Bug#263226: Processed: Re: Bug#240679: no network config
I am happy to report that all previously reported problems seem to be fixed in the Aug 2 daily build. I did download and burn that CD from a different computer however. (But I always checked the MD5SUMS of the burned disk before) Unhappily, when I booted after the install, the GDM login window was frozen (the mouse and keyboard were both dead). And I am still not sure why Debian is the only install that still has to ask which video driver to use. I'll try the install again to see if I get better results. Stuart On Tuesday 03 August 2004 11:28 am, Joey Hess wrote: Frederik Dannemare wrote: Sorry. The new info regarding failing checksums from submitter Stuart Scharf is hidden in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=263226msg=9 below the commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Also, submitters have a bad habbit of only replying back to me when following up on old installation reports. For this reason, the new info from submitter is only avail. in quoted form in my reply/done/clone-off (which becomes hidden since the msg also goes to [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Please forward the mail or cc your reply to the bug number in that case. Stuart Scharf: My record for using Sarge installers seems to be getting worse! I tried two different daily builds of the installer, (including the Aug 1 version) and although the MD5SUM of my disk matches, the installer reports my disk as corrupted! ( or at least that a needed file couldn't be loaded). In particular the check disk function reports that ./install/2.6/initrd.gz does not match the checksum. If I let it continue, i got to a message that most of the hardware drivers needed for my computer were unavailable. I tested the august 2 image and cdrom-checker reports no problems. Since Stuart says that the installer reported other actual problems with loading files from the CD, this is not a md5sum problem and is likely a problem with the CD he burnt, with his CD drive, or possibly with the kernel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#240679: no network config
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 240679 -1 Bug#240679: [i386] [beta3] [unknown] no network config Bug 240679 cloned as bug 263226. reassign -1 cdrom-checker Bug#263226: [i386] [beta3] [unknown] no network config Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `cdrom-checker'. retitle -1 ./install/2.6/initrd.gz does not match the checksum Bug#263226: [i386] [beta3] [unknown] no network config Changed Bug title. tags -1 d-i Bug#263226: ./install/2.6/initrd.gz does not match the checksum There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#263226: Processed: Re: Bug#240679: no network config
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 240679 -1 Bug#240679: [i386] [beta3] [unknown] no network config Bug 240679 cloned as bug 263226. reassign -1 cdrom-checker Bug#263226: [i386] [beta3] [unknown] no network config Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `cdrom-checker'. retitle -1 ./install/2.6/initrd.gz does not match the checksum Bug#263226: [i386] [beta3] [unknown] no network config Changed Bug title. I can't find a word about checksums in bug #263226. Since cdrom-checker did not work at all until beta 4, I'm inclined to just close this cloned bug. Where did it come from? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#263226: Processed: Re: Bug#240679: no network config
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 03 August 2004 16:23, Joey Hess wrote: Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 240679 -1 Bug#240679: [i386] [beta3] [unknown] no network config Bug 240679 cloned as bug 263226. reassign -1 cdrom-checker Bug#263226: [i386] [beta3] [unknown] no network config Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `cdrom-checker'. retitle -1 ./install/2.6/initrd.gz does not match the checksum Bug#263226: [i386] [beta3] [unknown] no network config Changed Bug title. I can't find a word about checksums in bug #263226. Since cdrom-checker did not work at all until beta 4, I'm inclined to just close this cloned bug. Where did it come from? Sorry. The new info regarding failing checksums from submitter Stuart Scharf is hidden in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=263226msg=9 below the commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Also, submitters have a bad habbit of only replying back to me when following up on old installation reports. For this reason, the new info from submitter is only avail. in quoted form in my reply/done/clone-off (which becomes hidden since the msg also goes to [EMAIL PROTECTED]). - -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBD6U2LSX61ZxOtagRAsPuAJ9Jqqy8pL56q000Nem4l82XMLnfIACcD/vG YoaSY2e/PblYVkPqAMw95Lw= =3sBT -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#263226: Processed: Re: Bug#240679: no network config
Frederik Dannemare wrote: Sorry. The new info regarding failing checksums from submitter Stuart Scharf is hidden in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=263226msg=9 below the commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Also, submitters have a bad habbit of only replying back to me when following up on old installation reports. For this reason, the new info from submitter is only avail. in quoted form in my reply/done/clone-off (which becomes hidden since the msg also goes to [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Please forward the mail or cc your reply to the bug number in that case. Stuart Scharf: My record for using Sarge installers seems to be getting worse! I tried two different daily builds of the installer, (including the Aug 1 version) and although the MD5SUM of my disk matches, the installer reports my disk as corrupted! ( or at least that a needed file couldn't be loaded). In particular the check disk function reports that ./install/2.6/initrd.gz does not match the checksum. If I let it continue, i got to a message that most of the hardware drivers needed for my computer were unavailable. I tested the august 2 image and cdrom-checker reports no problems. Since Stuart says that the installer reported other actual problems with loading files from the CD, this is not a md5sum problem and is likely a problem with the CD he burnt, with his CD drive, or possibly with the kernel. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#240679: no network config
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, first and foremost: thank you for your bug report http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=240679 I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you reported some problems with the debian installer back in March, I would very much appreciate it, if you could find time to download and test the latest[1] cd image and confirm whether you still see the problems you've mentioned. If you can confirm they are no longer present, I will close this report. Much has changed with the installer since March, and it is not unlikely that the problems you mention have been dealt with by the Debian Developers working on the installer. Looking forward to hearing from you again. Thank you for your time. [1]http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/ - -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBBTSILSX61ZxOtagRAnnFAJ95oltFv/c8Gl4Ywn/M2GiNhLwtSgCgqKKS UQJYWsnF61X0tJxD5agh3aY= =/5xz -END PGP SIGNATURE-
