Processed: Re: Bug#661825: do we need to provide keymaps in kbdcontrol?

2012-04-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 661825 normal
Bug #661825 [kbdcontrol] On kfreebsd-*, please integrate kbdcontrol within 
keyboard-configuration.
Severity set to 'normal' from 'wishlist'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
661825: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661825
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133573731430174.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#661825: do we need to provide keymaps in kbdcontrol?

2012-04-29 Thread Robert Millan
severity 661825 normal
thanks

I think that for now I'll assume everything is working fine with the
new scheme. In this scenario the old debconf questions and their
associated keyboard files are harmless, and still useful for users
upgrading from Squeeze.

At some point we can remove support for the old mechanism completely,
but this doesn't necessarily have to happen in Wheezy IMHO.

2012/4/27 Robert Millan :
> Hi all,
>
> I have the impression that everything needed to handle keyboard
> properly on GNU/kFreeBSD is already in place:
>
> - keyboard-configuration provides the user setting (maybe fed from
> D-I) and /etc/init.d/keyboard-setup
>
> - In turn, /etc/init.d/keyboard-setup uses /bin/setupcon from console-setup
>
> - In turn, /bin/setupcon uses /bin/kbdcontrol to load fonts from
> console-setup-freebsd.
>
> Do we need to do anything else in kbdcontrol to make this work?  It
> seems that the only missing thing is removing the fonts we're
> currently providing in /usr/share/syscons/keymaps, or move them aside
> to another package, since these aren't being used anymore.
>
> --
> Robert Millan
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: 
> http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXPY8mgewN5azmGMq0hECyc+u4WayQUQdu4qN6yE2_=t...@mail.gmail.com
>



-- 
Robert Millan



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxnwu_vawveu92zdhf28wybr7_kl74cd25blr7pinmd...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Bug#669165: mount errors when attempting remount of /run, /proc and /sys

2012-04-29 Thread Robert Millan
Hi Roger,

2012/4/29 Roger Leigh :
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:47:34PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>> Misc errors are displayed during boot because initscripts attempts
>> to remount /run, /proc and /sys.  However, on GNU/kFreeBSD it's not
>> possible to remount tmpfs, linprocfs or linsysfs file systems:
>>
>> mount: /run: unknown special file or file system
>> mount: proc : Operation not supported
>> mount: sys : Operation not supported
>
> Is it possible to know ahead of time which filesystems do not
> support remounting?

There's no automated method, but grepping MNT_UPDATE through the
source reveals that tmpfs supports remounting only for certain flags.
For linprocfs/linsysfs I'm not sure, it seems there isn't a struct
vfsops in them.

I'm afraid I don't have time to investigate this atm, sorry!  I'm
adding debian-bsd to CC, maybe someone can help.

-- 
Robert Millan


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxnhtcts-mi37kzed6c7cvpixvpa__ewsgzwscfuhr4...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Bug#669307: pcp: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type

2012-04-29 Thread Robert Millan
2012/4/20 Robert Millan :
> El 20 d’abril de 2012 1:43, Nathan Scott  ha escrit:
>> That's merged.  For the glibc-bsd commit, will I need an updated
>> Build-Depends line to ensure that the new glibc is present when
>> building pcp?
>
> Yes.
>
>> If so, could you suggest a minimum version to depend on there?  Thanks!
>
> No, but if you subscribe to #669424 you'll get notice when the fixed
> version is known.

Fix available in libc0.1-dev (>= 2.13-31~).

-- 
Robert Millan


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxngjebnzkkos8htqjzeqc68yzifgss_beex-fotdz7...@mail.gmail.com



Re: new patch. eglibc upload urgently required!

2012-04-29 Thread Robert Millan
2012/4/22 Robert Millan :
> I notice that my initial patch didn't handle the library dependency
> part.  I'm attaching a new patch that fixes this issue. This makes new
> packages built against the patched libc0.1-dev depend on libc0.1 >=
> 2.13-31.
>
> VERY IMPORTANT NOTICE: if this patch is introduced in a later
> version (rather than 2.13-31), you MUST change the version in
> debian/libc0.1.symbols.common to the first version that provides
> pthread_condattr_*etclock on GNU/kFreeBSD.

Uhm, I notice you didn't include this part.  Now packages that build
with libc0.1-dev 2.13-31 won't have a versioned dependency on libc0.1
>= 2.13-31.

Are you sure this is correct?  It seems to me that this can be a big
problem if those packages migrate to testing before eglibc does.

-- 
Robert Millan


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxn33lcn-bmsfefx3k7y_waw8d2vd5obxpzbdy8hfmw...@mail.gmail.com



Re: svn commit: r234684 - head/lib/libusb

2012-04-29 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Saturday 28 April 2012 15:32:58 Robert Millan wrote:
> Hi Hans,
> 
> 2012/4/28 Hans Petter Selasky :
> >> Can you be more specific about this?  We've got around 80 packages
> >> that are linking with this library.  If it's really broken, we
> >> probably need to change the build dependencies and rebuild every of
> >> them.
> > 
> > Are these packages built with libusb header files from the FreeBSD USB
> > library or the libusb.org library? If the libusb.org header files are
> > used, then updating the FreeBSD USB library will fix some issues. Else
> > not.
> 
> I think you missunderstand what we're doing.  I'll try to explain, but
> please note that I don't claim what we do is correct, in fact I have
> no clue about it!  I'm merely describing:
> 
> Debian GNU/kFreeBSD provides two USB libraries, libusb-0.1-4 and
> libusb2debian.
> 
> libusb-0.1-4 is the library for libusb.org (currently version 0.1.12).
> It includes a patch (06_bsd.diff, attached) which was added in Jan
> 2010. Aurelien wrote this in changelog file: "Add
> debian/patches/06_bsd.diff to fix build with kFreeBSD headers 8.0.".
> 
> libusb2debian is the library from FreeBSD. The "debian" suffix does
> *not* indicate that we diverged from FreeBSD ABI. It is ABI compatible
> with the one from FreeBSD (except for the fact that it's linked againt
> GNU libc, of course).
> 
> Packages can be linked with libusb-0.1-4 or with libusb2debian,
> depending on the setting in their debian/control file.

Ok, I see.

> It is unclear to me why we're providing both libraries at the same
> time.  libusb2debian must have been added because there's some
> limitation in libusb-0.1-4, otherwise we wouldn't have bothered to
> provide another library, but I don't know which is that limitation.

The official libusb does not support FreeBSD.

> 
> If the problem with libusb-0.1-4 is so severe that it's completely
> unusable on GNU/kFreeBSD, then we should look into rebuilding
> everything with libusb2debian.
> 
> ABI compatibility with libusb-0.1-4 is helpful because it makes
> transitions easier, but it doesn't resolve this kind of problem (if
> there is one).

Ok, then there is no problem about keeping the libusb2debian package as-is.

--HPS


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201204291919.48411.hsela...@c2i.net



Bug#669424 closed by Aurelien Jarno (Bug#669424: fixed in eglibc 2.13-31)

2012-04-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the libc0.1-dev package:

#669424: missing struct loadavg

It has been closed by Aurelien Jarno .

Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
better one in a separate message then please contact Aurelien Jarno 
 by
replying to this email.


-- 
669424: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669424
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: eglibc
Source-Version: 2.13-31

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
eglibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

eglibc-source_2.13-31_all.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/eglibc-source_2.13-31_all.deb
eglibc_2.13-31.diff.gz
  to main/e/eglibc/eglibc_2.13-31.diff.gz
eglibc_2.13-31.dsc
  to main/e/eglibc/eglibc_2.13-31.dsc
glibc-doc_2.13-31_all.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/glibc-doc_2.13-31_all.deb
libc-bin_2.13-31_amd64.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/libc-bin_2.13-31_amd64.deb
libc-dev-bin_2.13-31_amd64.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/libc-dev-bin_2.13-31_amd64.deb
libc6-dbg_2.13-31_amd64.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/libc6-dbg_2.13-31_amd64.deb
libc6-dev-i386_2.13-31_amd64.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/libc6-dev-i386_2.13-31_amd64.deb
libc6-dev_2.13-31_amd64.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/libc6-dev_2.13-31_amd64.deb
libc6-i386_2.13-31_amd64.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/libc6-i386_2.13-31_amd64.deb
libc6-pic_2.13-31_amd64.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/libc6-pic_2.13-31_amd64.deb
libc6-prof_2.13-31_amd64.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/libc6-prof_2.13-31_amd64.deb
libc6-udeb_2.13-31_amd64.udeb
  to main/e/eglibc/libc6-udeb_2.13-31_amd64.udeb
libc6_2.13-31_amd64.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/libc6_2.13-31_amd64.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.13-31_amd64.udeb
  to main/e/eglibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.13-31_amd64.udeb
libnss-files-udeb_2.13-31_amd64.udeb
  to main/e/eglibc/libnss-files-udeb_2.13-31_amd64.udeb
locales-all_2.13-31_amd64.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/locales-all_2.13-31_amd64.deb
locales_2.13-31_all.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/locales_2.13-31_all.deb
multiarch-support_2.13-31_amd64.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/multiarch-support_2.13-31_amd64.deb
nscd_2.13-31_amd64.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/nscd_2.13-31_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 669...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Aurelien Jarno  (supplier of updated eglibc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 17:45:45 +0200
Source: eglibc
Binary: libc-bin libc-dev-bin glibc-doc eglibc-source locales locales-all nscd 
multiarch-support libc6 libc6-dev libc6-dbg libc6-prof libc6-pic libc6-udeb 
libc6.1 libc6.1-dev libc6.1-dbg libc6.1-prof libc6.1-pic libc6.1-udeb libc0.3 
libc0.3-dev libc0.3-dbg libc0.3-prof libc0.3-pic libc0.3-udeb libc0.1 
libc0.1-dev libc0.1-dbg libc0.1-prof libc0.1-pic libc0.1-udeb libc6-i386 
libc6-dev-i386 libc6-sparc64 libc6-dev-sparc64 libc6-s390 libc6-dev-s390 
libc6-s390x libc6-dev-s390x libc6-amd64 libc6-dev-amd64 libc6-powerpc 
libc6-dev-powerpc libc6-ppc64 libc6-dev-ppc64 libc6-mipsn32 libc6-dev-mipsn32 
libc6-mips64 libc6-dev-mips64 libc0.1-i386 libc0.1-dev-i386 libc6-i686 
libc6-xen libc0.1-i686 libc0.3-i686 libc0.3-xen libc6.1-alphaev67 
libc6-loongson2f libnss-dns-udeb libnss-files-udeb
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2.13-31
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Aurelien Jarno 
Changed-By: Aurelien Jarno 
Description: 
 eglibc-source - Embedded GNU C Library: sources
 glibc-doc  - Embedded GNU C Library: Documentation
 libc-bin   - Embedded GNU C Library: Binaries
 libc-dev-bin - Embedded GNU C Library: Development binaries
 libc0.1- Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries
 libc0.1-dbg - Embedded GNU C Library: detached debugging symbols
 libc0.1-dev - Embedded GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Header Files
 libc0.1-dev-i386 - Embedded GNU C Library: 32bit development libraries for 
AMD64
 libc0.1-i386 - Embedded GNU C Library: 32bit shared libraries for AMD64
 libc0.1-i686 - Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i686 optimized]
 libc0.1-pic - Embedded GNU C Library: PIC archive library
 libc0.1-prof - Embedded GNU C Library: Profiling Libraries
 libc0.1-udeb - Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries - udeb (udeb)
 libc0.3- Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries
 libc0.3-dbg - Embedded GNU C Library: detached debugging symbols
 libc0.3-dev - Embedded GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Header Files
 libc0.3-i686 - Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i686 optimize

Bug#654783 closed by Aurelien Jarno (Bug#654783: fixed in eglibc 2.13-31)

2012-04-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the libc0.1 package:

#654783: race condition in libpthread causes hangs in python2.7 testsuite

It has been closed by Aurelien Jarno .

Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
better one in a separate message then please contact Aurelien Jarno 
 by
replying to this email.


-- 
654783: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=654783
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: eglibc
Source-Version: 2.13-31

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
eglibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

eglibc-source_2.13-31_all.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/eglibc-source_2.13-31_all.deb
eglibc_2.13-31.diff.gz
  to main/e/eglibc/eglibc_2.13-31.diff.gz
eglibc_2.13-31.dsc
  to main/e/eglibc/eglibc_2.13-31.dsc
glibc-doc_2.13-31_all.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/glibc-doc_2.13-31_all.deb
libc-bin_2.13-31_amd64.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/libc-bin_2.13-31_amd64.deb
libc-dev-bin_2.13-31_amd64.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/libc-dev-bin_2.13-31_amd64.deb
libc6-dbg_2.13-31_amd64.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/libc6-dbg_2.13-31_amd64.deb
libc6-dev-i386_2.13-31_amd64.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/libc6-dev-i386_2.13-31_amd64.deb
libc6-dev_2.13-31_amd64.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/libc6-dev_2.13-31_amd64.deb
libc6-i386_2.13-31_amd64.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/libc6-i386_2.13-31_amd64.deb
libc6-pic_2.13-31_amd64.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/libc6-pic_2.13-31_amd64.deb
libc6-prof_2.13-31_amd64.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/libc6-prof_2.13-31_amd64.deb
libc6-udeb_2.13-31_amd64.udeb
  to main/e/eglibc/libc6-udeb_2.13-31_amd64.udeb
libc6_2.13-31_amd64.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/libc6_2.13-31_amd64.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.13-31_amd64.udeb
  to main/e/eglibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.13-31_amd64.udeb
libnss-files-udeb_2.13-31_amd64.udeb
  to main/e/eglibc/libnss-files-udeb_2.13-31_amd64.udeb
locales-all_2.13-31_amd64.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/locales-all_2.13-31_amd64.deb
locales_2.13-31_all.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/locales_2.13-31_all.deb
multiarch-support_2.13-31_amd64.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/multiarch-support_2.13-31_amd64.deb
nscd_2.13-31_amd64.deb
  to main/e/eglibc/nscd_2.13-31_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 654...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Aurelien Jarno  (supplier of updated eglibc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 17:45:45 +0200
Source: eglibc
Binary: libc-bin libc-dev-bin glibc-doc eglibc-source locales locales-all nscd 
multiarch-support libc6 libc6-dev libc6-dbg libc6-prof libc6-pic libc6-udeb 
libc6.1 libc6.1-dev libc6.1-dbg libc6.1-prof libc6.1-pic libc6.1-udeb libc0.3 
libc0.3-dev libc0.3-dbg libc0.3-prof libc0.3-pic libc0.3-udeb libc0.1 
libc0.1-dev libc0.1-dbg libc0.1-prof libc0.1-pic libc0.1-udeb libc6-i386 
libc6-dev-i386 libc6-sparc64 libc6-dev-sparc64 libc6-s390 libc6-dev-s390 
libc6-s390x libc6-dev-s390x libc6-amd64 libc6-dev-amd64 libc6-powerpc 
libc6-dev-powerpc libc6-ppc64 libc6-dev-ppc64 libc6-mipsn32 libc6-dev-mipsn32 
libc6-mips64 libc6-dev-mips64 libc0.1-i386 libc0.1-dev-i386 libc6-i686 
libc6-xen libc0.1-i686 libc0.3-i686 libc0.3-xen libc6.1-alphaev67 
libc6-loongson2f libnss-dns-udeb libnss-files-udeb
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2.13-31
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Aurelien Jarno 
Changed-By: Aurelien Jarno 
Description: 
 eglibc-source - Embedded GNU C Library: sources
 glibc-doc  - Embedded GNU C Library: Documentation
 libc-bin   - Embedded GNU C Library: Binaries
 libc-dev-bin - Embedded GNU C Library: Development binaries
 libc0.1- Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries
 libc0.1-dbg - Embedded GNU C Library: detached debugging symbols
 libc0.1-dev - Embedded GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Header Files
 libc0.1-dev-i386 - Embedded GNU C Library: 32bit development libraries for 
AMD64
 libc0.1-i386 - Embedded GNU C Library: 32bit shared libraries for AMD64
 libc0.1-i686 - Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i686 optimized]
 libc0.1-pic - Embedded GNU C Library: PIC archive library
 libc0.1-prof - Embedded GNU C Library: Profiling Libraries
 libc0.1-udeb - Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries - udeb (udeb)
 libc0.3- Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries
 libc0.3-dbg - Embedded GNU C Library: detached debugging symbols
 libc0.3-dev - Embedded GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Header Files
 libc0.3-i686 - Embedded GNU C Li

[PATCH libX11] configure: check if issetugid is declared

2012-04-29 Thread Julien Cristau
GNU/kFreeBSD has issetugid in libc (for legacy apps?), but doesn't
declare it anywhere, causing gcc to error out with
-Werror=implicit-function-declaration.  Use AC_CHECK_DECL in addition to
AC_CHECK_FUNC so we disable this code instead of failing to build it.

Debian bug#669670 

Signed-off-by: Julien Cristau 
---
 configure.ac |5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index aaec968..c91234f 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -223,8 +223,9 @@ AC_CHECK_HEADERS([sys/select.h])
 AC_CHECK_FUNCS([strtol seteuid])
 # Used in lcFile.c (see also --enable-xlocaledir settings below)
 XLOCALEDIR_IS_SAFE="no"
-AC_CHECK_FUNC([issetugid], [XLOCALEDIR_IS_SAFE="yes"]
-   AC_DEFINE(HASSETUGID,1,[Has issetugid() function]))
+AC_CHECK_DECL([issetugid],
+   AC_CHECK_FUNC([issetugid], [XLOCALEDIR_IS_SAFE="yes"]
+   AC_DEFINE(HASSETUGID,1,[Has issetugid() function])))
 AC_CHECK_FUNC([getresuid], [XLOCALEDIR_IS_SAFE="yes"]
AC_DEFINE(HASGETRESUID,1,[Has getresuid() & getresgid() functions]))
 # Used in Font.c
-- 
1.7.10


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1335710589-5231-1-git-send-email-jcris...@debian.org



Bug#670836: libv8: please enable for kfreebsd-*

2012-04-29 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Package: src:libv8
Version: 3.8.9.20-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org

Hi,

I found that it is quite easy to build libv8 on GNU/kFreeBSD, with only
minor changes to its packaging for Debian:

1. Enable kfreebsd-* builds of the package
2. Set v8arch/v8os suitably on GNU/kFreeBSD
3. Actually pass v8os into GYP
4. Create a kfreebsd target (a clone of the existing freebsd target,
with -lpthread added and -lexecinfo removed)

Then it builds fine and the test suite shows 100% passes for me on
kfreebsd-i386.

Please consider including these patches (to follow)!

Thanks,
Regards,
-- 
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f9d4323.6030...@pyro.eu.org



Re: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#667018: avahi-daemon: add support for kFreeBSD native tools

2012-04-29 Thread Robert Millan
tags 667018 patch
thanks

2012/4/29 Andrew Shadura :
> For sure this is not possible, as it would break compatibility
> with FreeBSD. It's much easier to fix scripts so they don't use
> non-portable behaviour of net-tools.

Yes.  I've been meaning to address the problems in avahi for a few
days, but I hadn't had the time to finish it.

Attached patch should resolve them.  Mats, could you confirm this works for you?

-- 
Robert Millan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXPfRnT=8hGHE=pE8KMbAm5q-yAT3xDXzJ3kEj53T7=t...@mail.gmail.com



Processed: Re: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#667018: avahi-daemon: add support for kFreeBSD native tools

2012-04-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 667018 avahi-daemon
Bug #667018 [freebsd-net-tools] please make route behaviour compatible with 
net-tools
Bug reassigned from package 'freebsd-net-tools' to 'avahi-daemon'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #667018 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #667018 to the same values 
previously set
> retitle 667018 please add support for route utility from freebsd-net-tools
Bug #667018 [avahi-daemon] please make route behaviour compatible with net-tools
Changed Bug title to 'please add support for route utility from 
freebsd-net-tools' from 'please make route behaviour compatible with net-tools'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
667018: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667018
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133568755810845.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Re: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#667018: avahi-daemon: add support for kFreeBSD native tools

2012-04-29 Thread Andrew Shadura
reassign 667018 avahi-daemon
retitle 667018 please add support for route utility from freebsd-net-tools
thanks

Hello,

On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:52:08 +0200
Michael Biebl  wrote:

> I think the reasonable thing here to do, is make route from
> freebsd-net-tools behave compatible with route from net-tools.

For sure this is not possible, as it would break compatibility 
with FreeBSD. It's much easier to fix scripts so they don't use
non-portable behaviour of net-tools.

> So reassigning.

Exactly!

-- 
WBR, Andrew


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature