Ductape - Evenementenbureau

2015-04-01 Thread Ductape

Deze email nieuwsbrief werd in grafisch HTML formaat verzonden.
Als u deze tekstversie ziet, verkiest uw email programma gewone tekst emails.
U kan de originele nieuwsbrief online bekijken:
http://ymlp283.net/zpcMVQ



Beste

We stellen u graag Ductape voor, de perfecte partner voor het volledig
uitwerken van uw corporate event, personeelsfeest, klantenfeest,
incentive, teambuilding, etc. van A tot Z, zowel in binnen- als
buitenland. Je kan bij ons evengoed terecht voor event consulting of
event management op freelance basis.
 
Ductape verzorgt uw evenement tot in de puntjes en biedt een feilloze,
kwalitatieve en flexibele organisatie. Wij luisteren naar u en streven
ernaar om in functie van uw budget de beste oplossingen aan te reiken
om er telkens weer een geslaagd event van te maken. Het uitbesteden
van een evenement is niet duurder dan wanneer u het zelf
organiseert. Bovendien geniet u van onze event coördinatie.

Plant u een event? Contacteer ons ( mailto:he...@ductape.be ) vandaag
nog
voor een meeting en/of een vrijblijvende offerte!

We zijn er zeker van dat Ductape ook voor u iets kan betekenen.

Met vriendelijke groeten

Team Ductape

Wat?

Ductape organiseert uw corporate event, personeelsfeest,
klantenevent, incentive, teambuilding, etc. van A tot Z.
Enkel op zoek naar event consulting? Ook dat kan!

 

Hoe?

Ductape luistert naar u, zoekt naar de beste
oplossingen en werkt uw evenement volledig
op maat uit, in functie van uw budget.

 

Waar?

Ductape is gevestigd te Antwerpen maar
is inzetbaar in binnen- en buitenland!

 

 


Ductape, Oude Leeuwenrui 39/V2, 2000 Antwerpen
T: +32 (0)479 75 58 39  |  E: he...@ductape.be  |  W:
www.ductape.be

_
Uitschrijven / Gegevens wijzigen: 
http://ymlp283.net/ughbhmebgsgujjjuugmwsggeuheus
Powered door YourMailingListProvider



Bug#781511: marked as done (debian-installer-8-netboot-i386: fails to mount ext4 file system at / for root on /)

2015-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 1 Apr 2015 17:28:18 +0200
with message-id 20150401152818.gq23...@gpm.stappers.nl
and subject line Re: Bug#781511: debian-installer-8-netboot-i386: fails to 
mount ext4 file system at / for root on /
has caused the Debian Bug report #781511,
regarding debian-installer-8-netboot-i386: fails to mount ext4 file system at / 
for root on /
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
781511: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781511
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: debian-installer-8-netboot-i386
Version: 20150107
Severity: important
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: debian-edu

Hi,

while testing Debian Edu, PXE installations are failing with:

'The attempt to mount a file system with type ext4 in LVM VG vg_system, 
LV root at / failed.'

When using the current netboot tarball

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18544521 Mar 30 04:54 netboot-i386.tar.gz

the error doesn't show up.

Same with d-i-8-netboot-amd64, I guess.

Wolfgang



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 06:46:17PM +0200, Wolfgang Schweer wrote:
 On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 05:43:14PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
  
  Package from 
  http://incoming.debian.org/debian-buildd/pool/main/d/debian-installer-netboot-images/
   ( debian-installer-8-netboot-amd64_20150324_all.deb ) gets beyond the 
  error!
 
 Same here with debian-installer-8-netboot-i386_20150324_all.deb
 

Okay, closing this bugreport


Groeten
Geert Stappers
-- 
Leven en laten leven


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---


Re: Bug#761815: installation adds entries for USB media to /etc/fstab which confuse udisks

2015-04-01 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 08:08:50PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (2015-04-01):
 As it stands, this is only for removable media which people have not
 already set up as part of their systems. The whole issue here is that
 this is not useful any more. If anybody is relying on being able to
 use such media without any of the existing auto-mounting stuff
 (desktop or whatever), adding it to /etc/fstab manually later isn't
 hard. I don't really see likely breakage here.

OK. Color me convinced for the time being, feel free to push and upload;
I'll get that unblocked in a week(ish) if no objections have been raised
by then.

In incoming now.

If it reaches the release and people show up with appropriate use cases,
it should be easy enough to deal with it in the first point release by
introducing what I suggested.

ACK, makse sense.

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
We're the technical experts.  We were hired so that management could
 ignore our recommendations and tell us how to do our jobs.  -- Mike Andrews


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150402002511.gd6...@einval.com



partman-target_95_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2015-04-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters


Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 18:10:31 +0100
Source: partman-target
Binary: partman-target
Architecture: source all
Version: 95
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Steve McIntyre 93...@debian.org
Description:
 partman-target - Provides partman with ability to prepare /target (udeb)
Changes:
 partman-target (95) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Steve McIntyre ]
   * Further extend the fix for #761815 - don't add *any* extra USB devices
 to /etc/fstab.
Checksums-Sha1:
 1078d2c54252368e87308190bb74d5d9c3af8e2b 1746 partman-target_95.dsc
 6da4932a40f828d54687f2507efd32c359f90117 125296 partman-target_95.tar.xz
 dfcbc0294562d2d52af517b8ee688f60e7c2e69c 142492 partman-target_95_all.udeb
Checksums-Sha256:
 9420a97d9def2f364e28c54ee38f866ef362cd36e9156c4ae59d27ded0ce6e19 1746 
partman-target_95.dsc
 ec084ea16341db20db2693ab2e43b997b45c8339547bf32d74cb2fef59fed78d 125296 
partman-target_95.tar.xz
 aa65120b6500099163045ad6ad784a78dc19cf049f9bd35b5cba8392d0020d1e 142492 
partman-target_95_all.udeb
Files:
 00a77cf0a6471232a13365d57bc969b6 1746 debian-installer standard 
partman-target_95.dsc
 32ce14e69c77ab5427d240efe73c2d3d 125296 debian-installer standard 
partman-target_95.tar.xz
 c8a2e29b915dafc50c4d5a8b9c89ad8f 142492 debian-installer standard 
partman-target_95_all.udeb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=8K2u
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1ydt73-00049i...@franck.debian.org



Processing of partman-target_95_amd64.changes

2015-04-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
partman-target_95_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman-target_95.dsc
  partman-target_95.tar.xz
  partman-target_95_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1ydsxd-0003ar...@franck.debian.org



Re: Bug#761815: installation adds entries for USB media to /etc/fstab which confuse udisks

2015-04-01 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (2015-04-01):
 As it stands, this is only for removable media which people have not
 already set up as part of their systems. The whole issue here is that
 this is not useful any more. If anybody is relying on being able to
 use such media without any of the existing auto-mounting stuff
 (desktop or whatever), adding it to /etc/fstab manually later isn't
 hard. I don't really see likely breakage here.

OK. Color me convinced for the time being, feel free to push and upload;
I'll get that unblocked in a week(ish) if no objections have been raised
by then.

If it reaches the release and people show up with appropriate use cases,
it should be easy enough to deal with it in the first point release by
introducing what I suggested.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: [PATCH V4 0/3] d-i: support building bootable images for armhf targets

2015-04-01 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi,

Karsten Merker mer...@debian.org (2015-03-15):
 this patchset had been postponed to after d-i RC1 as discussions
 about it were still ongoing at the time for the RC1 release.
 I have in the meantime met Ian and Steve at FOSDEM and we have
 discussed the open topics there.  We came to the conclusion that
 using the concatenateable images approach is the way to go and
 that the space and bandwidth used by those images does not pose a
 problem for the mirror network.  I was busy with other topics
 during the last weeks, so it unfortunately took me longer than
 planned to strip the patchset down to the necessary parts and
 rebase it against the current codebase.

It's great you guys agreed. :)

 Follwing is the updated version of the patchset. I have run
 successful installation tests with all image types generated by
 it and it builds cleanly in pbuilder, so I intend to push it to
 d-i master for inclusion in d-i RC2.
 
 Kibi, is that ok for you?

Sorry for the lag, as explained out of band RC2 was long due, so I
decided to release it with those patches. Feel free to push/merge soon
to get that into RC3.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#781661: initramfs-tools: Split /usr on LVM fails when using LABEL or UUID in fstab

2015-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 reassign -1 lvm2
Bug #781661 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: Split /usr on LVM fails when 
using LABEL or UUID in fstab
Bug reassigned from package 'initramfs-tools' to 'lvm2'.
No longer marked as found in versions initramfs-tools/0.119.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #781661 to the same values 
previously set
 forcemerge 612402 -1
Bug #612402 [lvm2] /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-top/lvm2: initramfs 
hook does not activate volume group when root=UUID=... syntax used
Bug #781661 [lvm2] initramfs-tools: Split /usr on LVM fails when using LABEL or 
UUID in fstab
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
686130 was blocked by: 612402
686130 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 686130: 781661
Marked as found in versions lvm2/2.02.84-3.1, lvm2/2.02.66-5, and 
lvm2/2.02.95-4.
Added tag(s) patch.
Merged 612402 781661

-- 
612402: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612402
686130: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686130
781661: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781661
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b781661.142790681819926.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#712907: grub-installer: No longer installs automatically on a normal machine with one hard drive

2015-04-01 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi,

and sorry for the lag.

Sam McLeod s...@fastmail.com (2015-03-07):
 Thanks Cyril, I did indeed miss that, that's great - I'll test it today.
 
 It looks like the example pressed hasn't been updated to include this
 feature: https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/example-preseed.txt

This seems to be fixed by:

 69619  sthibault # Due notably to potential USB sticks, the location of the 
MBR can not be
 69619  sthibault # determined safely in general, so this needs to be specified:
 69619  sthibault #d-i grub-installer/bootdev  string /dev/sda
 69619  sthibault # To install to the first device (assuming it is not a USB 
stick):
 69619  sthibault #d-i grub-installer/bootdev  string default

(svn blame en/appendix/preseed.xml in the manual; confirmed by looking
at the website now.)

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#761815: installation adds entries for USB media to /etc/fstab which confuse udisks

2015-04-01 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 07:20:02PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi Steve,

Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (2015-03-30):
 Right, it seems that was too conservative and still left hd-media
 devices listed. We probably don't want those either. Let's try this:
 don't add *any* USB devices to /etc/fstab:

Thanks. I'm slightly worried that some people might depend on this
feature, so I'm feeling a bit uneasy with ripping out support for it
entirely in the last stage before a release.

Maybe having a low priority question (marked as non-translatable for
this release cycle), which would let people have a say on this with
expert install, and which would also allow preseeding it?

What do you think?

Maybe... :-)

As it stands, this is only for removable media which people have not
already set up as part of their systems. The whole issue here is that
this is not useful any more. If anybody is relying on being able to
use such media without any of the existing auto-mounting stuff
(desktop or whatever), adding it to /etc/fstab manually later isn't
hard. I don't really see likely breakage here.

Anybody else?

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Google-bait:   http://www.debian.org/CD/free-linux-cd
  Debian does NOT ship free CDs. Please do NOT contact the mailing
  lists asking us to send them to you.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150401173552.gb19...@einval.com



Hints for d-i jessie RC3, part 1

2015-04-01 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi people,

here's a first round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
jessie RC3. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
Please note that some are just unblock (installation-guide) or just
unblock-udeb (systemd) and that doesn't count as fishy (despite `date`).


# l10n only:
unblock apt-setup/1:0.95
unblock-udeb apt-setup/1:0.95

# l10n only:
unblock console-setup/1.120
unblock-udeb console-setup/1.120

# l10n only:
unblock grub-installer/1.114
unblock-udeb grub-installer/1.114

# UEFI quirks:
unblock grub2/2.02~beta2-22
unblock-udeb grub2/2.02~beta2-22

# doc:
unblock installation-guide/20150323

# not directly exposed through regular d-i, so no objections:
unblock-udeb ltsp/5.5.4-4

# stateful IPv6 addressing:
unblock netcfg/1.131
unblock-udeb netcfg/1.131

# l10n only:
unblock partman-basicfilesystems/111
unblock-udeb partman-basicfilesystems/111

# l10n only:
unblock partman-crypto/79
unblock-udeb partman-crypto/79

# l10n only:
unblock partman-iscsi/35
unblock-udeb partman-iscsi/35

# l10n only:
unblock partman-lvm/106
unblock-udeb partman-lvm/106

# l10n only:
unblock partman-zfs/44
unblock-udeb partman-zfs/44

# l10n only:
unblock rescue/1.50
unblock-udeb rescue/1.50

# not reviewed thoroughly, but I like what it says on the changebox:
unblock-udeb systemd/215-14

# l10n only:
unblock tzsetup/1:0.65
unblock-udeb tzsetup/1:0.65


Thanks for your time.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Status on and review/translation of the release-notes

2015-04-01 Thread Mathieu Parent
Hello,

 * Chapter 3: done

The installer section has seen no important changes since wheezy [1]
and still indicate a migration from ext3 to ext4 for example [2].

A full rewrite is needed (cc-ing debian-boot).

Regards


[1]: 
https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/ddp/manuals/trunk/release-notes/en/installing.dbk?view=log
[2]: 
https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/ddp/manuals/trunk/release-notes/en/installing.dbk?revision=10511view=markup#l223
-- 
Mathieu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/cafx5sbxa_xusupmxk3q+zf4czqagj6qwthi+im8aopj9y_d...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Hints for d-i jessie RC3, part 1

2015-04-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 20:02 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
 here's a first round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
 jessie RC3. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
 Please note that some are just unblock (installation-guide) or just
 unblock-udeb (systemd) and that doesn't count as fishy (despite `date`).

All added.

I'll poke at the -udeb only packages.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1427915006.622.3.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk



Re: Bug#761815: installation adds entries for USB media to /etc/fstab which confuse udisks

2015-04-01 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Steve,

Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (2015-03-30):
 Right, it seems that was too conservative and still left hd-media
 devices listed. We probably don't want those either. Let's try this:
 don't add *any* USB devices to /etc/fstab:

Thanks. I'm slightly worried that some people might depend on this
feature, so I'm feeling a bit uneasy with ripping out support for it
entirely in the last stage before a release.

Maybe having a low priority question (marked as non-translatable for
this release cycle), which would let people have a say on this with
expert install, and which would also allow preseeding it?

What do you think?

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature