Re: new potato boot-floppies

2001-04-17 Thread Tovar

For people who care about powerpc stuff

While the changelog below mentions powerpc, these are of course only
ia32 floppies.  Having no patience, I have taken the liberty to
build a boot floppy for oldworld apple powermacs that solves the
dreaded no response from keyboard when prompting to insert root
floppy problem.  It seems to work for doing installs on the one
machine that I was able to test it on, an Apple 7200/75.  It may
spew out a few error messages at one or two places about missing
symbols, can't load modules.  This should be ignored, unless someone
discovers a piece of hardware that isn't supported during the
install phase, in which case I'll fix it.  It should be fine,
though.  This works for the 2.2r2 Debian release for powerpc
oldworld macs ONLY!  It has not been tested on any other hardware. 
I'm not sure there IS any other hardware where it could be used. 
This should hold eager Debian users for powerpc until dummy-console
gets fixed for the new input layer.  Note that this link used to
point to a 2.2.17 based floppy I built a while ago that really
wasn't all that useful.

http://www.netfall.com/powerpc

Download the file boot-floppy-oldworld.img

Thank you VERY MUCH for generating this!  I can confirm that it works on a
9500 with XLR8 G3 upgrade.  It does not work well however, with the ix3D
(IMS) video card, even if it's set to 1024x768x8 (which at least makes it
vaguely readable).  Fortunately, there was patch space.  For those who don't
know, this boot disk is an HFS floppy with a custom 'System' file, a token
'Finder' and gzip'ed kernel, saved as 'zImage'.  The fix is to mount the
floppy under LINUX and, in my case, edit the resource fork:

/floppy/.resource/System

in 'binary-overwrite-mode'.  Search for the string 'adb' and in the blank
space following that, add 'video=ofonly', giving:

root=0200 load_ramdisk=1 prompt_ramdisk=1 adb_buttons=103,111 video=ofonly

That should work for display cards that LINUX doesn't handle well and 
hopefully on those which it works properly on.  You might consider making 
that change in the public version.  (Thank you to whoever left plenty of 
room for patching there!)

One can replace the 'zImage' with one's own kernel (if it fits) and have a
Rescue Disk for machines whose hardware the default kernel does not handle.

However, this clearly shows that the earlier problem was fixed in the kernel
as when i did this, its old behavior of not recognizing return when asking
for a 'root disk' came back.  The supplied kernel appears to be of '2.4'
vintage, so it should work for awhile with the newer releases.

Again, i really appreciate this, as it allowed me to hack things so i can
select different systems when the OldWorld machine is booted.  I did this
by creating a 1.4M HFS partition (which i stole from my 'Swap' partition,
since i've got LOTS of memory) and copying the floppy into that partition.
I then copied in my custom kernel and patched my boot args (as above) with:

... root=/dev/sda7 prompt_ramdisk=0 ...

Now, i can boot into LINUX by holding down

CommandOptionShift E 2

(all at the same time) just after hearing the reboot sound.  Unlike the 
BootX approach, i can do that without a monitor attached by keeping those 
keys held down for about 15-20 sec. (your time may vary according to disk 
and CPU speeds).  Here's a reference for various boot-up options:

http://internet.ggu.edu/university_library/keyboard.html

Note well that i suspect the keyboard hack may not work everywhere.  My
recollection, from years ago, is that it is in the commonly-used HDT
(Hard Disk Toolkit) SCSI driver and not in the Apple software.

Whether or not it's considered a 'duplication of effort', i have especially
appreciated the work.  Even if so, it will still be very useful to those
who are not ready to upgrade beyond 'Potato'.  I suspect even when the
'busybox' is replaced, this booting mechanism may still prove useful on 
the 'OldWorld' machines as it doesn't required a general awareness of 
dealing low level software (e.g. Open Firmware), and on some 'OldWorld'
machines, this can also require two computers, an obscure serial cable,
and suitable software to access the serial port at the right speed (which
also handles the Open Firmware escape sequences adequately).  This is 
 not  something i would want 'newbies' to have to deal with...

Thanks again!
   -- Tovar  (On the 'Net for over 25 years)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: new potato boot-floppies

2001-04-15 Thread Andrew Sharp

For people who care about powerpc stuff

While the changelog below mentions powerpc, these are of course only
ia32 floppies.  Having no patience, I have taken the liberty to
build a boot floppy for oldworld apple powermacs that solves the
dreaded no response from keyboard when prompting to insert root
floppy problem.  It seems to work for doing installs on the one
machine that I was able to test it on, an Apple 7200/75.  It may
spew out a few error messages at one or two places about missing
symbols, can't load modules.  This should be ignored, unless someone
discovers a piece of hardware that isn't supported during the
install phase, in which case I'll fix it.  It should be fine,
though.  This works for the 2.2r2 Debian release for powerpc
oldworld macs ONLY!  It has not been tested on any other hardware. 
I'm not sure there IS any other hardware where it could be used. 
This should hold eager Debian users for powerpc until dummy-console
gets fixed for the new input layer.  Note that this link used to
point to a 2.2.17 based floppy I built a while ago that really
wasn't all that useful.

http://www.netfall.com/powerpc

Download the file boot-floppy-oldworld.img

Cheers,

a



Adam Di Carlo wrote:
 
 You can find 2.2.23 of i386 boot-floppies (already uploaded for
 Potato) at
 
   
http://people.debian.org/~aph/debian/dists/potato/main/disks-i386/2.2.23-2001-04-14/
 
 Please test these, especially if you have udma drive controller or a
 lot of IDE drives (such as hdh).
 
 Included is the change log.
 
 Bug reports should go in to bug tracking system -- please use the
 'potato' tag if possible.  Note that we are only accepting critical
 bug reports for Potato at this time, since most of our efforts have
 shifted to woody.
 
 --
 .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]URL:http://www.onshored.com/
 
 boot-floppies (2.2.23) stable; urgency=low
 
   * Matt Kraai:
 - fix the drive_blocks array for hdg, hdh, hdi, and hdj
   (closes: Bug#90967)
   * Daniel Jacobowitz:
 - bump PowerPC to kernel 2.2.19.
 - fix URLs for bootx/bootvars
 - use \( \) in Makefile find invocation
 - bootprep.sh: Turn on CONFIG_IP_PNP_ENABLE also
   * Phil Blundell:
 - bump ARM kernel to 2.2.19
 
  -- Adam Di Carlo [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sat, 14 Apr 2001 20:02:35 -0400
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: new potato boot-floppies

2001-04-15 Thread Martin Schulze

Andrew Sharp wrote:
 For people who care about powerpc stuff
 
 While the changelog below mentions powerpc, these are of course only
 ia32 floppies.  Having no patience, I have taken the liberty to
 build a boot floppy for oldworld apple powermacs that solves the
 dreaded no response from keyboard when prompting to insert root
 floppy problem.  It seems to work for doing installs on the one

I'm not sure if I got you right.  What was required to build this
image?  Isn't it built through the regular powerpc build targed?

Regards,

Joey

-- 
GNU GPL: "The source will be with you... always."

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: new potato boot-floppies

2001-04-15 Thread Martin Schulze

Ethan Benson wrote:
 On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 03:04:59PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
  Andrew Sharp wrote:
   For people who care about powerpc stuff
   
   While the changelog below mentions powerpc, these are of course only
   ia32 floppies.  Having no patience, I have taken the liberty to
   build a boot floppy for oldworld apple powermacs that solves the
   dreaded no response from keyboard when prompting to insert root
   floppy problem.  It seems to work for doing installs on the one
  
  I'm not sure if I got you right.  What was required to build this
  image?  Isn't it built through the regular powerpc build targed?
 
 his image is just the old 2.2.16 boot floppy since the potato r2 boot
 floppies are broken.  drow is trying to fix that in the r3 boot
 floppies.

ARGS.  Is he "trying to fix this" or did he "actually fix this"?

Drow, it would be a good time to appear now... :)

Regards,

Joey

-- 
GNU GPL: "The source will be with you... always."

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: new potato boot-floppies

2001-04-15 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz

On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 01:51:29AM -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote:
 For people who care about powerpc stuff
 
 While the changelog below mentions powerpc, these are of course only
 ia32 floppies.  Having no patience, I have taken the liberty to

Of course, I've built them eight times in the past two days... You
-could- just have asked on the list.  I didn't upload them because I
was in the middle of debugging...

 build a boot floppy for oldworld apple powermacs that solves the
 dreaded no response from keyboard when prompting to insert root
 floppy problem.  It seems to work for doing installs on the one

this.

 machine that I was able to test it on, an Apple 7200/75.  It may
 spew out a few error messages at one or two places about missing
 symbols, can't load modules.  This should be ignored, unless someone
 discovers a piece of hardware that isn't supported during the
 install phase, in which case I'll fix it.  It should be fine,
 though.  This works for the 2.2r2 Debian release for powerpc

It SHOULD NOT BE USED.  You're avoiding a problem by using an old
kernel where the problem didn't occur; I've fixed the problem.  The new
floppies will probably be on mirrors by tomorrow.  You'll hit a lot of
random issues by the fact that you're not using the kernel that the
floppies were built with.

On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 03:49:50PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
 Ethan Benson wrote:
  his image is just the old 2.2.16 boot floppy since the potato r2 boot
  floppies are broken.  drow is trying to fix that in the r3 boot
  floppies.
 
 ARGS.  Is he "trying to fix this" or did he "actually fix this"?
 
 Drow, it would be a good time to appear now... :)

Fixed.  I just booted the same floppies I put in Incoming half an hour
ago and got a good way into an install.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz   Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Monta Vista Software  Debian Security Team
 "I am croutons!"


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: new potato boot-floppies

2001-04-15 Thread Martin Schulze

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
   his image is just the old 2.2.16 boot floppy since the potato r2 boot
   floppies are broken.  drow is trying to fix that in the r3 boot
   floppies.
  
  ARGS.  Is he "trying to fix this" or did he "actually fix this"?
  
  Drow, it would be a good time to appear now... :)
 
 Fixed.  I just booted the same floppies I put in Incoming half an hour
 ago and got a good way into an install.

I am *very* happy to hear this.

Regards,

Joey

-- 
GNU GPL: "The source will be with you... always."

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: new potato boot-floppies

2001-04-15 Thread Andrew Sharp

Perhaps you all should have read my post more fully.  It is NOT an
old kernel, it is 2.2.18pre21 and I tested an install.  It works
fine for 2.2.r2 Debian as I said.  It SHOULD be used unless you are
posting yours for 2.2r2.
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
 
 On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 01:51:29AM -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote:
  For people who care about powerpc stuff
 
  While the changelog below mentions powerpc, these are of course only
  ia32 floppies.  Having no patience, I have taken the liberty to
 
 Of course, I've built them eight times in the past two days... You
 -could- just have asked on the list.  I didn't upload them because I
 was in the middle of debugging...

As was I.  Building and debugging, that is.

  build a boot floppy for oldworld apple powermacs that solves the
  dreaded no response from keyboard when prompting to insert root
  floppy problem.  It seems to work for doing installs on the one
 
 this.
 
  machine that I was able to test it on, an Apple 7200/75.  It may
  spew out a few error messages at one or two places about missing
  symbols, can't load modules.  This should be ignored, unless someone
  discovers a piece of hardware that isn't supported during the
  install phase, in which case I'll fix it.  It should be fine,
  though.  This works for the 2.2r2 Debian release for powerpc
 
 It SHOULD NOT BE USED.  You're avoiding a problem by using an old
 kernel where the problem didn't occur; I've fixed the problem.  The new
 floppies will probably be on mirrors by tomorrow.  You'll hit a lot of
 random issues by the fact that you're not using the kernel that the
 floppies were built with.
 
 On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 03:49:50PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
  Ethan Benson wrote:
   his image is just the old 2.2.16 boot floppy since the potato r2 boot
   floppies are broken.  drow is trying to fix that in the r3 boot
   floppies.

You should have read the whole post.  It clearly says otherwise.

  ARGS.  Is he "trying to fix this" or did he "actually fix this"?
 
  Drow, it would be a good time to appear now... :)
 
 Fixed.  I just booted the same floppies I put in Incoming half an hour
 ago and got a good way into an install.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: new potato boot-floppies

2001-04-15 Thread Ethan Benson

On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 12:24:25PM -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote:
 Perhaps you all should have read my post more fully.  It is NOT an
 old kernel, it is 2.2.18pre21 and I tested an install.  It works
^^^

no where in your message did you say this, all you said is it worked
for 2.2r2, and to ignore all the `module symbol mismatches'  which is
exactly how the old 2.2.17 boot floppy worked, it also `worked' for
r2, in a kludged sort of way.  

 fine for 2.2.r2 Debian as I said.  It SHOULD be used unless you are
 posting yours for 2.2r2.

Dan is making boot floppies for r3, r2 is obsolete.  

 You should have read the whole post.  It clearly says otherwise.

i have to disagree your post was very unclear, nowhere did you say the
kernel version only vague descriptions that sounded exactly like the
previous `fix' of using the older boot floppies to bootstrap r2.  

next time you need to communicate more on the list about what your
working on to avoid duplication of effort.  it sounds like you and dan
were spending time fixing two seperate kernels on two seperate
versions of boot floppies.  2.2.18pre21 is not going to be used for
2.2r3, and the r2 boot floppies are not going to be fixed for r2, they
are instead replaced by r3 boot floppies using a 2.2.19 kernel.  r2 is
obsoleted.

-- 
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/

 PGP signature


Re: new potato boot-floppies

2001-04-15 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz

On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 12:24:25PM -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote:
 Perhaps you all should have read my post more fully.  It is NOT an
 old kernel, it is 2.2.18pre21 and I tested an install.  It works
 fine for 2.2.r2 Debian as I said.  It SHOULD be used unless you are
 posting yours for 2.2r2.

They've already been installed into the archive for 2.2r3, in fact.

If it is 2.2.18pre21, I'm interested in what you did to make it work. 
Change the wait to a delay?  Or did you actually duplicate what I've
been working on for the past two days and fix the initialization bug in
the keyboard layer?

 You should have read the whole post.  It clearly says otherwise.

As Ethan pointed out, no, it didn't.  You nowhere said what you were
doing, and everything I've seen posted before this was using 2.2.16. 
I'd appreciate it if you could explain what you did to fix the problem.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz   Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Monta Vista Software  Debian Security Team


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: new potato boot-floppies

2001-04-15 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz

On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 08:29:26PM -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote:
 boot-floppies build system works.  ~:^)  Contrary to popular myth,
 2.2r2 can't be obsolete until r3 is released.  It hasn't been
 released, has it?  Believe it or not, I'm trying to help out here.

It has been finalized.  I believe it should be out this time tomorrow.

 "Note that this link used to point to a 2.2.17 based floppy I built
 a while ago that really wasn't all that useful."

My impression was that the 2.2.17 floppy had the input problems, and
had been downgraded back to a 2.2.16 based one.  Oops.  Sorry.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz   Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Monta Vista Software  Debian Security Team


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: new potato boot-floppies

2001-04-15 Thread Andrew Sharp

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
 
 On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 12:24:25PM -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote:
  Perhaps you all should have read my post more fully.  It is NOT an
  old kernel, it is 2.2.18pre21 and I tested an install.  It works
  fine for 2.2.r2 Debian as I said.  It SHOULD be used unless you are
  posting yours for 2.2r2.
 
 They've already been installed into the archive for 2.2r3, in fact.
 
 If it is 2.2.18pre21, I'm interested in what you did to make it work.
 Change the wait to a delay?  Or did you actually duplicate what I've
 been working on for the past two days and fix the initialization bug in
 the keyboard layer?

No duplication of work, and it's not a fix at all.  It's a hack,
pure and simple, and one that is meant to be temporary until your
real fix is available via the release of 2.2r3.  The reasons that I
did it are to relieve the pressure, if possible, on getting 2.2r3
out just to fix this problem, and to make it possible for people to
install on oldworld macs without having to wait for 2.2r3.  Also,
I've been doing some crap, and just got tired of doing weird stuff
to get the software installed, and thought I would share it with the
community.  I read somewhere that you had a fix coming, so I saw no
need to work on an actual fix anymore.  Not that I'd spent much time
on it, it's taken me a while to figure out how the dang
boot-floppies build system works.  ~:^)  Contrary to popular myth,
2.2r2 can't be obsolete until r3 is released.  It hasn't been
released, has it?  Believe it or not, I'm trying to help out here.

  You should have read the whole post.  It clearly says otherwise.
 
 As Ethan pointed out, no, it didn't.  You nowhere said what you were
 doing, and everything I've seen posted before this was using 2.2.16.
 I'd appreciate it if you could explain what you did to fix the problem.

Too bad -- I say it did.  At least, it was clear to me!  Here is the
last line, more or less, of my original post, which for some reason
no one quoted when replying:

Note that this link used to point to a 2.2.17 based floppy I built
a while ago that really wasn't all that useful.

This should make it clear that this isn't the old floppy.  I also
stated in a post not long after I built that 2.2.17 floppy that it
wasn't really useful for installations, as I noticed the module
version mismatch problems that occured during installation. 
Regardless, next time I will be crystal clear, rather than relying
on people understanding what I mean by useful.  OK, OK, so I
didn't actually say 2.2.18pre21,, I guess the reason why is that
some time ago it was clear to me that nothing else would be useful. 
Sorry.  Guess I goofed.  At least I didn't f00f, though, right?

The module errors that occur with this 2.2.18pre21 floppy are
because some things in the original kernel are only for new world
macs and so I didn't bother to include them in the kernel I built. 
I think I accidently built it in a couple of things that used to be
modules in the original.  Stuff like that which I hoped won't matter
for the next week or two or three.

What I did: I built a kernel not using the new input layer.  That is
why it is a hack, not a real fix, because the kernel used can't be
used anywhere else except that one strange floppy unique to oldworld
macs.  But it will work, for, I don't know, the next week or so? 
The next two days?

Cheers,

a


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




new potato boot-floppies

2001-04-14 Thread Adam Di Carlo


You can find 2.2.23 of i386 boot-floppies (already uploaded for
Potato) at 

  http://people.debian.org/~aph/debian/dists/potato/main/disks-i386/2.2.23-2001-04-14/

Please test these, especially if you have udma drive controller or a
lot of IDE drives (such as hdh).

Included is the change log.

Bug reports should go in to bug tracking system -- please use the
'potato' tag if possible.  Note that we are only accepting critical
bug reports for Potato at this time, since most of our efforts have
shifted to woody.

-- 
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]URL:http://www.onshored.com/

boot-floppies (2.2.23) stable; urgency=low

  * Matt Kraai:
- fix the drive_blocks array for hdg, hdh, hdi, and hdj
  (closes: Bug#90967)
  * Daniel Jacobowitz:
- bump PowerPC to kernel 2.2.19.
- fix URLs for bootx/bootvars
- use \( \) in Makefile find invocation
- bootprep.sh: Turn on CONFIG_IP_PNP_ENABLE also
  * Phil Blundell:
- bump ARM kernel to 2.2.19

 -- Adam Di Carlo [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sat, 14 Apr 2001 20:02:35 -0400


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]