Re: Bug#1064588: bookworm-pu: package glibc/2.36-9+deb12u5

[Cyril Brulebois]

Hi,

Aurelien Jarno  (2024-03-13):
> The date of the next point release is slowly approaching, could you
> please have a look at this?

Sorry, lost track of that one. Feel free to upload.


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#1065463: debootstrap can deal with native dpkg file replacement feature

[Steven Shiau]

On 3/5/2024 7:25 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:

On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 08:36:59AM +0800, Steven Shiau wrote:

debootstrap should be able to solve the libuuid1t64 dependency by installing
libuuid1 only.

just in case you are not aware, bootstrapping using either mmdebstrap or
cdebootstrap works atm. mmdebstrap is faster and mostly a drop-in replacement.
(same applies to cdebootstrap but its less faster :)

daily tests are available at:

https://jenkins.debian.net/job/reproducible_debootstrap_unstable/
https://jenkins.debian.net/job/reproducible_cdebootstrap_unstable/
https://jenkins.debian.net/job/reproducible_mmdebstrap_unstable/

Hi Holger,
Great. Thanks for this useful info.
We have patched Debian live-build and created a merger request to 
support mmdebostrap:

https://salsa.debian.org/live-team/live-build/-/merge_requests/343

Steven

--
Steven Shiau 
Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 4096R/163E3FB0
Fingerprint: EB1D D5BF 6F88 820B BCF5  356C 8E94 C9CD 163E 3FB0

Re: Bug#1064588: bookworm-pu: package glibc/2.36-9+deb12u5

[Aurelien Jarno]

Hi Cyril,

On 2024-02-25 13:45, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 d-i
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 04:59:10PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > [ Reason ]
> > The upstream stable branch got a few fixes in the last months, and this
> > update pulls them into the debian package.
> > 
> > [ Impact ]
> > In case the update isn't approved, systems will be left with a few
> > issues, and the differences with upstream will increase, which might
> > make next fixes more difficult to review.
> 
> I'm happy with it from SRM point of view, but as you say d-i ack needed.

The date of the next point release is slowly approaching, could you
please have a look at this?

Thanks
Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno  GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net

Re: Bug#1064588: bookworm-pu: package glibc/2.36-9+deb12u5

[Aurelien Jarno]

Hi Cyril,

On 2024-02-25 13:45, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 d-i
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 04:59:10PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > [ Reason ]
> > The upstream stable branch got a few fixes in the last months, and this
> > update pulls them into the debian package.
> > 
> > [ Impact ]
> > In case the update isn't approved, systems will be left with a few
> > issues, and the differences with upstream will increase, which might
> > make next fixes more difficult to review.
> 
> I'm happy with it from SRM point of view, but as you say d-i ack needed.

The date of the next point release is slowly approaching, could you
please have a look at this?

Thanks
Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno  GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net