Re: New team member
Quoting Baptiste Jammet (bapti...@mailoo.org): Of course Christian knows that I'm involved in this work, and I think he's happy with this. Confirmed.both statements..:-) I've just commited the new po files for the french translation (r69298) after having built succesfully both html pdf. (Please let me know if I must subscribe to -boot) Subscribing to -boot could be a good idea, sure. Moreover, just in case you'd be interested in contributing also to the original English version of the d-i manual, that would help, too;-) -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Build squeeze debian-installer with 3.2 kernel from backports
On 09/04/2014 06:14 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: Anyway I'm obliged to install squeeze because the software stack I will use has not been ported and tested on wheezy yet. As far as I remember udev (squeeze based) will not work with a kernel 3.2 as a deeply changes in ioctl in the kernel API. Maybe you will need a newer udev too... The revert is true: if you will use a 2.6.36 kernel in a Wheezy distro, udev simply fail so any other script which need devpts, shm, and other delights... In few words ALMOST EVERYTHING IS BROKEN. Regards -- ,,, (o o) ==oOO==(_)==OOo== Gianluca Renzi RD phone: +39.0542.609120 fax: +39.0542.609212 .oooO Oooo. ==( )==( )=== \ () / \_) (_/ === | I would like to | | fix the world, | | but they're not | | giving me the | \ source code! / --- ¯\_(.)_/¯ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/540960c1.9030...@eurekelettronica.it
Processing of grub-installer_1.96_source.changes
grub-installer_1.96_source.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: grub-installer_1.96.dsc grub-installer_1.96.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xpnot-00034i...@coccia.debian.org
Processing of grub-installer_1.96_source.changes
grub-installer_1.96_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: grub-installer_1.96.dsc grub-installer_1.96.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xpnqt-0002a3...@franck.debian.org
grub-installer_1.96_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 07:40:00 +0100 Source: grub-installer Binary: grub-installer Architecture: source Version: 1.96 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Ian Campbell i...@debian.org Description: grub-installer - Install GRUB on a hard disk (udeb) Changes: grub-installer (1.96) unstable; urgency=medium . * Install grub-arm64-efi on arm64/efi platforms. Checksums-Sha1: 6f11765be4138792c77ba8c3eb655b95fa114390 1934 grub-installer_1.96.dsc 7e3d2b2a3e6672ade621977c6dc6a20541553acf 192168 grub-installer_1.96.tar.xz Checksums-Sha256: 6dbd57e96125fdb71995659490f471be7fbdb229070b30bf7420675b1e4f93a6 1934 grub-installer_1.96.dsc a483fa023773e7590c848ca012fc58a993c1e379c29c7abe0c2939a7d8e42d7e 192168 grub-installer_1.96.tar.xz Files: e8762ba55adde1197725b3b20e4f65e7 1934 debian-installer standard grub-installer_1.96.dsc 30c6a50cee4075f9d039a25c5767dcca 192168 debian-installer standard grub-installer_1.96.tar.xz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUCVwTAAoJECouJZ9pWkbGl/AQAK+269VvYnkMB+wMAVQwLG2q F8lJ8xZuMbwSEnsGUPM9FbJWv/lDbKFyETWjUcRRunSIPmypNYcT//abyua4yNuj xnSUarvWxR7i+3bZIcR5xi0yO+BadiNAOn73Hll5lNeh2uyCjTGBPCN2q1Zdx45q /0HCZG/KsmpS67TmPoLAdxp++jEbZZ8rR9aWMI5B3N6cCzbhfyZKfn4mCL56ySbn S6nriW3zEcPY3uZzAHRrNcjVwOydbcb8SBtj2iyfKwz5y3pSvGPBQAMJQnkljNK1 9ngkKuXcCVYGUpGAO/dQHB4cPu9WTYQ9qg/l1BPq8+z2jr14N5i3DcGMqWBF8syU 3qpgm5cxZ8+/UHVbKgcXFqJYI6mQOM7WQ9iPFgePOZMU4huZism6Sq8k09/NY4Hz daGbJuMiu7pzEsbXnbnLh31YtqQ1X9EKB2iiboZ207RRZa70EcCN+hdLsdSXPbxq o6LxxvC3ln63v2ptR3HTCwOJOzPP+41l00Ae7usIzSmNb1NoxNHM3fp3QUgl/ZW4 yCtu4vd7s66zn7gVAxCq0FEG4u9d0cHeYRc4zWWL6JvONGl9L1+YyCyHircgdbRd hyHF7NiYo4HupwHCJjdrEpJXG4Fs0T4DMwfAqZiQzCmoQGPogxZfCnwYx+2rsL7I ozMqh58q1cUsqsJ7p3HX =w5po -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xpo2r-0003gi...@franck.debian.org
Bug#757711: netcfg: promptly kills dhclient, deconfigures interface
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-31): On 31/08/14 07:00, Philipp Kern wrote: Is perhaps the same true for stop_rdnssd() on the next line? So Steven committed a patch in to git, getting rid of the dhcp part; Philipp, should I upload that and we'll figure out the rdnssd part another time? Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#760501: coreutils: df does not show LVM root partiton
Hi Mike, Here is the output: # ls -l /etc/mtab -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 387 sep 5 10:02 /etc/mtab # cat /etc/mtab tmpfs /run/user tmpfs rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,size=104857600,mode=0755 0 0 tmpfs /run/lock tmpfs rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,size=5242880 0 0 /dev/sda1 /boot ext2 rw 0 0 /dev/mapper/pulsar-home /home ext4 rw 0 0 rpc_pipefs /run/rpc_pipefs rpc_pipefs rw 0 0 binfmt_misc /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc binfmt_misc rw 0 0 gvfsd-fuse /run/user/1000/gvfs fuse.gvfsd-fuse rw,nosuid,nodev,user=gonzalo 0 0 However in another jessie installations I see that /etc/mtab is a symlink that points to /proc/mounts In my case I did one jessie install over one previous partitioned LVM structure (from another previous distro). And I did another installation in nother PC with the same weekly jessie iso and this didn't happen. So how seems that mtab is not complete. So should I create one symlink from /etc/mtab to /proc/mounts? Regards This is the /proc/mounts output: # cat /proc/mounts rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 sysfs /sys sysfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0 proc /proc proc rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0 udev /dev devtmpfs rw,relatime,size=10240k,nr_inodes=492960,mode=755 0 0 devpts /dev/pts devpts rw,nosuid,noexec,relatime,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000 0 0 tmpfs /run tmpfs rw,nosuid,relatime,size=792100k,mode=755 0 0 /dev/mapper/pulsar-root / ext4 rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,data=ordered 0 0 securityfs /sys/kernel/security securityfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0 tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev 0 0 tmpfs /sys/fs/cgroup tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,mode=755 0 0 cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,xattr,release_agent=/lib/systemd/systemd-cgroups-agent,name=systemd 0 0 pstore /sys/fs/pstore pstore rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0 cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,cpuset 0 0 cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu,cpuacct cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,cpu,cpuacct 0 0 cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/devices cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,devices 0 0 cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/freezer cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,freezer 0 0 cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,net_cls 0 0 cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/blkio cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,blkio 0 0 cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/perf_event cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,perf_event 0 0 systemd-1 /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc autofs rw,relatime,fd=27,pgrp=1,timeout=300,minproto=5,maxproto=5,direct 0 0 mqueue /dev/mqueue mqueue rw,relatime 0 0 debugfs /sys/kernel/debug debugfs rw,relatime 0 0 hugetlbfs /dev/hugepages hugetlbfs rw,relatime 0 0 fusectl /sys/fs/fuse/connections fusectl rw,relatime 0 0 tmpfs /run/lock tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,size=5120k 0 0 tmpfs /run/user tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,size=102400k,mode=755 0 0 /dev/sda1 /boot ext2 rw,relatime 0 0 /dev/mapper/pulsar-home /home ext4 rw,relatime,data=ordered 0 0 rpc_pipefs /run/rpc_pipefs rpc_pipefs rw,relatime 0 0 binfmt_misc /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc binfmt_misc rw,relatime 0 0 gvfsd-fuse /run/user/1000/gvfs fuse.gvfsd-fuse rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=1000,group_id=1000 0 0 2014-09-04 23:17 GMT+02:00 Michael Stone mst...@debian.org: reassign 760501 debian-installer thanks On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 09:30:22PM +0200, Gonzalo Marcote wrote: After a new clean jessie installation df command or mount command does not show / root parition: Sounds like a problem with /etc/mtab configuration. It doesn't sound like a coreutils problem if it's also affecting mount. What is the output of ls -l /etc/mtab cat /etc/mtab Mike Stone
Bug#757711: netcfg: promptly kills dhclient, deconfigures interface
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:55:24AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-31): On 31/08/14 07:00, Philipp Kern wrote: Is perhaps the same true for stop_rdnssd() on the next line? So Steven committed a patch in to git, getting rid of the dhcp part; Philipp, should I upload that and we'll figure out the rdnssd part another time? ACK. I wanted to look at it today, but meh. rdnssd isn't as critical as it won't take your interface down if you kill it. You just won't get updated DNS information. Kind regards and thanks Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#760501: coreutils: df does not show LVM root partiton
I went ahead and created one symlink from /etc/mtab to /proc/mounts and now I show the info without issues: # ls -l /etc/mtab; df -hT; mount *lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 sep 5 10:30 /etc/mtab - /proc/mounts* S.ficheros Tipo Tamaño Usados Disp Uso% Montado en */dev/mapper/pulsar-root ext4 7,1G 4,5G 2,3G 68% /* udevdevtmpfs10M 0 10M 0% /dev tmpfs tmpfs 774M 8,9M 765M 2% /run tmpfs tmpfs 1,9G14M 1,9G 1% /dev/shm tmpfs tmpfs 1,9G 0 1,9G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup tmpfs tmpfs 5,0M 4,0K 5,0M 1% /run/lock tmpfs tmpfs 100M20K 100M 1% /run/user /dev/sda1 ext2 236M28M 196M 13% /boot /dev/mapper/pulsar-home ext444G 1,6G 40G 4% /home sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime) proc on /proc type proc (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime) udev on /dev type devtmpfs (rw,relatime,size=10240k,nr_inodes=492960,mode=755) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,nosuid,noexec,relatime,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000) tmpfs on /run type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,relatime,size=792100k,mode=755) */dev/mapper/pulsar-root on / type ext4 (rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,data=ordered)* securityfs on /sys/kernel/security type securityfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime) tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev) tmpfs on /sys/fs/cgroup type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,mode=755) cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,xattr,release_agent=/lib/systemd/systemd-cgroups-agent,name=systemd) pstore on /sys/fs/pstore type pstore (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime) cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,cpuset) cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu,cpuacct type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,cpu,cpuacct) cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/devices type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,devices) cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/freezer type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,freezer) cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,net_cls) cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/blkio type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,blkio) cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/perf_event type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,perf_event) systemd-1 on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type autofs (rw,relatime,fd=27,pgrp=1,timeout=300,minproto=5,maxproto=5,direct) mqueue on /dev/mqueue type mqueue (rw,relatime) debugfs on /sys/kernel/debug type debugfs (rw,relatime) hugetlbfs on /dev/hugepages type hugetlbfs (rw,relatime) fusectl on /sys/fs/fuse/connections type fusectl (rw,relatime) tmpfs on /run/lock type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,size=5120k) tmpfs on /run/user type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,size=102400k,mode=755) /dev/sda1 on /boot type ext2 (rw,relatime) /dev/mapper/pulsar-home on /home type ext4 (rw,relatime,data=ordered) rpc_pipefs on /run/rpc_pipefs type rpc_pipefs (rw,relatime) binfmt_misc on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc (rw,relatime) gvfsd-fuse on /run/user/1000/gvfs type fuse.gvfsd-fuse (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=1000,group_id=1000) --- If you need more info from my side for why this happened on the installation I will be glad to provide it. Regards, 2014-09-05 10:21 GMT+02:00 Gonzalo Marcote Peña gonzalomarc...@gmail.com: Hi Mike, Here is the output: # ls -l /etc/mtab -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 387 sep 5 10:02 /etc/mtab # cat /etc/mtab tmpfs /run/user tmpfs rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,size=104857600,mode=0755 0 0 tmpfs /run/lock tmpfs rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,size=5242880 0 0 /dev/sda1 /boot ext2 rw 0 0 /dev/mapper/pulsar-home /home ext4 rw 0 0 rpc_pipefs /run/rpc_pipefs rpc_pipefs rw 0 0 binfmt_misc /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc binfmt_misc rw 0 0 gvfsd-fuse /run/user/1000/gvfs fuse.gvfsd-fuse rw,nosuid,nodev,user=gonzalo 0 0 However in another jessie installations I see that /etc/mtab is a symlink that points to /proc/mounts In my case I did one jessie install over one previous partitioned LVM structure (from another previous distro). And I did another installation in nother PC with the same weekly jessie iso and this didn't happen. So how seems that mtab is not complete. So should I create one symlink from /etc/mtab to /proc/mounts? Regards This is the /proc/mounts output: # cat /proc/mounts rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 sysfs /sys sysfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0 proc /proc proc rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0 udev /dev devtmpfs rw,relatime,size=10240k,nr_inodes=492960,mode=755 0 0 devpts /dev/pts devpts rw,nosuid,noexec,relatime,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000 0 0 tmpfs /run tmpfs rw,nosuid,relatime,size=792100k,mode=755 0 0 /dev/mapper/pulsar-root / ext4 rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,data=ordered 0 0 securityfs /sys/kernel/security securityfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0 tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev 0 0 tmpfs /sys/fs/cgroup tmpfs
Bug#760553: debian-installer: changing from guided to manual with LVM results in corrupt LVM metadata
Package: debian-installer Version: debian-7.6.0-amd64-netinst.iso Severity: important hi, I've set Version: to the ISO I used for install as I'm not sure what version of d-i that correlates to, nor whether this is a bug fixed since. I recently performed an install and opted for guided - use LVM initially. When presented with the results, I was not satisfied (I didn't want the entire device filled up with a root LV - see also #651280) so I went back to manual and started over: I deleted each LV and the partition housing the PV, then created a new (smaller) partition for the LV and re-created the LVs. The GPT partition table I ended up with is as follows Model: ATA ST1000LM024 HN-M (scsi) Disk /dev/sdb: 1000GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B Partition Table: gpt Disk Flags: Number Start End SizeFile system Name Flags 1 1049kB 512MB 511MB fat32EFI System Partition boot, esp 2 512MB 768MB 256MB ext2 msftdata 3 768MB 10.8GB 10.0GB lvm 4 10.8GB 10.9GB 132MB fat16FREEDOS msftdata Note that I created partition #4 via parted post-installation (an experiment which failed: UEFI-boot for BIOS flashing is a no-go). However, I have just noticed that the LVM volume has corrupt metadata: # vgs VG #PV #LV #SN Attr VSize VFree qusp_vg 1 2 0 wz--n- 930.80g 921.49g # pvs PVVG Fmt Attr PSize PFree /dev/sdb3 qusp_vg lvm2 a-- 930.80g 921.49g Note that the above shows that it thinks the PV is approx 1T in size, but as parted shows, it's only ~10G. I was just about to create a new LV but if I had done so, I believe it would have started to overwrite partition #4 above and resulted in corruption. 'pvscan' didn't cure the issue, but 'pvresize' seems to have got things to where they should be # pvresize /dev/sdb3 Physical volume /dev/sdb3 changed 1 physical volume(s) resized / 0 physical volume(s) not resized I think the problem appears to be within d-i/partman and handling of deleting PVs or deleting partitions upon which PVs are stored. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140905085835.ga30...@bryant.redmars.org
Bug#757941: busybox-static: DNS resolver stopped working in busybox-static version 1.22.0-7
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:31:12 +0200 Diederik de Haas didi.deb...@cknow.org wrote: On Tuesday 12 August 2014 21:16:06 Michael Tokarev wrote: Also, it is specific to amd64 arch, it does not happen on i386 (from 2 variants of x86 arches). It's not just limited to amd64, since I encountered the issue on raspbian for the Raspberry Pi, which is somewhere between armel and armhf. See https://github.com/debian-pi/raspbian-ua-netinst/issues/80 -- GPG: 0x138E41915C7EFED6 Another Pi user here - also suffering with the same issue. As suggested, using a wheezy static package works without issue. It also seems to have damaged NTP support - even when specifying an NTP server by IP (tried my own and one on the web), setting the time fails. As does package installation by IP (even with a local mirror). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140905114030.horde.3don3bzf9og8zfblchjb...@static-159-253-77-232.karoo.kcom.com
Re: Build squeeze debian-installer with 3.2 kernel from backports
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 09:05 +0200, gianluca wrote: On 09/04/2014 06:14 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: Anyway I'm obliged to install squeeze because the software stack I will use has not been ported and tested on wheezy yet. As far as I remember udev (squeeze based) will not work with a kernel 3.2 as a deeply changes in ioctl in the kernel API. Maybe you will need a newer udev too... You remember wrongly. The revert is true: if you will use a 2.6.36 kernel in a Wheezy distro, udev simply fail so any other script which need devpts, shm, and other delights... In few words ALMOST EVERYTHING IS BROKEN. So far as I am aware, this is not true for Debian's kernel packages. The last time we had a udev/kernel incompatibility across releases was between lenny and squeeze: https://www.debian.org/releases/squeeze/amd64/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#upgrading-udev Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Experience is directly proportional to the value of equipment destroyed. - Carolyn Scheppner signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processing of partman-auto_121_source.changes
partman-auto_121_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-auto_121.dsc partman-auto_121.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xpyht-000298...@franck.debian.org
Processing of partman-auto_121_source.changes
partman-auto_121_source.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: partman-auto_121.dsc partman-auto_121.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xpyhb-0005ru...@coccia.debian.org
partman-auto_121_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 19:03:06 +0100 Source: partman-auto Binary: partman-auto Architecture: source Version: 121 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Ian Campbell i...@debian.org Description: partman-auto - Automatically partition storage devices (partman) (udeb) Changes: partman-auto (121) unstable; urgency=medium . * Add arm64/efi receipe, reusing amd64/efi. Checksums-Sha1: 22652477c85bcc642025f5d34d11980845d356be 1614 partman-auto_121.dsc 3709d10f47d02e485941b4b8e7de8e9924bacebe 104516 partman-auto_121.tar.xz Checksums-Sha256: d597f05edfc3ea725371af8d3896175abe4fdb5ca4b18cd6231e13a74ec5083b 1614 partman-auto_121.dsc 33250a0f65ffded4720a4a13c1d059ef5ac3a9587e389f9c916e65c2eb9ef880 104516 partman-auto_121.tar.xz Files: 3bd5f494aea567f62f4a98a1db6a21ae 1614 debian-installer standard partman-auto_121.dsc 1ceb743c85c83b15e6492912d24a624f 104516 debian-installer standard partman-auto_121.tar.xz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUCfx2AAoJECouJZ9pWkbGkTAP/0POnBfX8B0+gpAuOg+HZ/lK 1qGU+tYHs5/w23zjKA4kIbq7ow8LMaiplO4RzeBw+eADu/sAHM2tF1B8mg09UETe wiAfdNypPF915DKJwuNWTPVhQ5P50dws8iGyHh2pjXWWzCZr6vI5a3O9vY9MMkUC EhoUw8Gqs9Q1RNewlo157gl1QsAhj66uNDThJZ03Tw+T/8eKf+rqGS5mAByRb/Nw VZgFgnrNreHgLRRjTwujuYxI77WpkipFSnD2v3Amsoz9cZPmU3fAWdrtN1kibzS2 d/zgFuUcZnAFC1iZ8KIgUTFbNVg7W9EgxFPmWdaOlNz3rwfsxBPyBFR4dL8Oftxq N5I/OQZQhUCUSjYvQHJuo4f8Gt+J/GBLcooYlDuOhnGZnB8odPYvRX3IUkjIYbLH fnVW4hTU48t+PpmFmWRWmdx75IGnm8YkfnOmu72+jHTBjRv+6cFW8BUIdRR129bA brqxZl7iw2rIkhXOtRu9gQHGgtOTBTmIJ4ntOex+XARyuJ1uHQifQodoz07c86wd JBq47BAoFrVTBK4bFe31WDMbbkj6aGHRyxhkrwQYaAaaq6wta4Wmx5GidRJqNeJB PLnwzUvLbHLvj1pqVJrcw6yXSZuVuF9xYB/jyaTOzVy4WfPj4YJu3mq4NEd39emW qMS10dKj2WiMYUiytgtf =QZif -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xpykw-0002cf...@franck.debian.org
Bug#742671: seeding base-installer/debootstrap_script with an absolute path emits a warning, and just a codename results in an error
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 05:51:28 + Tianon Gravi admwig...@gmail.com wrote: I've attached a patch that makes either of these values work as expected by prepending /usr/share/debootstrap/scripts if the given value exists within that directory, and only throwing a warning if the value given either isn't an absolute path that exists or isn't inside the debootstrap scripts directory. ... Of course, I'm open to tweaking any aspect of this, especially to better fit the expected contribution style or scripting preferences. :) Friendly ping - anything I can do to help here? :) I'm still happy to make changes as necessary. :) ♥, - Tianon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140905193903@gmail.com
Bug#742672: allow debootstrap to take a bare codename as the script parameter
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 06:32:06 + Tianon Gravi admwig...@gmail.com wrote: I've attached a patch that allows $4 (script) to be either an absolute path or a path/file within /usr/share/debootstrap/scripts, so that values like sid or wheezy can be supplied as the script argument and DWIM. ... Of course, as I noted on #742671, I'm very happy to adapt this to better match expected contribution style or scripting style. :) Friendly ping - anything I can do to help here? :) As I noted again on #742671, I'm still happy to make changes as necessary. :) ♥, - Tianon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140905194001@gmail.com
accessibility of jessie desktops
Accessibility is probably the most important issue to consider when choosing the default desktop for jessie. So, the tasksel maintainers request a short report from the accessibility team: Please rank the degree of the accessibility of each desktop from -1 to +1. For more on the process we're using, see this wiki page: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianDesktop/Requalification/Jessie We're tight on time, so just ranking gnome and xfce would be useful. (But we are also curious about how accessible kde and lxde are.) -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
i18n and l10n of desktop environments
In the discussion about whether jessie should default to installing gnome or xfce (or whatever), the question was raised that some might be better translated than others. So, this has been included as a criteria on this wiki page: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianDesktop/Requalification/Jessie I invite either the i18n team as a whole or a motivated member to come up with some kind of answer to this question: How well is each desktop internationalized and translated? It would be great to get some hard numbers, perhaps of the form X% of world population can use $desktop in their native language. Please rank desktops from -1 to +1. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Upload of new partman-base version?
Hello Karsten! Karsten Merker mer...@debian.org (2014-09-05): the linux kernel 3.16 is about to enter unstable this weekend (see https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2014/09/msg00057.html) and will make - among other things - the support for MMC storage on the armhf/sunxi platform available in sid. While this is a good thing, it also means that d-i users on armhf/sunxi systems might be bitten by bug #751704 (d-i overwriting parts of the system firmware stored on MMC) as soon as d-i starts building images based on kernel 3.16. A fix for this bug has been applied to the partman-base git repository, but there has not yet been a new partman-base release since. I would therefore like to ask whether a new release of partman-base could be uploaded in the near future. Thanks for the heads-up. Should the partman maintainers wish that, I can of course also do an upload myself (marked as team upload). Feel free to tag and upload yourself, I fail to see why that would a problem. :) Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: accessibility of jessie desktops
Hi, I don't know exactly what's expected (should 9e an]ier here? on the wiki? etc)? Anyway: - gnome seems to be accessible now, especially 3.14 release. I'm not sure it's friendly for users with low visual capabilities, and easily usable with the keyboard, but at least there are no critical bugs I think. The problem is: not customisable enough, no magmifying possible with the needed quality, not enough visual customisations. Other a11y tools work in it, such as dasher. - lxde is less accessible, given that lxpanel isn't yet accessible. It works but requires hacks, using outside packages such as gnome-panel - XFCE is not at all so far, mainly due to openbox and not link on GTK or Nt toolkits. - KDE is not: theorically, it works via qt-at-spi, but so far, not usable practically. - MATE, not in this benchmarking, is the best solution. They migrate to GTK3. The project is 1.8 release is accessible: compatible with recent apps (iceweasel, icedove, etc); gnome-accessibility-themes work in it, Compiz works in it (will be packaged before freeze), user can customize the layout per-item (colour, size, fonts). It's the slightest after LXDE. The devs are a11y-sensitive. While I'm sure MATE is the ideal solution now, given it's accessible for a lot of disabilities and also for sight people, I think Eebian won't choose it. So, alternatively, I suggest gnome, which has a real work on a11y via Orca's maintainers (Joanie). Anyway, you should ship MATE in benchmarking. Thanks, Regards, Le 05/09/2014 22:37, Joey Hess a écrit : Accessibility is probably the most important issue to consider when choosing the default desktop for jessie. So, the tasksel maintainers request a short report from the accessibility team: Please rank the degree of the accessibility of each desktop from -1 to +1. For more on the process we're using, see this wiki page: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianDesktop/Requalification/Jessie We're tight on time, so just ranking gnome and xfce would be useful. (But we are also curious about how accessible kde and lxde are.) -- Jean-Philippe MENGUAL accelibreinfo, votre partenaire en informatique adaptée aux déficients visuels Mail: te...@accelibreinfo.eu Site Web: http://www.accelibreinfo.eu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/540a3841.7060...@free.fr
Bug#757711: netcfg: promptly kills dhclient, deconfigures interface
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org (2014-09-05): On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:55:24AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-31): On 31/08/14 07:00, Philipp Kern wrote: Is perhaps the same true for stop_rdnssd() on the next line? So Steven committed a patch in to git, getting rid of the dhcp part; Philipp, should I upload that and we'll figure out the rdnssd part another time? ACK. I wanted to look at it today, but meh. rdnssd isn't as critical as it won't take your interface down if you kill it. You just won't get updated DNS information. Alright, thanks. Quickly checked on Linux that going back to the network step still kills the dhcp client and get it started again. Tagged and uploaded. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#742671: seeding base-installer/debootstrap_script with an absolute path emits a warning, and just a codename results in an error
Hi, Tianon Gravi admwig...@gmail.com (2014-09-05): On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 05:51:28 + Tianon Gravi admwig...@gmail.com wrote: I've attached a patch that makes either of these values work as expected by prepending /usr/share/debootstrap/scripts if the given value exists within that directory, and only throwing a warning if the value given either isn't an absolute path that exists or isn't inside the debootstrap scripts directory. ... Of course, I'm open to tweaking any aspect of this, especially to better fit the expected contribution style or scripting preferences. :) Friendly ping - anything I can do to help here? :) I'm still happy to make changes as necessary. :) thanks for the patch and the prod. Unfortunately I think I'll pass and let a more regular debootstrap contributor comment on this, sorry. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processing of netcfg_1.120_source.changes
netcfg_1.120_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: netcfg_1.120.dsc netcfg_1.120.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xq1yo-0003dv...@franck.debian.org
Bug#757711: marked as done (netcfg: promptly kills dhclient, deconfigures interface)
Your message dated Fri, 05 Sep 2014 22:36:17 + with message-id e1xq277-0004wj...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#757711: fixed in netcfg 1.120 has caused the Debian Bug report #757711, regarding netcfg: promptly kills dhclient, deconfigures interface to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 757711: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757711 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- package: debian-installer user: debian-...@lists.debian.org Installing Debian from the weekly image fails to properly provide network connectivity. Attached you find the console output right after the network detection step. As you can see the DHCP client receives a signal 15 and exits. This should not happen. It makes it impossible to select a mirror in the later stage of the installer (with no indication to the real cause). signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: netcfg Source-Version: 1.120 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of netcfg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 757...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (supplier of updated netcfg package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 23:40:24 +0200 Source: netcfg Binary: netcfg netcfg-static Architecture: source Version: 1.120 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org Description: netcfg - Configure the network (udeb) netcfg-static - Configure a static network (udeb) Closes: 757711 757988 Changes: netcfg (1.120) unstable; urgency=medium . [ Steven Chamberlain ] * Do not kill_dhcp_client after setting the hostname and domain, otherwise Linux udhcpc will stop renewing its lease, and on other platforms dhclient will de-configure the network interface (Closes: #757711, #757988) Checksums-Sha1: 9aff82bc8c9a6168d9d759f127eee166b088cc03 1890 netcfg_1.120.dsc 84aae6b08df3544748a2cfab3e600bd00be4ea41 392344 netcfg_1.120.tar.xz Checksums-Sha256: 92f1fab69c2ae00fe46887aa68722f7e7762978b0371cf515dcff6e190ce0214 1890 netcfg_1.120.dsc eb538bec9d38828b23ff712305fed79345eec3d4ad52daeade212848aa22a7a7 392344 netcfg_1.120.tar.xz Files: 24511bfd4577cc22875bc5a68d281cbd 1890 debian-installer optional netcfg_1.120.dsc a7ecb39679d947dd237dd5da0ab97745 392344 debian-installer optional netcfg_1.120.tar.xz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUCjg9AAoJEP+RSvDCs1UgNTsQAJ76FI590EmgsEZDL6mUCMRo j09IsXkK49lG91pn+Cvj/XT5cSeiYLIXsuJ41d+QLRpEbNyXExGM2PHgKvPeZ92P OeFxfm+RNIdc5sS/CGwuRKWEDezQ0VH0WWcr1nSS8k5Rv3KxoaZzuXW+0fcSkYlS saGCmbNNWzFA3yPBocNnhsnG8v1SsaJJDIHlQUngM0GinpvECYEbEIIyqpVboFDb UZxEvUV+8xlJILdnIlNfbXW08RX/EUxiHDBr/AaMbm/Wc86zFfO/Oc4T4Opnnqrl c0AGHkTbN8T1iKVf+36sqGhbhtHI5a0sUMz0WkoYXeW5GbR0KFfWWJuYL/R85ggx XZ0P3dBtFJXhrW+mdRX/Z81bivl5WabhHxWziFUkeVXNAEgY0nDW9gIOnwqucZ7s HgFrH4TaKtp4yXJS8Ao19owRPHn//eoZWSHA2V6pPkUIeYrX6zItcQo/iGC86KZ1 jmtwcbfK58ND3PiCEtWXIEVIXJ+Q54f6VqndPToUccUSZXE8e2ZjkxbOTI6cpSkk cFX6KbszJLauxuY+/oEwOzLyrR7sYCnxbF/31j1NyF2zBNA6K7xia1LXrORfkPd9 HCIcRWajjUfeZ0B0rKf0ymMTAnWtc+9rDGb9ugUkCqF3FySuU9cHm2gWT8VEyJuV qpXVzeB3vxn/JpD/KNHY =YtKX -END PGP SIGNATUREEnd Message---
netcfg_1.120_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 23:40:24 +0200 Source: netcfg Binary: netcfg netcfg-static Architecture: source Version: 1.120 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org Description: netcfg - Configure the network (udeb) netcfg-static - Configure a static network (udeb) Closes: 757711 757988 Changes: netcfg (1.120) unstable; urgency=medium . [ Steven Chamberlain ] * Do not kill_dhcp_client after setting the hostname and domain, otherwise Linux udhcpc will stop renewing its lease, and on other platforms dhclient will de-configure the network interface (Closes: #757711, #757988) Checksums-Sha1: 9aff82bc8c9a6168d9d759f127eee166b088cc03 1890 netcfg_1.120.dsc 84aae6b08df3544748a2cfab3e600bd00be4ea41 392344 netcfg_1.120.tar.xz Checksums-Sha256: 92f1fab69c2ae00fe46887aa68722f7e7762978b0371cf515dcff6e190ce0214 1890 netcfg_1.120.dsc eb538bec9d38828b23ff712305fed79345eec3d4ad52daeade212848aa22a7a7 392344 netcfg_1.120.tar.xz Files: 24511bfd4577cc22875bc5a68d281cbd 1890 debian-installer optional netcfg_1.120.dsc a7ecb39679d947dd237dd5da0ab97745 392344 debian-installer optional netcfg_1.120.tar.xz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUCjg9AAoJEP+RSvDCs1UgNTsQAJ76FI590EmgsEZDL6mUCMRo j09IsXkK49lG91pn+Cvj/XT5cSeiYLIXsuJ41d+QLRpEbNyXExGM2PHgKvPeZ92P OeFxfm+RNIdc5sS/CGwuRKWEDezQ0VH0WWcr1nSS8k5Rv3KxoaZzuXW+0fcSkYlS saGCmbNNWzFA3yPBocNnhsnG8v1SsaJJDIHlQUngM0GinpvECYEbEIIyqpVboFDb UZxEvUV+8xlJILdnIlNfbXW08RX/EUxiHDBr/AaMbm/Wc86zFfO/Oc4T4Opnnqrl c0AGHkTbN8T1iKVf+36sqGhbhtHI5a0sUMz0WkoYXeW5GbR0KFfWWJuYL/R85ggx XZ0P3dBtFJXhrW+mdRX/Z81bivl5WabhHxWziFUkeVXNAEgY0nDW9gIOnwqucZ7s HgFrH4TaKtp4yXJS8Ao19owRPHn//eoZWSHA2V6pPkUIeYrX6zItcQo/iGC86KZ1 jmtwcbfK58ND3PiCEtWXIEVIXJ+Q54f6VqndPToUccUSZXE8e2ZjkxbOTI6cpSkk cFX6KbszJLauxuY+/oEwOzLyrR7sYCnxbF/31j1NyF2zBNA6K7xia1LXrORfkPd9 HCIcRWajjUfeZ0B0rKf0ymMTAnWtc+9rDGb9ugUkCqF3FySuU9cHm2gWT8VEyJuV qpXVzeB3vxn/JpD/KNHY =YtKX -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xq277-0004w9...@franck.debian.org
Bug#757988: marked as done (kfreebsd: troubles with dhcp (configuration going away))
Your message dated Fri, 05 Sep 2014 22:36:17 + with message-id e1xq277-0004wp...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#757988: fixed in netcfg 1.120 has caused the Debian Bug report #757988, regarding kfreebsd: troubles with dhcp (configuration going away) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 757988: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757988 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: debian-installer Version: 20140802 Severity: important User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Hi, I know this is tracked as #757711 but I'm trying to get a comprehensive list of issues affecting kfreebsd-*, along with possible solutions for those using images. So, using debian-jessie-DI-b1-kfreebsd-amd64-netinst.iso with DHCP, an error is shown right after the mirror selection, since network configuration obtained through DHCP is lost at this point. It would be nice to make sure what triggered this issue before blindly applying a patch against netcfg IMHO. Switching to vt2 (alt-f2), and typing this allowed me to resume my (kvm-based) installation test: ifconfig re0 10.0.2.15 255.255.255.0 route add default 10.0.2.2 (I hope my notes are correct on this, readers should get the idea anyway.) Mraw, KiBi. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: netcfg Source-Version: 1.120 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of netcfg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 757...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (supplier of updated netcfg package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 23:40:24 +0200 Source: netcfg Binary: netcfg netcfg-static Architecture: source Version: 1.120 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org Description: netcfg - Configure the network (udeb) netcfg-static - Configure a static network (udeb) Closes: 757711 757988 Changes: netcfg (1.120) unstable; urgency=medium . [ Steven Chamberlain ] * Do not kill_dhcp_client after setting the hostname and domain, otherwise Linux udhcpc will stop renewing its lease, and on other platforms dhclient will de-configure the network interface (Closes: #757711, #757988) Checksums-Sha1: 9aff82bc8c9a6168d9d759f127eee166b088cc03 1890 netcfg_1.120.dsc 84aae6b08df3544748a2cfab3e600bd00be4ea41 392344 netcfg_1.120.tar.xz Checksums-Sha256: 92f1fab69c2ae00fe46887aa68722f7e7762978b0371cf515dcff6e190ce0214 1890 netcfg_1.120.dsc eb538bec9d38828b23ff712305fed79345eec3d4ad52daeade212848aa22a7a7 392344 netcfg_1.120.tar.xz Files: 24511bfd4577cc22875bc5a68d281cbd 1890 debian-installer optional netcfg_1.120.dsc a7ecb39679d947dd237dd5da0ab97745 392344 debian-installer optional netcfg_1.120.tar.xz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUCjg9AAoJEP+RSvDCs1UgNTsQAJ76FI590EmgsEZDL6mUCMRo j09IsXkK49lG91pn+Cvj/XT5cSeiYLIXsuJ41d+QLRpEbNyXExGM2PHgKvPeZ92P OeFxfm+RNIdc5sS/CGwuRKWEDezQ0VH0WWcr1nSS8k5Rv3KxoaZzuXW+0fcSkYlS saGCmbNNWzFA3yPBocNnhsnG8v1SsaJJDIHlQUngM0GinpvECYEbEIIyqpVboFDb UZxEvUV+8xlJILdnIlNfbXW08RX/EUxiHDBr/AaMbm/Wc86zFfO/Oc4T4Opnnqrl c0AGHkTbN8T1iKVf+36sqGhbhtHI5a0sUMz0WkoYXeW5GbR0KFfWWJuYL/R85ggx XZ0P3dBtFJXhrW+mdRX/Z81bivl5WabhHxWziFUkeVXNAEgY0nDW9gIOnwqucZ7s HgFrH4TaKtp4yXJS8Ao19owRPHn//eoZWSHA2V6pPkUIeYrX6zItcQo/iGC86KZ1 jmtwcbfK58ND3PiCEtWXIEVIXJ+Q54f6VqndPToUccUSZXE8e2ZjkxbOTI6cpSkk cFX6KbszJLauxuY+/oEwOzLyrR7sYCnxbF/31j1NyF2zBNA6K7xia1LXrORfkPd9 HCIcRWajjUfeZ0B0rKf0ymMTAnWtc+9rDGb9ugUkCqF3FySuU9cHm2gWT8VEyJuV qpXVzeB3vxn/JpD/KNHY =YtKX -END PGP SIGNATUREEnd Message---
Bug#757818: partman-lvm: Refuses to reinstall if it find old lvm volume
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 02:18:43PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I first tried with
log-output -t partman-lvm lvcreate --wipesignatures y -l $extents \
-n $lv $vg
but this did not work as I had hoped. Next, I tried using --yes instead
of '--wipesignatures y', and this worked as intended.
man lvcreate says
-W, --wipesignatures {y|n}
[...]
This default behaviour can be controlled by
allocation/wipe_signatures_when_zeroing_new_lvs
setting found in lvm.conf(5).
[...]
$ sudo lvm dumpconfig |grep wipe
wipe_signatures_when_zeroing_new_lvs=1
Thus it's already enabled. And that means it checks their presence and
unfortunately asks for wiping.
IMHO it should not prompt at all. Or prompt only if unset.
Also see thread
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/anaconda-patches/2014-January/thread.html#8514
Anyway, with -Wn (do not wipe them), it doesn't prompt anymore and
lvcreation succeeds:
# lvcreate -l1 -n lv00 vg00 ; mkswap -f /dev/vg00/lv00 ; lvremove -f
/dev/vg00/lv00
Logical volume lv00 created
Setting up swapspace version 1, size = 4092 KiB
no label, UUID=8b4f2693-6b36-4f1b-b64b-eebbb273152b
Logical volume lv00 successfully removed
# lvcreate -l1 -n lv00 vg00
WARNING: swap signature detected on /dev/vg00/lv00. Wipe it? [y/n]: y
Wiping swap signature on /dev/vg00/lv00.
Logical volume lv00 created
# mkswap -f /dev/vg00/lv00 ; lvremove -f /dev/vg00/lv00
Setting up swapspace version 1, size = 4092 KiB
no label, UUID=7131bd2b-6312-49e1-9aa0-7dafeba6b844
Logical volume lv00 successfully removed
# lvcreate -Wn -l1 -n lv00 vg00
Logical volume lv00 created
Better than --yes? I didn't test it on d-i.
--
G..e
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140906020516.GA3355@jessie01
