Bug#653711: force __FAVOR_BSD in netinet/tcp.h and netinet/udp.h
Package: libbsd-dev Severity: wishlist Tags: patch El 25 de desembre de 2011 11:56, Robert Millan r...@debian.org ha escrit: +#define __FAVOR_BSD 1 #include netinet/in_systm.h #include netinet/in.h #include netinet/ip.h #include netinet/ip_icmp.h #include netinet/tcp.h #include netinet/udp.h +#undef __FAVOR_BSD Shouldn't this kind of fix be in libbsd-dev? E.g. in overlay netinet/in.h: #if __FAVOR_BSD # include_next netinet/in.h #else # define __FAVOR_BSD 1 # include_next netinet/in.h # undef __FAVOR_BSD #endif Let's make a bug out of this. Patch attached. -- Robert Millan --- /dev/null +++ b/include/bsd/netinet/tcp.h @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +#include features.h +#if __FAVOR_BSD +# include_next netinet/tcp.h +#else +# define __FAVOR_BSD 1 +# include_next netinet/tcp.h +# undef __FAVOR_BSD +#endif --- /dev/null +++ b/include/bsd/netinet/udp.h @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +#include features.h +#if __FAVOR_BSD +# include_next netinet/udp.h +#else +# define __FAVOR_BSD 1 +# include_next netinet/udp.h +# undef __FAVOR_BSD +#endif
Bug#653193: Missing patch
El 25 de desembre de 2011 0:16, Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org ha escrit: Hi! seems svn diff didn't include the new patch 14_alias.diff. Here it is. The get-orig-source bits are also missing from the patch. Btw, do you receive my mail also directly or only via list/BTS? I suspect my direct mails to you are being lost. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxon5x0_aurfp-curr3mwoq8cac8g6ogr0a3fdg7m2t...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bug#653771: FTBFS on kfreebsd-* due to -Wformat-security
On 30/12/11 21:49, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
ntp is now failing to build on the kfreebsd-* arches.
Argh! I had the wrong version of the source package. Most of the fixes
in my last mail are already applied (as per #542721, #627403) -- but
there are two places where some (apparently kfreebsd-specific) code was
not covered by Colin Watson's existing format-security.patch
This explains why build failures occurred only on kfreebsd arches.
My new patch (attached) fixes only those parts, and I am now able to
build successfully on kfreebsd-i386.
Thanks!
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
Index: ntp-4.2.6.p3+dfsg/lib/isc/unix/ifiter_sysctl.c
===
--- ntp-4.2.6.p3+dfsg.orig/lib/isc/unix/ifiter_sysctl.c 2010-12-25 09:40:35.0 +
+++ ntp-4.2.6.p3+dfsg/lib/isc/unix/ifiter_sysctl.c 2011-12-30 20:30:25.0 +
@@ -272,10 +272,11 @@
return (ISC_R_SUCCESS);
} else {
- printf(isc_msgcat_get(isc_msgcat, ISC_MSGSET_IFITERSYSCTL,
- ISC_MSG_UNEXPECTEDTYPE,
- warning: unexpected interface list
- message type\n));
+ fprintf(stdout, %s,
+ isc_msgcat_get(isc_msgcat, ISC_MSGSET_IFITERSYSCTL,
+ ISC_MSG_UNEXPECTEDTYPE,
+ warning: unexpected interface list
+ message type\n));
return (ISC_R_IGNORE);
}
}
Index: ntp-4.2.6.p3+dfsg/ntpd/refclock_oncore.c
===
--- ntp-4.2.6.p3+dfsg.orig/ntpd/refclock_oncore.c 2010-12-25 09:40:34.0 +
+++ ntp-4.2.6.p3+dfsg/ntpd/refclock_oncore.c 2011-12-30 20:37:33.0 +
@@ -4058,7 +4058,7 @@
snprintf(Msg, sizeof(Msg), ONCORE[%d]: %s, instance-unit,
msg);
- syslog(log_level, Msg);
+ syslog(log_level, %s, Msg);
i = strlen(msg);
Bug#631639: __unused in libbsd. workaround for #522773 (linux) and #522774 (libc)
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 17:24:00 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: That won’t help. The overlay mode uses pkg-config which no BSD thing touches. Well, even OpenBSD has its own re-implementation: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=pkg-configsektion=1format=html regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111231013742.ga23...@gaara.hadrons.org
