Re: Artwork for jessie?
Hi all, I really enjoyed this work. Congratulations! https://wiki.debian.org/DebianArt/Themes/Lines Let me know how I can help. Adjusting the artwork for format and dimensions. We will also prioritize the use of the SVG format that is scalable. Great, Valessio Brito 2014-08-18 6:05 GMT-07:00 : > Hi, > > I've upload the theme with the rescaled logo. > If everything is OK, I can start the others artworks to complete the theme. > > Regards, > > Juliette > > - Mail original - > De: "Cyril Brulebois" > À: "Vincent Blut" > Cc: "Adrien Aubourg" , "juliette belin" > , "Ulrich" , > onsemel...@riseup.net, "Debian Desktop" , > debian-boot@lists.debian.org, "Paul Tagliamonte" > Envoyé: Mercredi 13 Août 2014 17:42:39 > Objet: Re: Artwork for jessie? > > Vincent Blut (2014-08-13): >> Le mer. 13 août 2014 à 14:40, Adrien Aubourg >> a écrit : >> > >> >Le 13/08/2014 14:33, juliette.be...@free.fr a écrit : >> >>Hi, I'm on hollidays until sunday, I don't have the right >> >>computer to work on the theme... >> >>Thank you for the scaling Adrien, but some others changes are >> >>necessary, all the lines must fit the new scaled logo. >> >>Can it wait until next week ? >> > I tried to do my best, but sure it would be better if the original >> > author do the rescaling him/herself. >> > >> > Paul should be the one who can tell if it can wait until next week. >> >> And Cyril, who needs those files in order to include them in the >> installer, which should be froze fairly soon ;-) > > Hello, > > for what it's worth, the next Beta (Beta 2) will likely not happen > before one, maybe two months. Nevertheless, artwork has to be merged > into several components, so it takes time to get all of this sorted. > (I think Paul might tell you more about the relevant components.) > > Bottom line: as far as I can tell, waiting until next week should be > good OK. :) > > Mraw, > KiBi. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-desktop-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: > https://lists.debian.org/1590103045.31088124.1408367126448.javamail.r...@zimbra19-e3.priv.proxad.net > -- ://ValessioBrito.com.br > Profissional de inovação @valessiobrito / +55 (71) VALESSIO -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJd8MAk2Ltb3NEJ8KvZwPSiD-EbSX-qQb=9kgyb2sackbuh...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#758116: Please be verbose whether you would like to get your Blend promoted by tasksel
Hi Franklin, On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 08:57:37AM +0800, Franklin Weng wrote: > > I think it should be also a criterion that the team behind the Blend > > confirms that they are interested and so I'm hereby pinging all lists in > > question to ask you for confirmation. I have set Reply-To to the bug > > report and the general Blends list in case you are interested in further > > discussion with other Blends. > > > > Debian ezgo blends is active. > (Is that what you meant to reply so that the blends can be kept active?) Ahh, sorry for leaving out EzGo in the list given in my initial bug report. What I really meant is: 1. Do you think Blends should be listed by tasksel at installation time. 2. Do you want to be Debian EzGo added to this list. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140828062346.gd23...@an3as.eu
Re: Bug#759189: isolinux: isohybrid dropped, breaking debian-installer builds
On 08/26/2014 10:35 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote: > now, can you give me a *technical* reason why the bugreport needs to be > kept open? is there a need to keep syslinux out of testing or why does > it need to be kept open? if you can't give a technical reason why the newer version of syslinux should be kept out of testing i will close the bug again. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53feb2f6.6020...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#758116: Please be verbose whether you would like to get your Blend promoted by tasksel
2014/8/26 下午7:28 於 "Andreas Tille" 寫道: > > Hi, > > I think it should be also a criterion that the team behind the Blend > confirms that they are interested and so I'm hereby pinging all lists in > question to ask you for confirmation. I have set Reply-To to the bug > report and the general Blends list in case you are interested in further > discussion with other Blends. > Debian ezgo blends is active. (Is that what you meant to reply so that the blends can be kept active?) Franklin
Bug#758116: Please be verbose whether you would like to get your Blend promoted by tasksel
Hi, On Mittwoch, 27. August 2014, Mike Gabriel wrote: > I guess this only makes sense if a Debian Edu machine (standalone) can > be installed via Debian's normal D-I, right? why? and why limit this to stabalone? cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#751704: bug#18289: libparted ped_disk_clobber() overwrites firmware on some arm systems
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:06:21AM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:07:59PM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote: > > > You are fully right that normally a bootloader should be > > installed after partitioning. This works well for the case of a > > bootloader that uses universally available BIOS functions and is > > not hardware-specific, such as is the case on PCs. In the case > > of u-boot on the other hand, in PC-lingo we would have to provide > > the installer with the ability to flash the BIOS for every PC > > model on the market as part of the operating system installation, > > which is not feasible. We might be able to do that for a small > > selection of devices, but not for all of them --> we need to keep > > the u-boot image that is on the device even when creating a new > > disklabel, but we are unsure what is the best way to handle this. > > > > The approach in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751704#60 > > (setting PedDisk.needs_clobber to 0 before calling ped_disk_commit > > for specific devices) works in practice, but the question was > > whether it is ok for the calling application to fiddle around with > > the needs_clobber flag, or whether we should take some other > > approach. > > Hello Brian, > > may I ping you again regarding the last paragraph? The question > whether this approach is ok from a libparted point of view is > still open and I would very much apprechiate your feedback on it. Oops, sorry about that. I think that's probably ok. I'm not sure what other option you have. -- Brian C. Lane | Anaconda Team | IRC: bcl #anaconda | Port Orchard, WA (PST8PDT) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140827221646.gd2...@lister.brianlane.com
Bug#759442: discover: run dh-autoreconf to update for new architectures
Wookey (2014-08-27): > Package: discover > Version: 2.1.2-5.2 > Severity: normal > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertag: arm64 > > This package failed to build on arm64. Here is the buildd log: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=discover&arch=arm64&ver=2.1.2-5.2&stamp=1408296386. > > It is one of hundreds of packages which need autoconf updates in order > to build on new architectures such as arm64, mips64el, ppc64el and > or1k. Re-autoconfing is the recommended way to deal with the general > case of this problem in Debian, as it works now and in the future, and > ensures packages remain buildable from source. This page ( > https://wiki.debian.org/Autoreconf ) contains information on this > issue, and details for maintainers on how to update their packages: > > The porter teams are working hard to get the new architectures ready > for jessie, and time is short, so do please try to fix this issue > promptly. It's often trivial to do. discover hasn't been touched in a while (and isn't even maintained in a VCS apparently), so you might want to investigate preparing an NMU here. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#759442: discover: run dh-autoreconf to update for new architectures
Package: discover Version: 2.1.2-5.2 Severity: normal User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertag: arm64 This package failed to build on arm64. Here is the buildd log: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=discover&arch=arm64&ver=2.1.2-5.2&stamp=1408296386. It is one of hundreds of packages which need autoconf updates in order to build on new architectures such as arm64, mips64el, ppc64el and or1k. Re-autoconfing is the recommended way to deal with the general case of this problem in Debian, as it works now and in the future, and ensures packages remain buildable from source. This page ( https://wiki.debian.org/Autoreconf ) contains information on this issue, and details for maintainers on how to update their packages: The porter teams are working hard to get the new architectures ready for jessie, and time is short, so do please try to fix this issue promptly. It's often trivial to do. -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.6 APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.60-kvm-i386-20140609 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140827095605.24538.62439.report...@stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk
Bug#752418: marked as done (partman-auto: ppc64el support)
Your message dated Wed, 27 Aug 2014 09:23:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#752418: fixed in partman-auto 120 has caused the Debian Bug report #752418, regarding partman-auto: ppc64el support to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 752418: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752418 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: partman-auto Version: 118 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ppc64el Dear Maintainer, here is a patch from Ubuntu to add support to ppc64el. F. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: ppc64el (ppc64le) Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-powerpc64le (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash diff -Nru partman-auto-118/recipes-ppc64el/atomic partman-auto-118/recipes-ppc64el/atomic --- partman-auto-118/recipes-ppc64el/atomic 1970-01-01 00:00:00.0 + +++ partman-auto-118/recipes-ppc64el/atomic 2014-01-15 00:28:39.0 + @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +partman-auto/text/atomic_scheme :: + +8 1 1 prep + $primary{ } + $bootable{ } + method{ prep } . + +128 512 256 ext2 + $defaultignore{ } + $primary{ } + method{ format } + format{ } + use_filesystem{ } + filesystem{ ext2 } + mountpoint{ /boot } . + +500 1 -1 $default_filesystem + $lvmok{ } + $primary{ } + method{ format } + format{ } + use_filesystem{ } + $default_filesystem{ } + mountpoint{ / } . + +96 512 300% linux-swap + $lvmok{ } + method{ swap } + format{ } . diff -Nru partman-auto-118/recipes-ppc64el/home partman-auto-118/recipes-ppc64el/home --- partman-auto-118/recipes-ppc64el/home 1970-01-01 00:00:00.0 + +++ partman-auto-118/recipes-ppc64el/home 2014-01-15 00:28:39.0 + @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +partman-auto/text/home_scheme :: + +8 1 1 prep + $primary{ } + $bootable{ } + method{ prep } . + +128 512 256 ext2 + $defaultignore{ } + $primary{ } + method{ format } + format{ } + use_filesystem{ } + filesystem{ ext2 } + mountpoint{ /boot } . + +500 4000 7000 $default_filesystem + $lvmok{ } + $primary{ } + method{ format } + format{ } + use_filesystem{ } + $default_filesystem{ } + mountpoint{ / } . + +96 512 300% linux-swap + $lvmok{ } + method{ swap } + format{ } . + +100 1 -1 $default_filesystem + $lvmok{ } + method{ format } + format{ } + use_filesystem{ } + $default_filesystem{ } + mountpoint{ /home } . + diff -Nru partman-auto-118/recipes-ppc64el/multi partman-auto-118/recipes-ppc64el/multi --- partman-auto-118/recipes-ppc64el/multi 1970-01-01 00:00:00.0 + +++ partman-auto-118/recipes-ppc64el/multi 2014-01-15 00:28:39.0 + @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +partman-auto/text/multi_scheme :: + +8 1 1 prep + $primary{ } + $bootable{ } + method{ prep } . + +128 512 256 ext2 + $defaultignore{ } + $primary{ } + method{ format } + format{ } + use_filesystem{ } + filesystem{ ext2 } + mountpoint{ /boot } . + +70 800 280 $default_filesystem + $lvmok{ } + $primary{ } + method{ format } + format{ } + use_filesystem{ } + $default_filesystem{ } + mountpoint{ / } . + +500 3000 5000 $default_filesystem + $lvmok{ } + method{ format } + format{ } + use_filesystem{ } + $default_filesystem{ } + mountpoint{ /usr } . + +70 1500 3000 $default_filesystem + $lvmok{ } + method{ format } + format{ } + use_filesystem{ } + $default_filesystem{ } + mountpoint{ /var } . + +96 512 300% linux-swap + $lvmok{ } + method{ swap } + format{ } . + +20 300 400 $default_filesystem + $lvmok{ } + method{ format } + format{ } + use_filesystem{ } + $default_filesystem{ } + mountpoint{ /tmp } . + +300 3000 -1 $default_filesystem + $lvmok{ } + method{ format } + format{ } + use_filesystem{ } + $default_filesystem{ } + mountpoint{ /home } . + diff -Nru partman-auto-118/recipes-ppc64el/_numbers partman-auto-118/recipes-ppc64el/_numbers --- partman-auto-118/recipes-ppc64el/_numbers 1970-01-01 00:00:00.0 + +++ partman-auto-118/recipes-ppc64el/_numbers 2014-01-15 00:28:39.0 + @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +30 atomic +50 home +80 multi --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: partman-auto Source-Version: 120 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of partman-auto, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 752...@b
partman-auto_120_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 09:54:38 +0200 Source: partman-auto Binary: partman-auto Architecture: source Version: 120 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Aurelien Jarno Description: partman-auto - Automatically partition storage devices (partman) (udeb) Closes: 752418 Changes: partman-auto (120) unstable; urgency=medium . [ Updated translations ] * Estonian (et.po) by Mattias Põldaru . [ Frederic Bonnard ] * Add ppc64el recipes (closes: #752418). Checksums-Sha1: 008585c931300e2b85cd307bb402b2075f9479f0 1606 partman-auto_120.dsc 89c1f6bbb4c1e63e163262b8cf132b9cbd6d3a6d 104772 partman-auto_120.tar.xz Checksums-Sha256: d88e749b658567fc752c11ef9f942730101c9f2984298f14bb18e92435c082ee 1606 partman-auto_120.dsc 1f9c7b34f0cbd6091bb8f5b1bc991fe364bc59309616df62efe095b95d07789c 104772 partman-auto_120.tar.xz Files: 91931717cc09ec1a0b9e1399c39ca3a6 1606 debian-installer standard partman-auto_120.dsc 236e6d4a10c3d3d020a6ef757bbf6bc8 104772 debian-installer standard partman-auto_120.tar.xz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIVAwUBU/2PSbqceAYd3YybAQj8QhAAkCXMtSf1q5vxPVFJnkjFFhmbsHmTgHfT 6jm4WrtoEkGJ4KwSGq8htXu1KMAqgzhk+4bhla8a/qMjrZceIYPO5kXRk9eCkCG2 Q9lwhBHWQ/YefsBzS7w+LdKQ6S1diX8kYgcj5FzWopA2zrTnv178FN+L5P05+l/m s0AczyuFsMrKr7aQQsb0vTYVUxhJqZ7axzmKllz4/CDEP3tX4scAaAuEseH3NBkq RxRWrlJQGJkXmU2NceJ1ra7dHXpSpCletmd2ppRS+RkCMJFS4Xs5VkP/WQSuW/qA E2d7gKJScZcI4P13XWWifLO6Flg21BmnYVLnLmbVphgMkCq11sKF0kE7JQOV62V0 32Em9gH+w9z4mOl15QDH8Xk/FHud5aNb5SIS5krRjPUR6t3saTUgAJKXyLDE3Q2v kST3AclDuLyKaR8w7JNUrhoPPLsGUp4DgvT0PyqGIz2DNoOesbqEHC/vlibDwZ2l fMl/IHneKy/OYIt+yald/BFzTYm000yhCIxTdu/YHCvZz0oSmgCG7uaGa5WI5zeS lvaeckfc6EDZAeTqjU0A9LAZSwfPIYJXqDvlETnxvOq/5OdWgOJA6CJrNB84uflt nXxN4JQQKUPDNDLT/8KeDmpd503usQfwuTqLv+pD+3b3Sv/bc4mZ3nqPZoRUKWos uc6M6wSlflY= =p1JG -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xmzrg-0006g3...@franck.debian.org
Re: Debian installer and CD BoF: my views for jessie
Hi, On Tue, 26 Aug 2014, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I might be misremembering of course but I think d-i on linux archs has > been working more or less during the whole release cycle. (The parted I can confirm this as I imported d-i snapshots from git into Kali to cope with new upstream kernels that we imported too. Sometimes subsequent fix to kernel udebs were required but apart from that, it's been working well for us. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Discover the Debian Administrator's Handbook: → http://debian-handbook.info/get/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140827092640.gf23...@x230-buxy.home.ouaza.com
Re: Bug#673715: [d-i manual] doc about creating a bootable Debian usb stick
On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 21:25 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > Hi, > > Brian Potkin wrote: > > On Sun 24 Aug 2014 at 19:24:48 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > > > > > +USB stick is large enough — you have the option of copying any > > > +ISO image, even a DVD image to it. > > > > Could you tolerate an extra comma? > > Sure! > > >+USB stick is large enough — you have the option of copying any > >+ISO image, even a DVD image, to it. > > You will need to mention that the USB stick cannot be used to install extra software after the initial installation. Phil. -- Philip Charles; 39a Paterson Street, Abbotsford, Dunedin, New Zealand +64 3 488 2818Fax +64 3 488 2875Mobile 027 663 4453 phil...@copyleft.co.nz - personal.i...@copyleft.co.nz - business -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1409129685.1664.1.camel@stephen
Bug#758116: Please be verbose whether you would like to get your Blend promoted by tasksel
Hi Mike, On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 07:08:27AM +, Mike Gabriel wrote: > > I guess this only makes sense if a Debian Edu machine (standalone) > can be installed via Debian's normal D-I, right? Why do you think only this is would make sense? IMHO it would make perfectly sense to feed a freshly installed box with educational software. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140827084321.ga25...@an3as.eu
Bug#759428: d-i manual: non-US is no longer existing, so there is also no "export-restricted" software
Package: installation-guide Tags: patch Hi, in http://d-i.debian.org/manual/en.i386/ch08s03.html the manual mentions "export-restricted packages" (in reference to contrib and non-free). This is a left-over from non-US I think. Should be changed just into "restricted". Holger Index: en/post-install/orientation.xml === --- en/post-install/orientation.xml (Revision 69270) +++ en/post-install/orientation.xml (Arbeitskopie) @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ One of the best installation methods is apt. You can use the command line version apt-get or full-screen text version aptitude. Note apt will also let you merge -main, contrib, and non-free so you can have export-restricted packages +main, contrib, and non-free so you can have restricted packages as well as standard versions. Cheers Holger -- Holger Wansing -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140827102046.38575c8c00c6cf09828b5...@mailbox.org
Processed: clone for di-netboot-assistant
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 757920 -1 Bug #757920 [debian-installer] debian-installer: vesamenu.c32 is not a COM32R image Bug 757920 cloned as bug 759424 > reassign -1 di-netboot-assistant Bug #759424 [debian-installer] debian-installer: vesamenu.c32 is not a COM32R image Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'di-netboot-assistant'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #759424 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #759424 to the same values previously set > retitle -1 di-netboot-assistant: please update package for jessie / new > syslinux Bug #759424 [di-netboot-assistant] debian-installer: vesamenu.c32 is not a COM32R image Changed Bug title to 'di-netboot-assistant: please update package for jessie / new syslinux' from 'debian-installer: vesamenu.c32 is not a COM32R image' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 757920: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757920 759424: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=759424 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.140912604920756.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processing of partman-auto_120_source.changes
partman-auto_120_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-auto_120.dsc partman-auto_120.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xmy8w-0003dv...@franck.debian.org
Bug#758116: Please be verbose whether you would like to get your Blend promoted by tasksel
Hi Andreas, [taking all lists except debian-blends and debian-edu off the loop...] On Di 26 Aug 2014 13:27:23 CEST, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi, yesterday I joined the videostream of the installer BoF at DebConf[1]. I also became a bit involved via IRC. Joey Hess raised the question about the criteria to add a Blend or not. I answered "all in the list of the bug report #758116" which IMHO fits the criterion of "actively maintained and some valuable content for users". I think it should be also a criterion that the team behind the Blend confirms that they are interested and so I'm hereby pinging all lists in question to ask you for confirmation. I have set Reply-To to the bug report and the general Blends list in case you are interested in further discussion with other Blends. Any input is welcome to make sure users will realise the fruits of your great work at the earliest point in time. Kind regards Andreas. I guess this only makes sense if a Debian Edu machine (standalone) can be installed via Debian's normal D-I, right? @Petter: is that possible? Do you know? Mike -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148 GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31 mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb pgp0rBzjiiUJm.pgp Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur