Bug#772657: ttf-cjk-compact: build-depends on ruby1.8
Source: ttf-cjk-compact Version: 1.20 Severity: serious Tags: jessie User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-uninstallable Hi, ttf-cjk-compact build-depends on ruby1.8, which does not exist in jessie. In fact, ruby1.8 was removed from testing on 2014-03-13. -Ralf. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141209172542.ga1...@murdock.inria.org
Bug#772657: ttf-cjk-compact: build-depends on ruby1.8
Ralf Treinen trei...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr (2014-12-09): Source: ttf-cjk-compact Version: 1.20 Severity: serious Tags: jessie User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-uninstallable Hi, ttf-cjk-compact build-depends on ruby1.8, which does not exist in jessie. In fact, ruby1.8 was removed from testing on 2014-03-13. It really would be nice not to remove packages that are still build-depended on, especially when no bug reports are being filed. One month into the freeze isn't exactly the right time to attempt a 1.8 to 1.9 (or whatever else is current this week) ruby transition in d-i packages. Can you please fix whatever tool you're using to make sure this doesn't happen again? (Wild guess, dak rm vs. udebs?) Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#772657: ttf-cjk-compact: build-depends on ruby1.8
* Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org [141209 18:41]: Ralf Treinen trei...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr (2014-12-09): Source: ttf-cjk-compact Version: 1.20 Severity: serious Tags: jessie User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-uninstallable Hi, ttf-cjk-compact build-depends on ruby1.8, which does not exist in jessie. In fact, ruby1.8 was removed from testing on 2014-03-13. It really would be nice not to remove packages that are still build-depended on, especially when no bug reports are being filed. One month into the freeze isn't exactly the right time to attempt a 1.8 to 1.9 (or whatever else is current this week) ruby transition in d-i packages. AFAICT, ttf-cjk-compact 1.20 is not in jessie or sid. ttf-cjk-compact 1.23 from jessie/sid depends on ruby, not ruby1.8. From here it looks like there was no bug filed because 1.21 already fixed this issue (in 2013) without us needing to file an additional bug. Best, -- ,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler z...@debian.org : :' : Debian Developer `. `' 7D1A CFFA D9E0 806C 9C4C D392 5C13 D6DB 9305 2E03 `- pgpS6fzlhK6mT.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#772657: ttf-cjk-compact: build-depends on ruby1.8
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 08:51:52PM +0100, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: * Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org [141209 18:41]: Ralf Treinen trei...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr (2014-12-09): Source: ttf-cjk-compact Version: 1.20 Severity: serious Tags: jessie User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-uninstallable Hi, ttf-cjk-compact build-depends on ruby1.8, which does not exist in jessie. In fact, ruby1.8 was removed from testing on 2014-03-13. It really would be nice not to remove packages that are still build-depended on, especially when no bug reports are being filed. One month into the freeze isn't exactly the right time to attempt a 1.8 to 1.9 (or whatever else is current this week) ruby transition in d-i packages. AFAICT, ttf-cjk-compact 1.20 is not in jessie or sid. ttf-cjk-compact 1.23 from jessie/sid depends on ruby, not ruby1.8. In fact, the jessie Sources file contains both 1.20 and 1.23. Which means there is indeed no bug against ttf-cjk-compact. However, this seems still strange to me. I know that sid may contain temporarily multiple versions of the same package, but I don't think that this is OK for testing. Ralf. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141209201650.gb6...@seneca.home.org
Bug#772657: ttf-cjk-compact: build-depends on ruby1.8
* Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk [141209 21:05]: On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 20:51 +0100, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: * Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org [141209 18:41]: Ralf Treinen trei...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr (2014-12-09): Source: ttf-cjk-compact Version: 1.20 Tags: jessie AFAICT, ttf-cjk-compact 1.20 is not in jessie or sid. ttf-cjk-compact 1.23 from jessie/sid depends on ruby, not ruby1.8. It's still in sid's Sources file, but marked as Extra-Source-Only. AFAICS, that's due to us having bumped stable's debian-installer-netboot-images (which was quite legitimately built against ttf-cjk-compact 1.20 and ruby1.8) in to sid and jessie during the last point release. rmadison and dak ls (on coccia) both don't show any indication of ttf-cjk-compact 1.20 being 'in' jessie/sid. The BTS also thinks 1.20 as being in stable, and 1.23 being the jessie/sid version. apt-cache showsrc was showing me an 1.20 source package, but I disregarded it with I may have wheezy sources configured in this VM. If the common tools fail at showing this, then I'm really at a loss of tools and would like to request improvements to these tools. This is not a bug in the package, nor anything that can be fixed other than by a source upload of d-i-n-i for sid. I'm therefore going to close this report. (In general, it's worth checking such things aren't purely E-S-O: yes.) Thanks for the explanation. C. -- ,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler z...@debian.org : :' : Debian Developer `. `' 7D1A CFFA D9E0 806C 9C4C D392 5C13 D6DB 9305 2E03 `- pgp4hXxfIxoRN.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#772657: ttf-cjk-compact: build-depends on ruby1.8
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 08:04:50PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 20:51 +0100, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: * Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org [141209 18:41]: Ralf Treinen trei...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr (2014-12-09): Source: ttf-cjk-compact Version: 1.20 Severity: serious Tags: jessie User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-uninstallable Hi, ttf-cjk-compact build-depends on ruby1.8, which does not exist in jessie. In fact, ruby1.8 was removed from testing on 2014-03-13. It really would be nice not to remove packages that are still build-depended on, especially when no bug reports are being filed. One month into the freeze isn't exactly the right time to attempt a 1.8 to 1.9 (or whatever else is current this week) ruby transition in d-i packages. AFAICT, ttf-cjk-compact 1.20 is not in jessie or sid. ttf-cjk-compact 1.23 from jessie/sid depends on ruby, not ruby1.8. It's still in sid's Sources file, but marked as Extra-Source-Only. AFAICS, that's due to us having bumped stable's debian-installer-netboot-images (which was quite legitimately built against ttf-cjk-compact 1.20 and ruby1.8) in to sid and jessie during the last point release. This is not a bug in the package, nor anything that can be fixed other than by a source upload of d-i-n-i for sid. I'm therefore going to close this report. (In general, it's worth checking such things aren't purely E-S-O: yes.) OK. Julien pointed me already to E-S-O in the context of a different case where I had reported missing build-depends. Sorry for the noise, I'll refine my script. -Ralf. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141209202718.gc6...@seneca.home.org
Bug#772657: ttf-cjk-compact: build-depends on ruby1.8
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 09:16:50PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: In fact, the jessie Sources file contains both 1.20 and 1.23. Which means there is indeed no bug against ttf-cjk-compact. It is marked with | Extra-Source-Only: yes So it is only there to fullfil source requirements with a Built-Using declaration. However, this seems still strange to me. I know that sid may contain temporarily multiple versions of the same package, but I don't think that this is OK for testing. Different problem. Unstable can have binary packages of different version on different architectures and the corresponding sources. Bastian -- First study the enemy. Seek weakness. -- Romulan Commander, Balance of Terror, stardate 1709.2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141209214921.ga3...@mail.waldi.eu.org
