Re: Still daily build problems
Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org): >> Christian Perrier wrote: >>> Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org): I guess this got solved in the meantime? >>> I'm afraid not. >>> The following packages have unmet dependencies: >>> cdebconf-gtk-terminal: Depends: libvte9 (>= 1:0.17.1) but it is not >>> installable >>> E: Broken packages >>> >>> ...but the very same happens even after dropping packages from >>> localudebs. >> Can you please have a look why libvte9 is not installable and verify >> that you are trying to install an up-to-date libvte9 (1:0.17.4-2+b1)? > So, my problem is: what the hell could I do to have mr einformation > about what makes "the package uninstallable" The easy way is to just showing what it wants to install and try to install it, output of the following commands: apt-cache policy libvte9 apt-get -s install libvte9 Though I guess the real problem migth be that it's not a udeb like Dato said? Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Still daily build problems
Hi, On Sonntag, 22. März 2009, Christian Perrier wrote: > So, my problem is: what the hell could I do to have mr einformation > about what makes "the package uninstallable" http://edos.debian.net/edos-debcheck/ regards, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Still daily build problems
* Christian Perrier [Sat, 21 Mar 2009 23:39:06 +0100]: > Looking at this this morning, I finally found out that I had locally > built packages sitting in localudebs, one of them being > cdebconf-gtk-terminal, and: > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > cdebconf-gtk-terminal: Depends: libvte9 (>= 1:0.17.1) but it is not > installable > E: Broken packages Note how cdebconf-gtk-terminal is an udeb but depends on a libvte9 instead of libvte9-udeb. See #518706 and #520642. I’ll schedule Bin-NMUs. -- - Are you sure we're good? - Always. -- Rory and Lorelai -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Still daily build problems
Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org): > Christian Perrier wrote: > > Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org): > >> I guess this got solved in the meantime? > > > > I'm afraid not. > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > cdebconf-gtk-terminal: Depends: libvte9 (>= 1:0.17.1) but it is not > > installable > > E: Broken packages > > > > ...but the very same happens even after dropping packages from > > localudebs. > > Can you please have a look why libvte9 is not installable and verify > that you are trying to install an up-to-date libvte9 (1:0.17.4-2+b1)? OK, sources.list.udeb has: # This file is automatically generated, edit sources.list.udeb.local instead. deb copy:/home/bubulle/src/debian/debian-installer/installer/build/ localudebs/ deb ftp://kheops/pub/mirror/debian unstable main/debian-installer So, the mirror is my local mirror on the "kheops" host. Looking at kheops, in packages.gz files, I see: In /mirror/debian/dists/unstable/main/debian-installer/binary-i386/Packages.gz: Package: libvte9-udeb Priority: extra Section: debian-installer Installed-Size: 696 Maintainer: Guilherme de S. Pastore Architecture: i386 Source: vte (1:0.17.4-2) Version: 1:0.17.4-2+b1 Depends: fontconfig-udeb (>= 2.4.0), libatk1.0-udeb (>= 1.20.0), libc6-udeb (>= 2.9), libcairo-directfb2-udeb (>= 1.8.0-2), libdirectfb-1.2-0-udeb, libglib2.0-udeb (>= 2.18.0), libgtk-directfb-2.0-0-udeb (>= 2.14.0), libpango1.0-udeb (>= 1.22.0) Filename: pool/main/v/vte/libvte9-udeb_0.17.4-2+b1_i386.udeb In /mirror/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz: Package: libvte9 Priority: optional Section: libs Installed-Size: 1496 Maintainer: Guilherme de S. Pastore Architecture: i386 Source: vte (1:0.17.4-2) Version: 1:0.17.4-2+b1 Depends: libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.20.0), libc6 (>= 2.3.4), libcairo2 (>= 1.2.4), libfontconfig1 (>= 2.4.0), libfreetype6 (>= 2.3.5), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.18.0), libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.14.0), libice6 (>= 1:1.0.0), libncurses5 (>= 5.6+20071006-3), libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.22.0), libsm6, libx11-6, libxft2 (>> 2.1.1), zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4), libvte-common Filename: pool/main/v/vte/libvte9_0.17.4-2+b1_i386.deb Package: libvte-common Priority: optional Section: libs Installed-Size: 482 Maintainer: Guilherme de S. Pastore Architecture: all Source: vte Version: 1:0.17.4-2 Replaces: libvte2 (<= 0.5.1-2) Filename: pool/main/v/vte/libvte-common_0.17.4-2_all.deb And the relevant files *are* in pool/main/v/vte... I also tred by changing the local mirror to another (ftp.de.d.o) and got the same result. So, my problem is: what the hell could I do to have mr einformation about what makes "the package uninstallable" signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Still daily build problems
Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org): >> I guess this got solved in the meantime? > > I'm afraid not. > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > cdebconf-gtk-terminal: Depends: libvte9 (>= 1:0.17.1) but it is not > installable > E: Broken packages > > ...but the very same happens even after dropping packages from > localudebs. Can you please have a look why libvte9 is not installable and verify that you are trying to install an up-to-date libvte9 (1:0.17.4-2+b1)? Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Still daily build problems
Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org): > I guess this got solved in the meantime? I'm afraid not. Looking at this this morning, I finally found out that I had locally built packages sitting in localudebs, one of them being cdebconf-gtk-terminal, and: The following packages have unmet dependencies: cdebconf-gtk-terminal: Depends: libvte9 (>= 1:0.17.1) but it is not installable E: Broken packages ...but the very same happens even after dropping packages from localudebs. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Still daily build problems
Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org): >> Christian Perrier wrote: >>> I still have problems with daily builds on my machine. All builds fail >>> but the netboot image. >> On what architecture? On amd64 for one, I did manage to build them >> without problem as can be seen on [0]. > > i386. I'm using my local miror, which is running mostly unattended, so > being late by 1 day is possible. I guess this got solved in the meantime? Btw, it looks like some daily build environments on [0] are not up-to-date. Cheers Luk [0] http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/build-logs.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Still daily build problems
Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org): > Christian Perrier wrote: > > I still have problems with daily builds on my machine. All builds fail > > but the netboot image. > > On what architecture? On amd64 for one, I did manage to build them > without problem as can be seen on [0]. i386. I'm using my local miror, which is running mostly unattended, so being late by 1 day is possible. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Still daily build problems
Christian Perrier wrote: > I still have problems with daily builds on my machine. All builds fail > but the netboot image. On what architecture? On amd64 for one, I did manage to build them without problem as can be seen on [0]. > Failure of the netboot-gtk image, for instance: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > cdebconf-gtk-terminal: Depends: libvte9 (>= 1:0.17.1) but it is not > installable This was happening because there were no binNMUs scheduled for udebs that were using the new directfb udeb, though that has happened in the meantime. powerpc, hppa, ia64 and sparc might still have problems in that regard, though apparently not all of the builds are using up-to-date chroots. Cheers Luk [0] http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/build-logs.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Still daily build problems
I still have problems with daily builds on my machine. All builds fail but the netboot image. Failure of the netboot-gtk image, for instance: The following packages have unmet dependencies: cdebconf-gtk-terminal: Depends: libvte9 (>= 1:0.17.1) but it is not installable signature.asc Description: Digital signature
