Re: [l10n] anon svn templates

2004-05-17 Thread Denis Barbier
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:30:20AM +0200, Nikolai Prokoschenko wrote:
 Hello!
 
 What's up with the repositories? I check out my templates  co. from the
 normal svn with my alioth account and I get old templates - for example,
 base-installer's template is dated POT-Creation-Date: 2004-05-04
 23:35-0400\n, whereas the one Denis Barbier has on his page is from 16th
 May. I assume he's using the anonymous SVN, so where's the difference
 between the two? Have there been any changes I've missed?

This is explained in the listing output:

  Example:
  * debian-installer/tools/lilo-installer: 2t1f7u  [Foo Bar]
debian-installer/tools/netcfg: 9t19f33u  [Foo Bar]
  ! debian-installer/tools/partconf: Invalid PO file
On the first line, an asterisk tells that the file in the SVN
repository is outdated, debconf-updatepo must be run first.


Debconf-updatepo is run on the PO files on my pages, which is why
they differ from pristine svn.

Denis


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [l10n] anon svn templates

2004-05-17 Thread Nikolai Prokoschenko
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 08:54:19AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
  What's up with the repositories? I check out my templates  co. from the
  normal svn with my alioth account and I get old templates - for example,
 This is explained in the listing output:
 On the first line, an asterisk tells that the file in the SVN
 repository is outdated, debconf-updatepo must be run first.
 Debconf-updatepo is run on the PO files on my pages, which is why
 they differ from pristine svn.

Oh, cool. So this means it's not really my fault if I don't get the newest
templates, but the maintainer's, who should have run debconf-updatepo
after updating the templates?

-- 
Nikolai Prokoschenko 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[l10n] anon svn templates

2004-05-16 Thread Nikolai Prokoschenko
Hello!

What's up with the repositories? I check out my templates  co. from the
normal svn with my alioth account and I get old templates - for example,
base-installer's template is dated POT-Creation-Date: 2004-05-04
23:35-0400\n, whereas the one Denis Barbier has on his page is from 16th
May. I assume he's using the anonymous SVN, so where's the difference
between the two? Have there been any changes I've missed?

-- 
Nikolai Prokoschenko 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [l10n] anon svn templates

2004-05-16 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Nikolai Prokoschenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
 Hello!
 
 What's up with the repositories? I check out my templates  co. from the
 normal svn with my alioth account and I get old templates - for example,
 base-installer's template is dated POT-Creation-Date: 2004-05-04
 23:35-0400\n, whereas the one Denis Barbier has on his page is from 16th

Hmmm, *my* copy has:

POT-Creation-Date: 2004-05-13 15:26+0200\n


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]