one for console, another for X. > keyboard-configuration/xkb-keymap applies for both of them? > Yes. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian Installer 7.0 Beta1 preseed , Keymap to use issue
05.08.2012, 23:39, "Cyril Brulebois" : > Hello, > > Darren Baginski (05/08/2012): > >> I'm testing "Debian Installer 7.0 Beta1" with the same pressed I have >> for Squeeze for a long time. > > did you read the announce? > >> For some reason new installer asks me about "Keymap to use:". >> But as for Squeeze I have >> 1) isolinux.cfg: >> default install >> timeout 100 >> prompt 1 >> LABEL install >> kernel linux >> append initrd=initrdc.gz preseed/file=/preseed.cfg auto-install/enable >> debian-installer/keymap=us debian-installer/locale=en_US.UTF-8 >> console-setup/ask_detect=false console-setup/layoutcod >> e=en_US debconf/priority=critical >> >> 2) preseed.cfg >> d-i console-tools/archs string skip-config >> d-i debian-installer/locale string en_US >> d-i console-keymaps-at/keymap select us > > quoting the relevant part: > | Behavioral changes in this release > | == > | > | […] > | * preseed: Point the keymap alias to keyboard-configuration/xkb-keymap > | instead of the now-gone console-keymaps-at. > >> d-i languagechooser/language-name-fb select English >> d-i debian-installer/locale select en_US.UTF-8 > > That should help you get started for wheezy. Thank for pointing out. Perhaps I mistakenly though that there is/was two keyboard configuration: one for console, another for X. keyboard-configuration/xkb-keymap applies for both of them? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/304041344265...@web13h.yandex.ru
Bug#684048: installation-reports: Successful installation from CD netinst Beta1 on PC amd64
Package: installation-reports Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, This is a report of a successful installation. Congratulations for the work and thank you very much. -- Package-specific info: Boot method: CD Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch- latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso Date: Sun 5 Aug 2012 Machine: PC AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3500+ Partitions: S.ficheros Tipo 1K-bloques Usado Disponible Uso% Montado en rootfs rootfs 9949776 42517045198976 45% / udev devtmpfs 10240 0 10240 0% /dev tmpfs tmpfs309540 640 308900 1% /run /dev/disk/by-uuid/27dcf376-86bb-4fa4-8c11-f8c2b2c43e90 ext49949776 42517045198976 45% / tmpfs tmpfs 5120 0 5120 0% /run/lock tmpfs tmpfs619076 200 618876 1% /tmp tmpfs tmpfs619076 296 618780 1% /run/shm Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O ] Detect network card:[O ] Configure network: [ O] Detect CD: [ O] Load installer modules: [O ] Clock/timezone setup: [O ] User/password setup:[O ] Detect hard drives: [O ] Partition hard drives: [O ] Install base system:[O ] Install tasks: [O ] Install boot loader:[O ] Overall install:[O ] Comments/Problems: I used the text install, not the graphical install. I used manual partition, reusing my old /dev/sda6 which was used formerly for Debian Squeeze (reformatted it as ext4) and reused /dev/sda7 as swap I chose Spanish from Spain. Everything went ok, all the installer was in Spanish, except the tasksel options. I chose Debian Desktop environment, print server, ssh server, and "standard system utilities" (this last one option was in Spanish, the rest in English). Everything went ok. Thank you very much and congratulations for the work. -- Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this report. Please compress large files using gzip. Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org. == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Debian GNU/Linux installer" DISTRIB_RELEASE="7.0 (wheezy) - installer build 20120712" X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom == Installer hardware-summary: == uname -a: Linux debian7arjona 3.2.0-3-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Jun 28 09:07:26 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Memory controller [0580]: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 Memory Controller [10de:005e] (rev a3) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5000] lspci -knn: 00:01.0 ISA bridge [0601]: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 ISA Bridge [10de:0050] (rev a3) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:0c11] lspci -knn: 00:01.1 SMBus [0c05]: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 SMBus [10de:0052] (rev a2) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:0c11] lspci -knn: 00:02.0 USB controller [0c03]: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 USB Controller [10de:005a] (rev a2) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5004] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:02.1 USB controller [0c03]: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 USB Controller [10de:005b] (rev a3) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5004] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:06.0 IDE interface [0101]: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 IDE [10de:0053] (rev a2) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5002] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pata_amd lspci -knn: 00:07.0 IDE interface [0101]: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 Serial ATA Controller [10de:0054] (rev a3) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:b003] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: sata_nv lspci -knn: 00:08.0 IDE interface [0101]: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 Serial ATA Controller [10de:0055] (rev a3) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:b003] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: sata_nv lspci -knn: 00:09.0 PCI bridge [0604]: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 PCI Bridge [10de:005c] (rev a2) lspci -knn: 00:0a.0 Bridge [0680]: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 Ethernet Controller [10de:0057] (rev a3) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:e000] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: forcedeth lspci -knn: 00:0b.0 PCI bridge [0604]: NVIDIA Corporation CK804
Re: [SCM] d-i libdebian-installer repository branch, master, updated. 0.79-8-g4ac8107
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 02:04:08PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > Yes, I normally would, don't know how I missed it this time. I'll go fix > it up now. dch should do this by itself in the meantime. Otherwise add DEBCHANGE_RELEASE_HEURISTIC=changelog to ~/.devscripts. Bastian -- Each kiss is as the first. -- Miramanee, Kirk's wife, "The Paradise Syndrome", stardate 4842.6 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120806132549.ga18...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org
Re: [SCM] d-i libdebian-installer repository branch, master, updated. 0.79-8-g4ac8107
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 14:04 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 13:57 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > Quoting Ian Campbell (i...@hellion.org.uk): > > > The following commit has been merged in the master branch: > > > commit 4ac8107d9338cd0ff48c1223529516359c32fec6 > > > Author: Ian Campbell > > > Date: Tue Jul 10 21:20:51 2012 + > > > > > > Add Dreamplug device (Kirkwood) > > > > > > diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog > > > index 11a4b32..03ea18f 100644 > > > --- a/debian/changelog > > > +++ b/debian/changelog > > > @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ > > > +libdebian-installer (0.82) unstable; urgency=low > > > + > > > > > > .../... > > > > May I suggest using "UNRELEASED" as distribution name so that we can > > more easily spot pending changes waiting for someone to upload > > them. Thanks in advance... > > Yes, I normally would, don't know how I missed it this time. I'll go fix > it up now. You've already done it, thanks! Ian, -- Ian Campbell "If we were meant to fly, we wouldn't keep losing our luggage." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1344258353.11339.31.ca...@zakaz.uk.xensource.com
Re: [SCM] d-i libdebian-installer repository branch, master, updated. 0.79-8-g4ac8107
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 13:57 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Ian Campbell (i...@hellion.org.uk): > > The following commit has been merged in the master branch: > > commit 4ac8107d9338cd0ff48c1223529516359c32fec6 > > Author: Ian Campbell > > Date: Tue Jul 10 21:20:51 2012 + > > > > Add Dreamplug device (Kirkwood) > > > > diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog > > index 11a4b32..03ea18f 100644 > > --- a/debian/changelog > > +++ b/debian/changelog > > @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ > > +libdebian-installer (0.82) unstable; urgency=low > > + > > > .../... > > May I suggest using "UNRELEASED" as distribution name so that we can > more easily spot pending changes waiting for someone to upload > them. Thanks in advance... Yes, I normally would, don't know how I missed it this time. I'll go fix it up now. Ian. -- Ian Campbell "Mach was the greatest intellectual fraud in the last ten years." "What about X?" "I said `intellectual'." ;login, 9/1990 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1344258248.11339.30.ca...@zakaz.uk.xensource.com
Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy
Release Team, Now that Beta 1 is out, what is the status on this request? Will this migrate to testing? As the maintainer, let me know if there is anything I can do to speed up the process. PS: If the new udeb is too big a problem, let me know. I will revert it. I hope we can close this soon. The more it is delayed, the lesser testing it gets, if any. On Sunday 29 July 2012 03:48 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Sunday 29 July 2012 03:36 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Ritesh Raj Sarraf (29/07/2012): Any updates? Is it being held for Beta 1 ? >> That, plus I still haven't heard back from Colin. > Okay!! I hope he responds back soon. Otherwise please let me know your > secondary plan of action. > -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [SCM] d-i libdebian-installer repository branch, master, updated. 0.79-8-g4ac8107
Quoting Ian Campbell (i...@hellion.org.uk): > The following commit has been merged in the master branch: > commit 4ac8107d9338cd0ff48c1223529516359c32fec6 > Author: Ian Campbell > Date: Tue Jul 10 21:20:51 2012 + > > Add Dreamplug device (Kirkwood) > > diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog > index 11a4b32..03ea18f 100644 > --- a/debian/changelog > +++ b/debian/changelog > @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ > +libdebian-installer (0.82) unstable; urgency=low > + .../... May I suggest using "UNRELEASED" as distribution name so that we can more easily spot pending changes waiting for someone to upload them. Thanks in advance... signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#547175: Reproduced on Sun Fire v490/Wheezy
Installed from the 30th of July 2012 DVD ISO. Same workaround was successful - drop to a shell, manually copy firmware across and reload modules.
Re: Bug#661379: debian-installer: Keyboard connected via Logitech Unifying sender/receiver stops working during installation
Christian PERRIER, le Mon 06 Aug 2012 08:27:56 +0200, a écrit : > Dunno what the "?" means It means not to fail if the module does not actually exist, which is useful when the availability depends on the arch. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120806101238.gd32...@type.famille.thibault.fr
Re: Bug#684005: unblock: busybox/1:1.20.0-6
Hello, just replying for the sake of people reading -boot@ and wondering: Philipp Kern (06/08/2012): > This is fine from a RT point of view, thanks. But given that this package > needs the d-i RM ACK and I couldn't find a definite answer in the archives, > this still needs confirmation. KiBi? I've just sent an ACK to that very bug some minutes ago. ;-) Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#684005: unblock: busybox/1:1.20.0-6
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 12:33:36PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Please unblock package busybox. > > The version in unstable fixes a single bug - busybox basically was > unusable on s390(x) due to a programming error. The single fix > merely removes "__attribute__(aligned(1))" and similar qualifiers > for a few strings on s390(x) where it was problematic. > > The other change in the package - reordering of patches in debian/series - > makes no effect whatsoever on the resulting source (after applying all > patches - I diffed the result to be sure), but makes it easy to group > upstream and non-upstream patches. > > So the only change in this release is to remove forced-alignment of > static strings on s390(x). This is fine from a RT point of view, thanks. But given that this package needs the d-i RM ACK and I couldn't find a definite answer in the archives, this still needs confirmation. KiBi? Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#683888: fixed
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following changes were made to the overrides... Concerning package cdebconf-gtk... Operating on the unstable suite Changed priority from optional to extra Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 683...@bugs.debian.org. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1syjds-0003bq...@franck.debian.org
Bug#684005: unblock: busybox/1:1.20.0-6
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package busybox. The version in unstable fixes a single bug - busybox basically was unusable on s390(x) due to a programming error. The single fix merely removes "__attribute__(aligned(1))" and similar qualifiers for a few strings on s390(x) where it was problematic. The other change in the package - reordering of patches in debian/series - makes no effect whatsoever on the resulting source (after applying all patches - I diffed the result to be sure), but makes it easy to group upstream and non-upstream patches. So the only change in this release is to remove forced-alignment of static strings on s390(x). Thanks! /mjt unblock busybox/1:1.20.0-6 diff -Nru busybox-1.20.0/debian/changelog busybox-1.20.0/debian/changelog --- busybox-1.20.0/debian/changelog 2012-07-08 01:37:33.0 +0400 +++ busybox-1.20.0/debian/changelog 2012-07-22 12:30:25.0 +0400 @@ -1,3 +1,15 @@ +busybox (1:1.20.0-6) unstable; urgency=low + + * reorder patches in debian/patches/series: all upstream first, +debian-specific next. cmp(1) shows no changes in the resulting +sources (after applying patches both ways) + * dont-force-no-alignment-for-s390.patch: do not use ALIGN* macros +on s390 and s390x because gcc generates wrong code (for wrong +declarations). No effect for anything but s390(x), where the +resulting package does not work anyway. (Closes: 681760) + + -- Michael Tokarev Sun, 22 Jul 2012 12:30:02 +0400 + busybox (1:1.20.0-5) unstable; urgency=low * enable various xargs features for all flavours, to make it work diff -Nru busybox-1.20.0/debian/patches/dont-force-no-alignment-for-s390.patch busybox-1.20.0/debian/patches/dont-force-no-alignment-for-s390.patch --- busybox-1.20.0/debian/patches/dont-force-no-alignment-for-s390.patch 1970-01-01 03:00:00.0 +0300 +++ busybox-1.20.0/debian/patches/dont-force-no-alignment-for-s390.patch 2012-07-22 11:58:39.0 +0400 @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +Subject: dont force no alignment for s390 +From: Michael Tokarev +Bugs-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/681760 +Forwarded: no + +This fix hasn't been forwarded upstream, because might be more +correct fix is to use the ALIGN* marks properly in the declarations +too, or just remove whol ALIGN* mess: + + http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2012-July/078155.html + http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2012-July/078163.html + +--- a/include/platform.h b/include/platform.h +@@ -284,7 +284,13 @@ + #define fdprintf dprintf + + /* Useful for defeating gcc's alignment of "char message[]"-like data */ +-#if 1 /* if needed: !defined(arch1) && !defined(arch2) */ ++/* #if 1 /o if needed: !defined(arch1) && !defined(arch2) */ ++/* on s390 and s390x, GCC may generate incorrect code when accessing ++ * variables defined with ALIGN* but declared without -- assuming alignment ++ * on access which isn't actually present. The right fix is to use ALIGN* ++ * properly in all declarations too, but there are quite some of such places. ++ */ ++#if !defined(__s390__) + # define ALIGN1 __attribute__((aligned(1))) + # define ALIGN2 __attribute__((aligned(2))) + # define ALIGN4 __attribute__((aligned(4))) diff -Nru busybox-1.20.0/debian/patches/series busybox-1.20.0/debian/patches/series --- busybox-1.20.0/debian/patches/series2012-07-06 19:21:19.0 +0400 +++ busybox-1.20.0/debian/patches/series2012-07-22 11:59:35.0 +0400 @@ -1,5 +1,14 @@ 1.20.1.patch +# upstream stable patches +busybox-1.20.1-ash.patch +busybox-1.20.1-ifupdown.patch +busybox-1.20.1-man.patch +busybox-1.20.1-tar.patch +busybox-1.20.1-ps.patch +busybox-1.20.1-mke2fs.patch +busybox-1.20.1-1.20.2.patch + shell-ash-export-HOME.patch # we need to get rid of this one: #applets-fallback.patch @@ -10,11 +19,5 @@ u-mount-FreeBSD-support.patch swaponoff-FreeBSD-support.patch -# upstream stable patches -busybox-1.20.1-ash.patch -busybox-1.20.1-ifupdown.patch -busybox-1.20.1-man.patch -busybox-1.20.1-tar.patch -busybox-1.20.1-ps.patch -busybox-1.20.1-mke2fs.patch -busybox-1.20.1-1.20.2.patch +# http://bugs.debian.org/681760 +dont-force-no-alignment-for-s390.patch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120806083336.9383.25852.reportbug@gandalf.local
Re: Bug#682405: unblock: xserver-xorg-input-mouse/1:1.7.2-3
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 02:26:29PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Petr Salinger (03/08/2012): > > > Just keeping you posted. The change looks reasonable, but the > > > package needs a separate ACK from the d-i team. Last I heard from > > > them, they requested that we hold all udebs for now. > > > > It is a little problematic. The udeb is created only for > > > > * hurd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 > > > > And version in testing is completely unuseable on kfreebsd-*, i.e. the > > graphical installer with 1.7.2-2 will only crash on kfreebsd-* > > And I wasn't going to trigger a rebuild of the images for that > particular issue. (Even the fix for #682313 was postponed, FWIW.) > > Niels/RT: all good, feel free to unblock this package. Done, thanks. Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: busybox unblock?
On 06.08.2012 12:18, Philipp Kern wrote: > Hi Michael, > > could you request an unblock for the busybox in unstable if you're happy with > it? I waited for the usual 10 days to finish. And meanwhile I've a few more fixes for it which are worth to add for wheezy, -- not urgent but nice-to-have. But okay, will do in a moment. /mjt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/501f7ec7.7040...@msgid.tls.msk.ru
busybox unblock?
Hi Michael, could you request an unblock for the busybox in unstable if you're happy with it? Thanks Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [GIT/PATCH] libdebian-installer: Add support for dreamplug
On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 14:30 +0200, Hector Oron wrote: > Hi Ian, > > 2012/7/27 Ian Campbell : > > On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 18:37 +0200, Hector Oron wrote: > > >> > Did the d-i beta get done? I must have been sleeping ;-) > >> > >> No, not really, I think I got that wrong. Got confused with alpha1. > > OK, I think we can go ahead now. :-) Thanks, I've pushed my changes to libdebian-installer and debian-installer. I think that was everything. Apart perhaps from this update to the manual. I'm not sure how useful this is, I don't think the existing list is exhaustive anyway. diff --git a/manual/en/hardware/supported/arm.xml b/manual/en/hardware/supported/arm.xml index a386eaf..98637eb 100644 --- a/manual/en/hardware/supported/arm.xml +++ b/manual/en/hardware/supported/arm.xml @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ Kirkwood is a system on a chip (SoC) from Marvell that integrates an ARM CPU, Ethernet, SATA, USB, and other functionality in one chip. We currently support the following Kirkwood based devices: OpenRD (OpenRD-Base, OpenRD-Client and OpenRD-Ultimate), plug computers (SheevaPlug and -GuruPlug), and QNAP +url="&url-arm-cyrius-sheevaplug;">plug computers (SheevaPlug, GuruPlug and +DreamPlug), and QNAP Turbo Station (all TS-11x, TS-21x and TS-41x models). diff --git a/manual/en/install-methods/download/arm.xml b/manual/en/install-methods/download/arm.xml index f3c826d..7ca55d7 100644 --- a/manual/en/install-methods/download/arm.xml +++ b/manual/en/install-methods/download/arm.xml @@ -65,8 +65,8 @@ the installation files for QNAP TS-11x, TS-21x and TS-41x models from Plug Computer and OpenRD Installation Files -The installation files for plug computers (SheevaPlug, GuruPlug, etc) and -OpenRD devices consist of a kernel and initrd for U-Boot. You can obtain +The installation files for plug computers (SheevaPlug, GuruPlug, DreamPlug etc) +and OpenRD devices consist of a kernel and initrd for U-Boot. You can obtain these files from &kirkwood-marvell-firmware-img;. -- Ian Campbell Do you mean to say that I can read mail with vi too? ;-) Didn't you know that? :r /var/spool/mail/jk -- Seen on #debian-mentors signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: pkgsel: please clarify intention of "|| aptfailed"
On 6 August 2012 14:33, Christian PERRIER wrote: >> These semantics could be enforced by replacing use of aptitude with >> equivalent calls to apt-get, or updating aptitude to 0.6.9 series (in >> experimental) which can report the errors similar to apt-get. IMO >> apt-get is preferable because it is simpler and would ensure the most >> consistency possible within pkgsel. However, there may be users who >> rely on the current implicit support of aptitude-only search patterns >> in pkgsel/include. > > I thik this is what should be done, despite this (minor) > inconvenience. We (IIRC) never documented that aptitude search > patterns are supported in pkgsel/include. > > Help in doing this is likely to be appreciated..:-) > Attached converts the aptitude calls to more-or-less equivalent apt-get. On an installed system, aptitude is sometimes able to upgrade a few more packages than apt-get: $ aptitude -q --without-recommends -y full-upgrade -s | grep upgraded 548 packages upgraded, 18 newly installed, 5 to remove and 1 not upgraded. $ apt-get -q --no-install-recommends -y dist-upgrade -s | grep upgraded 544 upgraded, 12 newly installed, 2 to remove and 5 not upgraded. Given that the upgrade in pkgsel is performed on minimal system this is unlikely to be much of a difference, but note that I am not familiar with why pkgsel is using aptitude, or whether this use was introduced because apt-get was deemed to have issues sometimes. Regards postinst.diff Description: Binary data
Processed: Re: d-i: radeon: Please make sure firmware is installed or the user warned about its lack
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 661069 + release-notes Bug #661069 [base-installer] d-i: radeon: Please make sure firmware is installed or the user warned about its lack. Bug #660734 [base-installer] d-i: radeon: Please make sure firmware is installed or the user warned about its lack Added indication that 661069 affects release-notes Added indication that 660734 affects release-notes > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 660734: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660734 661069: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661069 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134423622528254.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
