Re: Hints for d-i jessie RC2, part 2
### l10n + one compiler pacification: wrt l10n, I'm left with two packages now: - choose-mirror, which I have trouble compiling, no idea why. Notice that I tried to update its embarked Mirrors.masterlist, which is something we probably want for Jessie - console-setup that had some more translation updates since 1.118, but which I didn't upload yesterday in order to not break the existing unblock request. Once 1.118 enters testing, I might upload 1.119: if there's time enough, it would be good to have it in testingbut this is certainly not a blocker. Don't wait for it. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Hints for d-i jessie RC2, part 2
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org (2015-03-10): ### l10n + one compiler pacification: wrt l10n, I'm left with two packages now: - choose-mirror, which I have trouble compiling, no idea why. Notice that I tried to update its embarked Mirrors.masterlist, which is something we probably want for Jessie Not sure what compilation troubles you might be having, strange. Anyway, I've just updated the list (make Mirrors.masterlist), and pushed uploaded 2.61. - console-setup that had some more translation updates since 1.118, but which I didn't upload yesterday in order to not break the existing unblock request. Once 1.118 enters testing, I might upload 1.119: if there's time enough, it would be good to have it in testingbut this is certainly not a blocker. Don't wait for it. OK, I've added a note, and I might look into it if you don't beat me to it. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processing of choose-mirror_2.61_amd64.changes
choose-mirror_2.61_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: choose-mirror_2.61.dsc choose-mirror_2.61.tar.xz choose-mirror_2.61_all.udeb choose-mirror-bin_2.61_amd64.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1yvj9r-0006z5...@franck.debian.org
choose-mirror_2.61_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:11:59 +0100 Source: choose-mirror Binary: choose-mirror choose-mirror-bin Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 2.61 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org Description: choose-mirror - Choose mirror to install from (menu item) (udeb) choose-mirror-bin - Choose mirror to install from (program) (udeb) Changes: choose-mirror (2.61) unstable; urgency=medium . [ Updated translations ] * Danish (da.po) by Joe Hansen . [ Cyril Brulebois ] * Update Mirrors.masterlist Checksums-Sha1: 5315d41ef1625cf6de1d2a1664629af278c9 1855 choose-mirror_2.61.dsc 0e2acc90d31fe6a9a38bd6fe6808bec886ec769c 199464 choose-mirror_2.61.tar.xz 732c5b95e1ca123dac2bb9b11f45a76ce825dbdc 1056 choose-mirror_2.61_all.udeb aee0ba9d9bed136028d1de83500d07b2d6f55015 245866 choose-mirror-bin_2.61_amd64.udeb Checksums-Sha256: 9bdc2deabed82bdc0875d41d3f7d0c1fc0a404aa6882434521af9061d1ba5422 1855 choose-mirror_2.61.dsc c2d6c4dd50876c5f5519ea17566ba038529f190b836d9872175c3ba25203724e 199464 choose-mirror_2.61.tar.xz 2e34e0a3b1a3a36689afa957a7ac989b039d4789c524a30902d3a5fdad3bd7d0 1056 choose-mirror_2.61_all.udeb 61355647bb63fd6bc26948f6534491501550bf2b4c611b3c22badc8c63976b53 245866 choose-mirror-bin_2.61_amd64.udeb Files: d146aa085158fe4df0712a8b70e686a6 1855 debian-installer extra choose-mirror_2.61.dsc f08b5ef76bef57a02ebd6e529a1d8607 199464 debian-installer extra choose-mirror_2.61.tar.xz e8250b948d0dc8b590a9f36b091ddbef 1056 debian-installer extra choose-mirror_2.61_all.udeb 673925cb63b1f56e51e504dd37b7e242 245866 debian-installer extra choose-mirror-bin_2.61_amd64.udeb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU/uCGAAoJEP+RSvDCs1UgisYP/3MQ6cjJ4QI5XB1HUBnLl15M qmzkIz8qb8XMb6MR5ur6eXe4WvvYKfi+NJw0wEDT934fMJO3TEMd2pBVeYu9tB/S Shk/k3jhT3xreQdU/MAu9TU4np6hQ9BWJHwhNW7VLC6vZpP7e10gf5jzh2NuqKee A7V8w++pP+HZ3Fnc7elSlPNgPeMaJoCrKFkyLllKe2XktQT6hyZglKVBZ0gbe2UN eQmSB2LpnOqP2WV4h5T8+teVD7VJuqiKaWrCZ49ZA/wiuAjBEnCq1IPoR7WGpwF9 zNw2gUxtZ/YtFBB/ZDOBD17zo8c12F0LZb12XogANiUzS8ra8idUeJblD3xRWVUm AH/XMGyEv8xFosAoFIUVprg+cCBXjkJ6xgEKbKvs+qALWKXCTwzmwwzdeHBQVKOz NoKIfZlcaqZJdCcuW3s2Lk7nYR6kMajEWXsX/AH8qNPwglkLcG+i7n2ZWpYSc7hs MvE71Ve6Fl682c3sd29fw7BwHXtzsOjU7jc+WjwopTQphXHc368O3yy++Jh+ihoL 0QSmm71M5brzeiAtJV1qvoyF33vttuvtX0QPLG5Xi1rSIOeI7THhVLkNstZPwaSs RJ1A3n5rR694D8M7B4LujYX5wymelGDdHSrgjooa/3acInhNNHzwv89VSjVIU6Sh tkvMypsyz34Tix/dAA5i =Pmfq -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1yvjlw-0002nm...@franck.debian.org
Re: partman-partitioning_107_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org): Hello, it's me again! :) size=hugeDOH/size Fixed in 108. Thanks for checking carefully over my shoulder..:-) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processing of partman-partitioning_108_i386.changes
partman-partitioning_108_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-partitioning_108.dsc partman-partitioning_108.tar.xz partman-partitioning_108_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1yvof9-0001zb...@franck.debian.org
Processing of partman-partitioning_108_i386.changes
partman-partitioning_108_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: partman-partitioning_108.dsc partman-partitioning_108.tar.xz partman-partitioning_108_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1yvoca-0003p7...@coccia.debian.org
Preseeding with multiple volume groups/independently encrypted groups
Hi,
I'm trying to get a stable preseeding setup to setup my default partitioning
scheme, which is:
1) clear /boot
2) random-key encrypted /tmp
3) random key encrypted swap
4) everything else in a PW encrypted btrfs partition (/)
The preseeding file (where it matter) currently looks as follow, but the
installation complains that their's a valume group that doesn't contain a
physical volume and balks. Is what I want even possible via preseeding?
Thank you for any hints.
Sincerely, Joh
# Custom recipe:
## Set the default file system
d-i partman/default_filesystem string btrfs
## Choose the first SATA block device
d-i partman-auto/disk string /dev/sda
## OK removal of potentially pre-existing lvm setups
d-i partman-lvm/device_remove_lvm boolean true
## OK removal of potentially pre-existing RAID setups
d-i partman-md/device_remove_md boolean true
## OK writing to lvm partitions
d-i partman-lvm/confirm boolean true
d-i partman-lvm/confirm_nooverwrite boolean true
## Choose maximal partition use (?)
d-i partman-auto-lvm/guided_size string max
## Choose the 'crypt' partman method
d-i partman-auto/method string crypto
## Ensure selction of custom recipe
d-i partman-auto/choose_recipe select joh-complex
## Make the lvm volume groups:
d-i partman-auto-lvm/new_vg_name multiselect vg_crypto_swap, \
vg_crypto_tmp, vg_crypto_root
## Define the custom recipe
d-i partman-auto/expert_recipe string \
joh-complex :: \
100 150 200 ext3\
$primary{ } \
$bootable{ }\
label{ boot_nocrypto } \
method{ format }\
format{ } \
use_filesystem{ } \
filesystem{ ext4 } \
mountpoint{ /boot } \
options/discard{ discard } \
options/relatime{ relatime }\
. \
1000 5000 5000 lvm \
$primary{ } \
$defaultignore{ } \
method{ lvm } \
device{ /dev/sda } \
vg_name{ vg_crypto_tmp }\
. \
1000 5000 5000 ext3 \
$lvmok{ } \
method{ format }\
format{ } \
in_vg{ vg_crypto_tmp } \
lv_name{ tmp_crypto } \
use_filesystem{ } \
filesystem{ ext2 } \
mountpoint{ /tmp } \
options/relatime{ relatime }\
options/noexec{ noexec }\
. \
100% 300% 300% lvm \
$primary{ } \
$defaultignore{ } \
method{ lvm } \
device{ /dev/sda } \
vg_name{ vg_crypto_swap } \
. \
100% 300% 300% linux-swap \
$lvmok{ } \
method{ swap } \
format{ } \
in_vg{ vg_crypto_swap } \
lv_name{ swap_crypto } \
. \
1000 1 10 lvm \
$primary{ } \
$defaultignore{ } \
method{ lvm } \
device{ /dev/sda } \
vg_name{ vg_crypto_root } \
. \
1000 1 10 ext3 \
$lvmok{ } \
method{
Bug#712907: grub-installer: No longer installs automatically on a normal machine with one hard drive
Hi Sam, On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 09:02:17AM +1100, Sam McLeod wrote: Thanks Cyril, I did indeed miss that, that's great - I'll test it today. It looks like the example pressed hasn't been updated to include this feature: https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/example-preseed.txt This seems to be fixed in VCS at http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/d-i?view=revisionrevision=69554 (so should be in the final version for jessie) Regards, Salvatore -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150310173334.GA3999@eldamar.local
Re: bastardizing packages or stepping down
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 06.03.2015 15:02, Sam Hartman wrote: [] So, you're involving the TC because you're hoping to better understand why your unblock was not approved? How are you hoping the TC can help? Here are some options I see: * Some folks on the TC are fairly good at release engineering and have been involved in this either in Debian, for other projects or for other distributions. We could look over the situation and try to help you understand why someone might decide not to approve those unblocks. Since we weren't the one acting on the request we can give you an understanding of why someone might think that way, but not why they did. * Alternatively you could be asking for help engaging with the release team and Cyril to explain the actual reasoning involved. Or perhaps you're asking for something else. I asked for understanding mostly. But as I wrote at the very beginning of my first email, I don't have much hope. This email has been sent to 3 places: d-i team who rejected busybox, d-release team and TC, so maybe at least one party can find something to say or do. What I see here are 3 possible solutions to this problem. I guess I ordered them right, starting with most unlikely but best, and ending in most likely but worst. a) allow current busybox to migrate from unstable to testing. This is what I asked when filing an unblock-udeb request initially in #771208, which was filed before jessie freeze. This is what will make everyone happy, I think, including current people involved with the package because there wont be any reason anymore to do the same work twice (including making another crippled release for jessie with unneeded-for-debian security bugfix but without needed- for-jessie other fixes), there wont be any need anymore to bastardize the package. Disadvantages are none, to my view anyway, except that in this case, people who rejected the unblock request will have to agree it was a mistake. That, I think, is one of important points here, because Cyril is one of them (if not the only one), and he's an important person for the project, and no one want to make him unhappy. But since this hasn't happened so far, and even my main questions went unanswered this far in the release cycle, I've no hope for this. b) someone -- be it TC, or D-I team, or the Release team, explain to me why the changes hasn't been accepted. I asked this several times, but always got the same answer: the changes are fixing jessie-ignore bug and introduce uneeded-for-jessie changes for things which are now history already (glibc bug). To which I answered initially in the very first unblock request: the jessie-ignore thing was only because that bug was _difficult_ to fix in time for jessie (but I did that and I was in time), so not to introduce an RC bug which is unlikely to be fixed, and that these changes are _needed_ for jessie, not anything past jessie, exactly because it isn't yet history for jessie, as buildd story demonstrates, and because fixed glibc hasn't even been released upstream at the time -- if not for jessie users, this helps derived distributions and in other situations, like backporting and whatnot. But even more: all this, which I voluntary explained, is hardly relevant for the unblock-UDEB request, because none of the changes in question EVER affect D-I in any way whatsoever. So I don't really understand why an unblock-UDEB request has been denied in a background that the changes aren't needed for jessie, BEFORE jessie has been frozen? And another question which I asked several times is, even if the changes aren't exactly necessary, does it HURT any? Does the new stuff break anything? If not, again, why to work more when it's that simple to do less and make everyone happy? So, basically, it'd be good to understand why. Maybe TC can help, maybe the release team can, or maybe d-i team, I dunno. c) lacking a) and b), I don't have any choice but to step down. The reason is plain and simple. I don't understand why, see b), why even such small, easy to review, carefully selected, tested and needed changes can't be accepted, and why my questions goes on unanswered while freeze progresses, and why it is better to do more work _instead_ of the same work which I already did. Since I don't understand why my work isn't needed for debian, and instead, debian prefers to do MORE work, I see this as I'm not helping debian but instead disturbing its work. So I can't continue, I don't want to make life for others harder. So I _have_ to go. I can't even change the way I do things to make it easier for debian, because I don't understand what is going on so don't know the direction to change myself. So, if c) is the only choice I have, I request that my name be removed from all packages which, at leaat, produces udebs (these are busybox and mdadm so far) on the next upload, and I'm stopping maintaining these packages, because I don't
Re: CSS for installation guide ?
2015-03-04 20:10 GMT+01:00 Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org: Cyril Brulebois, le Tue 03 Mar 2015 04:00:27 +0100, a écrit : At first glance, I dont think toying around with CSS would be much of an issue, but I'll let others more involved with the installation guide speak up (Samuel?). I don't think it should be an issue indeed. Thank you. I started to work on the CSS. Unfortunately, I discovered a remaining bug on the release notes CSS. So I currently stopped the work on the installation guide in order to fix the bug. I will notice here when I will restart on installation guide. Perhaps it will be definitely too late. Have a nice day, -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caoy+up4aendk2usrvbtxodezkg3arrufdksnwmeyfhztss8...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#780208: installation-report: Successful jessie install with 2015-03-09 daily uefi netboot image
Package: installation-reports Version: 2.58 Severity: normal I initially tried to use the RC1 installer, but the kernel doesn't match the modules so ext2/3/4 and such were not loading and that didn't go well. Using the daily build (after locating it, since there are no links to the netboot images on the web page for the daily builds), it worked much better. Obviously the next release with the kernel for the netboot back in sync with the kernel module packages will take care of this. -- Package-specific info: Boot method: network Image version: http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/netboot/debian-installer/amd64/bootnetx64.efi 2015-03-09 Date: 2015-03-09 13:00 EDT (-0400) Machine: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Partitions: See below Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[O] Overall install:[O] Comments/Problems: I set it up with encrypted FS, but was a bit annoyed that it made the swap so small by default (only slightly larger than ram), given I am going to add more ram soon and would like suspend to be an option. I had to manually delete the LVs and create new ones for swap and root to get saner sizes. Would be nice if the guided setup could ask if I wanted to specify the size of swap. Booting using pxe in uefi mode worked fine (once I added uefi support to the dhcp server setup on the network), and everything else worked great. Grub even added an entry for the system boot menu which was unexpected but handy. -- Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this report. Please compress large files using gzip. Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org. == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer DISTRIB_RELEASE=8 (jessie) - installer build 20150309-00:07 X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=netboot == Installer hardware-summary: == uname -a: Linux lennartsorensen 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt7-1 (2015-03-01) x86_64 GNU/Linux lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 4th Gen Core Processor DRAM Controller [8086:0c00] (rev 06) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:18e4] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: hsw_uncore lspci -knn: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th Gen Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0412] (rev 06) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:18e4] lspci -knn: 00:03.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th Gen Core Processor HD Audio Controller [8086:0c0c] (rev 06) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:18e4] lspci -knn: 00:14.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family USB xHCI [8086:8c31] (rev 04) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:18e4] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: xhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:16.0 Communication controller [0780]: Intel Corporation 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family MEI Controller #1 [8086:8c3a] (rev 04) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:18e4] lspci -knn: 00:16.3 Serial controller [0700]: Intel Corporation 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family KT Controller [8086:8c3d] (rev 04) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:18e4] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: serial lspci -knn: 00:19.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation Ethernet Connection I217-LM [8086:153a] (rev 04) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:18e4] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: e1000e lspci -knn: 00:1a.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family USB EHCI #2 [8086:8c2d] (rev 04) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:18e4] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ehci-pci lspci -knn: 00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset High Definition Audio Controller [8086:8c20] (rev 04) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:18e4] lspci -knn: 00:1d.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family USB EHCI #1 [8086:8c26] (rev 04) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:18e4] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ehci-pci lspci -knn: 00:1f.0 ISA bridge [0601]:
Re: partman-partitioning_107_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Debian FTP Masters ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org (2015-03-09): Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 06:56:31 +0100 Source: partman-partitioning Binary: partman-partitioning Architecture: source i386 Version: 107 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Description: partman-partitioning - Partitioning operations for partman (udeb) Changes: partman-partitioning (107) unstable; urgency=low . [ Updated translations ] * Danish (da.po) by Joe Hansen Hello, it's me again! :) active_partition/copy/choices |7 active_partition/copy/do_option | 59 debian/changelog|7 debian/po/da.po |6 ++-- debian/po/zh_CN.po |2 - 5 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) The first two were dropped in: commit efe54284a22fe0f1b13287d7d5e39b3933b37145 Author: Phillip Susi ps...@ubuntu.com Date: Sun Jul 6 01:54:47 2014 +0100 Remove partition copy operation for libparted 3 transition (closes: #738864). active_partition/_numbers |1 - active_partition/copy/choices |7 --- active_partition/copy/do_option | 59 --- debian/changelog |7 +++ debian/partman-partitioning.templates | 37 - 5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-) Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Hints for d-i jessie RC2, part 2
Hi, Ivo De Decker iv...@debian.org (2015-03-10): On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 09:22:13PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: The rest is (almost) only about l10n. All unblocked. Most of them are urgency low, I can age them if you want. Thanks. No need to urgent them, I'll do so if/when they become a blocker for RC2, once other things are ready. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#709883: [keyboard-configuration] Re: Bug#709883: [keyboard-configuration] RE: keyboard-configuration: X keyboard configuration lost after upgrade
Package: keyboard-configuration Version: 1.118 Just a quick note to say that a few upgrades of this package have now gone past, but /etc/default/keyboard has not been broken (caps blocking removed). Thanks --- System information. --- Architecture: amd64 Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 Debian Release: 8.0 990 testing 10.1.0.3 500 unstable10.1.0.3 500 quodlibet-unstable 10.1.0.3 1 experimental10.1.0.3 --- Package information. --- Depends (Version) | Installed ==-+- liblocale-gettext-perl | 1.05-8+b1 initscripts| 2.88dsf-58 liblocale-gettext-perl | 1.05-8+b1 initscripts| 2.88dsf-58 console-setup-linux| 1.118 OR console-setup-freebsd | xkb-data (= 0.9) | 2.12-1 keyboard-configuration (= 1.111) | 1.118 kbd (= 0.99-12) | 1.15.5-2 OR console-tools (= 1:0.2.3-16) | keyboard-configuration (= 1.111) | 1.118 Package Status (Version) | Installed =-+-=== kbd | 1.15.5-2 console-tools | console-data | console-common| Package's Recommends field is empty. Suggests (Version) | Installed -+-=== lsb-base (= 3.0-6) | 4.1+Debian13+nmu1 locales | 2.19-15 console-setup| 1.118 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
