Re: please update patches / investigate build failures for gcc-4.7 snapshot builds
On 19 December 2011 14:55, Konstantinos Margaritis mar...@genesi-usa.com wrote: On 19 December 2011 01:55, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote: Please have a look at the gcc-4.7 package in experimental, update patches (hurd, kfreebsd, ARM is fixed in svn), and investigate the build failures (currently ia64, but more will appear). Attached is the build failure on armhf (clean chroot with all bdeps satisfied). Just tested 4.7-20111222-1 as well, it built fine, installed and tested 5 known gcc ICEs (ace, webkit, 2 neon-related ones, a gfortran one) and all but one neon ICE were fixed :) Regards Konstantinos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cabsevwt_qdasf6hg_ev2e3vvexdnnrxdvsqjerfbz6rbae4...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bug#631639: __unused in libbsd. workaround for #522773 (linux) and #522774 (libc)
El 31 de desembre de 2011 4:40, Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de ha escrit: Yes, but (a) not for their own stuff but to replace the GNU one which has a bootstrapping issue wrt. libglib nowadays (BSD ports start from a base OS system and compile everything from source on each installation), and (b) my MirCoDeveloper says it doesn’t work right anyway. How does any of this help with solving #631639? Maybe someone could comment on the patch I sent 6 months ago? I couldn't care less about pkg-config. I'd rather have this problem solved so we can get rid of that 2337-line patch in freebsd-utils. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxmfxwdpt-+iw6wnjwvrntyc3c3hol4mn2hyngwuty3...@mail.gmail.com
Re: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#653771: FTBFS on kfreebsd-* due to -Wformat-security
On 31/12/11 20:48, Peter Eisentraut wrote: On fre, 2011-12-30 at 23:29 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: My new patch (attached) fixes only those parts, and I am now able to build successfully on kfreebsd-i386. Why did you change printf to fprintf(stdout, ...)? Hi, I saw it written that way in other code, functionally it would be identical, so I was just trying to be consistent, e.g.: ./ntpd/refclock_jupiter.c:903: fprintf(stdout, %s: , function); But actually use of printf seems more common overall... I should probably have kept it the same. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4eff784a.1090...@pyro.eu.org
Re: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#653771: FTBFS on kfreebsd-* due to -Wformat-security
On fre, 2011-12-30 at 23:29 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: My new patch (attached) fixes only those parts, and I am now able to build successfully on kfreebsd-i386. Why did you change printf to fprintf(stdout, ...)? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1325364488.8243.1.ca...@vanquo.pezone.net
Bug#653193: Missing patch
On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 11:56:45 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: +#define __FAVOR_BSD 1 #include netinet/in_systm.h #include netinet/in.h #include netinet/ip.h #include netinet/ip_icmp.h #include netinet/tcp.h #include netinet/udp.h +#undef __FAVOR_BSD Shouldn't this kind of fix be in libbsd-dev? E.g. in overlay netinet/in.h: #if __FAVOR_BSD # include_next netinet/in.h #else # define __FAVOR_BSD 1 # include_next netinet/in.h # undef __FAVOR_BSD #endif I'd rather not, libbsd is there to help in porting by making embedded sources unnecessary and adding missing declarations and similar, but there's a limit to what extent it should include major hacks like this, some times the source just need to be made more portable or fixed some other way. In this case __FAVOR_BSD is an internal glibc macro, the source should be using _BSD_SOURCE instead of _GNU_SOURCE, currently passed through CFLAGS in debian/rules. regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111231223353.ga11...@gaara.hadrons.org
