Re: Building monolithic images daily?
Hello, On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote: Quoting Aurelien Jarno (aurel...@aurel32.net): I do wonder if we should enable it on the daily images, as it can be very useful for regression tracking. Monolithic images contain all the necessary udebs, so the list of udebs is known (from MANIFEST.udebs) and always the same. +1 It is always tricky to track reported problems as many people are using daily built images that doesn't always contain the latest version of various udebs. An argument against this image could be that, at some points, it could be broken because it embarks two incompatible udebs. But I still think it would be a good debugging tool. I fully agree about enabling it. Aurelien, can you handle it for us? it would be nice to try to build it in most architectures before commiting it. To not delay Beta1 wait for me to upload installer before pushing it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinccor9gndukk36cc=dyvmwvvb9o+wyfktod...@mail.gmail.com
Building monolithic images daily?
Hi all, Currently we are building daily netboot, cdrom and some other images depending on the architectures. There is a target for monolithic images, but it is not activated for the daily builds. I do wonder if we should enable it on the daily images, as it can be very useful for regression tracking. Monolithic images contain all the necessary udebs, so the list of udebs is known (from MANIFEST.udebs) and always the same. Any opinion? Cheers, Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100824132959.gn19...@hall.aurel32.net
Re: Building monolithic images daily?
Quoting Aurelien Jarno (aurel...@aurel32.net): Hi all, Currently we are building daily netboot, cdrom and some other images depending on the architectures. There is a target for monolithic images, but it is not activated for the daily builds. I do wonder if we should enable it on the daily images, as it can be very useful for regression tracking. Monolithic images contain all the necessary udebs, so the list of udebs is known (from MANIFEST.udebs) and always the same. +1 It is always tricky to track reported problems as many people are using daily built images that doesn't always contain the latest version of various udebs. An argument against this image could be that, at some points, it could be broken because it embarks two incompatible udebs. But I still think it would be a good debugging tool. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
