Re: Propagation stable -> {testing,unstable} and udebs
Adeodato Simó wrote: > + Adeodato Simó (Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:53:58 +0200): > >> * put oldsys-preseed 3.2lenny1 udeb in lenny, replacing 3.2? > >> * put all *-2.6.26-2-* kernel and module udebs in testing, REPLACING >> THEIR 2.6.26-1 COUNTERPARTS. > >> * drop the *-2.6.26-1-* kernel and module udebs from unstable, now >> that the 2.6.26-2 are there. > > After acknowledgement from Otavio on IRC, this is now done. According to > the linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6_1.9lenny1 changelog, the following udebs > should be dropped from stable: > > * rtc-modules-2.6.26-1-r4k-ip22-di 1.9 > * rtc-modules-2.6.26-1-r5k-ip32-di 1.9 > > I’ll ask ftpmaster. Though, uhm, it seems all the 2.6.26-1-* udebs were > left lying around. I guess all those should be removed as well? There was no decruft for d-i, so installing with the media from right after the release should (for some?) still be possible. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Propagation stable -> {testing,unstable} and udebs
+ Adeodato Simó (Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:53:58 +0200): > * put oldsys-preseed 3.2lenny1 udeb in lenny, replacing 3.2? > * put all *-2.6.26-2-* kernel and module udebs in testing, REPLACING > THEIR 2.6.26-1 COUNTERPARTS. > * drop the *-2.6.26-1-* kernel and module udebs from unstable, now > that the 2.6.26-2 are there. After acknowledgement from Otavio on IRC, this is now done. According to the linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6_1.9lenny1 changelog, the following udebs should be dropped from stable: * rtc-modules-2.6.26-1-r4k-ip22-di 1.9 * rtc-modules-2.6.26-1-r5k-ip32-di 1.9 I’ll ask ftpmaster. Though, uhm, it seems all the 2.6.26-1-* udebs were left lying around. I guess all those should be removed as well? -- - Are you sure we're good? - Always. -- Rory and Lorelai -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Propagation stable -> {testing,unstable} and udebs
Adeodato Simó wrote: >> * put all *-2.6.26-2-* kernel and module udebs in testing, REPLACING >> THEIR 2.6.26-1 COUNTERPARTS. * remove the arm kernel and module packages again from unstable/testing. Cheers luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Propagation stable -> {testing,unstable} and udebs
Hello, With the recent first point release of Lenny, the known version constraint “stable << testing << unstable” became endangered, since a lot of packages saw updates in unstable whilst they still hadn’t been updated in unstable or, more commonly, in testing. The release team agreed with ftpmaster that at the time of the point release, stuff would be propagated from stable to testing and/or unstable as appropriate as to continue meeting the version constraints. This is generally a safe thing to do. So, for example, linux-2.6 was upgraded from 2.6.26-13 to 2.6.26-15, which came via stable. As there was a d-i respin, a lot of udeb packages were uploaded as well, that now fail to meet the version check. ftpmaster has asked us to look into fixing these as well, that is, to migrate them from stable to testing. These are mostly the linux-kernel-di-* packages, plus oldsys-preseed. Apparently ftpmaster has already propagated all the linux-kernel-di-* packages to unstable (albeit the old binaries seem to have been left around). So, please be so kind to answer the following questions. Is it okay to: * put oldsys-preseed 3.2lenny1 udeb in lenny, replacing 3.2? * put all *-2.6.26-2-* kernel and module udebs in testing, REPLACING THEIR 2.6.26-1 COUNTERPARTS. * drop the *-2.6.26-1-* kernel and module udebs from unstable, now that the 2.6.26-2 are there. Thanks, -- - Are you sure we're good? - Always. -- Rory and Lorelai -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
