Re: [RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1
On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 13:43 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > By the way, I have a question. What is the difference between > the netboot and the xen image ? I thought I would need the xen > image on the Amazon cloud, but it worked well with the > simple netboot (which is good as the xen image did not build today). A 32 bit PV Xen guest must have PAE (large physical addressing) enabled in the kernel and so the 32 bit the netboot/xen image uses a PAE kernel. The plain netboot kernel is a 486 non-PAE kernel for compatibility with the widest range of native machines. There is no PAE/non-PAE distinction on 64 bit, all 64 bit kernels are effectively PAE already. So on 64 bit netboot/xen is actually just a symlink to the regular netboot, the only reason it exists really is for parity with 32 bit (i.e. it's easier to just unconditionally say "use netboot/xen on xen"). Ian. -- Ian Campbell Dr. Jekyll had something to Hyde. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1335710458.16558.15.ca...@cthulhu.hellion.org.uk
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.5)
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 21:06 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > 6.0.5 is somewhat overdue now and I've been procrastinating over > organising it for a while. So before I find something else to distract > myself with, some suggested dates: It looks like the discussion has converged towards: > May 12/13: York BSP. Probably not the best time for CDs, given that > Steve would be at the wrong end of the country. (As will I, but that's > less of an issue) If that's an issue for anyone, please let me know asap; otherwise I'll aim to get an announcement sent out in the next day or so. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1335714534.4844.74.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: [RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 16:31 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > To what we had for a1 basically: > > get CD images built (Steve, yey!); > test them > finish announce mail > mail to to d-d-a if all above work How are things going with that? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1335714580.4844.75.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: [RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 04:49:40PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: >On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 16:31 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> To what we had for a1 basically: >> >> get CD images built (Steve, yey!); >> test them >> finish announce mail >> mail to to d-d-a if all above work > >How are things going with that? I can do an alpha build of CDs whenever they're desired, just let me know when things are looking ready. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary." -- James D. Nicoll -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120429155458.gv21...@einval.com
Re: [RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 16:54 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 04:49:40PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: > >On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 16:31 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> To what we had for a1 basically: > >> > >> get CD images built (Steve, yey!); > >> test them > >> finish announce mail > >> mail to to d-d-a if all above work > > > >How are things going with that? > > I can do an alpha build of CDs whenever they're desired, just let me > know when things are looking ready. Ah, I'd somewhat assumed that Otavio's "Steve, yey!" above meant that he'd already talked to you about that. :-/ >From the -release side, I think we should get on with producing and testing images asap. Forgive my ignorance on the d-i side, but is there an easily accessible / parseable list of reported issues with the dailies which might be considered "show stoppers"? I guess they'd have to be fairly severe to be blockers for an alpha though. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1335717406.4844.85.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 08:40:38 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Duno if this is a transient problem or something we should care about > in deep. It's not, and you should. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#670852: libglib2.0-udeb: depends on non-udeb libelf1
Source: libglib2.0-udeb Version: 2.32.1-1 Severity: grave Tags: d-i Justification: renders package unusable What $subject says. Please double check stuff when adding new dependencies. And probably disable the libelf stuff for the udeb build if possible. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#648251: Any Updates?
Thanks for the cleanups. Anyway, is there any problems with the fix?
Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 30 00:04 buildd@barber build_cdrom_isolinux http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_cdrom_isolinux.log * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 30 00:05 buildd@barber build_cdrom_gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_cdrom_gtk.log * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 30 00:06 buildd@barber build_cdrom-xen http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_cdrom-xen.log * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 30 00:09 buildd@barber build_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_netboot-gtk.log * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 30 00:09 buildd@barber build_netboot-xen http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_netboot-xen.log * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 30 00:10 buildd@barber build_hd-media http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_hd-media.log * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 30 00:11 buildd@barber build_hd-media_gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_hd-media_gtk.log * FAILED BUILD: armel Apr 29 08:22 buildd@ancina build_kirkwood_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_kirkwood_netboot-gtk.log * FAILED BUILD: i386 Apr 30 00:05 buildd@biber build_cdrom_isolinux http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/build_cdrom_isolinux.log * FAILED BUILD: i386 Apr 30 00:05 buildd@biber build_cdrom_gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/build_cdrom_gtk.log * FAILED BUILD: i386 Apr 30 00:05 buildd@biber build_cdrom-xen http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/build_cdrom-xen.log * FAILED BUILD: i386 Apr 30 00:06 buildd@biber build_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/build_netboot-gtk.log * FAILED BUILD: i386 Apr 30 00:06 buildd@biber build_netboot-xen http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/build_netboot-xen.log * FAILED BUILD: i386 Apr 30 00:06 buildd@biber build_hd-media http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/build_hd-media.log * FAILED BUILD: i386 Apr 30 00:07 buildd@biber build_hd-media_gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/build_hd-media_gtk.log * OLD BUILD:kfreebsd-amd64 Apr 05 00:32 buildd@fano build_cdrom_grub http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_cdrom_grub.log * OLD BUILD:kfreebsd-amd64 Apr 05 00:32 buildd@fano build_cdrom_gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_cdrom_gtk.log * OLD BUILD:kfreebsd-amd64 Apr 05 00:37 buildd@fano build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_netboot.log * OLD BUILD:kfreebsd-amd64 Apr 05 00:42 buildd@fano build_netboot-9 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_netboot-9.log * OLD BUILD:kfreebsd-amd64 Apr 05 00:49 buildd@fano build_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_netboot-gtk.log * OLD BUILD:kfreebsd-amd64 Apr 05 00:54 buildd@fano build_netboot-gtk-9 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_netboot-gtk-9.log * OLD BUILD:kfreebsd-i386 Apr 05 00:17 buildd@finzi build_cdrom_grub http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-i386/daily/build_cdrom_grub.log * OLD BUILD:kfreebsd-i386 Apr 05 00:21 buildd@finzi build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-i386/daily/build_netboot.log * OLD BUILD:kfreebsd-i386 Apr 05 00:25 buildd@finzi build_netboot-9 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-i386/daily/build_netboot-9.log * OLD BUILD:mipsel Apr 19 00:11 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial.log * OLD BUILD:mipsel Apr 19 00:14 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_ssh http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_ssh.log * OLD BUILD:mipsel Apr 19 00:16 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_common http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_common.log * OLD BUILD:mipsel Apr 19 00:19 buildd@rem build_malta_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_malta_netboot-2.6.log * OLD BUILD:mipsel Apr 19 00:22 buildd@rem build_sb1-bcm91250a_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_sb1-bcm91250a_netboot-2.6.log * OLD BUILD:mipsel Apr 19 00:26 buildd@rem build_loongson-2f_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_loongson-2f_netboot-2.6.log * FAILED BUILD: powerpc Apr
