Bug#718250: kfreebsd-image-9.1-1-amd64: attaching USB keyboard makes system reboot
I performed yet another USB plug test, this time on 9.2 kernel. gcc-4.8 -O2 compiled kernel (aka 9.2~svn253470-1 in experimental) crashes too. gcc-4.8 -O1 compiled kernel survives. I will update SVN for 9.2 and 10 kernels to use gcc-4.8 -O1. IMO, the 9.1 should stay at gcc-4.6 -O1, as it is a previously tested combination. Hopefully the kernel 9.2 will enter testing before gcc-4.6 will be removed from sid. Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.lnx.2.00.1307300837060.18...@contest.felk.cvut.cz
Re: Bug#718250: kfreebsd-image-9.1-1-amd64: attaching USB keyboard makes system reboot
I can confirm that it works on my system now. On Jul 29, 2013 11:34 PM, Robert Millan r...@debian.org wrote: 2013/7/29 Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org: Meanwhile I have added that to the new trunk/kfreebsd-9.1/ Robert: I think we're ready for an upload of this to stable. We can try to tackle GCC issues another time, even after this has migrated. Ack. I was already running dput when you guys fixed this. Oh well, I guess I can't complain. Nice job ;-) Please bear with me as I have to rebuild and test all over again. I'm on my way. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXNkQD+O4D31Fq4TPENmwXwfmObGu-vMVE1jqESG1p=s...@mail.gmail.com
Re: zfsutils_9.1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Hey! On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 22:21:20 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2013/7/22 Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org: On 22/07/13 20:18, Debian FTP Masters wrote: zfsutils (9.1-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Reupload. Just FYI there is a Lintian check that expects slightly more specific wording for this: Argh. This must be the first time I see a computer talking a human into being redundant. It is completely backwards! While it surely sounds redundant, it's a question of context. When you upgrade from one version to the other, and have something like apt-listchanges installed, you only get to see the changelog entries after the last installed versions, and seeing just a “Reupload” entry seems rather confusing to the reader (I for example had to go check the whole changelog to see what was going on), because at first sight it appears as a reupload for reupload's sake. In this case lintian is following what has been considered “best” practice by humans. ;) Thanks, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130730075458.ga12...@gaara.hadrons.org
Re: Bug#712633: marked as done (Include freebsd-config into freebsd-buildutils)
Hi! On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 10:36:09 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Changes: freebsd-buildutils (10~svn251967-1) experimental; urgency=low […] [ Robert Millan ] * Add freebsd-config back. (Closes: #712633) Hmmm, this has the problem that it introduces a circular build-dependency: freebsd-buildutils → freebsd-libs (via libsbuf-dev) → freebsd-buildutils which is a problem when bootstrapping on new architectures. For example I was planning on making freebsd-buildutils buildable on the Hurd (so that freebsd-libs could follow), but this makes it more difficult, as it will require manual bootstrapping. We should perhaps move it to its own independent package. Thanks, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130730090818.ga18...@gaara.hadrons.org
