Re: decrufting hw-detect?
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:20:52PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net (2014-09-29): Hi all, hw-detect is a package missing in testing for arm64 and ppc64el. It is needed if we want to at least imagine running debian-installer with testing udebs on these architectures. It missed twice the migration to testing due to a new upload, and it seems it won't migrate automatically as it needs a manual decruft from the ftpmasters. The automated cruft script seems to be confused by the old new archdetect-udeb, with some additional provides: | * source package hw-detect version 1.104 no longer builds | binary package(s): archdetect-udeb | on amd64,arm64,armel,armhf,hurd-i386,i386,kfreebsd-amd64,kfreebsd-i386,mips,mipsel,powerpc,ppc64el,s390x,sparc | - suggested command: | dak rm -m [auto-cruft] NBS (no longer built by hw-detect) -s unstable -a amd64,arm64,armel,armhf,hurd-i386,i386,kfreebsd-amd64,kfreebsd-i386,mips,mipsel,powerpc,ppc64el,s390x,sparc -p -R -b archdetect-udeb | - broken Depends: | base-installer: bootstrap-base | hw-detect: hw-detect | live-installer: live-installer | partman-base: partman-base | prep-installer: prep-installer [powerpc] | quik-installer: quik-installer [powerpc] | silo-installer: silo-installer [sparc] | yaboot-installer: yaboot-installer [powerpc] Should we ask the ftpmasters for archdetect-udeb to be removed? I think I did that after having uploaded the revert, but I might be misremembering. Either way, I felt uncomfortable with the amount of changes/the diff while reviewing udebs this weekend, so I decided to skip it. Feel free to ask for a decruft, I can then get it into testing so that new archs get into a better shape, even if that introduces some risks for other archs. I have asked for decruft, and the decruft has been done. Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140930192956.gl3...@hall.aurel32.net
Re: decrufting hw-detect?
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net (2014-09-30): On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:20:52PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: I think I did that after having uploaded the revert, but I might be misremembering. Either way, I felt uncomfortable with the amount of changes/the diff while reviewing udebs this weekend, so I decided to skip it. Feel free to ask for a decruft, I can then get it into testing so that new archs get into a better shape, even if that introduces some risks for other archs. I have asked for decruft, and the decruft has been done. Thanks. My hints file now reads: # 2014-09-30 # jessie beta 2 preparation, aurel32's suggestions: # https://lists.debian.org/20140930111518.gk3...@hall.aurel32.net # https://lists.debian.org/20140930192956.gl3...@hall.aurel32.net urgent hw-detect/1.104 unblock-udeb hw-detect/1.104 urgent netcfg/1.122 unblock-udeb netcfg/1.122 urgent util-linux/2.20.1-5.9 unblock-udeb util-linux/2.20.1-5.9 Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: decrufting hw-detect?
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2014-09-30): My hints file now reads: # 2014-09-30 # jessie beta 2 preparation, aurel32's suggestions: # https://lists.debian.org/20140930111518.gk3...@hall.aurel32.net # https://lists.debian.org/20140930192956.gl3...@hall.aurel32.net urgent hw-detect/1.104 unblock-udeb hw-detect/1.104 urgent netcfg/1.122 unblock-udeb netcfg/1.122 urgent util-linux/2.20.1-5.9 unblock-udeb util-linux/2.20.1-5.9 Everything's in testing now. Still fighting with CJK though. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
decrufting hw-detect?
Hi all, hw-detect is a package missing in testing for arm64 and ppc64el. It is needed if we want to at least imagine running debian-installer with testing udebs on these architectures. It missed twice the migration to testing due to a new upload, and it seems it won't migrate automatically as it needs a manual decruft from the ftpmasters. The automated cruft script seems to be confused by the old new archdetect-udeb, with some additional provides: | * source package hw-detect version 1.104 no longer builds | binary package(s): archdetect-udeb | on amd64,arm64,armel,armhf,hurd-i386,i386,kfreebsd-amd64,kfreebsd-i386,mips,mipsel,powerpc,ppc64el,s390x,sparc | - suggested command: | dak rm -m [auto-cruft] NBS (no longer built by hw-detect) -s unstable -a amd64,arm64,armel,armhf,hurd-i386,i386,kfreebsd-amd64,kfreebsd-i386,mips,mipsel,powerpc,ppc64el,s390x,sparc -p -R -b archdetect-udeb | - broken Depends: | base-installer: bootstrap-base | hw-detect: hw-detect | live-installer: live-installer | partman-base: partman-base | prep-installer: prep-installer [powerpc] | quik-installer: quik-installer [powerpc] | silo-installer: silo-installer [sparc] | yaboot-installer: yaboot-installer [powerpc] Should we ask the ftpmasters for archdetect-udeb to be removed? Thanks, Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140929201210.ge3...@hall.aurel32.net
Re: decrufting hw-detect?
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net (2014-09-29): Hi all, hw-detect is a package missing in testing for arm64 and ppc64el. It is needed if we want to at least imagine running debian-installer with testing udebs on these architectures. It missed twice the migration to testing due to a new upload, and it seems it won't migrate automatically as it needs a manual decruft from the ftpmasters. The automated cruft script seems to be confused by the old new archdetect-udeb, with some additional provides: | * source package hw-detect version 1.104 no longer builds | binary package(s): archdetect-udeb | on amd64,arm64,armel,armhf,hurd-i386,i386,kfreebsd-amd64,kfreebsd-i386,mips,mipsel,powerpc,ppc64el,s390x,sparc | - suggested command: | dak rm -m [auto-cruft] NBS (no longer built by hw-detect) -s unstable -a amd64,arm64,armel,armhf,hurd-i386,i386,kfreebsd-amd64,kfreebsd-i386,mips,mipsel,powerpc,ppc64el,s390x,sparc -p -R -b archdetect-udeb | - broken Depends: | base-installer: bootstrap-base | hw-detect: hw-detect | live-installer: live-installer | partman-base: partman-base | prep-installer: prep-installer [powerpc] | quik-installer: quik-installer [powerpc] | silo-installer: silo-installer [sparc] | yaboot-installer: yaboot-installer [powerpc] Should we ask the ftpmasters for archdetect-udeb to be removed? I think I did that after having uploaded the revert, but I might be misremembering. Either way, I felt uncomfortable with the amount of changes/the diff while reviewing udebs this weekend, so I decided to skip it. Feel free to ask for a decruft, I can then get it into testing so that new archs get into a better shape, even if that introduces some risks for other archs. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
