Re: Bug#499662: Proposed changes for #499662
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 01:08:43AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le jeudi 02 octobre 2008 à 20:52 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit : Dave Beckett wrote: The patch looks OK although I cannot test any directfb stuff, or do any cairo work today. […] Cc-ed debian-boot to be sure it does no harm on the installer nor the installation. I have prepared updated packages for cairo and GTK+: http://malsain.org/~joss/debian/ It would be nice if the installer people could check that all udebs work fine with this version, and that they can all be rebuilt. Theoretically, there should be zero issue at runtime. As for building, cdebconf and gtk2-engines will fail until we remove the -l flag, others should build without a change. I have rebuilt cdebconf with these packages after updating the Build-Depends and removing the special dh_shlibdeps case for cdebconf-gtk-udeb. Building and testing an installer with the resulting udebs lead to a successful installation. Using the updated cairo and gtk+2.0 udebs without rebuilding cdebconf also lead to a working installer. Cheers, -- Jérémy Bobbio.''`. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#499662: Proposed changes for #499662
Jérémy Bobbio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have rebuilt cdebconf with these packages after updating the Build-Depends and removing the special dh_shlibdeps case for cdebconf-gtk-udeb. Building and testing an installer with the resulting udebs lead to a successful installation. Using the updated cairo and gtk+2.0 udebs without rebuilding cdebconf also lead to a working installer. What is your opinion about this change to be accepted in Lenny? Since you have not find any issue with it I'm temped to support this unblock. -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#499662: Proposed changes for #499662
Dave Beckett wrote: The patch looks OK although I cannot test any directfb stuff, or do any cairo work today. One reason the directfb was NOT enabled in the main cairo package by me is that it is unsupported upstream. The customer for debian is really just the installer, so limiting the packages for that was a goal, and also to make the udeb minimal size. Any reported bugs on directfb outside the installer are unlikely to get any resolution from me or upstream. So the larger issue is the release-affecting consequences of this change. Please can somebody confirm that's it's approved by release team BEFORE any packaging is done. Cc-ed debian-boot to be sure it does no harm on the installer nor the installation. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#499662: Proposed changes for #499662
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dave Beckett wrote: The patch looks OK although I cannot test any directfb stuff, or do any cairo work today. One reason the directfb was NOT enabled in the main cairo package by me is that it is unsupported upstream. The customer for debian is really just the installer, so limiting the packages for that was a goal, and also to make the udeb minimal size. Any reported bugs on directfb outside the installer are unlikely to get any resolution from me or upstream. So the larger issue is the release-affecting consequences of this change. Please can somebody confirm that's it's approved by release team BEFORE any packaging is done. Cc-ed debian-boot to be sure it does no harm on the installer nor the installation. I fear it is a late change for now but I'll let Jeremy who has been the most involved person on this topic to speak up about that. Jeremy? -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#499662: Proposed changes for #499662
Le jeudi 02 octobre 2008 à 20:52 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit : Dave Beckett wrote: The patch looks OK although I cannot test any directfb stuff, or do any cairo work today. One reason the directfb was NOT enabled in the main cairo package by me is that it is unsupported upstream. The customer for debian is really just the installer, so limiting the packages for that was a goal, and also to make the udeb minimal size. Any reported bugs on directfb outside the installer are unlikely to get any resolution from me or upstream. So the larger issue is the release-affecting consequences of this change. Please can somebody confirm that's it's approved by release team BEFORE any packaging is done. Cc-ed debian-boot to be sure it does no harm on the installer nor the installation. I have prepared updated packages for cairo and GTK+: http://malsain.org/~joss/debian/ It would be nice if the installer people could check that all udebs work fine with this version, and that they can all be rebuilt. Theoretically, there should be zero issue at runtime. As for building, cdebconf and gtk2-engines will fail until we remove the -l flag, others should build without a change. Cheers, -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `-our own. Resistance is futile. signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
