Bug#942128: installation-guide-amd64: security apt resource

2019-10-10 Thread peekaa 

Dne 10. 10. 19 v 20:29 Lennart Sorensen napsal(a):

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 07:50:33PM +0200, Pavel Kosina wrote:

Package: installation-guide-amd64
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

* What led up to the situation?
In installation of debian 10, testing, there is bad entry to
/etc/apt/sources.list - installation procedure reports error when trying
contact old security repository (up to 9).

The instalation procedure should use the new one:
deb http://security.debian.org testing-security main contrib non-free
deb-src http://security.debian.org testing-security main contrib non-free

Thank you.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
   APT prefers testing
   APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=cs_CZ.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=cs_CZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Did you mean Debian 11 (Buster is 10 and is stable release right now)?



Yes, 11. Sorry for my error. It testing. I am running testing releases 
for many years.

Bug#942128: installation-guide-amd64: security apt resource

2019-10-10 Thread Lennart Sorensen 
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 07:50:33PM +0200, Pavel Kosina wrote:
> Package: installation-guide-amd64
> Severity: normal
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
> 
>* What led up to the situation?
> In installation of debian 10, testing, there is bad entry to
> /etc/apt/sources.list - installation procedure reports error when trying
> contact old security repository (up to 9).
> 
> The instalation procedure should use the new one:
> deb http://security.debian.org testing-security main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://security.debian.org testing-security main contrib non-free
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> 
> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: bullseye/sid
>   APT prefers testing
>   APT policy: (500, 'testing')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> 
> Kernel: Linux 5.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=cs_CZ.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
> LANGUAGE=cs_CZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
> Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
> LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Did you mean Debian 11 (Buster is 10 and is stable release right now)?

-- 
Len Sorensen

Bug#942128: installation-guide-amd64: security apt resource

2019-10-10 Thread Pavel Kosina 
Package: installation-guide-amd64
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
In installation of debian 10, testing, there is bad entry to
/etc/apt/sources.list - installation procedure reports error when trying
contact old security repository (up to 9).

The instalation procedure should use the new one:
deb http://security.debian.org testing-security main contrib non-free
deb-src http://security.debian.org testing-security main contrib non-free

Thank you.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=cs_CZ.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=cs_CZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Bug#942103: tasksel: Move fonts-arphic-* to Suggests for task-chinese-{s,t}-desktop

2019-10-10 Thread Aron Xu 
Package: tasksel
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Since fonts-arphic-{ukai,uming} have quite unfriendly fontconfig
configurations due to historical reasons, it makes default user
experience confusing, thus lowering them from Recommends to Suggests,
avoiding them from being automatically installed.

These two fonts have embeded bitmap version of characters, making
it becomes very clear on smaller font size of a non-HiDPI display.
But these font face is not so popular nowadays and Noto CJK has
alternative serif font face, so that we would like to shift to the
latter as default.

Regards,
Aron


0001-Move-fonts-arphic-to-Suggests-for-task-chinese-s-t-d.patch
Description: Binary data