Bug#722898: UI wording

2013-09-20 Thread Thiemo Nagel 
I think that level of detail is just right for the installer, we don't
want to scare people off by getting too technical. The Installation
Guide would be the right place for a more detailed explanation, I'd
say.

Cheers,
Thiemo

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Holger Levsen  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Donnerstag, 19. September 2013, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> So my final proposal:
>>
>> The installer is now overwriting ${DEVICE} with random data to prevent
>> meta-information leaks from the encrypted volume. This step may be
>> skipped by cancelling this action, albeit at the expense of a slight
>> reduction of the quality of the encryption.
>
> and then people will wonder what "a slight reduction of the quality of the
> encryption" really means... Sadly I have no idea how to express this better.
>
>
> cheers,
> Holger


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAOGcq_724sZQ-5dBntgq2ODF3eZBinPNCs9zAHHxcv=os0h...@mail.gmail.com

Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds

2013-09-20 Thread Cyril Brulebois 
Daily build aggregator  (2013-09-20):
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
> 
> Failed or old builds: [ many ]

We know there's apt's #723705, so I've decronned the build aggregator for now.

Mraw,
KiBi.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130920101546.ge15...@mraw.org

Bug#722898: UI wording

2013-09-20 Thread Holger Levsen 
Hi,

On Donnerstag, 19. September 2013, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> So my final proposal:
> 
> The installer is now overwriting ${DEVICE} with random data to prevent
> meta-information leaks from the encrypted volume. This step may be
> skipped by cancelling this action, albeit at the expense of a slight
> reduction of the quality of the encryption.

and then people will wonder what "a slight reduction of the quality of the 
encryption" really means... Sadly I have no idea how to express this better.


cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.