Re: Bug#183453: e2fsprogs-bf: Please provide a lintian override for man pages

2003-03-05 Thread Yann Dirson
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:06:06PM -0800, Micah Anderson wrote:
 http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html is generated based on the regular
 lintian reports at http://lintian.debian.org/. Listed on this page are
 all the manpages that normally would accompany e2fsprogs-bf. However,
 the man pages have been removed from this package because the package
 is intended to be used on a floppy, so anything extra goes. The
 lintian report gives an error, but this is a lintian false positive. 
 
 If you were to add a lintian override for this error, it would
 disappear from the QA web pages automatically. Simply add one by
 supplying a /usr/share/llintian/overrides/e2fsprogs-bf file as
 detailed in http://lintian.debian.org/manual/ch2.html#s2.4

Since it's a generic rule that *-bf packages should not contain
manpages, I'm of the opinion that a new rule should be added to
lintian, rather than adding overrides to all *-bf packages.

Further more, since I don't think the new debian-installer is using
those *-bf packages, but uses udeb's instead, those *-bf packages may
be completely obsolete already.

Did you discuss the issue first with the lintian maintainer and the bf
team ?

Regards,
-- 
Yann Dirson[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Why make M$-Bill richer  richer ?
Debian-related: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |   Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |  Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity
 http://ydirson.free.fr/| Check http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bug#183453: e2fsprogs-bf: Please provide a lintian override for man pages

2003-03-05 Thread Micah Anderson
Yann Dirson schrieb am Wednesday, den 05. March 2003:

 On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:06:06PM -0800, Micah Anderson wrote:
  http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html is generated based on the regular
  lintian reports at http://lintian.debian.org/. Listed on this page are
  all the manpages that normally would accompany e2fsprogs-bf. However,
  the man pages have been removed from this package because the package
  is intended to be used on a floppy, so anything extra goes. The
  lintian report gives an error, but this is a lintian false positive. 
  
  If you were to add a lintian override for this error, it would
  disappear from the QA web pages automatically. Simply add one by
  supplying a /usr/share/llintian/overrides/e2fsprogs-bf file as
  detailed in http://lintian.debian.org/manual/ch2.html#s2.4
 
 Since it's a generic rule that *-bf packages should not contain
 manpages, I'm of the opinion that a new rule should be added to
 lintian, rather than adding overrides to all *-bf packages.

I was under the impression, based on an email on another list
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2003/debian-qa-200303/msg1.html)
which was suggested, This is a lintian false positive, and probably one
that can't be worked around in lintian that this would not be possible in
lintian. 

I have CC'd the lintian-maintainer to see if it is possible.

 Further more, since I don't think the new debian-installer is using
 those *-bf packages, but uses udeb's instead, those *-bf packages may
 be completely obsolete already.
 
 Did you discuss the issue first with the lintian maintainer and the bf
 team ?

I have included the debian-boot list on this email as well to see if we can
get resolution on if the *-bf packages are completely obsolete or not.

Thanks!
Micah


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bug#183453: e2fsprogs-bf: Please provide a lintian override for man pages

2003-03-05 Thread Junichi Uekawa
 Since it's a generic rule that *-bf packages should not contain
 manpages, I'm of the opinion that a new rule should be added to
 lintian, rather than adding overrides to all *-bf packages.
 
 Further more, since I don't think the new debian-installer is using
 those *-bf packages, but uses udeb's instead, those *-bf packages may
 be completely obsolete already.


I've got an impression that -bf version is actually a version that 
is linked against -utf8 libraries.



regards,
junichi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]