Re: powerpc dailies back

2009-04-26 Thread Wartan Hachaturow
2009/4/26 Rogério Brito :
> I am interested to know what is needed to contribute with the ppc side
> of things in Debian. I care about the oldworld machines (at least, as
> long as mine works).

If you care about oldworld, I'd check if .29 works on them, and fix it
if it doesn't.
Otherwise, I would be personally against keeping miboot/oldworld
support (especially considering its non-freedom :)

-- 
Regards, Wartan.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: powerpc dailies back

2009-04-26 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi, all.

On Apr 20 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 20 April 2009, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > In setting up everything on the powerbook, I did not trouble myself
> > to re-enable the miboot builds anymore, since I understand they've
> > been long broken and nobody is working on them;
> 
> Agreed.

I am interested to know what is needed to contribute with the ppc side
of things in Debian. I care about the oldworld machines (at least, as
long as mine works).

> > and, also, since I can't seem to find the miboot package anymore
> > that's needed to do this (I believe Sven Luther used to maintain
> > them, but, well).
> 
> I "rescued" it from his $HOME on p.d.o:
> http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/pub/miboot/

I just did a facelift of the package and I think that it could enter
non-free, perhaps. Here are my modifications:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:37:43 -0300
Source: miboot
Binary: miboot
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0d4-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeremie Koenig 
Changed-By: Rogério Brito 
Description: 
 miboot - Linux bootloader for OldWorld PowerMac computers
Changes: 
 miboot (1.0d4-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * The "don't let miboot die" release.
   * debian/compat: create it with a 5.
   * debian/watch: create watchfile for BenH's page.
   * debian/copyright:
 + include copyright notice.
 + include notice that packages in non-free are not part of Debian.
 + include information where GPL-2 can be found on Debian systems.
   * debian/control:
 + include debhelper on build-deps.
 + include homepage field.
 + change section to non-free/admin.
   * debian/rules:
 + include call to dh_md5sums.
 + include mandatory binary-arch target.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 df8f8083f4d20cd8bd126c0a7ad92090677cc2a1 750 miboot_1.0d4-2.1.dsc
 4eb41fdf616f55c064c8b7a159386a583d6ebcf4 4596 miboot_1.0d4-2.1.diff.gz
 7f45256ea86463de42a3723226cf8713b35fe416 32586 miboot_1.0d4-2.1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 819b512bd70630b70d63dc96a1d2ae163aab004109cc02e4de19f8bf20e26836 750 
miboot_1.0d4-2.1.dsc
 e06847095dcca15bbe3c4fc650721ef064ad02aac3d7ee744666dd8ab99e43b0 4596 
miboot_1.0d4-2.1.diff.gz
 76b716a0bfee94146d056ccb0a8be7c803c359cac515cb58c4ae2e6c2c92484d 32586 
miboot_1.0d4-2.1_all.deb
Files: 
 334783f9515cfe8dfd54137f0ccc3be6 750 non-free/admin optional 
miboot_1.0d4-2.1.dsc
 0408e04e9a9ba761c2b43a4cd57e15f5 4596 non-free/admin optional 
miboot_1.0d4-2.1.diff.gz
 e2121c65a56e1008f51cce9f1b34d1c1 32586 non-free/admin optional 
miboot_1.0d4-2.1_all.deb
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Thanks, Rogério Brito.

P.S.: Please, CC'me, as I am not subscribed to this list (this is also
the reason why I am CC'ing Frans---so that the message doesn't get
lost).
-- 
Rogério Brito : rbr...@{mackenzie,ime.usp}.br : GPG key 1024D/7C2CAEB8
http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito : http://meusite.mackenzie.com.br/rbrito
Projects: algorithms.berlios.de : lame.sf.net : vrms.alioth.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: powerpc dailies back

2009-04-26 Thread Luk Claes
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 02:38:39PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Hello Luk and Wouter,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Luk Claes  wrote:
>> [...]
>>> I've prepared powerpc dailies on one of the buildds, so please tell me if I
>>> should update the repositories or if you want to keep providing the dailies
>>> yourself for now.
> 
> Where exactly are they set up?

on praetorius.

>>> The plan is to build all dailies on the buildds and have them all end up on
>>> d-i.debian.org eventually...
>> I prefer it those are done on buildd machines; it also allows Wouter to use
>> the machine for ppc hacking and test of the installer.
>>
>> Any objection to it Wouter?
> 
> Eh, not at all. Since I'm part of the powerpc buildd team, I could even
> keep an eye on it myself.

Right, though note that I see the current way the setup on the buildds
is done for building the dailies is a temporary solution. The main
reason being that concurrent building with regular builds on the buildd
might cause some problems. Building it on the buildd is the right thing
to do though as building it on less trusted machines is not what we want
IMHO.

Cheers

Luk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: powerpc dailies back

2009-04-23 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 02:38:39PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello Luk and Wouter,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Luk Claes  wrote:
> [...]
> > I've prepared powerpc dailies on one of the buildds, so please tell me if I
> > should update the repositories or if you want to keep providing the dailies
> > yourself for now.

Where exactly are they set up?

> > The plan is to build all dailies on the buildds and have them all end up on
> > d-i.debian.org eventually...
> 
> I prefer it those are done on buildd machines; it also allows Wouter to use
> the machine for ppc hacking and test of the installer.
> 
> Any objection to it Wouter?

Eh, not at all. Since I'm part of the powerpc buildd team, I could even
keep an eye on it myself.

-- 
The biometric identification system at the gates of the CIA headquarters
works because there's a guard with a large gun making sure no one is
trying to fool the system.
  http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/01/biometrics.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: powerpc dailies back

2009-04-21 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello Luk and Wouter,

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Luk Claes  wrote:
[...]
> I've prepared powerpc dailies on one of the buildds, so please tell me if I
> should update the repositories or if you want to keep providing the dailies
> yourself for now.
>
> The plan is to build all dailies on the buildds and have them all end up on
> d-i.debian.org eventually...

I prefer it those are done on buildd machines; it also allows Wouter to use
the machine for ppc hacking and test of the installer.

Any objection to it Wouter?

-- 
Otavio Salvador  O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: powerpc dailies back

2009-04-21 Thread Luk Claes

Wouter Verhelst wrote:

Hi,

As you may know, I stopped the powerpc dailies about a month ago, due to
the fact that the machine on which they were running was a PowerMac
8500, an oldworld machine, that is no longer supported by recent
kernels; the kernel that it does run is now too old for the libc in
squeeze.

They now run on my old laptop (an apple powerbook G4, presumably that'll
be supported for quite a while to come) and will in time be migrated to
a PegasosII system that is with Martin Michlmayr currently but which
should make it over here. As long as that migration hasn't happened,
there might be intermittent cases where the powerbook doesn't manage to
do the daily build on one or another day, since it's not really 'hosted'
ATM. This is a temporary arrangement, anyway. If this happens more than
one or two days in a row, that means it's gone offline and I haven't
noticed; feel free to gently nudge me in that case.

As I type this, the first of the dailies built on country (my old
laptop) is being uploaded to people.debian.org


I've prepared powerpc dailies on one of the buildds, so please tell me 
if I should update the repositories or if you want to keep providing the 
dailies yourself for now.


The plan is to build all dailies on the buildds and have them all end up 
on d-i.debian.org eventually...


Cheers

Luk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: powerpc dailies back

2009-04-20 Thread Rick Thomas


On Apr 20, 2009, at 7:50 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:


As I type this, the first of the dailies built on country (my old
laptop) is being uploaded to people.debian.org


Cool!  Thanks for the good work.

Can I assume that the following will soon be repaired if I'm patient?

namely, that the iso's in http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/sid_d-i/arch-latest/powerpc/iso-cd/ 
 all date from Fri Jan 23 03:30:35 UTC 2009.



Thanks!

Rick


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: powerpc dailies back

2009-04-20 Thread Xavier Oswald
On 13:50 Mon 20 Apr , Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> As you may know, I stopped the powerpc dailies about a month ago, due to
> the fact that the machine on which they were running was a PowerMac
> 8500, an oldworld machine, that is no longer supported by recent
> kernels; the kernel that it does run is now too old for the libc in
> squeeze.
> 
> They now run on my old laptop (an apple powerbook G4, presumably that'll
> be supported for quite a while to come) and will in time be migrated to
> a PegasosII system that is with Martin Michlmayr currently but which
> should make it over here. As long as that migration hasn't happened,
> there might be intermittent cases where the powerbook doesn't manage to
> do the daily build on one or another day, since it's not really 'hosted'
> ATM. This is a temporary arrangement, anyway. If this happens more than
> one or two days in a row, that means it's gone offline and I haven't
> noticed; feel free to gently nudge me in that case.
> 
> As I type this, the first of the dailies built on country (my old
> laptop) is being uploaded to people.debian.org
> 
> In setting up everything on the powerbook, I did not trouble myself to
> re-enable the miboot builds anymore, since I understand they've been
> long broken and nobody is working on them; and, also, since I can't seem
> to find the miboot package anymore that's needed to do this (I believe
> Sven Luther used to maintain them, but, well). Besides, it seems silly
> to provide installation media for hardware on which no recent kernel
> will boot.

If you are interested, Sven propose to do builds on his XServe dual G5, or even
on a powerstation (quad core G5) if the d-i team agreed and want him for this
part...

Greetings,
-- 
  ,''`.  Xavier Oswald
 : :' :  GNU/LINUX Debian Maintainer
 `. `'   GnuPG Key ID 0x88BBB51E
   `-938D D715 6915 8860 9679  4A0C A430 C6AA 88BB B51E 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: powerpc dailies back

2009-04-20 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi,

On Montag, 20. April 2009, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> In setting up everything on the powerbook, I did not trouble myself to
> re-enable the miboot builds anymore, since I understand they've been
> long broken and nobody is working on them; and, also, since I can't seem
> to find the miboot package anymore that's needed to do this (I believe
> Sven Luther used to maintain them, but, well). Besides, it seems silly
> to provide installation media for hardware on which no recent kernel
> will boot.

Yes, I suggest to drop miboot, if newer kernels dont work on oldworld anymore.

Also, miboot was never part of Debian as it needs a nonfree toolchain to 
build. (IIRC)


regards,
Holger




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: powerpc dailies back

2009-04-20 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 20 April 2009, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> In setting up everything on the powerbook, I did not trouble myself to
> re-enable the miboot builds anymore, since I understand they've been
> long broken and nobody is working on them;

Agreed.

> and, also, since I can't 
> seem to find the miboot package anymore that's needed to do this (I
> believe Sven Luther used to maintain them, but, well).

I "rescued" it from his $HOME on p.d.o:
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/pub/miboot/

It's still probably also available on gluck (the old p.d.o).


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


powerpc dailies back

2009-04-20 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Hi,

As you may know, I stopped the powerpc dailies about a month ago, due to
the fact that the machine on which they were running was a PowerMac
8500, an oldworld machine, that is no longer supported by recent
kernels; the kernel that it does run is now too old for the libc in
squeeze.

They now run on my old laptop (an apple powerbook G4, presumably that'll
be supported for quite a while to come) and will in time be migrated to
a PegasosII system that is with Martin Michlmayr currently but which
should make it over here. As long as that migration hasn't happened,
there might be intermittent cases where the powerbook doesn't manage to
do the daily build on one or another day, since it's not really 'hosted'
ATM. This is a temporary arrangement, anyway. If this happens more than
one or two days in a row, that means it's gone offline and I haven't
noticed; feel free to gently nudge me in that case.

As I type this, the first of the dailies built on country (my old
laptop) is being uploaded to people.debian.org

In setting up everything on the powerbook, I did not trouble myself to
re-enable the miboot builds anymore, since I understand they've been
long broken and nobody is working on them; and, also, since I can't seem
to find the miboot package anymore that's needed to do this (I believe
Sven Luther used to maintain them, but, well). Besides, it seems silly
to provide installation media for hardware on which no recent kernel
will boot.

-- 
The biometric identification system at the gates of the CIA headquarters
works because there's a guard with a large gun making sure no one is
trying to fool the system.
  http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/01/biometrics.html


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature