Re: [(old)stable] D-I kernel updates

2009-12-17 Thread dann frazier
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 05:32:03PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Hi Dann,
> 
> I'm preparing to upload a new version of D-I for both stable and oldstable 
> and was wondering whether or not to update the kernel udebs.
> 
> Are the current kernel images in (o-)p-u the versions intended for the next 
> point releases? Anything in them worth the effort?
> 
> p-u has 2.6.26-20; o-p-u has 2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch1.
> 
> For both all arches look to be up-to-date, so building and uploading the 
> kernel udebs will be trivial. I can take care of that.

hey Frans!

p-u still needs an update, so I wouldn't bother there. The bits in
o-p-u are candidates for the next oldstable release, though I believe
they add no additional hardware support. Feel free to resync them
though.

-- 
dann frazier


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: [(old)stable] D-I kernel updates

2009-12-17 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 17 December 2009, dann frazier wrote:
> p-u still needs an update, so I wouldn't bother there. The bits in

OK

> o-p-u are candidates for the next oldstable release, though I believe
> they add no additional hardware support. Feel free to resync them
> though.

Given that there's several versions between what we have now in D-I and the 
kernel, I think it's worth it. Building now and will upload after.

Thx,
FJP


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[(old)stable] D-I kernel updates

2009-12-17 Thread Frans Pop
Hi Dann,

I'm preparing to upload a new version of D-I for both stable and oldstable 
and was wondering whether or not to update the kernel udebs.

Are the current kernel images in (o-)p-u the versions intended for the next 
point releases? Anything in them worth the effort?

p-u has 2.6.26-20; o-p-u has 2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch1.

For both all arches look to be up-to-date, so building and uploading the 
kernel udebs will be trivial. I can take care of that.

Cheers,
FJP


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.