Re: [seppy@debian.org: [l10n] Status pages for 2nd-stage installer-packages]
Quoting Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): This is the result printed on Dennis page. But it is indeed not accurate, have a look at buildd logs and you will find more fuzzy strings. So the problem here is that apt-all.pot is not up-to-date. Here is an untested patch, but someone should ask apt maintainers to update it. Done. André, I can send you the correct apt-all.pot file if you want. I have just looked over APT bugs and mailed all translators which sent pending translations -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [seppy@debian.org: [l10n] Status pages for 2nd-stage installer-packages]
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:03:08AM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote: Hi Dennis, At Fri, 12 Mar 2004 01:11:56 +0100, Dennis Stampfer wrote: exim4-config is mentioned as one of 2nd-stage installer packages but is not listed in http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/2nd-stage/fi.txt and it seems not in any other language status page either. I did translate exim4-config and remember getting a reply via BTS that is was included. Is my translation somewhere or is the status pages missing some packages? -- Tapio Lehtonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG public key from http://www.iki.fi/Tapio.Lehtonen http://www.taleman.fi/ IT-alan asiantuntijapalvelut Porissa pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [seppy@debian.org: [l10n] Status pages for 2nd-stage installer-packages]
Hey, On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 06:00:13PM +0200, Tapio Lehtonen wrote: exim4-config is mentioned as one of 2nd-stage installer packages but is not listed in http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/2nd-stage/fi.txt and it seems not in any other language status page either. It's listed in http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/2nd-stage/ar.txt as a missing file: exim4-config/debian/po/ar.po 62u Only missing or fuzzy files are on the status-pages. I did translate exim4-config and remember getting a reply via BTS that is was included. Is my translation somewhere or is the status pages missing some packages? You mean #229792? As said above, full translated files are not listed. Dennis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [seppy@debian.org: [l10n] Status pages for 2nd-stage installer-packages]
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:03:08AM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote: snip Well, does this really reflect newest unstable status? I think ja.po of shadow and discover are already 100% translated. /snip Hmm. That's weird. I know that seppy does provides .po files for all the packages listed as not yet fully translated into his web page at http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/2nd-stage/files/lang, but just to be sure I went ahead and apt-get source'd apt in order to see what was there in terms of pt_BR translations and guess what ? It was already up-to-date, as can be seen bellow : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/i18n/apt/test/apt-0.5.23/po$ msgfmt -o /dev/null -v pt_BR.po 455 mensagens traduzidas. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/i18n/apt/test/apt-0.5.23/po$ Yet more weird is the fact that seppy's page was right about dpkg being not fully transtaled for pt_BR (seppy's page correctly told me that there were 4 fuzzy and 1 non-translated strings). So, it seems that for some packages seppy's page's right while it's wrong for some others (not sure which ones). In the apt case explained above, which one's correct ? Current apt or seppy's page ? Regards, -- ++--++ || Andr Lus Lopes [EMAIL PROTECTED]|| || http://people.debian.org/~andrelop || || Debian-BR Projecthttp://www.debian-br.org || || Public GPG KeyID 9D1B82F6 || signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [seppy@debian.org: [l10n] Status pages for 2nd-stage installer-packages]
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 02:50:16PM -0300, Andre Luis Lopes wrote: [...] Hmm. That's weird. I know that seppy does provides .po files for all the packages listed as not yet fully translated into his web page at http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/2nd-stage/files/lang, but just to be sure I went ahead and apt-get source'd apt in order to see what was there in terms of pt_BR translations and guess what ? It was already up-to-date, as can be seen bellow : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/i18n/apt/test/apt-0.5.23/po$ msgfmt -o /dev/null -v pt_BR.po 455 mensagens traduzidas. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/i18n/apt/test/apt-0.5.23/po$ $ msgmerge -U pt_BR.po apt-all.pot $ msgfmt -o /dev/null -v pt_BR.po 285 translated messages, 1 fuzzy translation. This is the result printed on Dennis page. But it is indeed not accurate, have a look at buildd logs and you will find more fuzzy strings. So the problem here is that apt-all.pot is not up-to-date. Here is an untested patch, but someone should ask apt maintainers to update it. Denis apt-all.pot.bz2 Description: Binary data
Re: [seppy@debian.org: [l10n] Status pages for 2nd-stage installer-packages]
Hey Andre, On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 02:50:16PM -0300, Andre Luis Lopes wrote: Hmm. That's weird. I know that seppy does provides .po files for all the packages listed as not yet fully translated into his web page at http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/2nd-stage/files/lang, but just to be sure I went ahead and apt-get source'd apt in order to see what was there in terms of pt_BR translations and guess what ? It was already up-to-date, as can be seen bellow : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/i18n/apt/test/apt-0.5.23/po$ msgfmt -o /dev/null -v pt_BR.po 455 mensagens traduzidas. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/i18n/apt/test/apt-0.5.23/po$ yes, that's correct. All strings *in pt_BR.po* are translated. Please run a msgfmt to the .pot-template and compare the results: 455 translated in your .po and about 282(I don't remember) in the template. So, it seems that for some packages seppy's page's right while it's wrong for some others (not sure which ones). In the apt case explained above, which one's correct ? Current apt or seppy's page ? the .po-files are updated before being checked. You can download this updated file in files/lang/ or do it yourself by running msgfmt -U file.po templ.pot (-U only if gettext from testing/unstable) (the po-files in CVS are most-time updated, but the po-files in 2nd-stage aren't) cheers, Dennis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [seppy@debian.org: [l10n] Status pages for 2nd-stage installer-packages]
Hi, At 12 Mar 04 01:03:08 GMT, Kenshi Muto wrote: http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/2nd-stage/ Well, does this really reflect newest unstable status? Ah, I misunderstood (new web page style tells what's I misunderstood :-) ). These status are not in package/debian/po/, but in package/po/, aren't they? OK, I'll try to contact Japanese translators and translate. Thanks, -- Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [l10n] Status pages for 2nd-stage installer-packages
Quoting Dennis Stampfer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Hey list, as some of you may have noticed, I am working on a status-page for 2nd-stage installer packages. I think it's running fine now: http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/2nd-stage/ Danke sehr for the great work, two n Dennis. The doc/translations.txt already mentions your page. I'm in the process of trying to finalize the 2nd-stage package list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [l10n] Status pages for 2nd-stage installer-packages
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 07:13:27AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: I'm in the process of trying to finalize the 2nd-stage package list. Will there be time _after_ the beta3 to finish these? The russian translation is fairly complete now (it's just not synchronised yet), but these 2nd-stage packages need some work. -- Nikolai Prokoschenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [l10n] Status pages for 2nd-stage installer-packages
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:06:24AM +0100, Nikolai Prokoschenko wrote: On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 07:13:27AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: I'm in the process of trying to finalize the 2nd-stage package list. Will there be time _after_ the beta3 to finish these? The russian translation is fairly complete now (it's just not synchronised yet), but these 2nd-stage packages need some work. Anthony Towns wrote http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/debian-devel-200401/msg00680.html but I do not know whether it will happen as described. Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [seppy@debian.org: [l10n] Status pages for 2nd-stage installer-packages]
re, On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 07:46:41AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: Well, does this really reflect newest unstable status? I think ja.po of shadow and discover are already 100% translated. Dennis, you may print package version on your pages. good idea. I will do that. dennis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[l10n] Status pages for 2nd-stage installer-packages
Hey list, as some of you may have noticed, I am working on a status-page for 2nd-stage installer packages. I think it's running fine now: http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/2nd-stage/ It is and looks similar to [0]Denis' status page, which generates the status from CVS (means: debian-installer-, base-config- and tasksel-CVS) tasksel is 2nd stage, but since it is maintained via CVS, it's on Denis' status page: http://people.debian.org/~barbier/debian-installer/l10n/ Some quotes from 2nd-stage status: 1 094% de 2 091% cs 3 079% pt_BR 4 079% pl 5 077% es 6 076% fr 7 073% da 8 071% it 9 068% ja 10 067% sv (...) 17 of 40 languages are below 5%, where 12 of them are on 0%. If you want to help out translating, please read the instructions below the stats: - first, look in BTS if your translation has not already been submitted - translate - file a bug against the package with your translation attached The pages are generated twice a day. Sources are from unstable. You can get a list of packages checked in the file packages-list. cheers, seppy [0] When talking about Status-Page, it's better to call them 2nd-stage-status and main-status or whatever. Don't call them by the surenames of people running them: Denis (Barbier) and Dennis (me) looks very similar :) pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [seppy@debian.org: [l10n] Status pages for 2nd-stage installer-packages]
Hi Dennis, At Fri, 12 Mar 2004 01:11:56 +0100, Dennis Stampfer wrote: Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:59:07 +0100 From: Dennis Stampfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [l10n] Status pages for 2nd-stage installer-packages Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Hey list, as some of you may have noticed, I am working on a status-page for 2nd-stage installer packages. I think it's running fine now: http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/2nd-stage/ Well, does this really reflect newest unstable status? I think ja.po of shadow and discover are already 100% translated. Thanks, -- Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [seppy@debian.org: [l10n] Status pages for 2nd-stage installer-packages]
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:03:08AM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote: Hi Dennis, [...] as some of you may have noticed, I am working on a status-page for 2nd-stage installer packages. I think it's running fine now: http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/2nd-stage/ Well, does this really reflect newest unstable status? I think ja.po of shadow and discover are already 100% translated. Dennis, you may print package version on your pages. This page lists program l10n (package/po/lang.po) and templates l10n (package/debian/po/lang.po). In your case, debconf templates are fully translated, but not programs. Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
