Re: m68k/atari ports update
Unfortunately, I didn't pay enough attention to the fact that partconf uses parted also. Since no support for atari exists in parted, d-i simply can't support atari until that is fixed -- partman vs. partconf isn't even the issue. :-( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=239816 Maybe a link to the bug should go on the ports page? Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: m68k/atari ports update
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 03:04:53PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-18 08:44]: Unfortunately, I didn't pay enough attention to the fact that partconf uses parted also. Since no support for atari exists in parted, d-i simply can't support atari until that is fixed -- partman vs. partconf isn't even the issue. :-( Are you sure partconf using parted matters actually matters? As far as I know, partconf uses partman in a way that the disk label doesn't matter. I could be wrong, though. It turns out that yes, I am indeed, an idiot. :-) I was just informed that partconf seems to work fine and that the problem is elsewhere. Oh well, live and learn. Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: m68k/atari ports update
Stephen R Marenka wrote: Unfortunately, I didn't pay enough attention to the fact that partconf uses parted also. Since no support for atari exists in parted, d-i simply can't support atari until that is fixed -- partman vs. partconf isn't even the issue. :-( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=239816 Maybe a link to the bug should go on the ports page? Done. Unfortunatly, Sven does not have mch time for d-i right now, I think he's been travling. I wonder if someone else is able to work on this? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: m68k/atari ports update
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 10:52:32AM -0300, Joey Hess wrote: Stephen R Marenka wrote: Please update the ports page to show that m68k/atari nativehd, floppy, and cdrom images and iso's are at http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/test/atari/current/. I suppose they should be listed as building or test or some such. As soon as I get some confirmation that these work, I'll add them to the daily builds. Done. Please let me know when the CD builds are available from the standard place so I can update it. I think Manty said that the m68k CD builds failed BTW. I'll let you know. I don't plan on adding it to the daily or cd build until I'm sure atari works to some extent. Hopefully that's fixed now (at least they build for me). Will there be atari netboot stuff, or should I remove that from the table? Remove it for now, if someone wants it bad enough, then I'll get it working. Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
m68k/atari ports update
Please update the ports page to show that m68k/atari nativehd, floppy, and cdrom images and iso's are at http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/test/atari/current/. I suppose they should be listed as building or test or some such. As soon as I get some confirmation that these work, I'll add them to the daily builds. Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: m68k/atari ports update
Stephen R Marenka wrote: Please update the ports page to show that m68k/atari nativehd, floppy, and cdrom images and iso's are at http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/test/atari/current/. I suppose they should be listed as building or test or some such. As soon as I get some confirmation that these work, I'll add them to the daily builds. Done. Please let me know when the CD builds are available from the standard place so I can update it. I think Manty said that the m68k CD builds failed BTW. Will there be atari netboot stuff, or should I remove that from the table? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
