Bug#734690: Language-chooser: C is not a language
also sprach Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org [2014-03-02 23:18 +0100]: Err, please clarify what “that was not the case, it just said C” means. I'm attaching a screenshot of the current state. (And Christian mentioned that was the case, so it's not clear to me what you're trying to say.) I am not using GTK, but dialog. Here's the screenshot: ┌───┤ [!!] Select a language ├┐ │ │ │ Choose the language to be used for the installation process. The│ │ selected language will also be the default language for the installed │ │ system. │ │ │ │ Language: │ │ │ │ C │ │ English │ │ │ │ Go Back │ │ │ └─┘ Tab moves; Space selects; Enter activates buttons Sure, English is preselected and most people won't expend a second thought, but C is not a language, and I don't think it should appear in the list of choices. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems if a man treats life artistically, his brain is his heart. -- oscar wilde digital_signature_gpg.asc Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
Bug#740271: d-i fails to purge LVM despite preseeding
On 2 March 2014 22:29, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: martin f krafft madd...@debian.org (2014-02-27): Package: debian-installer Version: 20130613+deb7u1+b2 Severity: normal Despite d-i partman-auto/purge_lvm_from_device boolean true d-i partman-lvm/device_remove_lvm boolean true d-i partman-lvm/confirm boolean true d-i partman-lvm/confirm_nooverwrite boolean true d-i fails to install a machine when libvirt passes it a storage volume that has previously been used as PV by another host. What happens (in my case) is that partman creates a new GPT, but often that will be exactly the same as the one used by the previous host using the volume. Therefore, /dev/vda3 will be a valid LVM PV, meaning that LVM will find the previous VG. Now, depending on whether the hostname is (a) the same, or (b) different, d-i will fail to install claiming (a) a VG with the same name is already present; (b) the PV is already in use by another VG. Logs would be helpful. Not necessary, as it's easy to reproduce and a known bug (i've tried and fixed couple symptoms but not all). Indeed just use an lvm-preseed, twice in a row, and delete partition table between the two runs. Furthermore, those that install Virtual Machines, with hard-drives provisioned by LVM volumes on the host, may find shadow effects where deleted freshly created lvm-volume for the repeat install still has left-over guest lvm metadata from previous incarnations. wiping / zeroing out the drive before installation would be slow, but would fix this... -- Regards, Dimitri. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CANBHLUiCt2LygtJy0KcyVr=zn8vh80nq7mfi+74ppaeppy6...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#734690: Language-chooser: C is not a language
martin f krafft madd...@debian.org (2014-03-03): also sprach Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org [2014-03-02 23:18 +0100]: Err, please clarify what “that was not the case, it just said C” means. I'm attaching a screenshot of the current state. (And Christian mentioned that was the case, so it's not clear to me what you're trying to say.) I am not using GTK, but dialog. Here's the screenshot: ┌───┤ [!!] Select a language ├┐ │ │ │ Choose the language to be used for the installation process. The │ │ selected language will also be the default language for the installed │ │ system. │ │ │ │ Language: │ │ │ │ C │ │ English │ │ │ │ Go Back │ │ │ └─┘ Tab moves; Space selects; Enter activates buttons Sure, English is preselected and most people won't expend a second thought, but C is not a language, and I don't think it should appear in the list of choices. Well, using the text installer I'm getting the attached screenshot by default, and I think it's as clear as the gtk version. None which you mentioned initially wouldn't be a language either, so I fail to see how that would help. Finally, I'm not sure why you're insisting we drop support for non- localized installations. All in all, it looks like everything confirms -done@ was right. Mraw, KiBi. attachment: c.png signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#740271: d-i fails to purge LVM despite preseeding
Dimitri John Ledkov x...@debian.org (2014-03-03): On 2 March 2014 22:29, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: Logs would be helpful. Not necessary, as it's easy to reproduce and a known bug (i've tried and fixed couple symptoms but not all). Meh, thanks for telling me what I do consider to be helpful. KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#740589: Complains it cannot find device
Package: partman-lvm Version: 82 Severity: normal partman-lvm / LVM cannot find /dev/vda3, yet it exists: Mar 3 08:34:14 partman: No matching physical volumes found Mar 3 08:34:14 partman: Reading all physical volumes. This may take a while... Mar 3 08:34:14 partman: Mar 3 08:34:14 partman: No volume groups found Mar 3 08:34:14 partman: Mar 3 08:34:14 partman-lvm: Mar 3 08:34:14 partman-lvm: No volume groups found Mar 3 08:34:14 partman-lvm: Mar 3 08:34:14 partman-auto: Available disk space (2147) too small for expert recipe (14465); skipping Mar 3 08:34:15 partman-lvm: Mar 3 08:34:15 partman-lvm: Device /dev/vda3 not found (or ignored by filtering). Mar 3 08:34:15 partman-lvm: Switching to the console: # ls /dev/vda* /dev/vda/dev/vda1/dev/vda2/dev/vda3 # pvcreate /dev/vda3 Writing physical volume data to disk /dev/vda3 Physical volume /dev/vda3 successfully created -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_NZ, LC_CTYPE=en_NZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems digital_signature_gpg.asc Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
Bug#734690: Language-chooser: C is not a language
also sprach Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org [2014-03-03 09:45 +0100]: Finally, I'm not sure why you're insisting we drop support for non- localized installations. I am not, I am just saying that C isn't a language to most people. All in all, it looks like everything confirms -done@ was right. As you wish, I don't care, I just thought it was important to pass on a message. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems there was silence for a moment, and then out of the scrambled mess of arthur's brain crawled some words. -- hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy digital_signature_gpg.asc Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
Bug#740271: d-i fails to purge LVM despite preseeding
also sprach Dimitri John Ledkov x...@debian.org [2014-03-03 09:31 +0100]: Indeed just use an lvm-preseed, twice in a row, and delete partition table between the two runs. What do you mean with that? wiping / zeroing out the drive before installation would be slow, but would fix this... It's what I am doing now, but it sucks. Logs coming… -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems a bank is an institution will to lend you money, provided you can prove that you don't need it. -- mark twain digital_signature_gpg.asc Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
Bug#740271: d-i fails to purge LVM despite preseeding
also sprach Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org [2014-03-02 23:29 +0100]: Logs would be helpful. Here's what happens if the same volume group name is used (see below for the case when a different volume group name is used): ┌──┤ [!!] Partition disks ├───┐ │ │ │ Volume group name already in use │ │ The volume group name used to automatically partition using LVM is │ │ already in use. Lowering the priority for configuration questions │ │ will allow you to specify an alternative name. │ │ │ │ Go BackContinue │ │ │ └─┘ # pvs PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree /dev/vda3 orange lvm2 a-- 1.76g0 Unfortunately, there's nothing useful in the logs: # grep '\(partman\|lvm\)' /var/log//syslog Mar 3 09:20:29 anna[3343]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-auto 106 Mar 3 09:20:30 anna[3343]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-auto-raid 21 Mar 3 09:20:30 anna[3343]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-base 165 Mar 3 09:20:31 anna[3343]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-utils 165 Mar 3 09:20:31 anna[3343]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-basicfilesystems 77 Mar 3 09:20:32 anna[3343]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-basicmethods 52 Mar 3 09:20:32 anna[3343]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-btrfs 10 Mar 3 09:20:32 anna[3343]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-efi 36 Mar 3 09:20:33 anna[3343]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-ext3 74 Mar 3 09:20:33 anna[3343]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-jfs 38 Mar 3 09:20:34 anna[3343]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-md 64 Mar 3 09:20:35 anna[3343]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-partitioning 91 Mar 3 09:20:35 anna[3343]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-target 82 Mar 3 09:20:36 anna[3343]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-ufs 14 Mar 3 09:20:36 anna[3343]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-xfs 50 Mar 3 09:20:46 main-menu[2522]: INFO: Menu item 'partman-base' selected Mar 3 09:20:46 anna-install: Installing partman-auto-lvm Mar 3 09:20:46 anna[5816]: DEBUG: retrieving lvm2-udeb 2.02.95-8 Mar 3 09:20:46 anna[5816]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-auto-lvm 47 Mar 3 09:20:47 anna[5816]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-lvm 82 Mar 3 09:20:48 anna-install: Installing partman-auto-crypto Mar 3 09:20:48 anna[5920]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-auto-crypto 19 Mar 3 09:20:48 anna[5920]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-crypto 57 Mar 3 09:20:49 partman: No matching physical volumes found Mar 3 09:20:49 partman: Reading all physical volumes. This may take a while... Mar 3 09:20:49 partman: Mar 3 09:20:49 partman: No volume groups found Mar 3 09:20:49 partman: Mar 3 09:20:49 partman-lvm: Mar 3 09:20:49 partman-lvm: No volume groups found Mar 3 09:20:49 partman-lvm: Mar 3 09:20:49 partman-auto: Available disk space (2147) too small for expert recipe (14465); skipping Mar 3 09:21:59 main-menu[2522]: (process:5802): /var/lib/partman/devices/=dev=vda Mar 3 09:21:59 main-menu[2522]: INFO: Menu item 'partman-base' succeeded but requested to be left unconfigured. Here's what happens when I try to install with a different volume group name: ┌──┤ [!!] Partition disks ├──┐ ││ │Unexpected error while creating volume group│ │ Autopartitioning using LVM failed because an error occurred while │ │ creating the volume group. │ ││ │ Check /var/log/syslog or see virtual console 4 for the details.│ ││ │ Go Back Continue │ ││ └┘ # pvs PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree /dev/vda3 orange lvm2 a-- 1.76g0 # grep '\(lvm\|partman\)' /var/log/syslog Mar 3 09:26:04 anna[3345]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-auto 106 Mar 3 09:26:04 anna[3345]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-auto-raid 21 Mar 3 09:26:04 anna[3345]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-base 165 Mar 3 09:26:05 anna[3345]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-utils 165 Mar 3 09:26:05 anna[3345]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-basicfilesystems 77 Mar 3 09:26:06 anna[3345]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-basicmethods 52 Mar 3 09:26:06 anna[3345]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-btrfs 10 Mar 3 09:26:07 anna[3345]: DEBUG: retrieving partman-efi 36 Mar 3 09:26:07 anna[3345]:
Bug#619236: debian PS3 installation kboot.conf needed
Hi Cyril, On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 22:21:28 +0100 Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: Adding -powerpc to the loop. Initial bug report: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619236 Geoff Levand ge...@infradead.org (2013-09-04): We still have a need for the kboot-utils package in debian. Recent daily builds of D-I work fine on PS3, but the installed system still cannot boot due to lack of a kboot.conf file for the PS3's native bootloader (petitboot). Is anyone working on getting better PS3 support? kboot-utils is in Debian[1] already, all that is missing is to find a way to tell the installer: if this system is a PS3, then install kboot-utils Can anyone suggest where this kind of logic can be added in d-i? I didn't manage to allocate enough time to look deeper into that. Thanks, Antonio [1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kboot-utils.html -- Antonio Ospite http://ao2.it A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140303103812.39299da3188c3358bdd44...@ao2.it
Bug#740073: Info received (Bug#740073: netinst hangs on scanning CD-ROM)
I can confirm, that this problem exists. Problem: - netinst url: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/current/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso - timestamp: 2014-03-03 05:04 - hardware: kvm (x86_64) - kvm mountpoint: kvm IDE CDROM - problem: d-i hangs at 11% at Scanning the CD-Rom - log message: apt-setup: Unmounting CD-ROM ... apt-setup: Repeat this process for the rest of the CDs in your set. br, florian signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Bug#740580: O: fbset -- framebuffer device maintenance program
Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org (2014-03-03): This package has a lethargic upstream, and needs to be synced from time to time with the latest Linux framebuffer header, accelerators, docs and modes, from «linux/include/linux/fb.h» and «linux/Documentation/fb/» respectively, which I've not done since linux-3.0.0-rc1, as I can't be bothered any longer. It also produces a udeb, so people interested in the installer might want to take a look. I only quickly looked, but I didn't find anything obvious making use of the binaries the udeb contains, or a reference to the udeb itself; so I might be OK for it to go away entirely. Cc-ing -boot@ so that someone can yell if I missed something. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
blends install preseeding?
Hi all, I noticed on the wiki that the DebianParl blend is working on install preseeding. I think this is a particularly interesting approach that might be interesting for more blends to adopt. https://wiki.debian.org/DebianParl#Profiles https://parl.debian.net/desktop/email/ One thing I noticed is that the firmware-linux package is non-free and thus should probably not be installed by default without user consent. Looking at your preseed/late_command, I noticed that you did something I wanted to do, marking packages as auto-installed. I filed #730162 and #739938 about this issue. It appears there is a clear need for this feature since now a blend is doing it. I wonder where the fix belongs, perhaps in debootstrap? To work around lack of this feature in d-i we are using this hack right now for our installs at work. It is more generic but more hacky than the approach taken by DebianParl. d-i preseed/early_command string \ sed -i '/exit 0/i\ mkdir -p /var/lib/apt-install' /bin/apt-install ;\ sed -i '/exit 0/i\ echo $packages /var/lib/apt-install/log' /bin/apt-install d-i preseed/late_command string \ (echo 'APT { NeverAutoRemove { ' ; chroot /target sed 's/ /\xA/g' /var/lib/apt-install/log | sort -u | sed '/popularity-contest/d;/installation-report/d;/^[[:space:]]*$/d;s/^\(.*\)$/ ^\1$;/' ; echo '}; };') /target/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/01autoremove-installer;\ chroot /target apt-mark showmanual | chroot /target xargs apt-mark auto;\ -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1393860666.8895.15.camel@chianamo
Bug#734690: Language-chooser: C is not a language
Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 03 Mar 2014 09:45:59 +0100, a écrit : martin f krafft madd...@debian.org (2014-03-03): I am not using GTK, but dialog. On a serial console. Here's the screenshot: ┌───┤ [!!] Select a language ├┐ │ │ │ Choose the language to be used for the installation process. The │ │ selected language will also be the default language for the installed │ │ system. │ │ │ │ Language: │ │ │ │ C │ │ English │ │ │ │ Go Back │ │ │ └─┘ Confirmed here by booting with console=ttyS0. I don't know why it is not showing the right part of the choices, but I guess that's where the bug should be fixed. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140303162855.gq5...@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr
Bug#740619: debian-installer: contrary to documentation hostname is not from dhcp
Package: debian-installer Version: 20130613+deb7u1+b2 Severity: normal Tags: d-i The example preseed file clearly states that the default hostname is determined by dhcp. This is not the case. udhcpc correctly gets the host and domain info and passes it to the config script which uses it to write a leases file with the correct hostname. the default in the prompt is still debian. with further reading it appears that this may actually be from rdns, which I don't have setup yet and would be reasonable but contrary to all official documentation. Can we please clarify where the hostname should be drawn from in what order and whether preseed or dhcp have any efect and in which configurations. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140303171534.19062.36127.report...@crystal.hildred.us
Re: blends install preseeding?
Quoting Paul Wise (2014-03-03 16:31:06) I noticed on the wiki that the DebianParl blend is working on install preseeding. I think this is a particularly interesting approach that might be interesting for more blends to adopt. https://wiki.debian.org/DebianParl#Profiles https://parl.debian.net/desktop/email/ Thanks for taking an interest in DebianParl - even before I've made much fuzz about it myself. I have now updated those preseeding profiles to reference their source: git://git.debian.org/parl/blends One thing I noticed is that the firmware-linux package is non-free and thus should probably not be installed by default without user consent. Better would be a debconf dialogue asking if the user would like to include the formware-linux package - with No thanks as default. That would however involve injection of more code into the debian-installer session than can fit in a preseeding file, I suspect. I'd love to learn that I am wrong and it can already be handled by debian-installer - I would also be interested in helping implement it, but I have too much on my plate already currently :-/ What I might do instead is give up on firmware-linux and for more more specific firmware check if any was used during install (e.g. using firmware-* netboot image or feeding firmware udebs from a separate USB stick) and if so install correspondent firmware packages (without asking). Looking at your preseed/late_command, I noticed that you did something I wanted to do, marking packages as auto-installed. I filed #730162 and #739938 about this issue. It appears there is a clear need for this feature since now a blend is doing it. I wonder where the fix belongs, perhaps in debootstrap? Ohh - you did something I wanted to do: File appropriate bugreports! My plan is that each tweak has a bugreports tracking its obliteration. You just eased my initiating that plan: Bugreports now added to source. To work around lack of this feature in d-i we are using this hack right now for our installs at work. It is more generic but more hacky than the approach taken by DebianParl. Your approach seem *too* generic for my taste (and possibly the reason bug#730162 was rejected): I don't want *all* apt-install installation flagged as auto-installed (and then partly reverted by fixating another way). I only want supposedly auto-installed packages flagged as such. What I mean by supposedly? Possibly all non-leaf packages, but pretty certain it includes all libraries and base packages. Another related but inverse issue, now that we are talking about it, is that of recommended packages missed: libuuid1 recommends uuid-runtime, and bash recommends bash-completion, neither of which are installed by default. You already filed a bugreport for that one too, Paul? ...and the bash skeleton supports the root user but custom files are installed instead. I intend to work around that e.g. in DebianParl, so expect a bugreport on that when I get around to it (if someone haven't beaten me to it). - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature
Bug#718548: debian-installer: add bcache support to partitions setup and bcache-tools to installer
On 3 March 2014 03:00, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: Control: tag -1 moreinfo Josep Lladonosa jllad...@gmail.com (2013-08-02): Last kernel versions have added bcache to the system. It allows to use an SSD drive as a cache for a -for example- a disk drive partition. A common installation is /dev/sda as the main disk drive and /dev/sdb as a cache drive for it. After a configuration like this, one gets the /dev/bcache0 device to mkfs the filesystem on it, in a similar way to LVM or RAID. Even more, bcache can be combined with these. It would be nice if the installer gave these options to configure, for example, at the moment, in an expert mode install. It would require bcache-tools at boot and bcache as a module in the kernel. bcache.ko is shipped in current debian kernels, alright. I don't see any bcache-tools package though. Mraw, KiBi. Hi, Well there is a package of bcache-tools under development (I guess) in http://mentors.debian.net/package/bcache-tools That is where I got it to install system. -- -- Salutacions...Josep -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAPBO7TaVYEGBJu2U9oqMuOnoBt6tzfc0og+HH=pmyxkysh7...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#656509: closed by Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (Re: Bug#656509: user-setup-udeb: Please consider amending password advice)
On Sun 02 Mar 2014 at 15:27:46 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Quoting Brian Potkin (claremont...@gmail.com): d-i says: A good password will contain a mixture of letters, numbers and punctuation and should be changed at regular intervals. Complexity in a password is good and probably unarguable, although length should also be considered to have some importance, Why advise changing it at regular intervals? Why not advocate not imparting it to anyone or not reusing it on other systems? Is there something which causes a good password to degenerate over time? The second part of the advice does not appear to have any technical basis so removing it would be of little consequence. It takes a few seconds to find something like this in a search engine: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/11/changing_passwo.html Thank you; I had read that debatable article before submitting the report. The interesting paragraph begins So in general: you don't need to regularly change the password to your computer . . . The arguments presented there and elsewhere have persuaded me to adopt a policy of changing my login password as frequently as I change the locks on the doors of my house and my car. :) Thanks for all your work with d-i. Regards, Brian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140303185234.gd8...@copernicus.demon.co.uk
Bug#653513: debian-installer: build/README lies, code says: USE_UDEBS_FROM ?= unstable
Control: tag -1 patch pending Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2011-12-29): Quoting some parts of build/README: | Warning: The build system for the installer is often tightly bound to the | version of Debian for which it is targeted. If you are using stable, use | apt-get source debian-installer to get a version of the installer that | will build on your system. If you are using testing or unstable, check out | a copy of the installer using the command | git clone git://git.debian.org/d-i/debian-installer.git | | Recipe: | […] | - Create your own sources.list.udeb.local, otherwise the build host's |sources.list is taken as a template for sources.list.udeb. […] I suggest adding a reference in the quoted part of the recipe above, like “see the USE_UDEBS_FROM variable below”. It says: | USE_UDEBS_FROM | Normally the codename of the release to use for the build. Defaults to | unstable for daily builds. | Included in /etc/udebs-source in most initrds. […] I've pushed this: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=d-i/debian-installer.git;a=commitdiff;h=47c5083 Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#653513: debian-installer: build/README lies, code says: USE_UDEBS_FROM ?= unstable
Processing control commands: tag -1 patch pending Bug #653513 [debian-installer] debian-installer: build/README lies, code says: USE_UDEBS_FROM ?= unstable Added tag(s) pending and patch. -- 653513: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653513 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b653513.13938796169883.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#688335: marked as done (debian-installer: Should not download all translations from mirror)
Your message dated Mon, 3 Mar 2014 22:54:10 +0100 with message-id 20140303215410.ga27...@mraw.org and subject line Re: Bug#683326: apt-setup: translations for all languages are downloaded has caused the Debian Bug report #683326, regarding debian-installer: Should not download all translations from mirror to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 683326: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683326 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: debian-installer Version: 20120828 Severity: minor Hi! (sorry if reported against the wrong package or if already known) While installing wheezy on a new system using http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/current/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso (downloaded yesterday at Set 20 17:44) and selecting Brazilian Portuguese as the language, I see that after selecting the mirror it downloads a lot of translations not related with the selected language (Translation-{pt_BR,pt,en} are fine (for me, at least), but I don't see why it has to download Translation-de (and others), for example). Shouln't apt's Acquire::Languages be configured to only use, at most, en + selected language? Thank you! Best regards, Nelson -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no (2012-07-25): Package: apt-setup Severity: wishlist apt-setup should configure apt so that only translations for the languages I have configured on the system are downloaded. Currently, all the various translations are downloaded, slowing down the installation process. My wheezy installation logs suggest this was fixed in time for wheezy: | May 3 00:15:53 in-target: Get:4 http://ftp.fr.debian.org wheezy/main Translation-en [3,852 kB] | May 3 00:15:59 in-target: Get:2 http://ftp.fr.debian.org wheezy/main Translation-en/DiffIndex [7,876 B] I believe this was fixed in apt: | apt (0.9.7.5) unstable; urgency=low | […] | * apt-pkg/cdrom.cc: | - copy only configured translation files from a CD-ROM and not all | available translation files preventing new installs with d-i from | being initialized with all translations (Closes: #678227) | […] | -- Michael Vogt m...@debian.org Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:56:44 +0200 Closing Tollef's and Nelson's bug reports. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#683326: marked as done (apt-setup: translations for all languages are downloaded)
Your message dated Mon, 3 Mar 2014 22:54:10 +0100 with message-id 20140303215410.ga27...@mraw.org and subject line Re: Bug#683326: apt-setup: translations for all languages are downloaded has caused the Debian Bug report #683326, regarding apt-setup: translations for all languages are downloaded to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 683326: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683326 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: apt-setup Severity: wishlist apt-setup should configure apt so that only translations for the languages I have configured on the system are downloaded. Currently, all the various translations are downloaded, slowing down the installation process. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=nb_NO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nb_NO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no (2012-07-25): Package: apt-setup Severity: wishlist apt-setup should configure apt so that only translations for the languages I have configured on the system are downloaded. Currently, all the various translations are downloaded, slowing down the installation process. My wheezy installation logs suggest this was fixed in time for wheezy: | May 3 00:15:53 in-target: Get:4 http://ftp.fr.debian.org wheezy/main Translation-en [3,852 kB] | May 3 00:15:59 in-target: Get:2 http://ftp.fr.debian.org wheezy/main Translation-en/DiffIndex [7,876 B] I believe this was fixed in apt: | apt (0.9.7.5) unstable; urgency=low | […] | * apt-pkg/cdrom.cc: | - copy only configured translation files from a CD-ROM and not all | available translation files preventing new installs with d-i from | being initialized with all translations (Closes: #678227) | […] | -- Michael Vogt m...@debian.org Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:56:44 +0200 Closing Tollef's and Nelson's bug reports. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#740669: debian-installer: kfreebsd-i386 xen support
Package: debian-installer Severity: wishlist Tags: d-i There are currrently kernels with xen domU support in the archive for kfreebsd-i386, for both kfreebsd 9 and kfreebsd 10 (e.g. https://packages.debian.org/sid/kfreebsd-image-10.0-1-xen), but there is currently no support for building xen installer images on this arch. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (100, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash 0x56F13E0F.asc Description: application/pgp-keys
Bug#740669: debian-installer: kfreebsd-i386 xen support
oldlaptop oldlaptop...@aol.com (2014-03-03): Package: debian-installer Severity: wishlist Tags: d-i There are currrently kernels with xen domU support in the archive for kfreebsd-i386, for both kfreebsd 9 and kfreebsd 10 (e.g. https://packages.debian.org/sid/kfreebsd-image-10.0-1-xen), but there is currently no support for building xen installer images on this arch. Cc-ing debian-bsd@ since they might want to send patches for that. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#635854: marked as done ([rescue] Wheezy Rescue mode won't chroot to ext4)
Your message dated Mon, 3 Mar 2014 23:04:09 +0100 with message-id 20140303220409.ga30...@mraw.org and subject line Re: Bug#635854: [rescue] Wheezy Rescue mode won't chroot to ext4 has caused the Debian Bug report #635854, regarding [rescue] Wheezy Rescue mode won't chroot to ext4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 635854: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635854 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: rescue Version: Wheezy Installer Severity: normal --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Running the Debian Wheezy Installer in Rescue mode and attempting the option to mount a hard disk partition (some kind of chroot) to an ext4 partition fails. Rescue mode appears unable to mount a ext4 partition using the ncurses interface. --- System information. --- Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-2-686-pae Debian Release: wheezy/sid 500 testing www.debian-multimedia.org 500 testing security.debian.org 500 testing ftp.us.debian.org --- Package information. --- Package's Depends field is empty. Package's Recommends field is empty. Package's Suggests field is empty. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Miguel Figueiredo el...@debianpt.org (2011-07-30): i've just tried the businesscard images for amd64 and i386 under Virtualbox. amd64 works as expected, the console appears with the mounted filesystem. i386 doesn't throw a shell to the mounted partition as expected, but the filesystem is mounted in /target. In both logs appears the following messages: Jul 30 21:39:51 rescue-mode: selected root device '/dev/sda1' Jul 30 21:39:51 rescue: umount: can't umount /target: Invalid argument Jul 30 21:39:51 kernel: [ 44.183793] EXT2-fs (sda1): error: couldn't mount because of unsupported optional features (244) Jul 30 21:39:51 kernel: [ 44.184494] EXT3-fs (sda1): error: couldn't mount because of unsupported optional features (240) Jul 30 21:39:51 kernel: [ 44.219889] EXT4-fs (sda1): recovery complete Jul 30 21:39:51 kernel: [ 44.220081] EXT4-fs (sda1): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null) I don't think this is an issue with the released wheezy images. I think I even demonstrated recovering from a broken encrypted LVM installation using ext4, during Mini-Debconf Paris 2012. So closing this bug report for the time being. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#740669: debian-installer: kfreebsd-i386 xen support
On 03/03/14 22:06, Cyril Brulebois wrote: oldlaptop oldlaptop...@aol.com (2014-03-03): There are currrently kernels with xen domU support in the archive for kfreebsd-i386, for both kfreebsd 9 and kfreebsd 10 (e.g. https://packages.debian.org/sid/kfreebsd-image-10.0-1-xen), but there is currently no support for building xen installer images on this arch. Cc-ing debian-bsd@ since they might want to send patches for that. Thanks. Actually, the regular kfreebsd d-i images should work okay for a Xen HVM-mode domU. kfreebsd-10 should additionally be able to use PV drivers in this mode out of the box, I think. The -xen flavour kernels are only needed for a Xen PV domU, or for kfreebsd-9 it may have run a little faster due to having PV drivers (whereas generic kernels didn't). I think Xen PV domU are becoming obsolete, with modern host hardware typically supporting AMD-V / Intel VT-x now, or otherwise being very slow/outdated for this task. For the jessie release, I don't think new d-i images for Xen PVM will be worth it. Perhaps even the -xen kernel flavour will be dropped unless sufficient demand can be shown for it. Its existence may actually be confusing if the generic kfreebsd-10 images are suitable. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#740674: installation-reports: netinst fails to query network mirrors
Subject: installation-reports: netinst fails to query network mirrors Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Tags: d-i Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? An attempt to install Debian from a netinst image. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? Answered YES when installer asked me do you want to use a network mirror?. * What was the outcome of this action? An error bad mirror or architecture is not supported randomly. * What outcome did you expect instead? Query that mirror and fetch the file list. -- Package-specific info: Boot method: cd/usb-drive Image version: I tried both http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.4.0/amd64/iso-cd/debian-7.4.0-amd64-netinst.iso and http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.4.0/i386/iso-cd/debian-7.4.0-i386-netinst.iso as well as I had same problems about a year ago on 7.0.0-i386-netinst (right after 7.0 release) Date: March 03, 2014 at noon Machine: have same effects on IBM Thinkpad T43 and Dell Precision T7400 Partitions: Filesystem Type 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on rootfs rootfs 113318568 47199928 60362328 44% / udev devtmpfs 102400 10240 0% /dev tmpfs tmpfs 207340 720206620 1% /run /dev/disk/by-uuid/ec7b380b-5005-4ad1-85c9-db51f46218fa ext4 113318568 47199928 60362328 44% / tmpfs tmpfs 51200 5120 0% /run/lock tmpfs tmpfs 833080 76833004 1% /run/shm Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[O] Overall install:[E] Comments/Problems: I first saw this problem about a year ago. The problem is: after installer asks me about using a network mirror and I reply YES, it gives a list by countries. Independently of what I choose I receive architecture is not supported or bad mirror messages in 90% of cases. Once I have seen such an error further attempts to change a mirror will all fail but I can try again after reboot (succeeded only once in about 10 attempts). At the same time (from another PC in the same network) these mirrors can be opened through browser normally. First, I thought that these problems somehow related to my wi-fi adapter, which is ipw2200, but then I saw the same using onboard Ethernet adapter (driver eth0). Ok, then I thought that it could have been related to IBM Thinkpad T43 until recently I was installing 7.4.0-amd64-netinst on my Dell Precision T7400 which has completely different set of hardware. I tried to boot from a CD and then from usb-drive, it's all the same. Interestingly, from a different console on a PC where I was installing Debian, it's always possible to actually ping all the Internet with no issues at all. It is still possible to install the very base system and then after reboot install desktop system from the console (less convenient). The network is behind a firewall but the fact that the same machine has no problems fetching packages after the base system installed and rebooted suggests that it's not a firewall-related issue. -- Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this report. Please compress large files using gzip. Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org. == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer DISTRIB_RELEASE=7 (wheezy) - installer build 20130613 X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom == Installer hardware-summary: == uname -a: Linux lapnik-big 3.2.0-4-486 #1 Debian 3.2.46-1 i686 GNU/Linux lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Mobile 915GM/PM/GMS/910GML Express Processor to DRAM Controller [8086:2590] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: IBM Device [1014:0575] lspci -knn: 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation Mobile 915GM/PM Express PCI Express Root Port [8086:2591] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport lspci -knn: 00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) PCI Express Port 1 [8086:2660] (rev 03) lspci -knn:
Bug#740674: installation-reports: netinst fails to query network mirrors
Hi, Yuriy Grishin ygris...@pyramidheadgroup.ca (2014-03-03): Subject: installation-reports: netinst fails to query network mirrors Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Tags: d-i Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? An attempt to install Debian from a netinst image. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? Answered YES when installer asked me do you want to use a network mirror?. * What was the outcome of this action? An error bad mirror or architecture is not supported randomly. * What outcome did you expect instead? Query that mirror and fetch the file list. any chance you could extract /var/log/syslog when that happens so that we have a better idea of what's actually tried, and so that we get a better idea of the failure mode? If you have a near-by machine with IP $foo, you could listen using nc: nc -l -p 1234 syslog and send /var/log/syslog from d-i to the other machine this way: nc $foo 1234 /var/log/syslog Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#740669: debian-installer: kfreebsd-i386 xen support
Hi, On 04/03/14 00:42, oldlaptop wrote: If this could be done by incorporating PV domU support into the normal kernels (as has been done with Linux for a while), that would solve the problem very nicely. Do you need to run the domU in PV mode? Or would HVM mode with PV drivers be okay? (this should be possible now with kfreebsd-10) Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5315227b.4090...@pyro.eu.org
Bug#740669: debian-installer: kfreebsd-i386 xen support
Steven Chamberlain wrote: Hi, On 04/03/14 00:42, oldlaptop wrote: If this could be done by incorporating PV domU support into the normal kernels (as has been done with Linux for a while), that would solve the problem very nicely. Do you need to run the domU in PV mode? Or would HVM mode with PV drivers be okay? (this should be possible now with kfreebsd-10) Regards, I would like to personally (machine with no virtualization extensions), but I'd agree it's probably not a very big concern in the general case. (Sorry I didn't CC the bug correctly! won't happen again ;)) 0x56F13E0F.asc Description: application/pgp-keys
Bug#740669: debian-installer: kfreebsd-i386 xen support
user debian-...@lists.debian.org usertags 740669 kfreebsd thanks On 04/03/14 00:50, oldlaptop wrote: Steven Chamberlain wrote: Do you need to run the domU in PV mode? I would like to personally (machine with no virtualization extensions), but I'd agree it's probably not a very big concern in the general case. That seems a good enough reason to keep the kfreebsd-10 -xen (PV) flavour, if you still get some use from it. And so I'd like to keep this wishlist bug open; maybe someone will find time to add d-i support for Xen PV. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/531525ba.3070...@pyro.eu.org
Bug#740669: debian-installer: kfreebsd-i386 xen support
Steven Chamberlain, le Tue 04 Mar 2014 01:00:42 +, a écrit : maybe someone will find time to add d-i support for Xen PV. I had already done it for hurd-i386, so I'm doing it for kfreebsd, it seems to be going well, I'll commit the changes. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140304021936.go5...@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr
Bug#740674: installation-reports: netinst fails to query network mirrors
any chance you could extract /var/log/syslog when that happens so that we have a better idea of what's actually tried, and so that we get a better idea of the failure mode? If you have a near-by machine with IP $foo, you could listen using nc: nc -l -p 1234 syslog and send /var/log/syslog from d-i to the other machine this way: nc $foo 1234 /var/log/syslog Attached. I first tried to access ftp.ca.debian.org which failed right away (bad mirror message), then switched to MIT's mirror which and it was downloading files for a while and then failed with Cannot access repository. syslog.tar.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Bug#740674: installation-reports: netinst fails to query network mirrors
Yuriy Grishin ygris...@pyramidheadgroup.ca (2014-03-03): Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2014-03-04): any chance you could extract /var/log/syslog when that happens so that we have a better idea of what's actually tried, and so that we get a better idea of the failure mode? If you have a near-by machine with IP $foo, you could listen using nc: nc -l -p 1234 syslog and send /var/log/syslog from d-i to the other machine this way: nc $foo 1234 /var/log/syslog Attached. I first tried to access ftp.ca.debian.org which failed right away (bad mirror message) This might be: Mar 4 02:02:29 choose-mirror[30164]: DEBUG: command: wget -q http://ftp.ca.debian.org/debian/dists/wheezy/Release -O - | grep -E '^(Suite|Codename):' Mar 4 02:02:34 choose-mirror[30164]: WARNING **: mirror does not support the specified release (wheezy) Unfortunately the error isn't exactly explicit. Maybe that was the same kind of errors as below, but in busybox's wget instead of the target's apt, which might explain different error reporting. then switched to MIT's mirror which and it was downloading files for a while and then failed with Cannot access repository. A very quick (it's past 3am here) look in the file gives: Mar 4 02:04:16 in-target: Failed to fetch http://debian.lcs.mit.edu/debian/dists/wheezy/Release.gpg Something wicked happened resolving 'debian.lcs.mit.edu:http' (-5 - No address associated with hostname) Mar 4 02:04:35 in-target: W: Failed to fetch http://security.debian.org/dists/wheezy/updates/Release.gpg Something wicked happened resolving 'security.debian.org:http' (-5 - No address associated with hostname) Mar 4 02:04:42 in-target: W: Failed to fetch http://debian.lcs.mit.edu/debian/dists/wheezy-updates/Release.gpg Something wicked happened resolving 'debian.lcs.mit.edu:http' (-5 - No address associated with hostname) which suggests some network-related issues. You may want to double-check what ends up in your /etc/resolv.conf, and whether your DNS is working fine. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#740669: debian-installer: kfreebsd-i386 xen support
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 04 Mar 2014 03:19:36 +0100, a écrit : Steven Chamberlain, le Tue 04 Mar 2014 01:00:42 +, a écrit : maybe someone will find time to add d-i support for Xen PV. I had already done it for hurd-i386, so I'm doing it for kfreebsd, it seems to be going well, I'll commit the changes. This is almost done. What is missing now and I won't work on is the kernel-image-9.2-1-xen-di packages, and also how to pass the initrd properly in the sample boot/kfreebsd/xen/debian.cfg file (in my test the kernel booted, but didn't recognize the initrd). Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140304025532.gp5...@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr
Bug#734690: Language-chooser: C is not a language
also sprach Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org [2014-03-03 17:28 +0100]: martin f krafft madd...@debian.org (2014-03-03): I am not using GTK, but dialog. On a serial console. Yes, sorry. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems my father, a good man, told me: 'never lose your ignorance; you cannot replace it.' -- erich maria remarque digital_signature_gpg.asc Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
Bug#734690: Language-chooser: C is not a language
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org): Confirmed here by booting with console=ttyS0. I don't know why it is not showing the right part of the choices, but I guess that's where the bug should be fixed. By right part, you mean other languages? If so, that's (or that was) on purpose given that there is no guarantee that a serial console can properly display non pure ASCII characters. Admitedly, this is an inheritage from the 80's and it could maybe be wise to allow at least languages that can be properly displayed with a Latin-1 charset, when installing through a serial console? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#734690: Language-chooser: C is not a language
also sprach Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org [2014-03-04 07:54 +0100]: If so, that's (or that was) on purpose given that there is no guarantee that a serial console can properly display non pure ASCII characters. I am not talking about character sets. I am talking about language names. C is not a human language, so it should not appear in any list about languages next to English. That we know it as a form of localization doesn't play a role because the average user doesn't even know what localization means. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems moderation is a fatal thing. enough is as bad as a meal. more than enough is as good as a feast. -- oscar wilde digital_signature_gpg.asc Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
Bug#734690: Language-chooser: C is not a language
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org): Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org): Confirmed here by booting with console=ttyS0. I don't know why it is not showing the right part of the choices, but I guess that's where the bug should be fixed. By right part, you mean other languages? Ah, no, you meant what says No localization, sorry. signature.asc Description: Digital signature