Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 09:29:36AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:05:04AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org writes: On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 07:32:56PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org): vmelilo-installer vmelilo-installer is specific to a rather rare m68k subarch. It should not be kicked from the repository (we still do care about m68k), but it should not be of much concern to d-i development anymore these days. Yes I agree that we shouldn't worry too much about it but if we can keep it in sync with rest it is better and makes porter's life easier too. I can upload it if that would make life easier. :) Yes please. How does one go about uploading m68k-only packages? Don't you have to do a source+m68k upload, which presumably the main archive would reject because it doesn't know about m68k? -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 02:54:48PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: Yes please. How does one go about uploading m68k-only packages? Don't you have to do a source+m68k upload, which presumably the main archive would reject because it doesn't know about m68k? Yes, indeed. We can upload to debian-ports, but not to the main archive (which is why I suggested not to worry about it ;) -- The biometric identification system at the gates of the CIA headquarters works because there's a guard with a large gun making sure no one is trying to fool the system. http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/01/biometrics.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 06:08:51PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 02:54:48PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: Yes please. How does one go about uploading m68k-only packages? Don't you have to do a source+m68k upload, which presumably the main archive would reject because it doesn't know about m68k? Yes, indeed. We can upload to debian-ports, but not to the main archive (which is why I suggested not to worry about it ;) Argh! I forgot about that. Also uploading source to d-ports is only allowed for unreleased not for sid. Peace, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! step...@marenka.net signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
Stephen R Marenka step...@marenka.net writes: On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 06:08:51PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 02:54:48PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: Yes please. How does one go about uploading m68k-only packages? Don't you have to do a source+m68k upload, which presumably the main archive would reject because it doesn't know about m68k? Yes, indeed. We can upload to debian-ports, but not to the main archive (which is why I suggested not to worry about it ;) Argh! I forgot about that. Also uploading source to d-ports is only allowed for unreleased not for sid. Peace, Stephen Create some arch:all package by the source and upload source+all. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 07:32:56PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org): [...] The following was not uploaded because they need to be done by porters: [...] vmelilo-installer vmelilo-installer is specific to a rather rare m68k subarch. It should not be kicked from the repository (we still do care about m68k), but it should not be of much concern to d-i development anymore these days. -- The biometric identification system at the gates of the CIA headquarters works because there's a guard with a large gun making sure no one is trying to fool the system. http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/01/biometrics.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org writes: On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 07:32:56PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org): [...] The following was not uploaded because they need to be done by porters: [...] vmelilo-installer vmelilo-installer is specific to a rather rare m68k subarch. It should not be kicked from the repository (we still do care about m68k), but it should not be of much concern to d-i development anymore these days. Yes I agree that we shouldn't worry too much about it but if we can keep it in sync with rest it is better and makes porter's life easier too. -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:05:04AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org writes: On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 07:32:56PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org): [...] The following was not uploaded because they need to be done by porters: [...] vmelilo-installer vmelilo-installer is specific to a rather rare m68k subarch. It should not be kicked from the repository (we still do care about m68k), but it should not be of much concern to d-i development anymore these days. Yes I agree that we shouldn't worry too much about it but if we can keep it in sync with rest it is better and makes porter's life easier too. I can upload it if that would make life easier. :) Peace, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! step...@marenka.net signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org): Packages that has translation-only or really trivial changes I worked on those today. After all, many of them had no upload since September 2008 and thus has numerous translation updates. While I was at this, I bumped debhelper compatibility levels to 6 (4 is considered deprecated). I did not choose 7 on the (quite vague) assumption that being N+1 is more or less being on the safe side..:-) So, I uploaded: anna cdebconf-entropy cdebconf-terminal cdrom-checker cdrom-detect cdrom-retriever kbd-chooser network-console partman-auto-crypto partman-basicmethods partman-efi partman-lvm rootskel tzsetup udpkg user-setup The following was not uploaded because they need to be done by porters: aboot-installer efi-reader elilo-installer partman-palo partman-prep s390-dasd s390-netdevice vmelilo-installer The following has not been done...because I jumped over them by mistake..:-) lvmcfg media-retriever net-retriever netcfg I'll try to do them in the next hours|days. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org): Packages that looks OK for upload ~ I uploaded: partconf partman-auto partman-auto-lvm (those yesterday) partman-crypto partman-ext3 partman-jfs partman-md partman-partitioning partman-reiserfs partman-xfs pkgsel rescue (today) Remaining: libdebian-installer I know there's a trick to build it...:-)...but needs to find it again. localechooser I need to ponder whether I include the parts that are part of console-setup switch. I think I will as this exposes c-s quite widely partitioner # someone need to upload it after we've parted in waiting for parted partman-base # i'll take it ditto prep-installer quik-installer both need a powerpc porter to upload them silo-installer needs a Sparc porter zipl-installer needs an s390 porter signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org): Remaining: libdebian-installer I know there's a trick to build it...:-)...but needs to find it again. Uploaded localechooser I need to ponder whether I include the parts that are part of console-setup switch. I think I will as this exposes c-s quite widely Uploaded with the console-setup changes. After all, we do want to expose this to user testing don't we? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Luk Claes wrote: Vincent McIntyre wrote: Can someone check that choose-mirror is the correct version please? And that it actually works? I reopened #517644 but have had no response after 3+ weeks. Well, reopening was strange as a fixed version was in proposed-updates at that time, though as there are no CD images for it, I left it alone so you and others would not keep reporting it. I had no evidence that it was fixed. The version I could access wasn't, but I expected it should be, going by the dates in the changelogs. So I thought I should report that fact. Feel free to test with the version in proposed-updates to really make sure it's fixed. I'm not completely sure how to do this. From what I can gather from [1] I need to build my own installer image, which I'll have a go at. I initially thought would be able to just patch in the updated choose-mirror, but this appears to require building a CD [2]. Am I on the right track here? See also #532840, which might be related. That has been fixed in the previous point release of etch (debian-installer 20070308etch5). ok, thank you. Vince [1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Build [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Modify -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
talking to myself again... Luk Claes wrote... Feel free to test with the version in proposed-updates to really make sure it's fixed. I'm not completely sure how to do this. From what I can gather from [1] I need to build my own installer image, which I'll have a go at. I initially thought would be able to just patch in the updated choose-mirror, but this appears to require building a CD [2]. Am I on the right track here? I was able to build a netboot image as per [1]. For anyone who might later care, the steps were: find/build a machine running lenny. svn co svn://svn.debian.org/svn/d-i/branches/d-i/lenny \ debian-installer-lenny cd debian-installer-lenny/installer apt-get build-dep debian-installer # installs a pile of packages dpkg-checkbuilddeps# should return nothing cd build grep DEBIAN_RELEASE config/common # set to 'lenny' grep USE_UDEBS_FROM config/common # ditto # this step is critical cp sources.list.udeb sources.list.udeb.local echo deb http://apt-proxy:/debian lenny-proposed-updates main/debian-installer \ sources.list.udeb.local echo deb http://apt-proxy:/debian lenny-proposed-updates main \ /etc/apt/sources.list echo deb-src http://apt-proxy:/debian lenny-proposed-updates main \ /etc/apt/sources.list apt-get update make reallyclean make build_netboot This produced a tree in dest/ that could copy into the TFTP server tree. grep choose-mirror dest/MANIFEST.udebs showed version 2.28lenny3. yay. Without the sources.list.udeb.local file I kept getting version 2.28lenny1. So it appears the fixed version Otavio uploaded did not make it into 5.0.1? Anyway I was able to install 'etch' with this build of the installer. Thanks for your work, folks. Looking forward to the point release. Cheers Vince [1] wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Build -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello folks, Here goes the updated list with the still missed packages. Since first message a total of 34 packages were upload and I'd like to thank people who worked on it. Please take a look on the remaining packages and process them if you're the porter or active on them. Otavio Salvador ota...@debian.org writes: Packages that looks OK for upload ~ libdebian-installer linux-modules-di-armel-2.6 linux-modules-di-hppa-2.6 linux-modules-di-powerpc-2.6 linux-modules-di-s390-2.6 localechooser partconf partitioner # someone need to upload it after we've parted in partman-auto partman-auto-lvm partman-base # i'll take it partman-crypto partman-ext3 partman-jfs partman-md partman-partitioning partman-reiserfs partman-xfs pkgsel prep-installer quik-installer rescue silo-installer zipl-installer Bellow goes few details about specific packages. linux-modules-* ~~~ The remaining linux-modules packages are the ones I couldn't massbuild since they were not available on mirror. Linux kernel 2.6.30 is expected to be upload in Sunday and would be nice if porters could start taking a look at more invasive changes in kernel that could affect us. parted related packages ~~~ partman-base and partitioner are waiting for parted on NEW. This is also going to allow us to enable ext4 support for testing. Thank you folks and let's keep the good work :-) Cheers, - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAkoyt/YACgkQLqiZQEml+FWfmgCeMhx+CzhEOOX+K6AwU5x4Wdn0 o9UAoKfpLC/MZL8HO/7C7s/ntd5pQKkw =uq2Y -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org): Packages that looks OK for upload ~ I uploaded a few, namely: apt-setup auto-install clock-setup finish-install installation-report iso-scan kickseed lilo-installer lowmem signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org): main-menu The following changes are afar from trivial: * After the debconf priority was lowered because of an error, return to the default priority in one step when next a component runs successfully. * Instead of lowering the debconf priority after the user backs up from a question, match the priority at which the menu is displayed to the current debconf priority. Closes: #331679. However, they're pending in the SVN since December and it's certainly time for us to upload them. I haven't tested them but I'll grant Frans the usual confidence we have in his changes for being well tested (would it be changes of line, then I would recommend more testing...:-)) So, I'll upload. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org): More uploads done: main-menu mdcfg mountmedia nobootloader partconf partman-auto partman-auto-lvm signature.asc Description: Digital signature
re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
Can someone check that choose-mirror is the correct version please? And that it actually works? I reopened #517644 but have had no response after 3+ weeks. See also #532840, which might be related. Hopefully this can be sorted out before 5.0.2 goes out. Thanks Vince -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
Vincent McIntyre wrote: Can someone check that choose-mirror is the correct version please? And that it actually works? I reopened #517644 but have had no response after 3+ weeks. Well, reopening was strange as a fixed version was in proposed-updates at that time, though as there are no CD images for it, I left it alone so you and others would not keep reporting it. Feel free to test with the version in proposed-updates to really make sure it's fixed. See also #532840, which might be related. That has been fixed in the previous point release of etch (debian-installer 20070308etch5). Hopefully this can be sorted out before 5.0.2 goes out. As it is in proposed-updates it should make it to 5.0.2 without problems. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br): Hello Christian, On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Christian Perrierbubu...@debian.org wrote: [...] To make it clear: grub-installer changes should not have been mentioned in my mail. Trivial changes above do *only* apply to installation-report that was following grub-installer in Otavio's list. Are you going to handle the uploads of the packages you've did a look at? I can, but not before the week-end. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
Packages that looks OK for upload ~ I had a look down to iso-scan apt-setup Has trivial changes (merge from Ubuntu which we can assume safely tested) auto-install The changes there are longstanding ones by Phil Hands: * check for dhcp preseed (closes: #511683) We can probably safely assume that Phil knows what he does..:) cdebconf CLearly safe changes (unbranding logo) clock-setup Clearly safe changes as well finish-install Safe changes grub-installer installation-report Trivial changes iso-scan Changes seem safe. One is a preparation for ext4. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2009, 07:15 +0200 schrieb Christian Perrier: Packages that looks OK for upload ~ grub-installer Trivial changes What about my patch for grub-installer I sent yesterday? Can this be included in the next upload or would it be better to wait? Otavio already said on IRC that it's okay for him but I should wait for more comments. drivemap is only used on a not yet uploaded grub2 and the UUID stuff works fine with the lenny grub2. update-grub in lenny already generates them, it's just the grub-installer's generated 30_otheros which doestn't use them yet. -- Felix Zielcke -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
Quoting Felix Zielcke (fziel...@z-51.de): grub-installer Trivial changes What about my patch for grub-installer I sent yesterday? Can this be included in the next upload or would it be better to wait? Otavio already said on IRC that it's okay for him but I should wait for more comments. To make it clear: grub-installer changes should not have been mentioned in my mail. Trivial changes above do *only* apply to installation-report that was following grub-installer in Otavio's list. I didn't look at grub-installer bu I suspect that pending changes there might not be trivial changes. So, in short, someone familiar with GRUB stuff should look at the package. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
Hello Christian, On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Christian Perrierbubu...@debian.org wrote: [...] To make it clear: grub-installer changes should not have been mentioned in my mail. Trivial changes above do *only* apply to installation-report that was following grub-installer in Otavio's list. Are you going to handle the uploads of the packages you've did a look at? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
* Otavio Salvador ota...@debian.org [2009-06-06 18:31]: Packages that looks OK for upload ~ I uploaded the following packages: arcboot-installer colo-installer nobootloader sibyl-installer These need some attention: linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6 linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6 linux-modules-di-mips-2.6 linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6 Would you mind massbuilding them? linux-modules-di-armel-2.6 linux-modules-extra-2.6 2.6.29 failed to build on armel, so uploading this one doesn't make sense. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org): localechooser I have pending changes for the console-setup switch (patch attached), which are basically aimed at installing c-s on the target system in *all* cases where we were previously configuring the console with kbd and kbd console fonts. These are not the main change for the console-setup and are much less invasive than the change where we'll replace kbd-config by console-setup-udeb, but they could have unexpected consequences (mostly extra questions as I reported elsewhere). I would welcome comments about these changes before committing them...and uploading localechooser. PS: one should notice that, if we validate these changes, we could soon drop a few hacks we currently have in finish-install and unconditionnally install console-setup for all languages. That would save some code in finish-installand a few bytes in languagelist. That would however mean installing c-s for languages for which we currently install nothing specific for the console handling and don't change the default console font (languages supported only in the graphical installer, and CJK languages). Index: languagelist === --- languagelist(révision 58736) +++ languagelist(copie de travail) @@ -1,63 +1,63 @@ # # This is the complete list of languages (locales) to choose from. # langcode;language (en);language (orig);supported_environments;countrycode;fallbacklocale;langlist;console-data -sq;Albanian;Shqip;2;AL;sq_AL.UTF-8;;kbd=lat0-sun16(utf8) +sq;Albanian;Shqip;2;AL;sq_AL.UTF-8;;console-setup am;Amharic;አማርኛ;4;ET;am_ET;; ar;Arabic;عربي;3;EG;ar_EG.UTF-8;;console-setup -ast;Asturian;Asturianu;2;ES;ast_ES.UTF-8;;kbd=lat0-sun16(utf8) -eu;Basque;Euskara;1;ES;eu_ES.UTF-8;;kbd=lat0-sun16(utf8) +ast;Asturian;Asturianu;2;ES;ast_ES.UTF-8;;console-setup +eu;Basque;Euskara;1;ES;eu_ES.UTF-8;;console-setup be;Belarusian;Беларуская;2;BY;be_BY.UTF-8;;console-setup bn;Bengali;বাংলা;4;BD;bn_BD;; -bs;Bosnian;Bosanski;2;BA;bs_BA.UTF-8;;kbd=Lat2-Terminus16(utf8) -#X br;Breton;Brezhoneg;2;FR;br_FR.UTF-8;;kbd=lat0-sun16(utf8) +bs;Bosnian;Bosanski;2;BA;bs_BA.UTF-8;;console-setup +#X br;Breton;Brezhoneg;2;FR;br_FR.UTF-8;;console-setup bg;Bulgarian;Български;2;BG;bg_BG.UTF-8;;console-setup # For C locale, set language to 'en' to make sure questions are translated # to English instead of showing codes. C;C;No localization;0;;C;en; -ca;Catalan;Català;1;ES;ca_ES.UTF-8;;kbd=lat0-sun16(utf8) +ca;Catalan;Català;1;ES;ca_ES.UTF-8;;console-setup # Special case for Chinese as the two flavours share the same ISO 639 code # Both will trigger countrychooser. Each will be the backup for the other # one zh_CN;Chinese (Simplified);中文(简体);3;CN;zh_CN.UTF-8;zh_CN:zh; zh_TW;Chinese (Traditional);中文(繁體);3;TW;zh_TW.UTF-8;zh_TW:zh; -hr;Croatian;Hrvatski;2;HR;hr_HR.UTF-8;;kbd=lat2-sun16(utf8) -cs;Czech;Čeština;2;CZ;cs_CZ.UTF-8;;kbd=lat2-sun16(utf8) -da;Danish;Dansk;1;DK;da_DK.UTF-8;;kbd=lat0-sun16(utf8) -nl;Dutch;Nederlands;1;NL;nl_NL.UTF-8;;kbd=lat0-sun16(utf8) +hr;Croatian;Hrvatski;2;HR;hr_HR.UTF-8;;console-setup +cs;Czech;Čeština;2;CZ;cs_CZ.UTF-8;;console-setup +da;Danish;Dansk;1;DK;da_DK.UTF-8;;console-setup +nl;Dutch;Nederlands;1;NL;nl_NL.UTF-8;;console-setup dz;Dzongkha;རྫོང་ཁ།;4;BT;dz_BT;; -en;English;English;0;US;en_US.UTF-8;;kbd=lat0-sun16(utf8) -# The Esperanto locale *is* (or will be as of 1/11/2006) eo.UTF-8 +en;English;English;0;US;en_US.UTF-8;;console-setup +# The Esperanto locale is eo.UTF-8 # so no country on purpose. The default country is Antarctica because... # ...why not..:-) eo;Esperanto;Esperanto;2;AQ;eo.UTF-8;;console-setup -et;Estonian;Eesti;2;EE;et_EE.UTF-8;;kbd=lat0-sun16(utf8) -fi;Finnish;Suomi;1;FI;fi_FI.UTF-8;;kbd=lat0-sun16(utf8) +et;Estonian;Eesti;2;EE;et_EE.UTF-8;;console-setup +fi;Finnish;Suomi;1;FI;fi_FI.UTF-8;;console-setup fr;French;Français;1;FR;fr_FR.UTF-8;;console-setup -gl;Galician;Galego;1;ES;gl_ES.UTF-8;;kbd=lat0-sun16(utf8) +gl;Galician;Galego;1;ES;gl_ES.UTF-8;;console-setup ka;Georgian;ქართული;4;GE;ka_GE.UTF-8;;console-setup -de;German;Deutsch;1;DE;de_DE.UTF-8;;kbd=lat0-sun16(utf8) +de;German;Deutsch;1;DE;de_DE.UTF-8;;console-setup el;Greek;Ελληνικά;2;GR;el_GR.UTF-8;;console-setup gu;Gujarati;ગુજરાતી;4;IN;gu_IN;; he;Hebrew;עברית;3;IL;he_IL.UTF-8;;console-setup hi;Hindi;हिन्दी ;4;IN;hi_IN;; -hu;Hungarian;Magyar;2;HU;hu_HU.UTF-8;;kbd=lat2-sun16(utf8) -#X is;Icelandic;Íslenska;1;IS;is_IS.UTF-8;;kbd=lat9u-16(utf8) -id;Indonesian;Bahasa Indonesia;1;ID;id_ID.UTF-8;;kbd=lat0-sun16(utf8) -ga;Irish;Gaeilge;1;IE;ga_IE.UTF-8;;kbd=lat0-sun16(utf8) -it;Italian;Italiano;1;IT;it_IT.UTF-8;;kbd=lat0-sun16(utf8) +hu;Hungarian;Magyar;2;HU;hu_HU.UTF-8;;console-setup +#X is;Icelandic;Íslenska;1;IS;is_IS.UTF-8;;console-setup +id;Indonesian;Bahasa Indonesia;1;ID;id_ID.UTF-8;;console-setup +ga;Irish;Gaeilge;1;IE;ga_IE.UTF-8;;console-setup +it;Italian;Italiano;1;IT;it_IT.UTF-8;;console-setup
Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
Hello Martin, On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:11 AM, Martin Michlmayrt...@cyrius.com wrote: * Otavio Salvador ota...@debian.org [2009-06-06 18:31]: Packages that looks OK for upload ~ I uploaded the following packages: arcboot-installer colo-installer nobootloader sibyl-installer Great and thanks :-) These need some attention: linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6 linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6 linux-modules-di-mips-2.6 linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6 Would you mind massbuilding them? Sure not; will do it today. linux-modules-di-armel-2.6 linux-modules-extra-2.6 2.6.29 failed to build on armel, so uploading this one doesn't make sense. Yes, indeed. It would be nice if we could get it done just to have it all in sync but not really a high priority task. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
Hello Christian, On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Christian Perrierbubu...@debian.org wrote: Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org): PS: one should notice that, if we validate these changes, we could soon drop a few hacks we currently have in finish-install and unconditionnally install console-setup for all languages. That would save some code in finish-installand a few bytes in languagelist. That would however mean installing c-s for languages for which we currently install nothing specific for the console handling and don't change the default console font (languages supported only in the graphical installer, and CJK languages). One thing that worries me is how we'll support it for Lenny'n Half? I believe we'll need to move the logic to decide about c-s (in target) to a lenny-support package and it would be nice if we could start working on that at same time we prepare the c-s switch to avoid huge delays later. Commends? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello folks, I've been finally able to take a more careful look at our repository and make up a list of packages that I believe we ought to upload. Please, if you're one of responsable by the package and you agree with me please go ahead and upload it or comment why you believe it is not ready. Packages that looks OK for upload ~ apt-setup arcboot-installer auto-install cdebconf clock-setup colo-installer finish-install grub-installer installation-report iso-scan kickseed libdebian-installer lilo-installer linux-kernel-di-alpha-2.6 linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6 linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6 linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6 linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 linux-modules-di-alpha-2.6 linux-modules-di-armel-2.6 linux-modules-di-hppa-2.6 linux-modules-di-ia64-2.6 linux-modules-di-mips-2.6 linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6 linux-modules-di-powerpc-2.6 linux-modules-di-s390-2.6 linux-modules-di-sparc-2.6 live-installer localechooser lowmem main-menu mdcfg mountmedia nobootloader partconf partitioner # someone need to upload it after we've parted in partman-auto partman-auto-lvm partman-base # i'll take it partman-basicfilesystems partman-crypto partman-ext3 partman-jfs partman-md partman-partitioning partman-reiserfs partman-xfs pkgsel prep-installer preseed quik-installer rescue rootskel-gtk sibyl-installer silo-installer yaboot-installer zipl-installer Packages that has translation-only or really trivial changes aboot-installer anna cdebconf-entropy cdebconf-terminal cdrom-checker cdrom-detect cdrom-retriever efi-reader elilo-installer kbd-chooser lvmcfg media-retriever net-retriever netcfg network-console partman-auto-crypto partman-basicmethods partman-efi partman-lvm partman-palo partman-prep rootskel s390-dasd s390-netdevice tzsetup udpkg user-setup vmelilo-installer I think we ought to do a full upload cycle. That will give us the required feedback of what the real state of the installer and also give to translators a good feeling of what is the real state of installer in their language. I believe we'll end up finding some bugs and will have few days of an unstable installer but I think this early in cycle it is not a really bad thing since it will allow us to really get those things deplyed and receive feedback from users. Even tough the minor changes and translation-only uploads aren't /required/ now, I'd like to do those after the first set of packages has been uploaded so we could do an installer upload and really start the Alpha1 release preparation. A very important thing is that porters need to upload their kernel packages so we really have full installer using latest kernel and discover problems on it as soon as possible. Any comments? Objections? Cheers, - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAkoq4BUACgkQLqiZQEml+FUfXQCghYAJkFtDg5LldUFd/Zk6dQZu kmgAni5mThCRzvo1cF+XVKG6znx++rbV =+4w3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
